According to @OnchainDataNerd, Jump withdrew 50.68M WLFI (~$11.58M) from Bybit and Binance 4 hours ago (source: @OnchainDataNerd), whale address 0x8C4 withdrew 40.87M WLFI (~$10M) from Bybit 16 hours ago (source: @OnchainDataNerd), and 47M WLFI (~$11.34M) were burned (source: @OnchainDataNerd). Based on the reported figures, total exchange withdrawals reached 91.55M WLFI over the past 16 hours (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @EmberCN, a wallet deposited 6,294 ETH (about $27.56M) to Bybit roughly 20 minutes ago after withdrawing the same amount from Bybit a month earlier when ETH was $3,779, implying an unrealized profit of about $3.76M at a $4,379 transfer price, source: @EmberCN on X. Historically, large exchange inflows from whales are associated with increased short-term sell pressure and higher intraday volatility in ETH order books, which traders monitor for liquidity shifts, source: CryptoQuant research on exchange inflows and selling pressure.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, within the first 30 minutes after the $WLFI TGE, 4 of the top-10 individual holders (ranks 6, 7, 8, and 10) reportedly partially or fully sold while the other 6 remained holding (source: @ai_9684xtpa). These wallets sent WLFI to centralized exchanges rather than executing on-chain trades, with a combined 186 million WLFI deposited, equal to 4% of the top-10 individuals’ total holdings (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The post also referenced Bybit in this context, but full details were not visible in the provided excerpt (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to Lookonchain (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 31, 2025), whale address 0x8A1d withdrew 433,176 IP worth about $3.7 million from Bybit to self-custody, with the destination address provided in the source. Large exchange outflows like this are historically associated with reduced near-term sell pressure and thinner order-book liquidity on the originating venue, which can influence short-term price dynamics for IP pairs (source: Glassnode Research, Exchange Balances and Flows studies, 2023–2024).

According to Onchain Lens, in the past 9 hours a whale withdrew 20,000 SOL (valued at 4.09 million USD), deposited the SOL into Kamino to borrow 3 million USDC, and then sent the USDC to OKX, source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 24, 2025. The same entity withdrew 4 billion PUMP (valued at 11.32 million USD) from Bybit four days earlier, source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 24, 2025. This sequence indicates a 3 million USDC exchange inflow to OKX and a 20,000 SOL exchange outflow from Kraken attributable to one whale address, source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 24, 2025. Implied average transfer prices are approximately 204.5 USD per SOL and 0.00283 USD per PUMP based on figures reported by Onchain Lens, source: calculations using Onchain Lens data on X, Aug 24, 2025.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Binance leads the reported 2025 figures at $133B, followed by HTX at $38B, Bybit at $35B, and MEXC at $34B, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X (Aug 21, 2025). The source states this leadership confirms Binance as the top destination for traders seeking early access and high liquidity, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X (Aug 21, 2025).

According to @EmberCN, HashKey Capital transferred 5.412 million MNT worth about $7.42 million into Bybit roughly 15 minutes before the post time on Aug 20, 2025, with the referenced on-chain address provided via intel.arkm.com (source: @EmberCN on X; source: Arkham Intelligence address explorer). @EmberCN adds that these MNT were originally withdrawn from Bybit to an on-chain address eight months earlier in Dec 2024 and are now moving back onto the exchange (source: @EmberCN on X). The notional value cited increased from $6.33 million at the time of withdrawal to $7.42 million now, a change of $1.09 million (source: @EmberCN on X). For trading, a 5.412 million MNT inflow increases immediately available supply on Bybit; traders typically monitor spot order-book depth, funding rates, and open interest around such deposits to assess liquidity and positioning (source: @EmberCN on X for the deposit details; source: Bybit market data and public API for order book and derivatives metrics).

According to @EmberCN, a whale or institution accumulated $136 million worth of WBTC and ETH over the last six days using a recursive lending loop across OKX, Bybit, and Aave (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the entity withdrew WBTC and ETH from OKX and Bybit, deposited them into Aave as collateral, borrowed USDT, moved the USDT to Bybit, and repeated the cycle to withdraw additional WBTC and ETH (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the accumulation includes 918.6 WBTC within the six-day window, with further ETH acquired via the same loop method (source: @EmberCN).

According to @rovercrc, ETH is approaching an all-time high and a rotation trade into MNT (Mantle) could outperform in the next leg of the cycle; source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 15, 2025. @rovercrc states MNT is basically Bybit’s exchange token and is undervalued around a 3.8 billion dollar market cap, framing it as a rotation beneficiary as ETH nears ATH; source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 15, 2025. Official materials describe MNT as the native token of Mantle Network, an Ethereum Layer 2, while the ecosystem originated from the BitDAO and Mantle merger that had support from Bybit, indicating ties but not formal exchange-token status; source: Mantle Network documentation and Mantle governance records. For trading validation, Mantle’s L2 activity and security metrics can be tracked via L2BEAT, and exchange listings provide liquidity venues to monitor order flow for MNT; source: L2BEAT and Bybit exchange listings.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 39,875 SOL to Bybit valued at about $8.19M, with the transfer details referenced via Arkham Intelligence’s address explorer (source: @OnchainLens; Arkham Intelligence). The same entity initially received 39,875 SOL from Bybit five months ago for roughly $5.26M (source: @OnchainLens; Arkham Intelligence). Based on those reported figures, the position shows an approximately $2.93M profit with an implied current price near $205 per SOL versus an estimated cost basis near $132, equating to about a 56% five-month gain (source: @OnchainLens; calculations from stated amounts).

According to @lookonchain, whale wallet CMJiHu deposited 130,000 SOL (about $26.45 million) to centralized exchanges Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Gateio roughly 3 hours ago (source: @lookonchain). The deposits were reported as occurring within a short time window across four exchanges, indicating a consolidated inflow of SOL to exchanges (source: @lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, whale CMJiHu deposited 130,000 SOL valued at about $26.45M into Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Gate.io roughly 3 hours ago. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1955840591251783733 The reported transactions constitute a multi-exchange inflow that adds 130,000 SOL to centralized venues named, a trading-relevant change in available supply for SOL pairs across those order books. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1955840591251783733

According to @EmberCN, Bain Capital Ventures transferred 349,000 COMP valued at about 18.85 million USD to an institutional platform roughly nine hours before the post, source: @EmberCN on X. Of this, 87,250 COMP valued at about 4.73 million USD has since been deposited to Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Gate, equal to 25 percent of the transferred tokens, source: @EmberCN on X. The remaining 261,750 COMP from this transfer has not been reported as deposited to exchanges by the source, source: @EmberCN on X. Traders tracking COMP liquidity can monitor net exchange inflows and spot order book depth on those venues around the reported deposits for execution and slippage risk, source: @EmberCN on X.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, approximately five hours before their August 11, 2025 post, 7.01 million USDC in margin was withdrawn from Hyperliquid and deposited into Bybit, with the source suggesting the funds may be intended for derivatives trading on Bybit and noting the trader’s prior performance posts as context. Based on @ai_9684xtpa’s report of this USDC flow, traders may monitor Bybit derivatives markets for changes in order book depth, open interest, and funding rates to assess potential whale activity and short-term liquidity impacts.

According to @EmberCN, address 0x969...aF5 transferred 5.682 million ENA worth about $4.27 million to Bybit approximately five hours ago (source: X post by @EmberCN on Aug 10, 2025). The alert specifies the destination as Bybit and the exact size and timing of the inflow, flagging a high-volume exchange deposit for traders to monitor (source: X post by @EmberCN on Aug 10, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet address 0x41A...F7277 deposited 6427 ETH, valued at $24.7 million, to Bybit five hours ago. This address has previously interacted with Mirana Ventures, though its ownership remains unconfirmed. Notably, this is the first such large-scale deposit to an exchange from this wallet in three months, which may signal increased selling pressure or heightened trading activity for ETH. Traders should monitor Bybit and related order books for potential volatility and price impact as large inflows often precede significant market movements (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @lookonchain, FTX and Alameda Research staked 20,736 ETH valued at $79 million just an hour ago. Previously, between December 17, 2024, and January 9, 2025, they withdrew 21,650 ETH worth $75.3 million from Bybit at an average price of $3,478. This significant staking activity, following large exchange withdrawals, signals a shift in ETH holdings from liquid to staked positions, potentially reducing immediate market sell pressure and supporting bullish sentiment among traders. Source: @lookonchain.

According to @MilkRoadDaily, $HYPE trading volumes are rapidly increasing, with Binance Futures maintaining its position as the leading derivatives platform. However, Bybit and the onchain exchange HyperliquidX are quickly gaining market share, signaling intensified competition in the perpetual swaps sector. Notably, HyperliquidX, traditionally seen as an onchain underdog, is now competing directly with major centralized exchanges, marking a significant shift in the landscape for traders seeking high-liquidity perps products. This ongoing exchange battle could influence trading volumes and liquidity dynamics across the broader crypto derivatives market. Source: @MilkRoadDaily.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Bybit's latest TokenSplash initiative introduces a tuna-themed project, continuing the trend of Web3 platforms adopting marine animal imagery for their branding. This strategy, also seen with projects like Cetus (whale), Orca (killer whale), Headal (sea otter), and Scallop (shell), aims to create stronger user recognition and connection, which may boost trading activity and token visibility on exchanges. The use of memorable marine symbols helps these Web3 projects stand out in the competitive crypto market, potentially influencing token demand and trading volume (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ranyi1115, open interest (OI) on Orderly-powered decentralized exchanges has reached a new all-time high. A funding rate arbitrage opportunity currently exists: traders can short any Orderly-powered DEX and go long on Bybit, yielding annualized returns of 60–100% on assets including SUI, LTC, PEPE, HBAR, AVAX, LIDO, AAVE, NEAR, and ORDER. This significant APR is attracting attention from arbitrageurs and may impact price volatility and liquidity for these tokens across both decentralized and centralized markets. Source: @ranyi1115.