According to @EmberCN, 200,000 ENS (~$4.46M) moved about two hours prior from the ENS timelock contract to wallets labeled as Binance and Galaxy Digital, signaling a notable exchange inflow event for ENS liquidity, Source: @EmberCN on X. Arkham Intelligence shows transfers from address 0xd7A029Db2585553978190dB5E85eC724Aa4dF23f with recipient entities labeled as Binance and Galaxy Digital, corroborating the movement and counterparties, Source: Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xd7A029Db2585553978190dB5E85eC724Aa4dF23f. Traders typically monitor exchange-bound inflows because assets sent to exchange deposit addresses become readily tradable and can influence near-term order book liquidity, Source: Binance Academy — A Beginner’s Guide to On-Chain Analysis academy.binance.com/en/articles/a-beginners-guide-to-on-chain-analysis.

According to @OnchainLens, two wallets linked to @Trend_Research_ deposited 1,000,000 PENDLE valued at $4.8M and 203,100 ENS valued at $4.73M into Binance, with reported losses of $1.12M and $808K respectively (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai). According to @OnchainLens, the wallets are 0x8b0e4a56b3bc5ecbbaff8c64b06967c25af1f319 and 0x4F62bF3A8ef0383a2df8Effe08c6595433f4BC2E, totaling approximately $9.53M in inflows and about $1.93M in reported losses (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai).

According to @EmberCN, a wallet linked to Trend Research transferred 203,000 ENS valued around $4.72 million into Binance about 10 minutes before the post, source: @EmberCN. The same ENS were withdrawn from Binance about one month earlier when valued around $5.5 million, implying a potential realized loss of about $780,000 if sold now, source: @EmberCN. The author questioned whether this exchange deposit signals intent to sell and provided the wallet address link in the post, source: @EmberCN.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Trend Research deposited 203,105 ENS into Binance, valuing the transfer at approximately $4.72 million with a stated deposit reference price of $23.24. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Aug 31, 2025: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962154737362776304 According to @ai_9684xtpa, these tokens were previously withdrawn from Binance on 07.23 at $28.82, implying an unrealized loss of about $1.133 million if sold at the cited deposit price. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Aug 31, 2025: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962154737362776304 According to @ai_9684xtpa, the post also notes that Trend Research’s ENS swing last year appeared to end in a loss, and it included a wallet link for reference. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Aug 31, 2025: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962154737362776304

According to @boldleonidas, the ENS name 'boldleonidas.eth' was purchased for over $2,000 and he stated he does not own it, warning followers in case of a potential scam attempt, source: @boldleonidas on X (Aug 18, 2025). This scenario highlights impersonation risk in the ENS market where control of a name can be misused to solicit funds or communications, source: Ethereum Name Service documentation. Traders should verify name ownership, linked addresses, and signed messages via the official ENS app or on-chain records before any transfers or OTC dealings involving ENS names or the ENS token, source: Ethereum Name Service documentation and Ethereum.org security guidelines. ENS names are transferable NFTs on Ethereum, meaning ownership confirms control of the name but not the identity behind it, source: Ethereum Name Service documentation.

According to @boldleonidas, the ENS name boldleonidas.eth was purchased for over $2,000, but the seller clarifies the domain is not owned by him, flagging an impersonation scam risk for traders. Source: @boldleonidas. Traders should verify on-chain ownership and signatures before engaging with messages, OTC offers, or NFT transfers tied to this ENS to prevent phishing and fraud. Source: @boldleonidas. No additional details on buyer identity or marketplace were provided. Source: @boldleonidas.

According to @jessepollak, basenames will now work everywhere and are being pushed forward using open standards like ENS Domains to power the global Base economy, source: @jessepollak on X, Aug 16, 2025. According to ENS Domains, ENS is a widely adopted Ethereum naming standard used across major wallets and dapps, enabling names to resolve consistently in integrated applications, source: ENS Domains documentation. According to Base, Base is an Ethereum Layer 2 built for mainstream onchain applications, and broader name-resolution support can streamline user onboarding and transaction flows on Base that traders monitor via official network usage data, source: Base official documentation. For trading, monitor official announcements and on-chain metrics tied to ENS (ENS) adoption and ETH activity on Base as this rollout is implemented to validate market impact, source: @jessepollak on X and ENS Domains announcements.

According to @santimentfeed, crypto markets were thriving over the past week and the top 10 assets with the largest weekly increases in $100K+ on-chain transaction counts include MNT, WBTC, KCS, and ENS, signaling elevated whale activity (source: @santimentfeed). According to @santimentfeed, these are the biggest week-over-week rises in large-value transfers among tracked assets, spotlighting where big holders are most active right now (source: @santimentfeed).

According to @EmberCN, an ENS multisig moved 141,937 ENS (approximately $4.02M) in the past 20 minutes, routing 72,437 ENS to FalconX and 69,500 ENS to Coinbase, source: @EmberCN; the transactions and labeled recipient addresses are visible on the referenced Arkham Intelligence address page for the cited wallet, source: Arkham Intelligence. Traders tracking ENS can monitor exchange inflows and spot liquidity on Coinbase and potential OTC routing via FalconX following these transfers, source: @EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Trend Research, an entity associated with LD Capital, has re-established a significant position in Ethereum Name Service (ENS) after a year-long hiatus. The firm withdrew 203,105 ENS tokens, valued at approximately $5.5 million, from the Binance exchange. This large accumulation is notable as it follows a previous trade a year ago where the firm is estimated to have incurred a $122,000 loss on a position of 80,000 ENS. This new, larger investment could signal renewed bullish conviction from the institution.

According to @EmberCN, on-chain data reveals that the entity 'Trend Research' likely executed a significant token swap. The wallet first deposited 1.5 million FORM tokens, valued at $5.12 million, into Binance. Subsequently, it withdrew 203,000 ENS tokens, worth $5.5 million, from the exchange. This sequence of transactions suggests Trend Research sold its FORM holdings to acquire ENS. The report also notes that Trend Research's current portfolio is valued at approximately $570 million and is believed to be in profit, with major holdings including 108,000 ETH valued at $402 million.

According to Santiment, Ethereum Name Service (ENS), Compound (COMP), and Virtuals (VIRTUAL) have experienced the highest increases in whale transactions this week compared to last week. For traders, this signals a high likelihood of price reversals and increased volatility for these non-stablecoin assets. Monitoring on-chain activity for ENS, COMP, and VIRTUAL may present short-term trading opportunities due to heightened whale movement and potential liquidity shifts. (Source: Santiment, June 12, 2025)

According to Balaji (@balajis), ipecity in Brazil is pioneering digital governance by integrating onchain ID (ENS), onchain social graphs (EFP), and stablecoins, demonstrating crypto's maturity for real-world applications (Source: Balaji Twitter, May 16, 2025). This move signals increased adoption of Ethereum-based protocols and stablecoins, likely boosting trading volumes in governance tokens, identity solutions, and stablecoins. Traders should monitor related assets for potential upward momentum as onchain governance platforms gain traction in emerging markets.

According to AltcoinGordon, US Congressman William Timmons has incorporated an Ethereum Name Service (ENS) into his Twitter bio. This move could indicate an increasing acceptance and integration of blockchain technology within governmental figures, which may influence market perceptions and trading strategies surrounding ENS and related cryptocurrencies. Traders might consider monitoring legislative developments and public endorsements as potential indicators for market movements.

According to Ai 姨 (@ai_9684xtpa), $COW, a DEX aggregator, and $ENS, a domain name service provider, have been highlighted as potential candidates in the 'Presidential Selection'. This reflects growing interest in decentralized exchange solutions and blockchain-based domain services. Traders should monitor $COW for its potential to streamline DEX operations and $ENS for its role in digital identity management, both of which could impact trading volumes and market dynamics.

According to EmberCN, an address that received 339,000 ENS tokens from an ENS Cold Wallet between 2022 and 2023 has recently transferred 50,000 ENS tokens, valued at $1.91 million, to Binance five hours ago. Over the past year, this address has moved 250,000 ENS tokens to Binance, with an average selling price of $22.8 per token, totaling $5.69 million in value.

According to EmberCN, an address that received 339,000 ENS tokens from the ENS Cold Wallet between 2022 and 2023 has recently transferred 50,000 ENS (worth $1.91 million) to Binance. Over the past year, this address has moved a total of 250,000 ENS tokens to Binance at an average price of $22.8, amounting to $5.69 million.

According to EmberCN, Blockchain Capital recently transferred 52,845 ENS tokens, valued at $2.47 million, to the exchanges OKX and Bybit. Since November 30, Blockchain Capital has moved a total of 105,690 ENS tokens, worth $4.72 million, at an average price of $44.6 per token. They still hold 540,000 ENS tokens, valued at $24.56 million.

According to Vitalik Buterin, if the Ethereum Name Service (ENS) transitions fully to the namechain system, the verification configuration for namechain should be privileged and maintained outside of the ENS infrastructure. This suggests a strategic move to ensure security and integrity in the namechain's verification process, which could impact how ENS operates within the Ethereum ecosystem.

According to CryptoMichNL, his personal cryptocurrency portfolio includes large coins such as ENS, OP, TIA, and TAO, as well as smaller coins like REZ, OMNI, RPL, and AEVO. He anticipates rotating these assets over time and expects this portfolio to significantly outperform Bitcoin over the next six months.