According to God of Prompt on X (Twitter), GPT-4o is multimodal but expensive to deploy at scale, Claude Sonnet delivers great quality with high compute cost, Gemini 1.5 is multimodal yet resource-heavy, while Qwen 3.5 is natively multimodal and designed for real-world agents without proportionally scaling compute budgets. As reported by the post’s comparison, this positions Qwen 3.5 as a cost-efficient choice for agentic workflows where latency and token throughput matter. According to the same source, businesses building voice, vision, and tool-using agents can reduce infrastructure overhead by prioritizing models with native multimodality and optimized serving footprints, indicating Qwen 3.5 may unlock lower total cost of ownership versus peers in production settings.