According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited the final 2,074 ETH valued at approximately $8.97M to Kraken and booked $6.07M in profit, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen. The address accumulated a total of 3,289 ETH for $6.43M between Sept 4, 2021 and Dec 9, 2024, implying an average cost near $1,955 per ETH, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen, calculations based on reported figures. At the time of the final deposit, the 2,074 ETH were valued at about $4,326 per ETH, while the stated profit implies an average realized gain of roughly $1,846 per ETH across the full 3,289 ETH, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen, calculations based on reported figures. The transfer address is 0x92cbb22a9b9fc01da9914c9b39ed904dd61b859c, source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale closed a 15x ETH long and realized a $35.39M loss (source: @OnchainLens; hyperdash.info). The same wallet opened a BTC short of 1,106.93 BTC with 25x leverage, notional value $122.6M (source: @OnchainLens; hyperdash.info). Traders can review the wallet’s on-chain derivatives activity for execution timing and size to assess BTC and ETH perp flow (source: hyperdash.info; @OnchainLens).

According to @OnchainLens and on-chain data from Hypurrscan, a newly created wallet deposited $3M USDC into HyperLiquid and opened a 20x ETH long sized at 7,174 ETH (~$30.8M) with an entry price of $4,292 and a reported liquidation price of $3,954 (source: Onchain Lens post on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7282B8e6690d5cA20462E53C26Fb78F2954fAD88). These parameters mark a concentrated liquidation level at $3,954 for 7,174 ETH exposure on HyperLiquid, as reported by @OnchainLens and shown on Hypurrscan (source: Onchain Lens; Hypurrscan).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited $14.53 million into HyperLiquid and opened a SOL long position with 2x leverage on Sep 5, 2025 (source: x.com/OnchainLens/status/1964114044740383176). The referenced address 0x560C61542E21544749Cd5DC8fd3ad0C4B78A3997 is viewable on HypurrScan for on-chain transaction details tied to this activity (source: hypurrscan.io/address/0x560C61542E21544749Cd5DC8fd3ad0C4B78A3997). Traders monitoring SOL perpetuals on HyperLiquid can track subsequent changes in open interest and funding rates to assess follow-through from this whale flow (sources: x.com/OnchainLens/status/1964114044740383176; hyperliquid.xyz).

According to @OnchainLens, an on-chain whale deposited 5M USDC into Hyperliquid and opened a 3x leveraged long on HYPE, with the activity viewable on Hypurrscan: hypurrscan.io/address/0x363db8A8387d59B4b53e473FC9C12fbF7994F0ef. According to @OnchainLens, the same address also holds long positions in ETH at 5x, PUMP at 3x, and PENGU at 3x on Hyperliquid. According to @OnchainLens, the address has open orders for HYPE and WLFI to further increase its position.

According to Onchain Lens, trader James Wynn was fully liquidated on a 25x ETH long, realizing a loss of 10,025 USD on Sep 5, 2025 (source: Onchain Lens). The event is tied to wallet 0x5078C2fBeA2b2aD61bc840Bc023E35Fce56BeDb6, as recorded on the Hyperdash trader page that details the liquidation and loss amount (source: Hyperdash). This was a complete position wipeout with no remaining exposure on the trade (source: Onchain Lens).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet received 14,000 MKR worth $24.74M from FalconX, with the recipient address 0xb2c70fb9e2297eff3a98c4bdf1a81a3d005b843b, source: @OnchainLens on X, Sep 5, 2025. The reported totals imply an average transfer value of about $1,767 per MKR based on the $24.74M figure and 14,000 MKR size, source: @OnchainLens on X, Sep 5, 2025.

According to Onchain Lens, trader James Wynn’s wallet (0x5078C2fBeA2b2aD61bc840Bc023E35Fce56BeDb6) was liquidated six times consecutively on 25x ETH long positions, as displayed on the linked HyperDash tracker, source: Onchain Lens; HyperDash. Onchain Lens characterized this streak as a potential contrarian top signal for ETH, suggesting that fading this wallet’s positions has been a theme in their observation, source: Onchain Lens. Traders can verify the liquidation history and monitor subsequent activity via the HyperDash public profile for the wallet shared by Onchain Lens, source: HyperDash; Onchain Lens.

According to @OnchainLens, whales and institutions accumulated a total of 82,709 ETH worth about $356.46M across multiple large transfers on Sep 5, 2025, source: Onchain Lens. Bitmine received 48,225 ETH valued at $207.54M from BitGo, source: Arkham Intelligence entity Bitmine and Onchain Lens. Newly created wallet 0xAF8 withdrew 12,692 ETH worth $54.84M from OKX, source: Arkham Intelligence address 0xAF8 and Onchain Lens. Newly created wallet 0xC77 received 18,404 ETH worth $79.45M from FalconX, source: Arkham Intelligence address 0xC77 and Onchain Lens. Another newly created wallet received 3,388 ETH worth $14.63M from FalconX and now holds 18,388 ETH ($79.14M) in total, source: Arkham Intelligence address 0x07BcD and Onchain Lens. These flows consolidate ETH into new wallets and Bitmine, which @OnchainLens characterizes as accumulation and a shift of supply away from centralized venues, source: Onchain Lens.

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, an Ethereum ICO participant has staked 150,000 ETH worth approximately $656 million to the ETH2 deposit contract after 8 years of inactivity (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the participant originally received 300,000 ETH for $93,300 during the ICO, implying an estimated cost basis of about $0.31 per ETH based on those figures (source: @OnchainLens). The staking address is 0x317BcFCC8d645e365A796eb505b57c060aC2132B and the ICO address is 0x7c532DB9E0c06C26fd40Acc56AC55C1eE92D3C3A, according to @OnchainLens with Nansen as the data source (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). At 32 ETH per validator, the 150,000 ETH stake is equivalent to roughly 4,687 validator lots, per Ethereum Foundation specifications (source: Ethereum Foundation).

According to @OnchainLens, World Liberty blacklisted an address associated with Justin Sun, freezing 540 million WLFI in unlocked tokens and 2.4 billion WLFI in locked tokens. Source: Onchain Lens X post dated Sep 4, 2025 and the Etherscan transaction https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0230880850ae1daebdb1a9984f0f6b1601390bbe4738152556738aa901862d74. According to @OnchainLens, World Liberty alleged that an exchange used customer tokens to sell and depress WLFI price. Source: Onchain Lens X post dated Sep 4, 2025. According to @OnchainLens, Justin Sun invested 75 million dollars to buy 3 billion WLFI across November 2024 and January 2025. Source: Onchain Lens X post dated Sep 4, 2025. For traders, the blacklisting event and the related allegations are material for monitoring WLFI liquidity and address risk, which can be checked via the referenced Etherscan transaction and related address activity. Source: Etherscan link provided by Onchain Lens.

According to @OnchainLens, three newly created wallets received 65,662 ETH valued at $293.09 million from FalconX on September 4, 2025 (source: @OnchainLens). The recipient addresses are 0x6f4339c635DC663e4eB81aCf8C79a93f36D4f925, 0xb079F8C9F086205C3fA3B5aD47e199Ea2D2086A7, and 0x75166e41FE1Bfb0B8081F0C60131820C704994dc, per @OnchainLens. Based on the figures reported by @OnchainLens, the transfer implies roughly $4,467 per ETH, highlighting a sizable on-chain move that traders can monitor by tracking subsequent activity from these addresses (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @OnchainLens, a Bitcoin wallet dormant for 12.8 years sent 0.25 BTC, valued around $28,000 (source: https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1963420572517634214). The same address still holds 479.44 BTC, worth approximately $53.56 million, per the reported figures (source: https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1963420572517634214). The 0.25 BTC transfer equals roughly 0.052% of the wallet’s current 479.44 BTC balance, calculated from those reported amounts (source: https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1963420572517634214).

According to @OnchainLens, Bitmine (BitMNR) added 14,665.5 ETH worth $65.32M to its ETH holdings within the past 50 minutes (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, Bitmine now holds 1,881,639 ETH valued at $8.39B (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 692 BTC (about $77.32 million) from Galaxy Digital to address 3DavyTWVZ1TXTY6tAzw4dRg3jceSpuJ3YS; source: @OnchainLens. Timestamp: Sep 4, 2025; source: @OnchainLens.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet labeled 0x900 withdrew 17,000 ETH valued at USD 75.81 million from Binance, indicating a large single-entity outflow from the exchange (source: Onchain Lens). According to @OnchainLens, a separate whale wallet labeled 0x8e0 withdrew 2,312 ETH valued at USD 10.31 million from Kraken, marking another sizable exchange withdrawal (source: Onchain Lens). According to @OnchainLens, the combined withdrawals total 19,312 ETH worth approximately USD 86.12 million based on the reported valuations, with implied withdrawal prices near USD 4,459 per ETH for the Binance transaction and roughly USD 4,461 per ETH for the Kraken transaction derived from the provided figures (source: Onchain Lens). According to @OnchainLens, the addresses shared include 0x90013e5fdd23ef161fb4154cfb239cb2a904b53b, and the activity was characterized as whales accumulating ETH (source: Onchain Lens).

According to Onchain Lens, Justin Sun deposited 5.289 million WLFI valued at approximately 1.19 million USD into HTX over the past two days, based on Nansen on-chain data. According to Onchain Lens citing Nansen, Sun has spent about 75 million USD to acquire 3 billion WLFI and also received 600 million WLFI via a token unlock. According to Onchain Lens, the activity is associated with address 0x5ab26169051d0d96217949adb91e86e51a5fda74 as identified by Nansen.

According to @OnchainLens, a tracked whale withdrew 12,869 ETH, valued at $55.59 million, from OKX on September 3, 2025, based on Nansen data (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The same report states the whale-controlled address 0x3e649a45ef11A36ac39FebCb8Ce9BA515c817520 now holds 17,969 ETH worth $77.62 million, consolidating funds off-exchange at that address (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). This move reduces this wallet’s ETH available on OKX by 12,869 ETH and shifts liquidity to self-custody, which traders track via exchange netflows and large-wallet activity dashboards (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The reported USD figures imply an approximate reference price of about $4,320 per ETH at the time of reporting, derived from the values provided (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @OnchainLens, an Ethereum whale deposited 7,500 ETH worth about $32.4M to Binance, locking in a profit of $6.7M, source: @OnchainLens on X. The same entity had withdrawn 15,202 ETH valued at roughly $58.8M about 1.5 months earlier, source: @OnchainLens on X. Afterward, the whale moved 2,801 ETH worth about $11.85M to a new wallet and borrowed $5M in USDC, which was later deposited to Binance, source: @OnchainLens on X.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited $3.25M USDC into HyperLiquid and opened short positions in BTC at 40x leverage and ETH at 25x, supported by their alert and accompanying screenshot (source: @OnchainLens on X, Sep 3, 2025). At 40x and 25x leverage, adverse moves of roughly 2.5% and 4% from entry can trigger liquidation on isolated margin based on standard crypto futures margin formulas (source: Binance Futures leverage and margin documentation, accessed prior to Oct 2024). Traders can monitor HyperLiquid funding rate shifts, open interest changes, and liquidation levels to gauge near-term volatility signals tied to this position set-up (source: HyperLiquid documentation on funding, open interest, and liquidation metrics; reference: @OnchainLens on X).