According to @ai_9684xtpa, total capital betting on $WLFI and $BLOCK has risen to $18.32M, with address 0x8C4...96CAd withdrawing 10.25M WLFI worth $2.35M from Bybit about two hours prior and the entity now holding 73.03M WLFI across two addresses at an average cost of $0.2241 and an unrealized loss of $380K. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on 2025-09-08 https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1964855489398997042; Arkham Intelligence entity page https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/1b652d6f-2349-4fad-8d23-0cf5f7e76e3c. For traders, track these addresses for additional CEX inflows/outflows and use the whale’s $0.2241 average cost as a reference level for positioning and risk management. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; Arkham Intelligence entity page https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/1b652d6f-2349-4fad-8d23-0cf5f7e76e3c.

According to @CryptoMichNL, $WLFI is showing high volatility with strong trading volume and an emerging uptrend, which he is actively trading (source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Sep 7, 2025). He noted a preferred dip-buy level around $0.21 if offered (source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Sep 7, 2025). He added that if the trend remains intact, the next upside level he is watching is $0.30 (source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Sep 7, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, WLFI’s top holder distributed 79.54 million WLFI across 9 addresses over the past 18 hours, valued at approximately $14.69 million; on-chain reference provided via Arkham Intelligence: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x7E06BC9750c3BF82bdE9968248AD34e1f2Ed90b8; X post: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1963802219259777444. Source: @ai_9684xtpa (X), Arkham Intelligence. According to @ai_9684xtpa, one recipient, moonmanifestphilanthropy.eth, made a small sell three days ago, while all current receiving addresses show no sell activity at the time of reporting; on-chain reference: Arkham Intelligence; X post: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1963802219259777444. Source: @ai_9684xtpa (X), Arkham Intelligence. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the top holder, identified as moonmanifest.eth, controls roughly 1% of WLFI, and the TGE unlocked 200 million tokens; X post: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1963802219259777444. Source: @ai_9684xtpa (X). According to @ai_9684xtpa, based on the disclosed figures (79.54M moved and 200M TGE unlock), the redistributed amount equals about 39.8% of the TGE-unlocked supply at the time of observation; X post: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1963802219259777444. Source: @ai_9684xtpa (X). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the wallet is suspected to be associated with TechnoRevenant linked to the XPL snipe-hedge incident; X post: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1963802219259777444; on-chain reference: Arkham Intelligence address above. Source: @ai_9684xtpa (X), Arkham Intelligence.

According to @MilkRoadDaily, protocols are turning on token buybacks with WLFI ($WLFI) cited as an example, and these reduce circulating supply and reward long-term holders only when backed by real cash flow, source: @MilkRoadDaily. The author adds that profitable protocols recycle fee revenue into ongoing buy pressure and gradual supply contraction, while unprofitable ones simply drain their treasuries, source: @MilkRoadDaily. For traders, the author flags fee-funded, sustainable buybacks as signals of product-market fit and real revenue, whereas treasury-funded buybacks are a clear red flag, source: @MilkRoadDaily.

According to Lookonchain, whale address 854RaR spent $2 million to buy 7.4 million $WLFI three days ago and the position is now valued at $1.35 million, an unrealized loss of over $650,000 (source: Lookonchain). Based on Lookonchain’s figures, the implied average entry is about $0.27 per WLFI and the current implied mark is roughly $0.182, indicating an approximately 32% drawdown from cost (source: Lookonchain). For traders, Lookonchain’s on-chain alert provides a clear reference for WLFI cost basis and current drawdown levels when monitoring large-holder flows (source: Lookonchain).

According to @bubblemaps, 85,000+ wallets joined the $WLFI presale, and two days after launch 60% are still holding, 29% have fully sold, 10% partially sold, and 1% bought more, with presalers up 5-15x depending on the round. According to @bubblemaps, this equates to at least 39% of presale wallets having sold some or all of their allocation, while 60% still hold two days post-launch. According to @bubblemaps, these on-chain distribution metrics provide a trading snapshot of realized selling and remaining presale holdings for $WLFI.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Jump withdrew 50.68M WLFI (~$11.58M) from Bybit and Binance 4 hours ago (source: @OnchainDataNerd), whale address 0x8C4 withdrew 40.87M WLFI (~$10M) from Bybit 16 hours ago (source: @OnchainDataNerd), and 47M WLFI (~$11.34M) were burned (source: @OnchainDataNerd). Based on the reported figures, total exchange withdrawals reached 91.55M WLFI over the past 16 hours (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x8C4...96CAd has committed a cumulative $13.29 million across $BLOCK and $WLFI, as reported via on-chain tracking details (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 3, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the address allocated 426 ETH and 170.3 ETH into WLFI phase-1 and phase-2 public rounds, receiving 10.22 million unlocked WLFI that have not been sold (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 3, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, since Aug 26 the address spent 298 ETH to buy 8.5 million BLOCK worth about $1.21 million, ranking as a Top-6 individual BLOCK holder (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 3, 2025).

According to @EmberCN, WLFI burned 47 million $WLFI from an unlocked treasury wallet about six hours ago, valued at approximately $11.34 million, with an on-chain burn link shared in the post (source: @EmberCN). The stated rationale was to commemorate a buyback-and-burn governance proposal as referenced in the same post (source: @EmberCN). In addition, after trading went live two nights earlier, the team conducted an on-chain buyback of 6.498 million $WLFI at $0.308 using 2 million USD1, with a transaction link provided (source: @EmberCN). For traders, these actions represent reported token removal and buy-side activity aligned with a governance process as described in the cited post (source: @EmberCN).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, 80% of the top 10 individual $WLFI holders have partially or fully taken profits, while only Top2 and Top5 have not transferred or sold any tokens, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the largest holder moonmanifest.eth has retained most of their allocation, and although paper gains have retraced with WLFI’s decline, their 1 billion WLFI is still valued at about $230 million at a quoted price of $0.2318, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders should monitor further movements from Top1, Top2, and Top5 wallets to assess near-term token supply and liquidity dynamics in WLFI markets, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @OnchainLens, Andrew Tate opened a $WLFI long position that was liquidated, realizing a $67,603 loss; source: @OnchainLens (X, September 1, 2025). He subsequently re-entered with a new $WLFI long at 3x leverage, indicating renewed leveraged exposure; source: @OnchainLens (X, September 1, 2025).

According to Onchain Lens, a $WLFI trader closed a profitable long for $915K and then re-entered a 3x $WLFI long that is now showing a $930K floating loss (source: Onchain Lens). Onchain Lens warned traders to avoid FOMO-driven re-entries because leverage can rapidly reverse gains in volatile tokens like $WLFI (source: Onchain Lens). This sequence signals elevated drawdown and liquidation risk for leveraged $WLFI positions, reinforcing the need for disciplined entries and exits during volatility (source: Onchain Lens).

According to Bubblemaps, WLFI’s locked token supply does not yet have a decided vesting schedule or cliff, and no community vote has finalized these parameters; source: Bubblemaps on X, Sept 1, 2025. This leaves the token unlock timeline and future circulating supply path unknown to the market, limiting traders’ ability to model potential supply dynamics; source: Bubblemaps on X, Sept 1, 2025. Bubblemaps directs users to follow WLFI in real time to track any governance or team updates that could define the vesting and cliff terms; source: Bubblemaps on X, Sept 1, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps, the on-chain bubble map for $WLFI matches the token distribution shown on the project’s official website. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 1, 2025. @bubblemaps adds that a full breakdown thread is available for deeper review, with no discrepancies flagged in the post. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 1, 2025.

According to @milesdeutscher, Trump’s $WLFI token has launched and he released a video detailing how he plans to trade $WLFI in the first days, whether the launch could be negative for altcoins, and his broader market view, providing trading-focused insights for the initial trading window (source: @milesdeutscher on X, Sep 1, 2025). For traders, the focus highlighted is WLFI’s live debut, short-term setups during the first few days, and the potential impact on altcoin liquidity and performance as assessed in his new video (source: @milesdeutscher on X, Sep 1, 2025).

According to @EmberCN, the @worldlibertyfi multisig bought back 6.498 million WLFI on-chain in the last hour using 2 million USD1 at a $0.308 average price. source: @EmberCN. The author also notes the post is sponsored by Bitget｜@Bitget_zh. source: @EmberCN.

According to @EmberCN, WLFI market-making tokens are being routed by market makers Jump and DWF into major centralized exchanges (source: @EmberCN on X, Sep 1, 2025). According to @EmberCN, approximately 10,000,000 WLFI moved from the Wlfi official multisig wallet to Gate about two hours prior, with a transaction link provided (source: @EmberCN on X, Sep 1, 2025). According to @EmberCN, Gate will open WLFI trading at 8:00, one hour earlier than most other exchanges opening at 9:00 (source: @EmberCN on X, Sep 1, 2025). According to @EmberCN, this one-hour lead at Gate provides an earlier execution window relative to venues reported to open at 9:00, so traders can monitor Gate order books and the cited 10M WLFI deposit to assess initial liquidity and slippage risk at the 8:00 open (source: @EmberCN on X, Sep 1, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, citing @0xDylan_, the $WLFI token generation event targets an 8% circulating supply, equivalent to 8.0B tokens (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; @0xDylan_ on X). However, only 16.88B tokens have been deposited into the Lockbox so far, implying a 20% unlock of 3.37B tokens and an effective TGE float around 6.37%, with the final figure dependent on the contract balance at 20:00 local time (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). With less than five hours to the open at the time of posting, traders should monitor the Lockbox and contract balances at 20:00 to size orders and plan liquidity and slippage around initial price discovery (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X).

According to @AltcoinGordon, it is a big day for $WLFI, highlighting a key date for the WLFI token; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, September 1, 2025. He stated he will be observing rather than taking immediate positions and asked how others are playing it; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, September 1, 2025. The post draws trader attention to $WLFI activity today, making it relevant for short-term monitoring; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, September 1, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, CoinMarketCap lists WLFI’s verified TGE initial circulating supply at 27.3 billion tokens, far above the previously discussed 5 billion theoretical float; source: CoinMarketCap via @ai_9684xtpa. Using the Binance contract price of $0.3599 referenced by @ai_9684xtpa, the implied potential opening sell pressure is about $9.83 billion (27.3B x $0.3599); source: Binance contract price via @ai_9684xtpa. Per @ai_9684xtpa’s review, the figure appears calculated as total supply minus team, advisor, partner, and Lockbox allocations; source: CoinMarketCap methodology as noted by @ai_9684xtpa. Based on these cited figures (27.3B vs 5B), the initial float is roughly 5.5x higher, indicating materially greater potential supply overhang at TGE at the same price reference; source: comparative calculation from CoinMarketCap data and Binance price via @ai_9684xtpa.