According to @litecoin, the Litecoin Foundation marked Data Privacy Day by emphasizing that MWEB delivers optional on-chain privacy that keeps transaction amounts and balances confidential while preserving Litecoin’s speed, security, and decentralization. According to @litecoin, the feature is framed as providing more choice, freedom, and control over user data, positioning LTC as sound digital money and encouraging direct usage.

According to @litecoin, the LitVM Builders Program is now open, inviting developers to deploy on Litecoin’s first trustless EVM rollup during an incentivized testnet, with details and registration available at builders.litvm.com (source: https://twitter.com/litecoin/status/2016286155981914383; https://x.com/LitecoinVM/status/2016205169059627477; https://builders.litvm.com).

According to @litecoin, citing Bitinfocharts data, Ethereum recorded 1,225,885 active addresses in the last 24 hours, followed by Litecoin at 246,216 and Bitcoin at 114,431, with Dogecoin at 40,849, Dash at 33,668, Bitcoin Cash at 27,256, Ethereum Classic at 9,176, and Zcash too low to chart (source: @litecoin via Bitinfocharts). According to @litecoin, this snapshot highlights ETH dominance in on chain activity and a notable LTC lead over BTC that traders can monitor for shifts in network engagement (source: @litecoin via Bitinfocharts).

According to @litecoin, attendees have paid for tickets to the Litecoin Summit in Amsterdam this June using Litecoin via MWEB, as stated on its official X account on Jan 19, 2026 (source: Litecoin on X, Jan 19, 2026). According to the source, this confirms real-world payment usage of LTC through MWEB for event ticketing, though no transaction counts or merchant platform details were disclosed (source: Litecoin on X, Jan 19, 2026). According to the same source, the only verified trading-relevant details are the event timing in June, the Amsterdam location, and the use of LTC via MWEB for ticket payments, with no price, volume, or on-chain metrics provided (source: Litecoin on X, Jan 19, 2026).

According to @zachxbt, a threat actor bridged funds from Bitcoin (BTC) to Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC), and Ripple (XRP) via THORChain, with the swaps identifiable by OP_Return memos shown in the attached screenshots, source: @zachxbt. He states the main counterparty taking the other side of these THORChain swaps uses Binance for arbitrage, source: @zachxbt. He identifies bc1qgkjems88jyk8hasj9ncspxz093nepdn00vaq0y as the THORChain user (threat actor) and labels bc1q30drw0j0erj804lyvl8pxrj789kaplpu2dryx9 and bc1q5yn5hpduzgcpskxjk49dyaczjsgwg5zvwsnahc as Asgard vault addresses, source: @zachxbt. He notes these transactions can be verified via THORChain block explorer evidence using OP_Return memos that mark THORChain swaps, source: @zachxbt. He adds that while Arkham is a useful free analytics tool, it does not attribute cross-chain swaps or UTXO flows well, cautioning analysts on cross-chain attribution, source: @zachxbt. For traders, the identification of a Binance arbitrage counterparty and specific Asgard vault addresses enables targeted monitoring of RUNE liquidity and cross-chain flows between BTC, ETH, LTC, and XRP on THORChain, source: @zachxbt.

According to @lookonchain, a victim lost over $282M in LTC and BTC in a hardware-wallet social engineering scam, and the attacker converted part of the funds into XMR, triggering a sharp XMR price spike; source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/2012355506120344030, https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2012212936735912351. The attacker used THORChain to swap 818 BTC (about $78M) into 19,631 ETH (about $64.5M), 3.15M XRP (about $6.5M), and 77,285 LTC (about $5.8M); source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/2012355506120344030, https://thorchain.net/address/bc1qpsmh26ja0fzzf286zulmt9eywujc2pggj40wzm, https://thorchain.net/address/bc1qgkjems88jyk8hasj9ncspxz093nepdn00vaq0y. Trading-wise, on-chain flows show concentrated activity across XMR, ETH, XRP, and LTC executed through THORChain, with the XMR price spike explicitly cited alongside the swap paths and amounts; source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/2012355506120344030, https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2012212936735912351, https://thorchain.net/address/bc1qpsmh26ja0fzzf286zulmt9eywujc2pggj40wzm, https://thorchain.net/address/bc1qgkjems88jyk8hasj9ncspxz093nepdn00vaq0y.

According to @santimentfeed, Litecoin LTC declined 8.6 percent over the past week while whale transactions on the network hit a five-week high based on Santiment on-chain data, source: Santiment X post dated Jan 13, 2026. According to @santimentfeed, Santiment states that historically assets show a significantly higher likelihood of price reversal following whale activity spikes, source: Santiment X post dated Jan 13, 2026. According to @santimentfeed, traders can monitor real-time LTC whale transactions via the linked Santiment dashboard to track potential inflection in on-chain activity, source: Santiment X post dated Jan 13, 2026.

According to @litecoin, Litecoin launched with a pre-announced start, zero insider allocation, and equal access to mine from day one, underscoring a fair-launch profile for LTC (source: @litecoin on X, Jan 3, 2026). For traders, the absence of insider allocations implies no insider unlock or vesting overhang to price in, with new supply primarily entering via proof-of-work mining rewards (sources: @litecoin on X, Jan 3, 2026; Litecoin.org).

According to @santimentfeed, weekend social data shows the largest increases in discussion for BTC, DOGE, ZEC, ETH, ADA, and LTC. According to @santimentfeed, BTC chatter is rising as posts compare its recent underperformance to gold and silver at all-time highs and debate 2026 upside, alongside narratives on scarcity and rotation between crypto and safe-haven metals. According to @santimentfeed, DOGE buzz is driven by sweepstakes and Robinhood giveaway chatter, with focus on price action, market cap, and the meme-finance role in portfolios. According to @santimentfeed, ZEC mentions concentrate on its privacy features, trading strategies, relative moves vs silver and BTC, and community interest in 2026-related themes. According to @santimentfeed, ETH trend strength reflects discussion around large ETH staking deposits attributed to BitMine and Tom Lee targets of $7,000–$9,000 by early 2026 and $20,000 long term, plus staking yields and large-holder strategy talk. According to @santimentfeed, ADA conversation centers on staking experiences, governance and protocol design, price analysis, and a privacy sidechain called NIGHT. According to @santimentfeed, LTC discussion highlights low fees, payment reliability, digital silver positioning, and usage references across treasuries, ETFs, IRAs, and wallets; onchain activity and price performance are also being debated. According to @santimentfeed, traders are watching these tickers for crowd-driven themes as social interest spikes across large-caps, privacy coins, and meme assets.

According to Litecoin, Charlie Lee said the market might recover to new highs in 2026, and the post labeled the comment as Bullish. Source: Litecoin on X, Dec 19, 2025. For trading context, the post offers a bullish outlook with a 2026 recovery horizon but includes no asset-specific targets or supporting metrics, indicating a sentiment cue rather than a data-backed trading signal. Source: Litecoin on X, Dec 19, 2025.

According to Litecoin, the official LTC account posted an IKEA monkey meme and included no product, roadmap, or market update in the message, indicating no direct fundamental news for LTC from this post; source: https://twitter.com/litecoin/status/1999336128831513078 The reference is to a 2012 Toronto IKEA incident that went viral, not to any on-chain or development change; source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-20667588 For traders, the content provides no fundamental catalyst; any potential sentiment impact would require separate market data analysis, which the post does not provide; source: https://twitter.com/litecoin/status/1999336128831513078

According to @litecoin, Litecoin usage is setting new all-time highs each cycle and MimbleWimble Extension Blocks (MWEB) just reached a record for peg-ins, indicating increased utilization of LTC’s privacy-extension layer (source: @litecoin on X, Dec 12, 2025). The source explicitly frames these metrics as proof that network effects are strengthening on Litecoin, highlighting an adoption-driven narrative relevant to trading decisions (source: @litecoin on X, Dec 12, 2025). The post provides no numerical figures or time series for verification, so traders should note the lack of disclosed data when assessing signals from this update (source: @litecoin on X, Dec 12, 2025).

According to @litecoin, Litecoin says LTC can be used globally for everyday payments, differentiating it from millions of tokens that cannot be used to pay for life. Source: Litecoin on X, Dec 11, 2025: https://twitter.com/litecoin/status/1999074871889063949 The post underscores a payments-first positioning for LTC and provides no merchant counts, processor names, or new integration details. Source: Litecoin on X, Dec 11, 2025: https://twitter.com/litecoin/status/1999074871889063949 For traders, this is utility-focused messaging rather than new fundamental data because the post discloses no adoption metrics or transaction figures. Source: Litecoin on X, Dec 11, 2025: https://twitter.com/litecoin/status/1999074871889063949

According to @litecoin, Bitcoin (BTC) and Litecoin (LTC) are long-running networks because fair launches foster wider distribution and resilient grassroots communities. Source: Litecoin on X, Dec 11, 2025. Both BTC (2009) and LTC (2011) use proof-of-work with no premine or ICO, meaning issuance comes from mining and follows transparent rules. Source: Bitcoin.org; Litecoin.org. For traders, neither BTC nor LTC has venture capital token unlock calendars, and both follow fixed halving schedules (BTC ~210,000 blocks; LTC ~840,000 blocks), which makes supply dynamics more predictable for positioning around emission changes. Source: Bitcoin.org; Litecoin.org. This contrasts with top-down, VC-funded tokens that can face supply cliffs tied to unlock schedules, an event risk tracked by token unlock calendars. Source: TokenUnlocks.

According to @litecoin, the amount of LTC pegged into Litecoin’s MimbleWimble Extension Blocks (MWEB) has reached a new all-time high, signaling record usage of optionally private addresses and storage, as relayed from Litecoin Foundation (@LTCFoundation). According to @litecoin, Litecoin Foundation (@LTCFoundation) stated this milestone shows MWEB as optional storage is increasingly recognized as a trusted feature of the Litecoin network.

According to @litecoin, the Litecoin network emphasizes uptime and reliability and is reportedly breaking its own usage records, positioning operational performance as its core value proposition, source: Litecoin on X, Dec 10, 2025. The post provides no quantitative metrics or timeframes for these records, so traders should seek independent validation before acting, source: Litecoin on X, Dec 10, 2025. Traders commonly verify such claims by tracking on-chain indicators like daily transactions, active addresses, and fee pressure as demand proxies, source: Glassnode Academy.

According to @litecoin, LTC is now officially live in BitwiseInvest’s 10 Crypto Index ETF, confirming Litecoin’s inclusion in the index product (source: Litecoin post on X, Dec 9, 2025). The announcement did not disclose the ETF ticker, allocation weight, or rebalancing schedule beyond stating that LTC is officially live (source: Litecoin post on X, Dec 9, 2025). The post tags @BitwiseInvest, indicating the referenced issuer for the 10 Crypto Index ETF (source: Litecoin post on X, Dec 9, 2025).

According to @litecoin, the Litecoin network is at its strongest level ever and usage has grown exponentially since 2011, signaling a payments-focused growth narrative for LTC traders, source: Litecoin account on X, Dec 8, 2025. According to @litecoin, Litecoin is the longest-running uninterrupted blockchain built for reliable payments, a reliability claim that traders can incorporate when assessing LTC market liquidity and execution risk, source: Litecoin account on X, Dec 8, 2025. According to @litecoin, opt-in privacy is available on the network, which can influence how traders plan address selection and venue workflows when transacting LTC, source: Litecoin account on X, Dec 8, 2025. Traders may monitor LTC pairs and on-chain activity to validate the stated usage growth and network strength before positioning for momentum or spread changes, source: Litecoin account on X, Dec 8, 2025.

According to @litecoin, the official account posted an anti-bank message on X without announcing any protocol changes, partnerships, or product releases, indicating no new fundamental catalyst for LTC trading, source: @litecoin on X, Dec 8, 2025. The post provides no roadmap details, on-chain metrics, or development disclosures, so traders should treat it as a sentiment-only headline rather than a catalyst-driven update, source: @litecoin on X, Dec 8, 2025.

According to @litecoin, at 5:45 pm MT on Dec 7, 2025, total active addresses across BTC, LTC, BCH, and DOGE were 430,364, with BTC at 114,597 (26.6%), LTC at 254,612 (59.2%), BCH at 22,387 (5.2%), and DOGE at 38,768 (9.0%) (source: @litecoin). According to @litecoin, the combined market cap was $1.837T, with BTC $1.798T (97.9%, rank 1), LTC $6.326B (rank 18), BCH $11.937B (rank 11), and DOGE $21.039B (1.2%, rank 9) (source: @litecoin). Based on @litecoin figures, LTC’s 59.2% address share versus an estimated ~0.34% of the four-asset market cap indicates the highest addresses-per-$1B ratio at ~40,242, compared with BTC ~64, DOGE ~1,843, and BCH ~1,875 (calculation from @litecoin data). Notably, the post states LTC at 0.03% and BCH at 0.06% of the combined market cap, while the posted dollar values imply ~0.34% and ~0.65% respectively, a discrepancy traders should note when screening relative on-chain activity versus valuation (source: @litecoin; calculation from @litecoin data).