According to @lookonchain, Machi (@machibigbrother) was partially liquidated again and now holds 4,800 ETH (~$15.25M) with a new liquidation price of $3,136.98 and a total PnL of -$21.52M, source: Lookonchain on X dated Dec 11, 2025. Earlier, the account closed 2,100 ETH (~$6.72M) but still faced partial liquidation with 7,200 ETH at a liquidation price of $3,171.59 before sizing down, source: Lookonchain on X dated Dec 11, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, trader 1011short added 20,000 ETH worth about $63.3M to an existing long as the market fell, taking the total position to 140,094 ETH (approximately $442M) with a stated liquidation price of $2,387.28. source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1999133026484465751 The position was previously reported at 120,094 ETH (around $392.5M) with a liquidation price of $2,234.69, corroborated by the referenced Hyperdash trader page. source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1998919895493566545; https://legacy.hyperdash.com/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae The trade’s PnL shifted from over $26M profit to more than $2.4M in losses during the drawdown, highlighting elevated liquidation risk. source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1998919895493566545 For trading, the $2,387.28 level is the key liquidation threshold for this large ETH long to monitor for risk management. source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1999133026484465751

According to @lookonchain, Bitcoin ETFs posted a 1D net flow of +3,016 BTC valued at $271.71 million and a 7D net flow of +1,373 BTC valued at $123.7 million. Source: Lookonchain on X, Dec 11, 2025. Ethereum ETFs recorded a 1D net flow of +19,434 ETH valued at $61.8 million and a 7D net flow of +39,594 ETH valued at $125.91 million. Source: Lookonchain on X, Dec 11, 2025. Solana ETFs saw a 1D net flow of +75,119 SOL valued at $9.84 million and a 7D net flow of +323,438 SOL valued at $42.37 million. Source: Lookonchain on X, Dec 11, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, address bc1qszp0kxgzhm4cmpd03ugerp8lw6syrgvklgjr2g deposited 2,000 BTC, valued at about $180.33M, into Binance on Dec 11, 2025, based on on-chain tracking and exchange address attribution; source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1999125044145090696 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/bc1qszp0kxgzhm4cmpd03ugerp8lw6syrgvklgjr2g. The same whale previously received 5,000 BTC worth about $463.55M from Matrixport on Dec 4 and 5 at a reference price of $92,710, per the transaction history flagged by Lookonchain and visible on the Arkham Intelligence address page; source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1999125044145090696 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/bc1qszp0kxgzhm4cmpd03ugerp8lw6syrgvklgjr2g. Post-transfer, these 2,000 BTC reside in a Binance-labeled address cluster rather than the whale’s self-custody wallet, indicating the coins are now held on an exchange venue, as shown by Arkham Intelligence’s labeling; source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/bc1qszp0kxgzhm4cmpd03ugerp8lw6syrgvklgjr2g.

According to @lookonchain, trader 0xa43d opened an ETH long near the local peak 14 hours ago and is down $3.24 million over that period, source: @lookonchain on X. @lookonchain reports the trader partially closed the position 3 hours ago, realizing a $583.5K loss, source: @lookonchain on X. The address still holds 11,793 ETH long valued at $37.6 million with $2.66 million in unrealized losses, and the position metrics are viewable on the Hyperdash trader page, source: @lookonchain on X; source: Hyperdash. The source flags this as FOMO-driven long exposure at local highs, underscoring elevated risk for levered entries at peaks, source: @lookonchain on X.

According to @lookonchain, FTX/Alameda unstaked 194,861 SOL, approximately 25.5 million USD, about three hours ago. Source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1999035229311475969 @lookonchain also reports that FTX/Alameda unlocks SOL on a monthly schedule. Source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1999035229311475969 The Alameda Research on-chain entity and related wallet flows can be monitored via Arkham Intelligence. Source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/alameda-research The cited post does not mention transfers to exchanges; traders can monitor the Arkham dashboard for subsequent movements. Source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1999035229311475969 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/alameda-research

According to Lookonchain, a newly created wallet labeled 6pj7c4 withdrew 37,002 SOL valued around $4.84 million from Binance, as posted on Dec 11, 2025. Source: Lookonchain on X. Lookonchain also shared an Arkham Intel explorer address referencing the wallet for on-chain viewing. Source: Lookonchain via Arkham Intel link.

According to @lookonchain, a whale exchanged 1,466 BTC valued around USD 132M now for 43,649 ETH valued around USD 139M now over the past 16 days, indicating a large BTC to ETH rotation based on on-chain traces (source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1998973903436394743). The swaps are traceable via the THORChain swap address 0x9F619C4F0E0519ead0aA4F35ceA7aF313D35A87c (source: https://thorchain.net/address/0x9F619C4F0E0519ead0aA4F35ceA7aF313D35A87c). Related wallet activity is visible on Arkham Intelligence at 0x9F619C4F0E0519ead0aA4F35ceA7aF313D35A87c and 0x7Cb55E2503877fb46d8b30ff6Bb4735Ffcc17dfc (source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x9F619C4F0E0519ead0aA4F35ceA7aF313D35A87c and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x7Cb55E2503877fb46d8b30ff6Bb4735Ffcc17dfc). Based on the reported unit counts, the flow implies roughly 29.8 ETH per BTC and a combined current notional near USD 271M, derived from the same figures shared by @lookonchain (source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1998973903436394743).

According to @lookonchain, Machi (@machibigbrother) was partially liquidated on his ETH long on Hyperliquid after closing 2,100 ETH worth $6.72M early, and he now holds 7,200 ETH worth $22.93M with a new liquidation price at $3,171.59; source: Lookonchain on X x.com/lookonchain/status/1998954080153346337. According to @lookonchain, prior to the partial liquidation he deposited 254,727 USDC into Hyperliquid to increase his ETH long to 11,100 ETH worth $36.36M with a liquidation price of $3,201.04; source: Lookonchain on X x.com/lookonchain/status/1998921777293250656 and Hyperliquid trader page legacy.hyperdash.com/trader/0x020cA66C30beC2c4Fe3861a94E4DB4A498A35872. According to @lookonchain, the liquidation threshold shifted from $3,201.04 to $3,171.59 as the position moved from 11,100 ETH to 7,200 ETH, indicating reduced size after partial liquidation; source: Lookonchain on X x.com/lookonchain/status/1998921777293250656 and x.com/lookonchain/status/1998954080153346337.

According to @lookonchain, Machi deposited another 254,727 USDC on Hyperliquid to continue longing ETH, bringing his position to 11,100 ETH valued at $36.36M, source: @lookonchain. According to the Hyperdash trader page referenced by @lookonchain, the position’s liquidation price is $3,201.04, source: Hyperdash trader page. For traders, the $3,201 level marks the key risk threshold for this account’s ETH long on Hyperliquid, source: Hyperdash trader page and @lookonchain.

According to Lookonchain, the trader known as BitcoinOG (1011short) has expanded his ETH long to 120,094 ETH valued at $392.5M, as reported by Lookonchain on X and evidenced by the linked Hyperdash trader page. According to Lookonchain on X, the position’s liquidation price is $2,234.69. The Hyperdash trader page referenced by Lookonchain corroborates the position size and provides ongoing updates. For traders, the $2,234.69 level is the key liquidation threshold for this account, per Lookonchain on X.

According to @lookonchain, Tom Lee’s Bitmine accumulated 33,504 ETH valued at USD 112.06 million over the past 6 hours, based on wallet activity flagged in their post on X dated Dec 11, 2025 (source: @lookonchain on X). The accumulation is tied to Arkham Intelligence–labeled addresses 0xfc5e6F1c3c5c8fc2eBdc9321EC6EeA4e57f5C185 and 0x4E6524E7A22961D55e0c5f523dF8E740275B67Af referenced by @lookonchain (source: Arkham Intelligence explorer and @lookonchain on X). This implies an average acquisition price of roughly USD 3,346 per ETH and a pace of about 5,584 ETH per hour during the window, derived from the totals reported by @lookonchain (source: @lookonchain on X). Traders can monitor subsequent transfers from these addresses to exchange-labeled wallets as potential liquidity signals, which are observable via Arkham Intelligence’s explorer (source: Arkham Intelligence explorer).

According to Lookonchain, Bitcoin mining firm MARA transferred 275 BTC worth approximately $25.31 million to FalconX about two hours ago, highlighting a notable miner outflow event for traders to monitor. According to Arkham Intelligence, the sender cluster is labeled under the mara-pool entity, linking the transaction to the miner’s pool and providing on-chain attribution for the flow. According to FalconX, the firm operates an institutional prime brokerage and OTC platform for large digital asset transactions, making miner transfers to FalconX relevant for assessing potential liquidity events. According to CryptoQuant research, increases in miner outflows to off-ramps are historically tracked as potential sell-side supply indicators, which is why this transfer may be relevant to short-term BTC order flow analysis.

According to Lookonchain, Bitcoin ETFs saw 1D net inflows of +445 BTC (+$40.87M) but 7D net outflows of -1,992 BTC (-$182.9M), signaling net weekly redemption despite a positive day (Source: Lookonchain). According to Lookonchain, Ethereum ETFs posted 1D net inflows of +35,347 ETH (+$117.71M) and 7D net inflows of +56,619 ETH (+$188.54M), with today’s flow equating to roughly 62% of the weekly total, indicating concentrated demand today based on the reported figures (Source: Lookonchain). According to Lookonchain, Solana ETFs recorded 1D net inflows of +74,573 SOL (+$10.23M) and 7D net inflows of +365,333 SOL (+$50.42M), showing sustained multi-day buying per the weekly tally (Source: Lookonchain). According to Lookonchain, the relative picture shows ETH and SOL attracting both daily and weekly inflows while BTC remains net negative on the week, a flow rotation that traders can track for ETH/BTC and SOL/BTC relative strength using these ETF demand signals (Source: Lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, BlackRock deposited 2,196 BTC, worth about USD 202.76 million, to Coinbase Prime, citing Arkham Intelligence data on the BlackRock-labeled entity and its transfer path to an exchange address (source: Lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence). Arkham Intelligence’s BlackRock entity page lists the attributed wallets and transaction traces that correspond to the reported BTC movement into a Coinbase Prime address, supporting the exchange inflow alert (source: Arkham Intelligence; Lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, an early Ethereum ICO wallet (0x782f52f0a676c77716d574c81ec4684f9a020a97) holding 850 ETH (~$2.82M) transferred 1 ETH to Coinbase after more than 10 years of inactivity; source: @lookonchain. Etherscan records show the wallet address and the outbound 1 ETH transaction to a Coinbase-related address; source: Etherscan (address 0x782f52f0a676c77716d574c81ec4684f9a020a97). @lookonchain states the wallet initially received 850 ETH for $263.5 during the ICO, implying a 10,684x return at the cited valuation; source: @lookonchain. Traders can monitor this wallet on Etherscan for any additional transfers to exchanges for timely on-chain updates; source: Etherscan.

According to @lookonchain, SpaceX transferred 1,021 BTC valued at $94.48M on Dec 10, 2025 (source: Lookonchain on X). @lookonchain linked Arkham Intelligence’s SpaceX entity page showing the BTC originated from a wallet labeled as belonging to SpaceX (source: Arkham Intelligence via Lookonchain). @lookonchain stated the destination may be Coinbase Prime for custody, which is unconfirmed (source: Lookonchain on X).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x76AB sold 1,654 ETH for 5.49M USDC, deposited the funds to Hyperliquid, and opened a 7x ETH long totaling 11,543 ETH valued at 38.4M USD with a liquidation price at 2,907.6 USD, source: @lookonchain; Hypurrscan.

According to @lookonchain, buying exactly at a DEX listing announcement is increasingly unprofitable, illustrated by DOYR trades on BSC where wallet 0xa7b5 paid an extra 6.8 BNB in tips and spent 44.8 BNB to buy 2.55M DOYR but exited for 32.12 BNB, a $17.4K loss; transactions: https://bscscan.com/tx/0x287d076fc6cf33d24920d5fbc53fa9205e5758a1b3a245d3f89193ddc12005c5 and https://bscscan.com/tx/0x1c48dfa8b40364505027ad4278ed83dca91abcd7a9636514afa49eee1d075ea7, source: Lookonchain and BscScan. According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x8A70 paid only 0.794 BNB in gas, spent 239 BNB to buy 28.8M DOYR, and sold for 282.5 BNB, a $38K profit equal to roughly a 15% return; source: Lookonchain and the BscScan links above. According to @lookonchain, 0xa7b5 tipped more yet still executed one second later than 0x8A70, showing higher tips do not guarantee priority in gas wars; source: Lookonchain. According to @lookonchain and the cited BscScan transactions, this case signals a shrinking edge and compressed returns for BSC listing snipes, where execution timing and fee strategy can turn aggressive entries into losses even with high tips; source: Lookonchain and BscScan.

According to @lookonchain, someone hacked @heyibinance’s WeChat account, posted about $Mubarakah, and sent the token’s price soaring. According to @lookonchain, the attacker created two new wallets (0x6739 and 0xD0B8) about 7 hours earlier and spent 19,479 USDT to buy 21.16M $Mubarakah. According to @lookonchain, after the pump the attacker sold 11.95M $Mubarakah for 43,520 USDT, still holds 9.21M $Mubarakah valued around $31K across 0x6739b732C14515997Caa8deCb6C047dc1c02Fb9c and 0xD0B8Ea6AF32A4F44Ed7F8A5E4E7b959239f5AE1D, and has realized a total profit of $55K.