According to @AltcoinGordon, another 1K SWIF tokens were burned, marking the second burn reported today and signaling ongoing supply-tightening activity for $SWIF that traders track for near-term liquidity shifts; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 10, 2025. Repeated token burns can reduce circulating supply and, if demand is stable, increase price sensitivity and intraday volatility, a known market effect of coin-burning mechanisms; source: Binance Academy, What Is Coin Burning?.

According to @AltcoinGordon, daily SWIF burns continued with 3,000,000 SWIF (about $10,000) removed from supply permanently on Sep 10, 2025, source: @AltcoinGordon. According to @AltcoinGordon, the post also tagged @sheepwifhatcoin and emphasized ongoing daily burns reducing SWIF supply by 3,000,000 tokens, source: @AltcoinGordon.

According to @AltcoinGordon, another 5 million SWIF were burned, bringing the cumulative burns over the past few weeks to nearly 10% of the token’s supply (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 3, 2025). Token burns permanently remove coins from circulation, reducing the effective float and tightening available liquidity for trading, which can increase sensitivity to order flow in spot and DEX markets (source: Binance Academy, What Is Coin Burning?).

According to @AltcoinGordon, the correction specifies the burn figure as another 2% for SWIF, not and other, clarifying the intended percentage for traders tracking supply changes; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, Alex said he might burn more $SWIF next week, signaling a potential additional burn event pending confirmation; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, traders should monitor official announcements and on-chain records next week to verify timing and size of any further SWIF burns; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, an individual described as "Alex" at BlackRock has burned another 2% of the $SWIF supply valued at over $150,000, bringing the alleged cumulative burn to 6% (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025). The post does not include a transaction hash, burn wallet, contract address, or official confirmation from BlackRock or the project, so the claim remains unverified at this time (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). Token burns permanently reduce circulating supply and can affect liquidity and volatility; traders should independently verify via the project’s official channels and on-chain explorers before positioning (source: Binance Academy — What Is a Token Burn; source: @sheepwifhatcoin on X for project updates). If confirmed, a 2% supply reduction could influence order book depth and slippage; monitor spot volume, spreads, and large-holder concentration around any verified burn event for trading signals (source: Binance Academy — Liquidity and Order Books; source: @AltcoinGordon on X).

According to @AltcoinGordon, an X post claims that 4% of $SWIF’s supply was burned and would now be valued at over $1,000,000, implying a material cut to circulating supply if confirmed, source: @AltcoinGordon on X. Token burns reduce available float and can amplify price volatility in low-liquidity markets, so traders typically seek on-chain confirmation via the token contract and burn address before positioning, source: Binance Academy and Etherscan Knowledge Base.