According to @StockMKTNewz, RKLB, CRWV, RGTI, and ASTS are scheduled to report earnings after the U.S. stock market close today. According to @StockMKTNewz, these tickers are described as FinTwit favorite names. According to @StockMKTNewz, the post does not cite any direct cryptocurrency market impact.

According to @caprioleio, CCCX is a SPAC trading around a 5 billion post merger valuation and he views it as the most obvious 2X if the quantum sector holds current levels, source: @caprioleio on X, Oct 27, 2025. He compares CCCX with IONQ at about 20 billion, QBTS at about 10 billion, and RGTI at about 12 billion, stating CCCX has similar revenues to IONQ and higher than QBTS and RGTI, source: @caprioleio on X, Oct 27, 2025. He states the company is targeting more than 1000 logical qubits within five years, source: @caprioleio on X, Oct 27, 2025. He adds the firm is partnered with all arms of US defense and was recently named quantum company of the year, source: @caprioleio on X, Oct 27, 2025. He notes backing from NVIDIA and investments from the UK, US, and Australian governments, source: @caprioleio on X, Oct 27, 2025. He cautions there are risks and advises investors to do their own research, source: @caprioleio on X, Oct 27, 2025.

According to @KobeissiLetter, quantum computing stocks rallied after Rigetti (RGTI) said it is in ongoing talks with the U.S. government regarding quantum funding, prompting a theme-wide surge driven by headline flow (source: @KobeissiLetter on X, Oct 23, 2025). The same source notes a rapid sequence of conflicting reports in the past 12 hours: The Wall Street Journal reported the Trump administration is taking a stake, Yahoo Finance disputed the WSJ report, and Rigetti’s update aligns with the WSJ narrative by confirming talks, while no funding amounts or timelines were disclosed in the cited post (sources: @KobeissiLetter summarizing WSJ, Yahoo Finance, and Rigetti’s statement).

According to @StockMKTNewz, CNBC reports that Rigetti (RGTI) says it is in ongoing talks with the U.S. government on quantum funding, indicating active discussions rather than a finalized award, source: @StockMKTNewz; CNBC. For traders, potential federal backing can serve as a policy-driven catalyst by signaling prospective non-dilutive capital and future contract visibility in the quantum-computing space, source: CNBC via @StockMKTNewz; U.S. National Quantum Initiative program overview (U.S. government sources). For crypto markets, increased U.S. investment focus on quantum technology keeps attention on post-quantum cryptography transition timelines outlined by NIST, which remains a risk-management theme for digital assets infrastructure, source: NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography project.

According to @nic__carter, after the Trump-Intel deal he identified IBM as the next candidate given quantum computing’s national security framing and disclosed long positions in RGTI and IONQ, noting both were heavily sold last week. Source: @nic__carter on X, Oct 23, 2025. The U.S. government has formally prioritized quantum and post-quantum cryptography, with NIST standardizing algorithms such as CRYSTALS-Kyber and Dilithium and the NSA issuing the CNSA 2.0 migration roadmap, signaling sustained federal demand and potential contracting tailwinds for quantum leaders like IBM. Source: NIST; NSA CNSA 2.0; White House NSM-10 (2022). For traders, the positioning aligns IBM, RGTI, and IONQ with policy-driven catalysts while also flagging a crypto-security overhang, as BTC and ETH rely on ECDSA that is not quantum-safe under current standards guidance, making quantum headlines directly relevant to crypto risk pricing. Source: NIST; NSA CNSA 2.0.

According to @StockMKTNewz, the Trump administration is in talks for the U.S. government, through the Commerce Department, to take equity stakes in quantum-computing firms in exchange for federal funding, with minimum awards discussed at $10 million per company, citing the Wall Street Journal. According to @StockMKTNewz, companies named in the discussions include IONQ (IONQ), Rigetti (RGTI), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT), and Atom Computing, citing the Wall Street Journal. According to @StockMKTNewz, this policy backdrop intersects with crypto-security considerations because quantum computing is recognized as a threat to classical public-key cryptography used by blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, and NIST has published post-quantum cryptography standards to address these risks, citing NIST and Bitcoin.org.

According to @KobeissiLetter, The Wall Street Journal reports the Trump Administration is in talks to take stakes in several quantum computing companies, including IonQ (IONQ), Rigetti Computing (RGTI), and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS). According to @KobeissiLetter, the companies explicitly named in The Wall Street Journal reporting are IONQ, RGTI, and QBTS, with no deal terms or timing disclosed in the post. According to The Wall Street Journal as cited by @KobeissiLetter, this headline places the named tickers in focus while traders await the primary report’s details on any stake structure and scope.

According to @stocktalkweekly, the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Commerce Department is in talks to take equity stakes in quantum-computing companies in exchange for federal funding, with minimum awards discussed at $10 million per company (source: Wall Street Journal via @stocktalkweekly). The companies in discussions include IonQ (IONQ), Rigetti Computing (RGTI), and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), while Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) and Atom Computing are considering similar arrangements (source: Wall Street Journal via @stocktalkweekly). The report describes the move as an expansion of the Trump administration’s intervention in critical technology sectors and notes other technology firms are expected to compete for the funding (source: Wall Street Journal via @stocktalkweekly).

According to @StockMarketNerd, IONQ, RGTI, and QBTS collectively hold roughly $25B in market capitalization and are expected to generate $122M in total 2025 revenue (source: @StockMarketNerd). Based on @StockMarketNerd’s figures, that implies an aggregate forward price-to-sales ratio of about 205x for the trio, a core valuation input for trade setup and risk calibration (source: @StockMarketNerd). Using @StockMarketNerd’s numbers, revenue density equates to roughly $4.88M per $1B of market cap, offering a simple benchmark to track any 2025 guidance changes against the current valuation (source: @StockMarketNerd). The source does not cite any direct cryptocurrency market linkage for these quantum computing names (source: @StockMarketNerd).