According to @EmberCN, the position has been increased to 120,000 ETH with an average entry price of $3,177, representing approximately $393 million in exposure; source: @EmberCN on X, Dec 11, 2025. Based on the disclosed 120,000 ETH size, each $1 move in ETH/USD changes unrealized PnL by about $120,000; source: @EmberCN on X, Dec 11, 2025. The $3,177 level is the stated breakeven reference for this position; source: @EmberCN on X, Dec 11, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, 77,736 ETH worth about USD 368 million were transferred from address 0xfDFE into Bitfinex, flagged roughly 10 minutes after the move, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 23, 2025. The same 77,736 ETH were originally withdrawn from Bitfinex in January 2019 when they were worth about USD 11.9 million, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 23, 2025. The stash was sent into Bitfinex in February 2025 but was reported as not sold and subsequently withdrawn back on-chain before being fully transferred into Bitfinex again today, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 23, 2025. Based on the values reported, the move implies an increase from roughly USD 11.9 million to roughly USD 368 million, about a 30x rise, with an implied per-ETH value shift from about USD 153 to about USD 4,735, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 23, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, on-chain operations were observed to have occurred shortly after an individual referred to as 'Boss Yi' published a tweet. The analysis, posted on July 15, 2025, highlights a direct temporal link between the social media post and subsequent blockchain transactions. This pattern suggests that the social media activity of influential figures could serve as a potential leading indicator for significant on-chain movements, offering a valuable signal for traders monitoring the market.

According to analyst @EmberCN, a recent development, potentially involving large-scale Bitcoin (BTC) accumulation, has prompted a strong reaction. In a social media post, @EmberCN commented that if the asset being hoarded was Bitcoin, the situation would be "numbing" or "speechless," suggesting the scale of the activity is significant enough to impact market perceptions. This sentiment highlights a potentially noteworthy event related to Bitcoin whale activity or institutional accumulation that could be relevant for traders.

According to EmberCN on Twitter, James Wynn deleted his earlier plea tweet after his crypto portfolio recovered, having raised approximately $60,000 from followers the previous night (source: @EmberCN, June 3, 2025). For traders, this event highlights the influence of social sentiment and high-profile personalities on short-term cryptocurrency market volatility. Monitoring such actions is crucial, as large inflows or outflows triggered by social media calls can impact liquidity and price swings in related tokens.

According to EmberCN on Twitter, James Wynn is facing imminent liquidation risk on his Bitcoin positions despite multiple margin top-ups, with BTC currently trading only $300 above his estimated liquidation price (source: EmberCN, Twitter, June 2, 2025). This situation highlights significant short-term volatility and potential forced selling pressure in the crypto market, which could impact overall Bitcoin price stability if liquidation occurs.

According to @EmberCN, a trader's high-leverage BTC long position with 40x leverage was liquidated within 45 minutes after a minor price pullback, resulting in a $175,000 loss. Over two days, the trader's capital dropped from $2.96 million to just $250,000. The trader then opened a 25x short position in ETH at $2444, with a liquidation price of $2480, shorting 2636 ETH. This highlights the significant risks of high-leverage trading, which can lead to rapid capital erosion and forced liquidations, especially in volatile crypto markets. Such events can increase short-term volatility and impact liquidity, influencing both retail and institutional trading strategies (source: @EmberCN Twitter, May 19, 2025).

According to EmberCN on Twitter, a whale or institutional investor sold 220 WBTC on-chain at $95,710 each, netting approximately $21.06 million USDT. The purchase was made in November 2023 at $34,938 per WBTC, resulting in a realized profit of $13.37 million, up 174% (source: EmberCN Twitter, May 4, 2025). After repaying related loans, $13.02 million USDT remains distributed across two addresses. This major profit-taking event may signal increased selling pressure and potential volatility in the WBTC and Bitcoin markets. Traders should monitor on-chain movements and USDT inflows to assess liquidity changes and anticipate possible impacts on price trends.

According to EmberCN, a trader successfully sold 35,800 ETH at an average price of $1,562 before the price dropped to $1,500 within an hour.

According to EmberCN, a significant Ethereum holder has sold 35,881 ETH for 56.05 million USDT within the last two hours, with an average selling price of $1562. This extensive sell-off suggests a potential complete liquidation rather than just a deleveraging move. The holder originally had 65,000 ETH as of March 11.

According to EmberCN, a major trader who invested $32.45 million in $EIGEN at peak prices suffered a $17.19 million loss and later switched to $HYPE, incurring an additional $5.21 million loss. The original investment from October last year has now depreciated to $10.03 million, marking a 69% reduction over five months.

According to EmberCN, a cryptocurrency trader's position is just $35 away from their liquidation price, highlighting a critical point for traders to manage risk effectively.

According to EmberCN, a whale or institution that previously withdrew 26% of the total $AUCTION supply has transferred an additional 300,000 $AUCTION (worth $8.56 million) to Binance. This brings today's total transfers to 1.05 million $AUCTION ($37.81 million). The on-chain address now holds only 450,000 $AUCTION ($12.84 million), indicating a significant reduction in holdings.

According to EmberCN, a whale or institution that previously withdrew 26% of total $AUCTION supply from Binance has transferred 750,000 $AUCTION (worth $29.25M) back to Binance in the last 3 hours. The $AUCTION price has dropped from $57 at 3 AM to $29, halving in 5 hours. This entity has previously transferred $AUCTION to Binance twice: on March 17, 500,000 $AUCTION were transferred, causing a price correction from $35 to $31.

According to @EmberCN, a trader closed a short position and withdrew 1.666 million USDC, converting it to 815 ETH, which was transferred to their main wallet (0x51d...921). The trader left 160,000 USDC on Hyperliquid and used 46,000 USDC to open a 3x leveraged position on $JELLY.

According to EmberCN, the BLUR token, which debuted at around $1 in early 2023 with a circulating market cap of $410 million, has seen its price plummet by 90% to $0.1. However, the circulating market cap has only decreased by 40% to $235 million. This discrepancy is attributed to the continuous monthly unlocking of tokens over the past year, which has diluted the price impact on the market cap.

According to EmberCN, a trader known as 'Hyperliquid 50x 老哥' has started closing BTC short positions using a TWAP (Time Weighted Average Price) strategy, having closed 108 BTC in the last one and a half hours. The trader still holds 5500 BTC in short positions, valued at $455 million.

According to EmberCN, $AUCTION has experienced a remarkable 214% increase in price over the past month, rising from $8.4 to $26.4. Notably, in the last 16 days, 1.5 million $AUCTION tokens, representing 20% of the total supply and valued at $39.6 million, were withdrawn from Binance by three addresses, each withdrawing 500,000 tokens. This significant withdrawal is speculated to be a key driver behind the recent price surge of $AUCTION.

According to EmberCN, the Maker oracle price is set to update to $1,806. If ETH does not rebound above its liquidation price before this update, or if the position holder does not add collateral, the position will face liquidation post-update. This situation highlights the importance of monitoring oracle updates and collateral levels to avoid liquidation risks. Source: EmberCN's tweet sponsored by Bitget.

According to EmberCN, a cryptocurrency influencer, there has been a recent scam involving impersonation. EmberCN clarified that fraudulent messages with their avatar and nickname were sent by an unknown party to deceive users. This highlights the importance of verifying the authenticity of communication in trading environments to avoid scams. EmberCN's statement serves as a reminder for traders to remain vigilant and verify sources before making trading decisions.