According to the source, the ZKsync creator has proposed a major revamp of the ZK governance token to add economic utility and explicit value capture for tokenholders; source: ZKsync creator proposal announcement. The source did not provide mechanics, timing, or vote details, so traders should monitor the official proposal text and governance timeline to assess potential impacts on ZK demand and on-chain flows; source: ZKsync creator proposal announcement.

According to @Ashcryptoreal, Momentum launched the HODL Yield Campaign Phase 2 to reward long-term supporters, strengthen liquidity consistency, and build sustainable yield on the Sui Network. Source: @Ashcryptoreal on X, Oct 31, 2025. Phase 1 previously brought tens of thousands of new users and record-breaking liquidity on Momentum DEX via the Build Pad. Source: @Ashcryptoreal on X. The MMT Community Offering closed with over 82 million dollars contributed and near-full participation from verified users. Source: @Ashcryptoreal on X. A two-thousand-dollar cap and strict anti-sybil filters eliminated more than 86 percent of suspected bots and farms. Source: @Ashcryptoreal on X. The team also released MMT tokenomics, referenced by @Ashcryptoreal and posted on the official @MMTFinance account. Source: @Ashcryptoreal on X and @MMTFinance on X. The source states this new chapter extends earnings, stabilizes liquidity, and deepens ecosystem growth, and also discloses an investment in MMTFinance while urging users to do their own research. Source: @Ashcryptoreal on X.

According to @dydxfoundation, a new dYdX Forum proposal (DRC) is exploring changes to protocol revenue distribution across DYDX buybacks, staking rewards, the MegaVault, and the Treasury (source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 31, 2025; dYdX Forum DRC: Revenue share on dYdX). The DRC suggests increasing the share allocated to DYDX buybacks to potentially as high as 75% of protocol revenue (source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 31, 2025; dYdX Forum DRC: Revenue share on dYdX). The proposal also recommends reducing or phasing out the MegaVault share while adjusting allocations to staking and the Treasury (source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 31, 2025; dYdX Forum DRC: Revenue share on dYdX). The item is under discussion on the forum, and traders should monitor the governance thread for final percentages and any implementation details that determine how revenue flows to buybacks versus staking (source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 31, 2025; dYdX Forum DRC: Revenue share on dYdX).

According to @PANewsCN, Cosmos Labs outlined three priorities for Cosmos Hub and ATOM at Cosmoverse: expanding the dedicated Hub team to deliver Tokenfactory and Comet performance upgrades, updating the validator delegation program to reinforce network stability and reward technical and community contributions, and co-designing a new ATOM tokenomics model aligned with Cosmos ecosystem growth. Source: Cosmos Labs on X; PANewsCN on X. Cosmos Labs stated that as global finance moves on-chain, Cosmos Hub and ATOM aim to play a central role and invited validators, developers, and the community to participate in discussions and provide feedback. Source: Cosmos Labs on X. For traders, monitor governance discussions on delegation policy and tokenomics redesign, as well as delivery timelines for the Tokenfactory and Comet upgrades announced by Cosmos Labs. Source: Cosmos Labs on X.

According to PANewsCN, zkPass unveiled ZKP tokenomics with a 1,000,000,000 total ERC-20 supply and utilities spanning settlement medium, validator collateral, network credits, service access, cross-system verifiability, and governance; source: zkPass on X: x.com/zkPass/status/1983583969867383193. Allocation totals are Community 48.5% (485,000,000), Early Investors 22.5% (225,000,000), Core Contributors 14% (140,000,000), DAO Treasury 10% (100,000,000), and Liquidity 5% (50,000,000); source: zkPass on X: x.com/zkPass/status/1983583969867383193. Unlocks: Community releases 12.5% at TGE and an additional 6% linearly over the first 3 months, followed by further monthly releases over the next 5 years as stated; Early Investors are locked 12 months then vest over 18 months; Core Contributors are locked 24 months then vest over 24 months; DAO Treasury vests linearly over 5 years; Liquidity is 100% unlocked at TGE; source: zkPass on X: x.com/zkPass/status/1983583969867383193. At TGE, circulating supply has a floor of at least 110,625,000 tokens from Community TGE (60,625,000) plus Liquidity (50,000,000), excluding any DAO linear emissions; source: zkPass on X: x.com/zkPass/status/1983583969867383193. Post-cliff supply overhangs: Early Investors vest ~12,500,000 tokens per month after month 12 (225,000,000 over 18 months), Core Contributors vest ~5,833,333 tokens per month after month 24 (140,000,000 over 24 months), and DAO Treasury emits ~1,666,667 tokens per month over 60 months, all of which are key supply catalysts for price discovery; source: zkPass on X: x.com/zkPass/status/1983583969867383193. Near term, traders should monitor the first 3 months’ Community drip (~9,700,000 tokens per month from the 6% tranche) and the 12-month and 24-month cliffs for potential liquidity and volatility impacts around unlock events; source: zkPass on X: x.com/zkPass/status/1983583969867383193.

According to @ThinkingUSD, HL’s approach spotlights that tokens with revenue but without allocating the majority to on-chain buybacks may offer weaker holder value. Source: X post by @ThinkingUSD, Oct 29, 2025. The post signals a potential rotation toward projects with verifiable, revenue-funded buyback programs, making the revenue-to-buyback ratio a key screen for traders. Source: X post by @ThinkingUSD, Oct 29, 2025. Actionably, traders can prioritize tokens with transparent wallet disclosures and on-chain proofs of buybacks, while applying a discount to tokens where cash flows accrue to treasury or teams instead of buybacks. Source: X post by @ThinkingUSD, Oct 29, 2025. This is an opinion and provides no audited figures, so verification of buyback execution and wallet provenance remains critical for risk management. Source: X post by @ThinkingUSD, Oct 29, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps, the bubble map of Meteora MET shows on-chain holder clusters and allocations that match Meteora’s stated tokenomics, confirming distribution consistency (source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 23, 2025). According to @bubblemaps, this public verification highlights alignment between MET’s on-chain distribution and its published tokenomics details, providing a clear on-chain check for traders tracking supply structure (source: Bubblemaps on X, Oct 23, 2025).

According to @dydxfoundation, the $DYDX Buyback Program has repurchased over 5.24 million DYDX via the Treasury subDAO as of the September Analyst Call after launching in April 2025, source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 16, 2025. Approximately 25% of protocol fees are directed to ongoing buybacks, channeling trading-generated revenue to support token holders and network security, source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 16, 2025. More buybacks are planned for H2 2025, underscoring the dYdX DAO’s commitment to revenue-backed tokenomics and value alignment, source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 16, 2025.

According to @ItsDave_ADA, ADA is the scarce native asset that powers the Cardano blockchain and serves as both a store of value and the network’s economic fuel for an inclusive, utility-driven financial system. According to @ItsDave_ADA, Cardano aims to remove barriers of geography, identity, and financial history to enable equitable participation in the digital economy. According to the source, the post is a narrative positioning update and does not disclose new metrics, timelines, or tokenomic changes, so no explicit short-term trading catalyst was announced. According to the source, no price guidance, TVL, or on-chain KPI data were included.

According to @ItsDave_ADA, Midnight implements a dual-token design where NIGHT is the tradable value asset that generates DUST, and DUST is the transaction resource for the network. Source: @ItsDave_ADA; Midnight whitepaper. The Midnight whitepaper states that DUST is non-transferable between addresses and decays when detached from the NIGHT that produced it, making DUST a pure utility resource rather than a tradable privacy coin. Source: Midnight whitepaper; @ItsDave_ADA. For traders, this concentrates economic exposure in NIGHT because transaction fuel (DUST) cannot be speculated on or hoarded independently, aligning value accrual with NIGHT holdings and network usage. Source: @ItsDave_ADA; Midnight whitepaper. Ethereum’s base layer uses ETH as both the value asset and gas, while @ItsDave_ADA argues that separating those roles would require deep protocol changes that could break existing assumptions in contracts. Source: ethereum.org; @ItsDave_ADA. This compliance-oriented, non-transferable gas model implies privacy and transaction demand translate primarily into NIGHT demand rather than a secondary gas market, a dynamic traders should monitor for pricing and liquidity impacts. Source: @ItsDave_ADA; Midnight whitepaper.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, AIA has surged 542% over the last seven days, lifting interest in the Sui ecosystem and AI infrastructure sector, which sets the backdrop for related trades (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Oct 6, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, Everlyn—a video AI Layer1 incubated by YZi Labs with Sui participation—is scheduled to list on Binance Alpha today at 15:00, positioning it squarely in the SUI + AI narrative (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Oct 6, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, Everlyn’s initial circulating supply is 12.5% (125 million tokens), primarily allocated via an Alpha airdrop, Kaito public sale, and community incentives, which is critical for assessing float-driven volatility at listing (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Oct 6, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, funding included a late-August institutional round at a $250 million valuation raising $15 million, and a September Kaito public sale at the same $250 million valuation raising $4 million with 100% TGE unlock, indicating immediate tradable supply from public sale allocations (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Oct 6, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, public-sale investors breakeven at $0.25, a level traders may monitor as potential supply pressure given the 100% TGE unlock for that tranche (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Oct 6, 2025).

According to @ranyi1115, Orderly One has 489 new DEXs created and 9 graduated within five days of launch, source: @ranyi1115 on X, Sep 28, 2025. The DEX Board at dex.orderly.network/board already lists many of these fresh launches for discovery and tracking, source: @ranyi1115 on X, Sep 28, 2025, and Orderly One DEX Board. Creating a DEX is free, while graduating a DEX costs $1,000 with a 25% discount for paying in $ORDER, and all fees are used to buy back and burn $ORDER, source: @ranyi1115 on X, Sep 28, 2025. This fee model directly links platform usage to $ORDER supply reduction, and new DEX creators include meme coins, trading communities, KOLs, AI projects, trading tools, and DeFi builders, source: @ranyi1115 on X, Sep 28, 2025.

According to @adriannewman21, PNKSTR’s flywheel relies on repeated 1.2x purchases of Punk (CryptoPunks) NFTs to channel organic demand where it is strongest. Source: @adriannewman21. The author states that recent price momentum also comes from additional NFT strategies whose underlying collections previously had near-zero organic interest. Source: @adriannewman21. The author cautions that when demand recedes, buyers may not continue paying 1.2x for those NFTs, which would reduce the ETH available to burn PNKSTR’s token supply. Source: @adriannewman21. For traders, this makes PNKSTR’s burn rate and tokenomics highly dependent on sustained organic demand for CryptoPunks and the strategy-linked collections, making on-chain demand and NFT turnover key risk indicators. Source: @adriannewman21. The author also acknowledges ongoing innovation in NFT mechanics. Source: @adriannewman21.

According to @MilkRoadDaily, Paxos plans to allocate 95% of its interest to $HYPE buybacks, sending significant inflows into the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Source: @MilkRoadDaily, X post dated Sep 8, 2025. The post characterizes this as a massive inflow directly into HyperliquidX, implying persistent buy-side support for $HYPE if the plan is executed as stated. Source: @MilkRoadDaily, X post dated Sep 8, 2025. The post does not include specifics on execution timing, frequency, or wallet details, which are critical for assessing near-term impacts on $HYPE liquidity and volatility. Source: @MilkRoadDaily, X post dated Sep 8, 2025. Traders can watch for official updates from Paxos and Hyperliquid to confirm implementation details and gauge realized buyback flow effects on order book depth, spreads, and price stability for $HYPE. Source: @MilkRoadDaily, X post dated Sep 8, 2025.

According to @adriannewman21 on X on Sep 8, 2025, Web3 TCG platforms are entertainment-first businesses and should prioritize delivering fun, diverse gameplay over token buybacks. According to @adriannewman21 on X on Sep 8, 2025, revenue-funded buybacks can boost short-term hype for traders with near-term horizons, but long-term performance should favor teams allocating resources to building multiple gaming experiences, which are costly. According to @adriannewman21 on X on Sep 8, 2025, traders assessing TCG tokens should align positioning with roadmap spend on gameplay rather than financial engineering when choosing between short-term momentum and long-term value.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Paxos has proposed launching USDH for Hyperliquid with a revenue design that allocates 95% of interest to repurchase HYPE and distribute to stakeholders, signaling a shift in stablecoin tokenomics (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 7, 2025). The described 95% interest-to-buyback structure would, if executed, translate USDH interest proceeds into recurring HYPE purchases, creating a structural bid tied to USDH assets and prevailing yields (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 7, 2025). For trading, the ultimate impact hinges on launch timing, reserve composition, and interest calculation parameters not specified in the post, which will determine buyback size and cadence (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 7, 2025). Traders should monitor official confirmations from Paxos and Hyperliquid and any disclosed on-chain buyback addresses to calibrate HYPE liquidity, slippage risk, and position sizing once the program starts (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 7, 2025).

According to @gensynai, points per round are calculated as tokensOut = peerCorrectChoiceBets + peerCorrectBalance.mulDiv(totalLoserBets, correctChoice.totalSupply), returning a user’s correct-bet stake plus a pro-rata share of totalLoserBets based on their balance relative to the correctChoice supply. Source: @gensynai on X, Sep 6, 2025, https://twitter.com/gensynai/status/1964404804492702155. For traders, expected payout increases with higher totalLoserBets and with a larger peerCorrectBalance share of correctChoice.totalSupply, making these variables critical to monitor when sizing positions and estimating edge before resolution. Source: @gensynai on X, Sep 6, 2025, https://twitter.com/gensynai/status/1964404804492702155. The formula enables direct sensitivity analysis of payouts to totalLoserBets and correctChoice.totalSupply, allowing disciplined risk-reward thresholds grounded in the stated redistribution mechanism. Source: @gensynai on X, Sep 6, 2025, https://twitter.com/gensynai/status/1964404804492702155.

According to @secondswap_io, 16.27% of the 25% presale allocation is locked in a Lockbox and can only be released via governance, which limits early sell pressure and strengthens scarcity, source: @secondswap_io. The remaining 8.73% of the presale allocation is unclaimed and currently locked, restricting immediate circulating supply from presale participants, source: @secondswap_io. For traders, this lock structure reduces near-term float and dampens initial sell-side liquidity in line with the stated design goal to curb early selling, source: @secondswap_io.

According to @EmberCN, citing allocation details shared by @0xDylan_, WLFI’s initial circulation is described as 5% from investors plus 3% from liquidity (source: @EmberCN; @0xDylan_ on X). According to @EmberCN, the investor allocation currently has 16.9B WLFI activated with 20% unlocking, equating to about 3.4B WLFI, and adding 3% liquidity implies an estimated initial circulating supply of roughly 6.4% or about 6.4B WLFI (source: @EmberCN; @0xDylan_ on X).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, CMC CEO @RushCMC said the circulating supply figure was repeatedly confirmed with the project team (source: @ai_9684xtpa). This update means strategic-round tokens are counted as circulating at TGE for the referenced project, as relayed in the same disclosure (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders should update initial float, FDV, and unlock assumptions for TGE pricing and liquidity planning based on this inclusion (source: @ai_9684xtpa).