According to @santimentfeed, on chain data shows Cardano's smart money wallets accumulated 454.7M ADA over the past two months while the token's price remained suppressed, driven by addresses holding 100K to 100M ADA increasing balances (source: @santimentfeed). @santimentfeed also notes that addresses with 100 ADA or fewer collectively reduced 22.0K ADA over the past three weeks, underscoring a divergence between whale wallets and small holders (source: @santimentfeed).

According to Glassnode, during the November to December bottoming phase, supply accumulation was led by larger entities while smaller cohorts were net distributors (source: Glassnode). According to Glassnode, this divergence was partly driven by exchange-related wallet reshuffling that can resemble organic flows and by large holders buying the dip (source: Glassnode). According to Glassnode, these dynamics highlight that on-chain accumulation signals must account for internal exchange movements versus genuine whale inflows when informing trade timing (source: Glassnode).

According to @EmberCN, Trend Research withdrew 7,960 ETH from Binance and purchased a total of 17,899 ETH, bringing its holdings to approximately 644,600 ETH valued around $2 billion with an average cost of $3,182. According to @EmberCN, these flows indicate ongoing ETH accumulation and exchange outflows by Trend Research.

According to glassnode, Bitcoin's VDD Multiple remains anchored in the low band, reflecting an accumulation regime with limited long-term holder spending and subdued distribution pressure (source: Glassnode, Jan 9, 2026, https://twitter.com/glassnode/status/2009604359819305403; https://glassno.de/3NazR2S). Glassnode states the market continues to absorb prior gains in a structurally constructive manner, consistent with the observed low-band VDD Multiple (source: Glassnode, Jan 9, 2026, https://twitter.com/glassnode/status/2009604359819305403).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH traded between $3,308 and $3,183 in the cited session, defining a $125 range, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xbbD01f9B63aE317c55B9a6837C51Bb2b6394B5d5 bought 1,314.74 ETH in the past hour during the drop at an average price of $3,276.12, totaling about $4.307 million, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. The address reference is listed on the ARKM Intel explorer for 0xbbD01f9B63aE317c55B9a6837C51Bb2b6394B5d5, source: ARKM Intel explorer. Based on the reported figures, the average buy sits about 2.9% above the session low and roughly 1.0% below the session high, framing near-term trading levels for ETH, source: calculations using data from @ai_9684xtpa on X.

According to @52kskew, BTC has seen a strong inflow of buying since the 2026 yearly open and slightly prior, indicating persistent demand, source: @52kskew on X, Jan 5, 2026. The majority of this flow appears executed via TWAPs, reflecting systematic, incremental accumulation rather than single large blocks, source: @52kskew on X, Jan 5, 2026. This TWAP-driven behavior is highlighted as essential context for interpreting current BTC price action and the developing market structure in January 2026, source: @52kskew on X, Jan 5, 2026.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a whale wallet 0x117 withdrew 63,424 LINK (about $860,000) from Coinbase roughly 30 minutes ago. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the same address accumulated a total of 540,684 LINK (about $6.76 million) over the past three weeks at an average entry price of $12.5. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the wallet can be verified via Arkham Intel: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x1170E91A51cB183999819943fdCA1f1E99Cf15Fe.

According to @OnchainLens, a tracked entity deposited $2 million USDC to increase its LIT position and now holds 33.84 million LIT across two wallets after purchases totaling $8.03 million at a reported average price of $2.37 over the past five days. Source: Onchain Lens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/2007616953343717481. According to @OnchainLens, the two wallets involved are 0x3f735907f2F151786efb59FF6527C74B5EE43199 and 0xFb94D3404c1d3D9D6F08f79e58041d5EA95AccfA, with balances and inflows viewable on Lighter Explorer. Source: Lighter Explorer https://app.lighter.xyz/explorer/accounts/0x3f735907f2F151786efb59FF6527C74B5EE43199 and https://app.lighter.xyz/explorer/accounts/0xFb94D3404c1d3D9D6F08f79e58041d5EA95AccfA. According to @OnchainLens, the accumulation window is five days, and the latest size increase is attributed to the fresh $2 million USDC deposit. Source: Onchain Lens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/2007616953343717481.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x46DB bought another 5,104 ETH (about $16.09M) around 30 minutes ago; source: Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026. Since Dec 3, cumulative buys by this address reached 51,374 ETH (about $159.76M) at a $3,110 average price; source: Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026. The address is 0x46DB0650645f7c9a29783c89171a62240CCc35cF as referenced via Arkham Intel; source: Arkham Intel via Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026. Earlier today, the same tracker noted a 5,500 ETH purchase and a then-cumulative 41,767 ETH at a $3,130 average with an unrealized loss over $8.3M, which has since updated to the new totals; source: Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026. Based on the reported totals, the whale’s stated average entry shifted from $3,130 to $3,110 following additional buys, a change derived from Lookonchain’s data; source: calculation from Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026.

According to @OnchainLens, a tracked wallet deposited 2 million USDC into Lighter to increase its LIT position, source: Onchain Lens on X https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/2006891827358495146; on-chain address https://app.lighter.xyz/explorer/accounts/0xFb94D3404c1d3D9D6F08f79e58041d5EA95AccfA. The wallet now holds 2.45 million LIT acquired for 6.03 million dollars at an average price of 2.46 over the past two days, source: Onchain Lens on X https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/2006891827358495146; Lighter explorer https://app.lighter.xyz/explorer/accounts/0xFb94D3404c1d3D9D6F08f79e58041d5EA95AccfA. Earlier activity shows a 4.03 million USDC deposit used to buy 1.63 million LIT at 2.33, indicating cost anchors near 2.33 and 2.46 based on executed transactions, source: Onchain Lens on X https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/2006183303637000315; Lighter explorer https://app.lighter.xyz/explorer/accounts/0xFb94D3404c1d3D9D6F08f79e58041d5EA95AccfA.

According to @Andre_Dragosch, accumulation has been picking up among very large crypto “whale” wallet cohorts and small wallets, while mid-sized cohorts are not showing the same strength (source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Dec 18, 2025). Overall accumulation activity is re-accelerating (source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Dec 18, 2025). He also notes that whales are not necessarily identical with long-term holders (source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Dec 18, 2025).

According to the source, persistent long-term Bitcoin (BTC) buyers are stepping in as market liquidity struggles, signaling dip accumulation amid reduced order book depth, source: the source. Thin liquidity conditions tend to magnify slippage and intraday volatility in BTC, raising execution risk during large orders and around liquidation clusters, source: Kaiko Research, BTC market liquidity analyses 2023-2024. Glassnode on-chain studies show that rising long-term holder supply and falling exchange balances have historically aligned with late-cycle drawdowns and subsequent recoveries, informing laddered limit bids over market orders, source: Glassnode, Week On-Chain 2023-2024. Derivatives traders can mitigate liquidity risk by favoring limit orders, adjusting stop distance to noise, sizing down, and monitoring order book depth and open interest imbalances, source: Binance Research, crypto market microstructure notes 2023.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Bitmine accumulated another 33.5k ETH valued at 112.06M USD over the past 7 hours, with specific on-chain wallet addresses provided in the source post for verification (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The post’s valuation implies an average acquisition price near 3,346 USD per ETH and explicitly describes the purchase as “another” tranche of ongoing accumulation (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @CryptoMichNL, STBL’s recent price spike was likely driven by confusion with a similarly named listing, shaping a short-term setup rather than a fundamental repricing, source: @CryptoMichNL. He expects a near-term test of the 20-day moving average and notes a higher low on the chart, which he views as constructive for a breakout bias, source: @CryptoMichNL. He states that as long as the $0.05–$0.06 support range holds, an accumulation phase followed by a clean break above the 20-day MA should trigger upside momentum and a strong breakout in STBL, source: @CryptoMichNL.

According to @StockMKTNewz, Tom Lee and BMNR reported ETH holdings rising across eight dated official updates from 3,236,014 ETH on 10/19 to 3,864,951 ETH on 12/7, a net increase of 628,937 ETH (+19.4%); source: @StockMKTNewz. Weekly net additions were 77,055 ETH (10/26), 82,353 ETH (11/2), 110,301 ETH (11/9), 54,156 ETH (11/16), 69,822 ETH (11/23), 96,798 ETH (11/30), and 138,452 ETH (12/7), based on the sequential updates; source: @StockMKTNewz. The largest weekly increase occurred in the week ending 12/7 at 138,452 ETH, and the smallest occurred in the week ending 11/16 at 54,156 ETH; source: @StockMKTNewz. The average weekly net addition over the seven intervals was approximately 89,848 ETH, computed from the reported figures; source: @StockMKTNewz. This time series provides traders a concrete large-holder ETH accumulation cadence to track flows around weekly reporting dates; source: @StockMKTNewz.

According to the source, a nearly 1 billion US dollar purchase of Bitcoin was executed, marking the largest BTC buy in months, according to the source. The source characterizes the transaction as the largest recent accumulation in months. The source does not provide the buyer identity, execution venue, or timestamp.

According to @CryptoKing4Ever, $ASTER has returned to the same demand zone that initiated its last major move, making this a critical retest for trend direction, source: @CryptoKing4Ever on X, Dec 2, 2025. According to the same source, if buyers step in here and drive price higher, the trend could flip from weakness to strong accumulation, source: @CryptoKing4Ever on X, Dec 2, 2025. The source adds that holding this level could open a path toward a $2.44 target and potentially new all-time highs for $ASTER, source: @CryptoKing4Ever on X, Dec 2, 2025.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a wallet withdrew 7,080 ETH (~$19.81M) from FalconX around 4 hours ago (source: https://x.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1995698452035203165). According to @OnchainDataNerd, the same wallet has accumulated 23,772 ETH (~$66.3M) at an average entry price of approximately $2,941, highlighting a visible cost basis for whale positioning (source: https://x.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1995698452035203165). According to @OnchainDataNerd, the address reference was shared by the author for verification: https://t.co/C6b2OsCup9 (source: https://x.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1995698452035203165).

According to @CryptoMichNL, current crypto market activity feels like a ghost town, a setup he says he has only witnessed twice before during late 2019 near the final leg of that cycle’s bear market and in early 2023, both of which preceded strong uptrends source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Nov 30, 2025. He adds that these past occurrences were among the best periods to accumulate positions and that the present phase appears similar for Bitcoin (BTC) and altcoins, implying an accumulation-focused strategy may be warranted now source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Nov 30, 2025.

According to @CryptoMichNL, NEAR is in an accumulation phase and was ready to break higher, prompting a preference to accumulate the position for potential upside, source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Nov 29, 2025. He states that NEAR Intents has seen a massive acceleration in revenue and interest, indicating stronger fundamentals versus current pricing, source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Nov 29, 2025. He adds that the NEAR token is significantly undervalued in both USD and BTC terms, suggesting a mispricing between price and fundamental growth that could favor accumulation strategies, source: @CryptoMichNL on X, Nov 29, 2025.