List of Flash News about Bitcoin ETF net flow
Time | Details |
---|---|
2025-09-18 14:34 |
Sept 18 Crypto ETF Flows: Bitcoin ETFs -209 BTC (-$24.59M) and Ethereum ETFs -2,430 ETH (-$11.23M); Fidelity Outflows 1,003 BTC and 6,488 ETH, Holdings at 206,541 BTC and 782,446 ETH
According to Lookonchain, Sept 18 ETF flow data show 10 Bitcoin ETFs recorded net flow of -209 BTC (-$24.59M), with Fidelity outflows of 1,003 BTC ($118.13M) and current holdings of 206,541 BTC ($24.33B), while 9 Ethereum ETFs recorded net flow of -2,430 ETH (-$11.23M), with Fidelity outflows of 6,488 ETH ($29.98M) and current holdings of 782,446 ETH ($3.61B), source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 18, 2025, x.com/lookonchain/status/1968685106748666065. |
2025-09-11 03:45 |
US Spot Bitcoin ETF Inflows Hit $741.5M on Sep 10: FBTC and IBIT Lead, ARKB Strong; BTC and GBTC Positive (BTC)
According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $741.5 million on 2025-09-10, based on its aggregated flow tracker for the US Bitcoin ETF cohort, source: @FarsideUK, farside.co.uk/btc. According to @FarsideUK, fund-level flows were FBTC +$299m, IBIT +$211.2m, ARKB +$145.1m, BITB +$44.4m, BTC +$17.6m, HODL +$12m, EZBC +$3.3m, GBTC +$8.9m, while BTCO, BRRR, and BTCW recorded zero flows, source: @FarsideUK, farside.co.uk/btc. According to @FarsideUK, the figures were published on Sep 11, 2025 and cover flows for Sep 10, 2025, with full dataset and disclaimers available at farside.co.uk/btc, source: @FarsideUK, farside.co.uk/btc. |
2025-06-07 07:00 |
Bitcoin ETF Weekly Net Flow Shows $131.6 Million Outflow: Key Impact on Crypto Market Trends
According to Farside Investors, the weekly net flow for US-listed Bitcoin ETFs totaled negative $131.6 million, highlighting a bearish sentiment among institutional investors. Notably, IBIT saw inflows of $81.1 million, while FBTC faced significant outflows of $167.7 million and GBTC lost $40.6 million. Smaller ETFs like BITB and HODL recorded modest inflows at $13 million and $19.7 million respectively. This persistent net outflow may signal caution for traders, indicating potential downward pressure on Bitcoin prices and increased market volatility as ETF activity remains an influential short-term driver for crypto price action (Source: Farside Investors, June 7, 2025). |
2025-06-07 03:46 |
Bitcoin ETF Net Outflow Hits $47.8 Million on June 6, 2025: Trading Analysis & Crypto Market Impact
According to Farside Investors (@FarsideUK), Bitcoin ETF funds recorded a total net outflow of $47.8 million on June 6, 2025, with IBIT experiencing the largest individual outflow at $130.5 million. Other major ETFs, including FBTC and BITB, posted inflows of $22.8 million and $31.8 million respectively. This net outflow signals reduced institutional demand for Bitcoin exposure via ETFs, potentially leading to short-term bearish sentiment in the crypto market. Active traders should note that such outflows can increase volatility and downward price pressure on Bitcoin, especially as IBIT's sizable outflow offsets gains from other funds. These flow patterns are crucial for short-term trading strategies and risk management in the current market environment (source: Farside Investors, 2025-06-07). |
2025-05-30 14:18 |
Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF Net Flows: Fidelity Sees $165M Outflow, BlackRock iShares Gains $49M Inflow – Impact on Crypto Trading May 30, 2025
According to Lookonchain, on May 30, 2025, the combined net outflow from 10 Bitcoin ETFs reached 1,977 BTC, equating to $208.78 million. Notably, Fidelity led the outflows with 1,571 BTC ($165.09 million), reducing its total holdings to 198,291 BTC ($20.95 billion). Meanwhile, Ethereum ETFs demonstrated a strong net inflow of 37,685 ETH ($97.45 million), with BlackRock iShares accounting for a significant 19,069 ETH ($49.31 million) inflow. These ETF movements signal shifting institutional sentiment: traders should monitor for potential Bitcoin price pressure due to selling and possible Ethereum strength fueled by new inflows. Trading strategies may need to adjust risk and allocation in response to these ETF-driven market flows. (Source: Lookonchain on Twitter) |