According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $178.9 million on 2025-08-28, based on their daily flow tracker. ARKB led with $79.8 million, followed by IBIT at $63.7 million, BITB at $25 million, and FBTC at $4.9 million, while BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, and GBTC were flat, per @FarsideUK. The dataset also lists a BTC line item of $5.5 million for the day, per @FarsideUK.

According to @FarsideUK, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded total net inflows of $219.1 million on 2025-08-25, led by FBTC with $65.6 million, IBIT with $63.4 million, and ARKB with $61.2 million, source: @FarsideUK. Additional flows showed BITB at $15.2 million, HODL at $6.3 million, and BTC at $7.4 million, while BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, BTCW, and GBTC registered zero net flows for the session, source: @FarsideUK.

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. Bitcoin (BTC) spot ETFs posted a total net outflow of $523.3 million on 2025-08-19. source: Farside Investors (@FarsideUK), farside.co.uk/btc FBTC recorded -$246.9m, GBTC -$115.5m, BITB -$86.8m, ARKB -$63.3m, EZBC -$3.3m, while IBIT, BRRR, HODL, and BTCW were reported at 0; the post did not list a figure for BTCO. source: Farside Investors (@FarsideUK), farside.co.uk/btc Based on the reported data, FBTC and GBTC together accounted for about 69% of the day’s net outflows, indicating redemptions were concentrated in these two funds. source: Farside Investors (@FarsideUK), farside.co.uk/btc

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a weekly net inflow of $547.6 million, led by IBIT with $887.7 million while ARKB saw -$183.9 million and GBTC -$95.9 million (source: Farside Investors). Excluding IBIT, the segment would have shown net outflows of $340.1 million this week, highlighting concentrated demand in a single issuer (source: Farside Investors). FBTC posted -$73.8 million, BITB -$18.4 million, and HODL -$5.9 million, partially offset by BTCO at +$4.9 million and BTC at +$32.9 million; EZBC, BRRR, and BTCW were flat (source: Farside Investors). Only 3 of 11 products had positive flows this week, indicating mixed breadth despite the headline inflow (source: Farside Investors).

According to @cas_abbe, Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth funds Mubadala and Al Warda hold a combined $681M exposure to Bitcoin via the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), source: @cas_abbe. Mubadala holds 8.72M IBIT shares valued at $534M, and Al Warda (managed by Mubadala) holds 2.41M shares valued at $147.5M, source: @cas_abbe. These BTC ETF positions have remained unchanged since May, indicating these accounts maintained their exposure through recent market conditions, source: @cas_abbe.

According to @FarsideUK, BlackRock’s US Bitcoin ETF recorded a daily net flow of $0 million in the latest update, reflecting no reported net subscriptions or redemptions for the day from that issuer’s fund, source: Farside Investors (@FarsideUK) via X. Farside Investors directed users to its full Bitcoin ETF flow dataset and disclaimers at farside.co.uk/btc/ for complete context across issuers and sessions, source: Farside Investors (@FarsideUK) and farside.co.uk/btc/.

According to @FarsideUK, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded total net inflows of $86.9 million on 2025-08-13 (source: @FarsideUK, farside.co.uk/btc). ARKB led with $36.6 million, followed by FBTC at $26.7 million, BITB at $7.3 million, BTCO at $4.9 million, and ticker BTC at $11.4 million (source: @FarsideUK, farside.co.uk/btc). IBIT, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, and GBTC posted zero net flow for the session, concentrating activity in ARKB and FBTC on the day (source: @FarsideUK, farside.co.uk/btc).

According to Farside Investors, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net inflow of $65.9 million on 2025-08-12 based on issuer-level flow data. Source: Farside Investors. BlackRock’s IBIT led with +$111.4 million, while ARKB posted -$23.9 million and GBTC -$21.6 million; all other funds were flat at $0, leaving IBIT as the sole positive contributor on the day. Source: Farside Investors. Based on the reported figures, IBIT’s inflow exceeded the combined outflows of peers, accounting for roughly 169 percent of the day’s net flow. Source: Farside Investors.

According to @rovercrc, BlackRock just bought $178.1M worth of Bitcoin BTC (source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 12, 2025). The post provides no official BlackRock filing, ETF creation data, or transaction evidence, so the claim is unverified at the source level (source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 12, 2025). For trading, if confirmed, a buy of this size would signal notable spot inflow and near-term support for BTC liquidity and sentiment, but prudent positioning should wait for confirmation via BlackRock disclosures or IBIT daily flow updates to mitigate headline risk (source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 12, 2025).

According to @lookonchain, Harvard University holds $116.67M in BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), exceeding its $101.51M gold position and placing IBIT as the endowment’s 5th-largest holding, based on an SEC EDGAR filing. Source: @lookonchain; SEC EDGAR.

According to Farside Investors, US spot Bitcoin ETFs posted a weekly total net inflow of 253.2 million dollars in the summary dated August 9, 2025, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc. The biggest inflows were IBIT at 188.9 million and BITB at 62.3 million, with additional inflows to HODL at 25.6 million, EZBC at 3.4 million, and GBTC at 3.4 million, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc. Outflows were led by FBTC at 55.2 million and ARKB at 5.8 million, while BTCO, BRRR, and BTCW were flat at zero for the week, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc. IBIT represented approximately 75 percent of the week’s positive net flows based on 188.9 divided by 253.2, indicating concentration of inflows among issuers, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc. The report also lists BTC: 30.6 as provided, source: Farside Investors, farside.co.uk/btc.

According to @rovercrc, BlackRock just bought $360M worth of Bitcoin (BTC). Source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 9, 2025. The post provides no corroborating details such as a BlackRock press release, iShares IBIT creation or redemption data, on-chain wallet evidence, or SEC filings, so the claim remains unverified at this time. Source: @rovercrc post; BlackRock iShares disclosures; SEC EDGAR. Traders should seek confirmation via BlackRock iShares IBIT daily holdings and creation unit reports, SEC EDGAR for material filings, and official issuer or exchange notices before taking positions. Source: BlackRock iShares IBIT website; SEC EDGAR; issuer and exchange disclosures.

According to @EricBalchunas, iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) volatility fell again this week to 38, matching the volatility level of the Mag 7 ETF (MAGS), based on his chart and commentary; source: @EricBalchunas on X, Aug 8, 2025. Lower volatility readings typically narrow expected move ranges and reduce option premiums under standard options pricing, affecting BTC-linked ETF option strategies and derivatives positioning; source: Cboe Options Institute. Volatility-targeting frameworks commonly increase exposure when measured volatility declines, which can influence allocation to BTC exposure via ETFs during calmer regimes; source: CFA Institute. The parity with MAGS offers a cross-asset reference point for traders tracking volatility compression in BTC ETF markets; source: @EricBalchunas on X, Aug 8, 2025.

According to @EricBalchunas, Harvard and Brown have purchased IBIT, signaling endowment participation in a spot Bitcoin ETF. Source: @EricBalchunas. IBIT refers to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, a spot BTC ETF that holds Bitcoin directly. Source: iShares. Harvard is the 29th largest IBIT holder among roughly 1,300 holders, indicating a sizable position relative to peers. Source: @EricBalchunas. He notes that endowments rarely buy ETFs, suggesting a higher bar for institutional adoption has been met in this case. Source: @EricBalchunas. For trading, monitor IBIT’s daily creations and redemptions published by iShares to gauge whether endowment interest is translating into sustained spot BTC demand via ETF flows. Source: iShares.

According to @EricBalchunas, Harvard and Brown endowments have purchased BlackRock’s IBIT spot Bitcoin ETF, providing institutional BTC exposure via an ETF vehicle (source: @EricBalchunas). Harvard is the 29th largest IBIT holder out of 1,300 reported holders, indicating a relatively sizable allocation among institutions (source: @EricBalchunas). Endowments are among the hardest institutions to engage and rarely buy ETFs, highlighting the significance of these allocations for institutional adoption signals in BTC markets (source: @EricBalchunas). For trading, participants tracking institutional demand may monitor IBIT holder rankings and count as referenced by @EricBalchunas to gauge continued endowment participation in spot BTC ETFs (source: @EricBalchunas).

According to Farside Investors, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a total net inflow of 277.4 million on 2025-08-07, led by IBIT 156.6 million, FBTC 43.4 million, HODL 21.5 million, GBTC 18.5 million, BITB 17.2 million, BTC 17.2 million and EZBC 3.4 million, while ARKB saw a 0.4 million net outflow and BTCO, BRRR, BTCW posted zero flow, source: Farside Investors farside.co.uk/btc. IBIT accounted for approximately 56 percent of the day’s net inflow by calculation from the reported totals, indicating concentration of creations in that fund, source: calculations based on Farside Investors data farside.co.uk/btc.

According to Farside Investors, Bitcoin ETF products saw a significant net outflow of $323.5 million on August 4, 2025, with the largest withdrawals reported from IBIT at $292.2 million and FBTC at $40.1 million. Only BITB recorded a modest inflow of $18.7 million, while other ETFs such as ARKB, BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, and BTCW reported zero net flows. GBTC registered a net outflow of $9.9 million. This sizable capital movement indicates waning investor sentiment and could fuel short-term downward pressure on the BTC spot price, impacting trading strategies and liquidity across the broader cryptocurrency market. Source: Farside Investors.

According to @rovercrc, BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF $IBIT is no longer the second-best ETF by monthly flows in the US market. This shift in ranking signals a potential change in investor sentiment and could influence short-term trading strategies for those holding BTC or related crypto assets. Traders should closely monitor ETF inflow data and the performance of alternative funds, as changes in ETF rankings often reflect broader market trends and liquidity shifts in the cryptocurrency sector. Source: @rovercrc.

According to Eric Balchunas, the top three ETFs by one-month inflows are VOO, IBIT, and ETHA out of 4,432 funds, highlighting strong investor demand for both traditional equity exposure and crypto assets like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH). This recent trend underscores the increasing integration of crypto-linked ETFs into mainstream portfolios, making these ETFs relevant for traders focused on crypto market momentum and cross-asset flows. Source: Eric Balchunas.

According to @FarsideUK, the weekly summary of Bitcoin ETF flows revealed a total net outflow of $642.9 million, with significant withdrawals from key funds such as ARKB (-$443.4M), FBTC (-$354.1M), and GBTC (-$125M), while IBIT recorded notable inflows of $355.4M. This negative net flow signals bearish investor sentiment and potential short-term downward pressure on BTC price, as ETF outflows often correlate with increased selling activity in the underlying Bitcoin market. Traders should closely monitor ETF flows as an early indicator of market direction and liquidity shifts in BTC. Source: @FarsideUK