According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETF weekly total net flow was $70.2 million, source: Farside Investors Twitter post Nov 29, 2025 and https://farside.co.uk/btc. FBTC led with $230.5 million of inflows while IBIT recorded $137 million of outflows, source: Farside Investors Twitter post Nov 29, 2025 and https://farside.co.uk/btc. GBTC posted $16.3 million of inflows and ARKB added $6.5 million of inflows, source: Farside Investors Twitter post Nov 29, 2025 and https://farside.co.uk/btc. BITB saw $18.1 million of outflows and HODL registered $36.9 million of outflows, source: Farside Investors Twitter post Nov 29, 2025 and https://farside.co.uk/btc. BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, and BTCW reported zero net flow for the week, source: Farside Investors Twitter post Nov 29, 2025 and https://farside.co.uk/btc. The weekly summary also lists BTC: 8.9 as an additional metric, source: Farside Investors Twitter post Nov 29, 2025 and https://farside.co.uk/btc.

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $128.7 million on Nov 25, 2025 (source: Farside Investors). FBTC led with $170.8 million of inflows and IBIT added $83 million, while ARKB saw $75.9 million of outflows, HODL posted $36.9 million of outflows, and BITB recorded $12.3 million of outflows (source: Farside Investors). BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, BTCW, GBTC, and BTC each reported zero flow for the day (source: Farside Investors). Despite notable redemptions in ARKB and HODL, the group finished net positive for the session with FBTC contributing the largest single-day inflow among peers (source: Farside Investors). Full dataset and methodology are available at farside.co.uk/btc (source: Farside Investors).

According to @FarsideUK, BlackRock’s US spot Bitcoin ETF posted a daily net outflow of 149.1 million dollars, indicating investor redemptions for that session. Source: twitter.com/FarsideUK/status/1993238437676109883; farside.co.uk/btc/ ETF primary market flows reflect creations and redemptions that track investor demand for the underlying asset and can diverge from secondary-market price moves, so traders monitor flow data to gauge US demand for BTC without assuming immediate price impact. Source: investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-basics/investment-products/exchange-traded-funds-etfs; farside.co.uk/btc/ For near-term positioning, traders often watch whether outflows at a major issuer like BlackRock are isolated or part of broad US spot Bitcoin ETF net outflows across issuers to assess directional demand during US hours. Source: farside.co.uk/btc/

According to @StockMKTNewz, the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has recorded $2.2 billion in month-to-date outflows as of Nov 25, 2025, as reported by CNBC (source: @StockMKTNewz; CNBC). The figure confirms net redemptions from IBIT this month, reducing aggregate U.S. spot BTC ETF flows for November (source: @StockMKTNewz; CNBC).

According to @charliebilello, gold has outperformed Bitcoin by 19% since the inception of the first Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, with GLD and IBIT referenced as the comparative proxies, source: X post by @charliebilello on Nov 22, 2025; bilello.blog/newsletter. For traders, this marks a 19% relative-strength spread over that window, implying a positive GLD/BTC spread and a negative BTC/Gold spread on a simple price comparison, source: @charliebilello on X. Instrument context: GLD is SPDR Gold Shares and IBIT is the iShares Bitcoin Trust, sources: ssga.com; ishares.com.

According to @EricBalchunas, US spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs recorded group-wide net inflows on Friday as other funds offset IBIT’s outflows, source: @EricBalchunas on X, Nov 22, 2025. According to @EricBalchunas, more than 95% of total ETF assets under management remained intact through the volatility, source: @EricBalchunas on X, Nov 22, 2025.

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs posted $238.4 million in total net inflows on 2025-11-21 (source: Farside Investors). IBIT recorded a $122 million net outflow, while FBTC saw a $108 million inflow and GBTC added $61.5 million, leading the day's positive flows (source: Farside Investors). Additional inflows were ARKB $39.1 million, BTCO $35.8 million, BITB $22.8 million, and HODL $8.3 million, with EZBC, BRRR, and BTCW reporting zero flow (source: Farside Investors). Combined inflows from FBTC and GBTC totaled $169.5 million, representing the largest share of the day's positive prints (source: Farside Investors).

According to @EricBalchunas, bitcoin ETFs set an all-time record today with $11.5B in aggregate trading volume, with $IBIT accounting for $8B, also an all-time high for that fund (source: @EricBalchunas). According to @EricBalchunas, volume tends to spike when a category is “going through it,” with ETFs acting as liquidity release valves (source: @EricBalchunas). For traders, the record turnover indicates elevated liquidity in BTC exposure via ETFs, consistent with ETFs serving as release valves during heightened activity (source: @EricBalchunas).

According to CoinMarketCap, the Abu Dhabi Investment Council nearly tripled its Bitcoin exposure in Q3 and held $520 million worth of shares in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT), characterizing BTC as digital gold, source: CoinMarketCap on X, Nov 20, 2025. For trading, the presence of a sovereign wealth fund among sizable IBIT holders underscores institutional demand for spot Bitcoin ETFs, making IBIT trading volumes and net creations or redemptions key signals to monitor for BTC spot liquidity and order flow during U.S. market hours, source: BlackRock iShares IBIT product materials and U.S. SEC ETF mechanics guidance.

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETF total net flow on 2025-11-17 was -$220.1 million, signaling a net redemption day across the tracked funds, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc. Per fund breakdown shows IBIT -$145.6M, FBTC -$12M, BITB -$9.5M, ARKB -$29.7M, HODL -$23.3M, while BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, BTCW, and BTC each recorded 0 flow, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc. GBTC’s value was not stated in the post, and the dataset link is provided for full disclosures and updates, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc.

According to the source, Harvard Management Company tripled its Bitcoin exposure via U.S. spot BTC ETFs while Emory University increased its BTC ETF positions, with the report based on recent institutional Form 13F disclosures (source: U.S. SEC EDGAR Form 13F). In U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, net inflows trigger primary creations that require custodial BTC purchases by issuers such as BlackRock iShares and Fidelity, linking 13F-reported positions to spot-demand metrics traders can track (source: iShares Bitcoin Trust and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund prospectuses). Traders should verify share counts and specific tickers held by Harvard and Emory on SEC EDGAR and monitor daily net creations for IBIT, FBTC, ARKB, BITB, HODL, BTCO, and BRRR on issuer sites to gauge incremental BTC demand (source: U.S. SEC EDGAR; issuer daily flow pages).

According to Eric Balchunas, Harvard’s endowment made IBIT its largest position in its latest 13F and its biggest Q3 position increase, signaling rare endowment participation in an ETF that traders track for institutional demand signals; source: Eric Balchunas on X, Nov 15, 2025. According to Eric Balchunas, the IBIT stake is roughly $500 million, about 1% of Harvard’s total endowment, providing a measurable benchmark for position sizing relative to AUM; source: Eric Balchunas on X, Nov 15, 2025. According to Eric Balchunas, endowments like Harvard or Yale rarely buy ETFs, and he characterized this allocation as about as strong a validation as an ETF can get, relevant for gauging BTC ETF credibility; source: Eric Balchunas on X, Nov 15, 2025. According to Eric Balchunas, the size would rank Harvard 16th among IBIT holders, underscoring meaningful institutional positioning that traders monitor when assessing BTC ETF liquidity and ownership concentration; source: Eric Balchunas on X, Nov 15, 2025.

According to @AltcoinDaily, Harvard University bought approximately $320 million in Bitcoin ETFs, indicating a 237% increase in exposure; source: @AltcoinDaily post on X dated Nov 14, 2025. The post provides no corroborating documents, and such institutional positions are typically verified via U.S. SEC Form 13F filings or Harvard Management Company disclosures; sources: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Form 13F requirements and Harvard Management Company public reporting. For trading, treat this as unverified headline risk and monitor flows, volume, and spreads in IBIT, FBTC, and ARKB during the U.S. session; sources: BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust IBIT issuer data, Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin ETF FBTC issuer data, and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF ARKB issuer data. Any confirmation would normally appear in the next 13F reporting window, generally due 45 days after quarter end; source: U.S. SEC Form 13F filing timetable.

According to @cas_abbe, headline inflows such as $500M into spot Bitcoin ETFs do not equal immediate BTC purchases because creations are processed by Authorized Participants rather than on each client trade. According to @cas_abbe, APs like JPMorgan, Jane Street, and Virtu deliver cash to the issuer, the issuer buys real Bitcoin via OTC desks or large exchanges, and coins are moved into cold storage primarily with Coinbase Custody. According to @cas_abbe, the process can take hours or even days, so inflows and outflows impact market demand over time rather than minute by minute. According to @cas_abbe, outflows reverse the path through AP redemptions, where the fund releases or sells BTC from custody. According to @cas_abbe, ETF prices track spot via NAV arbitrage as APs sell shares and buy BTC when the fund trades rich and buy shares and sell BTC when it trades cheap. According to @cas_abbe, investor returns come from BTC price changes minus management fees, and creations convert TradFi cash into real BTC demand through a slow, mechanical bridge.

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $524 million on 2025-11-11 (source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc). The day’s leaders were IBIT +$224.2M, FBTC +$165.9M, ARKB +$102.5M, BITB +$7.3M, and Global X BTC +$24.1M (source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc). BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, and GBTC posted $0 net flow on the day (source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc). IBIT and FBTC together accounted for about 74.5% of total net inflows, while the top three funds (IBIT, FBTC, ARKB) comprised roughly 94.0%, based on Farside’s reported figures (source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc).

According to Farside Investors, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs posted total net outflows of $558.4 million on 2025-11-07, led by FBTC at -$256.7M, ARKB at -$144.2M, IBIT at -$131.4M, GBTC at -$15.4M, and BITB at -$10.7M, while BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, and BTCW reported zero flows, with dataset available at farside.co.uk/btc, source: Farside Investors. Based on the same dataset, FBTC accounted for approximately 46 percent of the day’s net outflows, ARKB about 26 percent, and IBIT about 24 percent, indicating the concentration of redemptions among the largest vehicles by assets, source: Farside Investors. In cash-based ETF creation and redemption structures used by some U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, net outflows can require authorized participants or the fund to sell underlying BTC to meet cash redemptions, which mechanically channels flow pressure into the spot market’s liquidity during U.S. trading hours, source: U.S. SEC Investor Bulletin on ETFs; BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust prospectus; Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund prospectus.

According to the source, U.S. spot BTC ETFs recorded approximately $239.9 million in net inflows after six consecutive days of outflows. The source adds that IBIT led the inflows, with FBTC and ARKB following. The source highlights that BTC holding the 50-week EMA near $100,000 is the key bull line traders are watching for trend confirmation.

According to Farside Investors, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net inflow of 239.9 million dollars on 2025-11-06, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc. IBIT reported 112.4 million, FBTC 61.6 million, ARKB 60.4 million, and BITB 5.5 million, while BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, GBTC, and BTC posted zero net flow, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc. The top three funds IBIT, FBTC, and ARKB captured approximately 97.7% of the day’s net inflows, with 4 of 11 funds positive and 7 flat and no outflows reported, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc.

According to @Ashcryptoreal on X, BlackRock moved 4,562 BTC worth about $480 million to Coinbase, implying roughly $105.2k per BTC based on the figures provided, source: Ash Crypto on X. Coinbase serves as the Bitcoin custodian for BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), establishing an operational link between the firms, source: BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust prospectus filed with the U.S. SEC. Historically, large BTC transfers to centralized exchanges correlate with higher near-term sell-side liquidity and volatility, source: CryptoQuant Research on exchange inflows and price pressure. The post did not include a transaction hash or wallet details, so the transfer is not independently verifiable from the post itself, source: Ash Crypto on X.

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a total net outflow of $137 million on 2025-11-05, with IBIT at -$375.5 million, partially offset by FBTC at +$113.3 million and ARKB at +$82.9 million (source: Farside Investors). Additional flows showed BITB at +$17 million, HODL at +$3.7 million, BTC at +$21.6 million, while GBTC, BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, and BTCW reported zero for the session (source: Farside Investors). The mixed issuer flows indicate rotation across products alongside a negative aggregate ETF demand signal for BTC on the day (source: Farside Investors).