According to @EricBalchunas, Bitcoin ownership and usage should be open to all participants, including institutions, and he endorses a pro-Wall Street stance toward BTC. Source: @EricBalchunas on X, Dec 10, 2025. This public endorsement provides a positive institutional-adoption signal around BTC that traders can use as a sentiment input when evaluating Bitcoin spot and ETF markets. Source: @EricBalchunas on X, Dec 10, 2025.

According to Eric Balchunas, he supports stripping index funds of their corporate voting rights, describing it as one less expense and headache for fund providers, which frames the issue as a cost-reduction move relevant to ETF operations and fees, source: Eric Balchunas, X, Oct 20, 2025. According to Eric Balchunas, he notes that he and colleagues previously wrote a note arguing this change would be a win-win for most stakeholders, signaling his view that the trade-off between stewardship and costs favors removing voting rights, source: Eric Balchunas, X, Oct 20, 2025. According to Eric Balchunas, the post highlights that the core trading takeaway centers on potential operational cost savings for index funds if voting responsibilities are removed, a factor ETF traders track when assessing expense pressures and fund efficiency, source: Eric Balchunas, X, Oct 20, 2025. According to Eric Balchunas, the post does not mention cryptocurrencies or crypto ETFs, indicating no stated direct crypto market impact from this comment, though it underscores cost-focused dynamics in passive vehicles that traders monitor, source: Eric Balchunas, X, Oct 20, 2025.