According to Bubblemaps, the NEON presale cluster accounts for 15% of the supply, and presale tokens were routed to more than 2,000 contracts rather than directly to users based on their on-chain mapping shared on X on Nov 13, 2025 (source: Bubblemaps). According to Bubblemaps, this routing pattern is very unusual for token distributions (source: Bubblemaps).

According to @bubblemaps, another $15 million in UNI was sent to Coinbase, bringing the cumulative UNI off-ramped by a single entity to roughly $250 million, signaling sustained exchange-bound outflows from that wallet; source: Bubblemaps on X, Nov 12, 2025 — x.com/bubblemaps/status/1988560926682054755 and x.com/bubblemaps/status/1988221631563788699

According to Bubblemaps, aPriori raised $30M from tier-1 venture capital firms, while 60% of its airdrop was claimed by a single entity operating approximately 14,000 addresses based on its on-chain clustering analysis; source: Bubblemaps on X, Nov 11, 2025. According to Bubblemaps, the concentration suggests a single controlling entity holds a majority of the distributed supply from the airdrop event; source: Bubblemaps on X, Nov 11, 2025. Based on Bubblemaps’ findings, traders may prioritize monitoring transfers from the identified address cluster and any related exchange inflows to assess potential liquidity impact and order book pressure; source: Bubblemaps on X, Nov 11, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps, a single wallet acquired roughly 20% of newly launched GIGGLE and exited before a subsequent post by CZ, with Bubblemaps estimating the wallet missed approximately $30 million in upside, source: @bubblemaps on X, Nov 10, 2025. This on-chain concentration at launch signals a highly clustered supply profile for GIGGLE that can magnify early volatility and execution risk for short-term traders, source: @bubblemaps on X, Nov 10, 2025. The sequence underscores the impact of social catalysts on low-float tokens and the need to track large-holder behavior and timing around influencer activity when trading memecoins like GIGGLE, source: @bubblemaps on X, Nov 10, 2025.

According to the source, Binance Wallet has integrated Bubblemaps’ on-chain analytics to display token holder concentration and wallet-cluster links, helping users detect potential insider activity before entering positions (source: source post; verification recommended via Binance official channels and Bubblemaps official channels). For trade execution, apply Bubblemaps metrics such as top-holder share and cluster interlinks as pre-trade filters to avoid concentrated-supply tokens, especially across new listings and memecoins on BNB Chain (BNB) (source: Bubblemaps official documentation; Binance official channels).

According to @bubblemaps, the top 10 Intel Desk contributors earned a 200,000 BMT reward for last month's research. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 27, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/1982839820922868155 The announcement was posted as a thread on X inviting readers to learn more. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 27, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/1982839820922868155 The post confirms the reward amount and recipient tier but does not provide details on vesting, timing, or distribution mechanics. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 27, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/1982839820922868155 The update specifically references the BMT token in the reward announcement. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 27, 2025, https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/1982839820922868155

According to @bubblemaps, the bubble map of Meteora MET shows on-chain holder clusters and allocations that match Meteora’s stated tokenomics, confirming distribution consistency (source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 23, 2025). According to @bubblemaps, this public verification highlights alignment between MET’s on-chain distribution and its published tokenomics details, providing a clear on-chain check for traders tracking supply structure (source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 23, 2025).

According to @bubblemaps, five addresses sold all their STBL and made approximately USD 17 million from the sales, confirming a complete exit by those wallets. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 19, 2025, x.com/bubblemaps/status/1979865140804874430. For traders, the reported full exit by large holders highlights concentrated holder risk and warrants monitoring of STBL on-chain flows and DEX liquidity for potential follow-through effects. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 19, 2025, x.com/bubblemaps/status/1979865140804874430.

According to @EmberCN, Bubblemaps highlighted a wallet cluster that realized large profits on COAI, triggering a review of whether it was the COAI team or an external trading group, source: @EmberCN; Bubblemaps. According to @EmberCN, the wallets show highly similar BNB withdrawals from Binance and share the same address creation date of March 25, indicating control by a single entity, source: @EmberCN. According to @EmberCN, on-chain activity since July shows daily high-frequency trading across dozens of alpha tokens, with each address transacting more than 240 tokens and surpassing 45,000 transactions over the last 30 days, source: @EmberCN. According to @EmberCN, based on this scale and frequency, the group is most likely an external arbitrage or quantitative trading bot operation rather than the COAI project team, source: @EmberCN. According to @EmberCN, example wallets cited for monitoring include 0x40d24db7a98474a56b35f16446d921396ba4fe3e, 0xecf022c1a1c271ab76632dc3281a30c2f5ce8dff, and 0xde483b66bf3ef9e98e692f4265fa11615954d975, source: @EmberCN.

According to @bubblemaps, one entity controls half of the top-earning $COAI wallets with a combined profit of 13 million dollars, source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 16, 2025. According to @bubblemaps, the thread raises questions around ChainOpera and highlights concentrated gains among leading $COAI earners, source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 16, 2025. According to @bubblemaps, the alert focuses on the subset of top-earning wallets rather than all holders, and traders can track the flagged cluster in Bubblemaps to monitor any subsequent large transfers, source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 16, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps on X on Oct 7, 2025, over 100,000 on-chain traders bought new BNB memecoins and roughly 70% are in profit. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 7, 2025. The reported profit distribution includes 1 wallet with over $10M, 40 with over $1M, 900 with over $100K, 6,000 with over $10K, and 21,000 with over $1K. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 7, 2025. Based on these buckets, the implied minimum aggregate profit across profitable wallets is approximately $221 million, with at least 41 addresses earning $1M+ and at least 6,000 earning $10K+ among the 100,000+ participants. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 7, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps, insiders currently control 60% of YEPE’s supply in a bundled memecoin that was promoted by James Wynn, indicating highly concentrated ownership (source: @bubblemaps on X, Oct 5, 2025). Based on the 60% insider share reported by @bubblemaps, the effective public float is roughly 40%, which can make price more sensitive to large wallet movements and liquidity changes during trading (source: calculation derived from @bubblemaps on X, Oct 5, 2025). For trade execution and risk control, the concentration highlighted by @bubblemaps suggests monitoring top-holder wallet activity and liquidity pool depth as primary on-chain signals for volatility and slippage in YEPE (source: @bubblemaps on X, Oct 5, 2025). No additional details on tokenomics, lockups, or audits were provided in the cited post, limiting further due-diligence inputs at this time (source: @bubblemaps on X, Oct 5, 2025).

According to @bubblemaps, new token launches often follow a high‑risk pattern where an insider already controls about 30% of supply, sniper bots capture much of the remaining float, a celebrity tweet accelerates FOMO, and the token subsequently rugs, highlighting a repeatable playbook that harms traders and liquidity (source: @bubblemaps on X, Sep 24, 2025: https://x.com/bubblemaps/status/1970504379922059453). According to @bubblemaps, its Intel Desk will change this dynamic, and the post effectively flags insider concentration and sniper‑dominated early holder distribution as key risk signals traders should monitor to assess rug pull risk during new listings and fair launches (source: @bubblemaps on X, Sep 24, 2025: https://x.com/bubblemaps/status/1970504379922059453).

According to @bubblemaps on X dated Sep 12, 2025, 50% of $PUMP traders are currently in profit across 270k+ on-chain participants. According to @bubblemaps, the profit cohorts include 1 entity with $10M+ profit identified as Wintermute, 30 with $1M–$10M, 400 with $100k–$1M, 2,000 with $10k–$100k, 10,000 with $1k–$10k, and 120,000 with under $1k. According to @bubblemaps, 50% of 270k+ implies roughly 135k+ traders are in profit, indicating the scale and concentration of realized gains in $PUMP.

According to Bubblemaps on X, Sep 11, 2025, on-chain clustering ties $MYX team-associated wallets to addresses that claimed about $170 million from the project’s airdrop (source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 11, 2025). According to Bubblemaps, these wallets were flagged as directly connected to the team and framed as a potential inside-job risk for distribution integrity (source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 11, 2025). According to Bubblemaps, the concentration of airdropped tokens among team-linked wallets represents a material on-chain red flag that traders should monitor for potential market impact on $MYX (source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 11, 2025).

According to @bubblemaps, MYX Finance launched its token and ran an airdrop in which 100 sybil-linked addresses collectively received 1% of the total supply while the fully diluted valuation jumped to about $20B overnight, implying roughly $200M for that 1% tranche, source: @bubblemaps. @bubblemaps adds that the project’s subsequent public response was long and vague, described as GPT-like, which they argue makes the situation more suspicious, source: @bubblemaps. These on-chain concentration findings and the rapid FDV spike are material to trader risk assessment for distribution quality and price discovery, source: @bubblemaps.

According to @bubblemaps, multiple wallets that claimed MYX on BNB Chain showed no prior on-chain activity and exhibited identical funding and claim patterns, indicating the behavior was unlikely to be random. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 9, 2025. Bubblemaps referenced a specific on-chain example via BscScan transaction 0xe129ba601e05a69813fa570c08f8106f84a9e6c790faa1400080cff92412035c to illustrate the claim flow tied to the flagged addresses. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 9, 2025; BscScan transaction 0xe129ba601e05a69813fa570c08f8106f84a9e6c790faa1400080cff92412035c. For trading strategy, market participants can monitor the Bubblemaps-flagged wallets for transfers toward centralized exchanges and track MYX flows on BNB Chain to gauge potential supply overhang and short-term volatility risk. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 9, 2025; BscScan transaction 0xe129ba601e05a69813fa570c08f8106f84a9e6c790faa1400080cff92412035c. Key on-chain checks include clustering by common funding sources, first-activity timestamps, and synchronized claim times as highlighted by Bubblemaps, which are useful signals for assessing coordinated airdrop farming. Source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 9, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps, a set of airdrop-eligible addresses collectively claimed 9.8M MYX, representing about 1% of the token’s total supply (source: @bubblemaps). Most claims were initiated at approximately 5:30 am on May 7, indicating synchronized on-chain activity (source: @bubblemaps). These addresses were all eligible for the airdrop (source: @bubblemaps).

According to @bubblemaps, roughly 100 new addresses were funded via OKX about one month before the $MYX airdrop (source: Bubblemaps post on X, Sep 9, 2025). All transfers occurred on April 19 at around 6:50 a.m., and each wallet received similar amounts of BNB (source: Bubblemaps post on X, Sep 9, 2025; source: Bubblemaps on-chain map v2.bubblemaps.io/map/LQOWgfbfV0AF4IUunf51). These synchronized timestamps and uniform BNB sizes define a traceable wallet cluster that traders can monitor when analyzing $MYX-linked flows around distribution events (source: Bubblemaps post on X, Sep 9, 2025).

According to @bubblemaps, one entity claimed about $170 million of MYX from the airdrop after they traced 100 newly funded addresses with identical on-chain activity, which they allege indicates a coordinated sybil cluster (source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 9, 2025). For traders, concentrated token control and subsequent exchange inflows from large holders have historically coincided with higher near-term sell pressure and volatility, so monitoring the flagged wallets and exchange inflows is prudent (source: Glassnode Insights, 2021; source: Binance Academy, 2023).