According to @lookonchain, 10 Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net outflow of 2,264 BTC worth $228.62M on Nov 6 (source: @lookonchain). BlackRock saw outflows of 3,609 BTC ($364.39M) and now holds 796,092 BTC valued at $80.38B (source: @lookonchain). BlackRock’s BTC outflow exceeded the aggregate net outflow, implying other BTC ETFs collectively had a net inflow of roughly 1,345 BTC on the day based on the reported totals (source: @lookonchain). For Ethereum, 9 ETFs posted a net outflow of 103,494 ETH totaling $341.12M (source: @lookonchain). BlackRock reported outflows of 77,112 ETH ($20.89M) and currently holds 3,892,951 ETH valued at $12.83B (source: @lookonchain). The figures imply the remaining ETH ETFs combined for an estimated net outflow of about 26,382 ETH on the day based on the reported totals (source: @lookonchain). BlackRock’s daily redemptions equate to roughly 0.45% of its BTC holdings and about 1.98% of its ETH holdings when measured against its reported positions (source: @lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, both machismallbrother.eth and @machibigbrother are currently long ETH with similar position sizes, citing on-chain tracking via Hyperdash dashboards hyperdash.info/trader/0xdDc7E50a83710f9c62eFB558bcD0f640314aE2F8 and hyperdash.info/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 and the report on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439. According to @lookonchain, @machibigbrother consistently uses maximum leverage, has been repeatedly liquidated, and has accumulated total losses exceeding $15M, as reflected on the Hyperdash PnL page hyperdash.info/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 and the X post twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439. According to @lookonchain, machismallbrother.eth employs moderate leverage and is currently up about $8.5M, corroborated by Hyperdash PnL data hyperdash.info/trader/0xdDc7E50a83710f9c62eFB558bcD0f640314aE2F8 and the X post twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439. According to @lookonchain, the explicit takeaway for traders is to avoid high-leverage gambling trades, based on the observed outcomes in these ETH long positions twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439. According to @lookonchain’s figures ($15M+ loss vs $8.5M+ gain), the performance gap between max leverage and moderate leverage on comparable ETH long sizing exceeds $23.5M, highlighting the material impact of leverage choice on realized PnL as shown by Hyperdash data and the X report hyperdash.info and twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439.

According to @lookonchain, trader Machi (@machibigbrother) was partially liquidated again on Hyperliquid and then deposited 262,500 USDC to add more ETH longs, source: @lookonchain on X. The current disclosed position is 3,000 ETH (approximately $9.81M) with a new liquidation price of $3,199.31, source: @lookonchain on X; Hyperdash tracker linked in the post. The Hyperdash page for the referenced Hyperliquid account confirms the updated position size and liquidation level cited, source: Hyperdash via @lookonchain. For trading purposes, the reported $3,199.31 liquidation level is a key near-term risk threshold tied to this whale’s ETH perpetuals exposure on Hyperliquid, source: @lookonchain on X; Hyperdash.

According to @lookonchain, USDX depegged to 0.3887 dollars, source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 6, 2025. A whale wallet 0xe454 quickly spent 800,000 USDT to buy 933,241 USDX at 0.8572 dollars immediately after the depeg, source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 6, 2025. This purchase adds to 1.4 million USDX acquired a week earlier, with the entire stack submitted for redemption, source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 6, 2025 and DeBank profile debank.com/profile/0xe454f0e8312ea34eaac839aadfca10af71b31f1c. If redemption succeeds, the estimated profit is about 135,000 dollars, source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 6, 2025. Three hours after submission, the wallet had not successfully redeemed, source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 6, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, three whale wallets accumulated a combined 17 million OVPP worth about 375,000 dollars over the past month, source: @lookonchain on X on Nov 6, 2025. According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xaca50a3a37d6f2ba49a9f9e3be949c342ac4b8a7 holds over 10 million dollars in assets and bought 7.6 million OVPP worth about 165,000 dollars from MEXC and decentralized exchanges, source: @lookonchain on X on Nov 6, 2025. According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xae84d81a8e74e5040a62300c66eb2181e38227ad bought 5.43 million OVPP worth about 117,000 dollars, source: @lookonchain on X on Nov 6, 2025. According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x3bd532ff803378e651d456cee741e0d858d265fa bought 3.97 million OVPP worth about 87,000 dollars, source: @lookonchain on X on Nov 6, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, address 0x540C withdrew 114.9M USDT from Aave, pushing USDT utilization on the core market to 92.83%, above the 92% optimal utilization threshold (source: @lookonchain; source: Etherscan tx 0x8427fc1c91a133c02f10999c089806ebff0296bae4c875f07ed379b649ba8549). According to Aave documentation, when utilization exceeds the optimal level, the kinked interest rate model increases variable borrow APRs sharply and lifts supply APYs due to the higher post-kink slope (source: Aave Docs – Interest Rate Strategy). Based on @lookonchain’s reported 92.83% utilization, USDT borrowing costs on Aave should rise while USDT suppliers see higher yields under the model mechanics (source: @lookonchain; source: Aave Docs – Interest Rate Strategy). For traders, monitoring Aave’s USDT variable borrow APR, supply APY, and available liquidity can inform decisions to repay variable USDT debt or supply USDT to capture elevated yields in line with the documented rate model (source: Aave Docs – Interest Rate Strategy; source: @lookonchain).

According to Lookonchain, utilization on Lista DAO’s vaults managed by MEV Capital and Re7 Labs reached 99%, triggering a forced liquidation on-chain. Source: Lookonchain. Lookonchain also reported that utilization rates on several DeFi platforms are now above 90% and advised users with funds deposited across protocols to stay safe. Source: Lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, Phase 2 of the @Stable Pre-Deposit has surpassed $253 million, reflecting substantial on-chain participation in the program; source: @lookonchain on X (Nov 6, 2025). Over 60 wallets incorrectly used contract addresses as receiving addresses during deposits, with mis-sent funds exceeding $2.34 million; source: @lookonchain on X and Etherscan address 0xd9b2cb2fbad204fc548787ef56b918c845fcce40. The source issued a risk warning urging users to double-check receiving addresses before depositing to avoid sending funds to the wrong address; source: @lookonchain on X.

According to Lookonchain, BlackRock deposited 4,653 BTC ($478.5M) and 57,455 ETH ($194.9M) to Coinbase Prime, based on Arkham Intelligence entity tracking cited by Lookonchain. Lookonchain reports that the BlackRock-linked wallets are attributed via Arkham Intelligence’s entity labels. The combined transfers total approximately $673.4M using Lookonchain’s reported figures.

According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet deposited 7M USDC to Hyperliquid and opened 20x short positions on BTC and XRP. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 6, 2025 The positions are 1,129 BTC about 116M dollars and 8,888,888 XRP about 20.35M dollars, totaling roughly 136M dollars notional from around 7M dollars margin at 20x. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 6, 2025 On-chain and explorer links identify wallet 0x7B7b908c076B9784487180dE92E7161c2982734E on Hypurrscan and Arkham Intelligence, with history indicating usage of Roobet and Stake.com. Source: Lookonchain on X, Hypurrscan 0x7B7b908c076B9784487180dE92E7161c2982734E, Arkham Intelligence addresses 0x7B7b908c076B9784487180dE92E7161c2982734E and 0x8E68C36E0727420aBC466c7A5eA6593ca58A7aeA This represents concentrated short exposure in a single account on Hyperliquid BTC and XRP perpetuals. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 6, 2025

According to @PANewsCN, citing Lookonchain, wallet 0x1527 that previously realized over $14M in profits on Hyperliquid deposited 25.56M USDC into Hyperliquid and began accumulating HYPE (source: @PANewsCN on X: https://twitter.com/PANewsCN/status/1986390742483542517; Lookonchain on X: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1986386906666742076). According to @PANewsCN and Lookonchain, the address has purchased 92,173 HYPE worth about $3.68M so far, indicating notable buy-side flow concentrated on HYPE markets (source: @PANewsCN on X: https://twitter.com/PANewsCN/status/1986390742483542517; Lookonchain on X: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1986386906666742076). According to the same sources, the reported HYPE buys (~$3.68M) represent a fraction of the $25.56M USDC deposit, a gap traders can monitor for additional order flow and liquidity impact on Hyperliquid’s HYPE order books (source: @PANewsCN on X: https://twitter.com/PANewsCN/status/1986390742483542517; Lookonchain on X: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1986386906666742076).

According to @lookonchain, the address machismallbrother.eth deposited 1M USDC to Hyperliquid roughly an hour ago and opened a 10x long position totaling 2,900 ETH with $9.8M notional (source: Lookonchain on X; Hyperdash trader page). According to @lookonchain, the trader is currently in profit with total PnL exceeding $8.9M (source: Lookonchain on X; Hyperdash trader page). According to @lookonchain, these figures are derived from live account metrics viewable on the referenced Hyperdash profile for the address (source: Lookonchain on X; Hyperdash trader page).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x1527 deposited 25.56M USDC and began accumulating HYPE on Nov 6, 2025, source: @lookonchain. The wallet has purchased 92,173 HYPE totaling $3.68M so far, implying an average cost near $39.9 per HYPE based on reported totals, source: @lookonchain. The address highlighted is 0x15271757b398cd1d3d7cca05c4f7b0c159afa7c2 as linked via hypurrscan.io, source: @lookonchain. The same wallet previously realized over $14M profit on Hyperliquid, source: @lookonchain. Based on the stated deposit and filled amount, roughly $21.88M USDC remains unspent as of this report, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet 0x96ea opened a long on ZEC three days ago and is showing about $2.7M in unrealized profit, based on the on-chain post and the referenced address at hypurrscan.io/address/0x96eaaf0375a6c5ecfc4980503bc8ce6c0192616d. According to @lookonchain, the position size is 32,000 ZEC with an estimated notional value of $16.3M, as reflected in the on-chain data link. According to @lookonchain, the liquidation price is $373.13, providing a clear risk threshold for monitoring this large ZEC long.

According to @lookonchain, multiple whale wallets collectively bought 394,682 ETH in the past 3 days, totaling approximately $1.37 billion (source: @lookonchain, X, Nov 6, 2025). According to @lookonchain, the purchases were made by many large addresses over the stated 3-day window (source: @lookonchain). Based on figures reported by @lookonchain, the implied average acquisition price is roughly $3,472 per ETH, calculated from $1.37B divided by 394,682 (source: @lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, Machi (@machibigbrother) re-entered the market on Hyperliquid, raising 525K USDC to go long ETH after a prior liquidation, source: @lookonchain. The current position is 2,550 ETH with an indicated value of about $8.72M, source: @lookonchain. The reported liquidation price is $3,250.5, a key risk threshold that traders may monitor for potential forced-selling pressure, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 6UFLbg spent $10,000 to buy 993,165 $GHOST on Nov 5, 2025; wallet: 6UFLbgXz8LX19WbQWZ5zC34oVteXzLbKHXcPfE1hKhvo (source: @lookonchain on X, 2025-11-05). The trader previously made $10.9 million on $TRUMP, per the same on-chain report (source: @lookonchain on X, 2025-11-05). Based on those figures, the estimated average entry cost is about $0.0101 per GHOST, calculated from data reported by the source (source: @lookonchain on X, 2025-11-05).

According to @lookonchain, wallet sencrazy.eth deposited 20,002 $GIGGLE back to Binance two days ago, valued at about $1.67M, after withdrawing the same amount six days earlier, representing roughly a $484K loss versus the withdrawal basis (source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence address data). @lookonchain adds that $GIGGLE has since surged about 250% from its bottom and doubled relative to the deposit price, implying that if the tokens were sold on deposit, the trader is now missing approximately $1.67M in profit (source: @lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet 0x93c5753e47ae857c372fc2ebaa5f9b58f3d3902a deposited 2.5 million USDC into Hyperliquid and opened max leverage long positions in BTC, PUMP, and FARTCOIN, source: @lookonchain. On-chain records for 0x93c5 confirm the Hyperliquid deposit and position activity tied to this address, source: Hypurrscan address 0x93c5753e47ae857c372fc2ebaa5f9b58f3d3902a. Traders tracking potential volatility and liquidation risk on these pairs can monitor this wallet and Hyperliquid funding and open interest to gauge positioning pressure, source: @lookonchain; Hypurrscan.

According to Lookonchain, ten Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded net outflows of 5,057 BTC valued at $519.48 million on Nov 5, with Fidelity responsible for 3,552 BTC in redemptions and holding 201,225 BTC worth $20.67 billion, source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 5, 2025). Across nine Ethereum spot ETFs, net outflows totaled 12,408 ETH valued at $41.57 million on the same day; Fidelity redeemed 6,237 ETH and now holds 738,962 ETH worth $2.48 billion, source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 5, 2025). Fidelity accounted for roughly 70% of BTC ETF outflows (3,552 of 5,057 BTC) and about 50% of ETH ETF outflows (6,237 of 12,408 ETH) based on the reported figures, source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 5, 2025).