According to @ylecun, industry leaders should defer to labor economists on AI’s employment effects, urging attention to research by Philippe Aghion and Erik Brynjolfsson rather than tech executives’ opinions. As reported by Yann LeCun on X (April 18, 2026), the post challenges claims by Dario Amodei, Sam Altman, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton, emphasizing that long-run job creation, displacement dynamics, and productivity gains must be assessed through peer-reviewed evidence. According to Brynjolfsson’s work cited widely in economics literature, AI augments tasks unevenly, creating opportunities where complementarity is high and risking displacement where automation is direct; LeCun’s guidance implies companies should conduct task-level impact assessments, invest in worker upskilling, and track wage polarization metrics. As noted by Aghion’s growth theory research, technology policy, competition, and reallocation costs shape net employment outcomes; LeCun’s statement signals that AI strategy teams should incorporate economist-led scenario planning, adoption lags, and diffusion bottlenecks when modeling ROI and workforce transformation.