According to Edward Dowd, the high costs associated with starting an AI initiative now include significant legal expenses, particularly related to intellectual property issues. This highlights that relying on intellectual property theft is not a sustainable business model. Legal compliance and intellectual property protection are crucial factors for AI startups to consider, impacting their financial planning and operational strategies (source: Edward Dowd on Twitter).

According to Vitalik Buterin, there is a playful suggestion to influence the naming of a major AI initiative, which could indirectly affect market perceptions and investor sentiment. Such strategic naming could potentially impact stakeholders' approach to AI-related cryptocurrency ventures, given Buterin's influence in the blockchain community.

According to Vitalik Buterin, a creative strategy could involve naming AI initiatives after fictional elements, such as a portal used by alien species. While this tweet does not directly relate to current cryptocurrency trading strategies, it reflects Buterin's innovative thinking which often influences Ethereum's development and subsequently its market perception and trading dynamics.