According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x01ef sold 197 BTC for about $21.35M at $108,398 and then opened a 3x leveraged short totaling 561 BTC with roughly $60.89M notional (source: @lookonchain). The combined activity represents 197 BTC spot sold plus a 561 BTC short, equating to around 758 BTC of bearish exposure and approximately $82.24M positioned around the reported price level (source: @lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet 3FPtXq received 1,506 BTC worth about $163.5 million from a Galaxy Digital address roughly 30 minutes before the post, implying an average transfer value near $108.6k per BTC based on the stated figures, source: @lookonchain. The source identifies the sender as Galaxy Digital and provides no indication of any exchange deposit or further distribution beyond this single inbound transfer, source: @lookonchain. Traders monitoring BTC liquidity may watch for subsequent movements from this wallet to exchanges or custody addresses, but such follow-up details are not included in the source, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, a Bitcoin OG deposited another 2,000 BTC (about $217M) to Hyperliquid within the past hour, sold the BTC and bought ETH spot, implying an executed BTC-to-ETH rotation with an approximate $108.5k per BTC mark-to-market based on the stated figures (source: @lookonchain on X, Aug 30, 2025, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961674144762007966).

According to @lookonchain, 100M units of the USD1 token were minted on Solana roughly 50 minutes before the post time, with an explorer link and screenshot provided to verify the on-chain event, source: @lookonchain on X, Aug 30, 2025. According to @lookonchain, traders can track the mint address and subsequent transfers via the shared on-chain link to gauge whether liquidity is being deployed into Solana DeFi and market-making wallets, which can influence trading conditions and slippage in SOL-denominated pools, source: @lookonchain on X, Aug 30, 2025. According to @lookonchain, the post does not include issuer details, backing information, or exchange listings for USD1, so risk checks should rely on activity visible from the referenced mint address and any emergent pool creations, source: @lookonchain on X, Aug 30, 2025. According to @lookonchain, near-term watchpoints include new Raydium or Orca pools for USD1, large liquidity additions, and transfers to high-activity wallets interacting with the mint address shared in the post, source: @lookonchain on X, Aug 30, 2025.

According to Lookonchain, wallet 0x3c9E sold 7,800 ETH for about $34 million at an average execution price of $4,363 as the market dipped; source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961618001058521375. According to Lookonchain, the address was described as a buy-high-sell-low whale and the move was characterized as panic selling; source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961618001058521375. According to Lookonchain, this identifies a large holder’s executed sell level near $4,363 that traders can reference as a recent on-chain exit price; source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961618001058521375.

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x8cAB withdrew 12,410 ETH worth $53.74M from OKX over the past 15 hours, signaling continued whale buying and a notable exchange outflow in ETH. Source: @lookonchain. Large exchange outflows are commonly tracked as potential accumulation that can reduce immediate sell-side liquidity, a dynamic traders often view as supportive for price. Sources: Glassnode research; CryptoQuant insights. Outflow signals can reverse if funds are redeposited to exchanges, so monitoring follow-up on-chain movements and exchange netflows is critical for trade timing. Source: CryptoQuant education.

According to @lookonchain, a Bitcoin OG sold 2,000 BTC valued around $221M and bought 49,850 ETH worth about $219M on spot in the past 12 hours, source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, the wallet has accumulated a total of 691,358 ETH valued around $3B, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, the Bitcoin OG who previously accumulated 641,508 ETH valued at $2.94B has resumed activity after a two-day pause, signaling continued large-scale Ethereum accumulation. According to @lookonchain, the same wallet deposited another 1,000 BTC worth $108.27M to Hyperliquid, sold the BTC, and bought ETH on spot, with the wallet activity viewable via Hypurrscan address starting with 0x7c43. According to @lookonchain and Hypurrscan, this flow reflects direct BTC-to-ETH rotation on Hyperliquid spot, providing verifiable on-chain evidence of fresh ETH demand.

According to Lookonchain, Bitcoin ETFs recorded net inflows of +1,578 BTC (+$174.35M) on Aug 29, with iShares (BlackRock) contributing +568 BTC (+$62.738M) and holding 746,584 BTC valued at $82.5B, source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961423969975926859. Ethereum ETFs posted net inflows of +12,489 ETH (+$54.86M) the same day, with iShares receiving +15,127 ETH (+$66.45M), source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961423969975926859. Combined BTC and ETH ETF net inflows totaled approximately $229.21M on Aug 29, source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961423969975926859.

According to @lookonchain, influencer 0xSunNFT purchased 807,301 $Block for 30 $ETH (valued at $133.8K) on Aug 29, 2025; based on those figures, the implied average cost is roughly $0.166 per $Block (~0.0000372 ETH), source: Lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961392083237064809. @lookonchain also reports 0xSun previously realized over $24M profit from $TRUMP, source: Lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1961392083237064809.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xa523 closed a 31,559 ETH long position valued at $137.69M at a loss as ETH declined, while retaining a 55,286 ETH long worth $240.65M, with total realized losses of about $22M (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 29, 2025). According to @lookonchain, the wallet trimmed its ETH long exposure from approximately 86,845 ETH to 55,286 ETH, a reduction of roughly 36%, based on the reported figures (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 29, 2025; calculation based on Lookonchain data).

According to Lookonchain, Mantle has surpassed $4 billion in treasury assets, making it the top-ranked treasury in the market (source: Lookonchain post, Aug 29, 2025). For traders, the reported size and ranking underscore Mantle’s capital base relative to peers, a metric often referenced when evaluating protocol sustainability and ecosystem incentive capacity across L2 markets (source: Lookonchain post, Aug 29, 2025). Mantle’s native token is MNT following the BitDAO-to-Mantle migration, providing the network’s governance and economic unit (source: Mantle governance documentation).

According to @lookonchain, an early Ethereum ICO participant wallet 0x42D3 transferred 0.001 ETH after more than 10 years of inactivity. According to @lookonchain, the wallet owner invested $49 in the ICO and received 158 ETH, valued at approximately $694,000 at the time of reporting. According to @lookonchain, this implies a 14,177x return on the initial allocation, with the move flagged as a test transaction.

According to Lookonchain, whales accumulated WLD, AAVE, and UNI via large exchange withdrawals totaling about USD 26.84 million within the last two days; source: Lookonchain. Whale address 0xF436 withdrew 43,123 AAVE, approximately USD 13.87 million, from exchanges over the past two days; source: Lookonchain. Fresh wallet 0xC0D9 withdrew 9.325 million WLD, approximately USD 8.86 million, from Binance about 11 hours ago; source: Lookonchain. Fresh wallet 0x4940 withdrew 408,557 UNI, approximately USD 4.11 million, from Binance; source: Lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x746b deposited 5,125 ETH (about $22.95M) to Binance within the past hour and is up roughly $9.4M on the position (source: @lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, the funds were deposited to Binance, indicating an on-chain inflow to a centralized exchange (source: @lookonchain). Based on @lookonchain data, the transfer size implies approximately $4,480 per ETH (source: @lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x0895 has placed limit orders to short $XPL between $2 and $3 (source: @lookonchain, Aug 29, 2025). The post includes a link and screenshot indicating the specific price band where the short entries are queued (source: @lookonchain, Aug 29, 2025). Traders tracking $XPL may monitor the $2–$3 zone as the reported placement levels for these short orders (source: @lookonchain, Aug 29, 2025).

According to Lookonchain, whale address 0x9e8b, who previously realized over $15M in profit on Hyperliquid, opened a 20x leveraged long of 141,611 SOL with about $30.75M notional and a 25x leveraged short of 6,698 ETH with about $30M notional. According to Lookonchain, this positioning reflects a relative-value view favoring SOL over ETH on Hyperliquid. Based on figures provided by Lookonchain, the implied entry levels are roughly $217 per SOL and $4,477 per ETH, which traders can use to benchmark PnL sensitivity and risk management.

According to @lookonchain, a whale on Hyperliquid is attempting to manipulate $XPL to liquidate short positions. According to @lookonchain, in the past three hours the whale created four wallets and deposited $10M $USDC into Hyperliquid. According to @lookonchain, traders "shouldn't short $XPL unless you can survive a liquidation," citing the whale-driven setup.

According to Lookonchain, a newly created wallet 0x0C62 withdrew 17,836 ETH worth about $80.37 million from OKX over the past 4 hours on Aug 29, 2025 (source: Lookonchain). Based on those figures, the transfer equates to roughly $4,506 per ETH and reflects a movement of funds from an exchange into a fresh address outside exchange custody (source: Lookonchain).

According to Lookonchain, Tether minted another $1B USDT, bringing total USDT mints to $2B over the past 24 hours, highlighting a short-term jump in stablecoin supply that traders track as a liquidity signal; source: Lookonchain on X. Traders should monitor subsequent USDT treasury transfers to exchanges, USDT premiums or discounts versus USD, and changes in market depth as stablecoin issuance can precede shifts in crypto liquidity; source: Kaiko Research; Glassnode. Tether has previously stated that large mint transactions may be authorized but not issued for inventory and therefore do not immediately enter circulation, which can affect near-term interpretation of mint data; source: Tether. For trade setup, watch BTC and ETH basis, perpetual funding rates, and spot order book imbalance in case USDT inflows reach exchanges and impact risk appetite; source: Kaiko Research.