According to Ethan Mollick on X, Kimi 2.6 Thinking shows strong open-weights reasoning capabilities but still trails closed-source state-of-the-art, producing a 74-page thinking trace on the Lem Test with only an adequate final answer, plus competent TiKZ and twigl outputs (source: Ethan Mollick). As reported by Ethan Mollick, these results suggest Kimi’s chain-of-thought style traceability and reproducibility may aid enterprise auditability, while gaps in final-answer quality indicate teams should benchmark Kimi 2.6 Thinking against closed models for mission-critical reasoning and code synthesis. According to Ethan Mollick, the model generated an acceptable TiKZ unicorn and a serviceable twigl shader for a neo-gothic city in waves, implying practical utility for technical graphics prototyping but highlighting rough edges in polish and accuracy compared to premium closed models.