According to @jayantramanand, OM will implement a 2.5B maximum supply post consolidation, replacing the current uncapped inflation model, source: @jayantramanand. The update clarifies emissions are not new tokens but protocol inflation distributed to validators and stakers, source: @jayantramanand. As real world asset yields expand, the protocol intends to transition away from inflation based rewards, source: @jayantramanand.

According to @adriannewman21, Monad’s token generation event is rumored for August or September, with no official date cited in the post and a question raised about recent progress, flagging uncertainty for traders (source: Adrian on X, Aug 17, 2025). For verified context, Monad Labs raised $225 million led by Paradigm in April 2024 to build a high-throughput EVM layer-1, indicating substantial runway ahead of any launch timeline that remains unconfirmed in the post (source: Paradigm announcement, Apr 9, 2024). Historically, new token listings show elevated short-term volatility and liquidity spikes around TGE and exchange listings, so initial circulating supply, vesting cliffs, and market maker support are key variables to evaluate once disclosed (source: Binance Research analyses on token listings and token unlocks, 2023–2024). Until an official TGE date and tokenomics are published, traders should avoid positioning solely on the rumored window and instead monitor Monad’s official channels for tokenomics, vesting schedules, and exchange announcements that have been shown to drive early price action in prior listings (source: Binance Research on evaluating token economics and project disclosures; Monad official announcements).

According to @alice_und_bob, Polkadot governance proposal 1709 is too weak to generate meaningful economic impact for the DOT ecosystem (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025). They state proposal 1710 effectively reduces inflation but does not create demand-side incentives for DOT, limiting its growth impact (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025). The author argues tokenomics policy should prioritize demand drivers to expand the DOT economy rather than focusing solely on inflation suppression (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025). For traders, the governance outcome between 1709 and 1710 is a near-term catalyst for DOT by directly targeting supply via inflation and highlighting the need for demand mechanisms, making monitoring the vote and implementation details critical to assessing supply-demand balance (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025).

According to @alice_und_bob, the growth pressure proposal would stop overpaying for staking and ring-fence funds beyond simple OpenGov votes to algorithmically reward protocols that grow the economy, directly changing how incentives are allocated across the network, Source: @alice_und_bob. For traders, this rebalances tokenomics by shifting payouts away from stakers toward programmatic growth incentives, implying lower staking compensation and a larger dedicated rewards pool for protocols, Source: @alice_und_bob. By placing funds out of the reach of simple OpenGov voting, the proposal limits discretionary treasury outflows and increases predictability of incentive emissions, factors that can affect yield expectations and governance risk premiums, Source: @alice_und_bob.

According to @alice_und_bob, three Polkadot OpenGov signal-vote proposals titled Soft Pressure, Hard Pressure, and Growth Pressure target a DOT supply cap and an inflation reduction (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025). The author states they submitted a competing Growth Pressure proposal to the first two approaches (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025). Traders should monitor the ongoing signal vote given the potential for changes to DOT’s issuance policy if governance advances these proposals (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025).

According to @alice_und_bob, Proposal 1711 'Growth Pressure' is an alternative plan that introduces a 2.1 billion DOT hard cap, reduces inflation by 33% every two years, and cuts staking APR by 50% every two years, with an added incentive pool to grow the economy, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025. These changes target token supply ceilings, issuance pace, and staking yield paths that define DOT’s tokenomics mechanics, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 15, 2025.

According to @milesdeutscher, Chainlink’s adoption-driven model creates a perpetual, automated buyback in which increased usage raises revenue that is used to purchase and lock LINK, directly converting adoption into buy-side pressure. According to @milesdeutscher, the flywheel sequence is Increased Adoption → Higher Revenue → More LINK Purchased and Locked → Greater Network Security and Resources → Increased Utility. Based on the mechanism described by @milesdeutscher, the trading takeaway is that growth in adoption and revenue would directly scale programmatic LINK purchases and supply locking, concentrating buy flows. Based on the mechanism described by @milesdeutscher, traders can track adoption, revenue, and the amount of LINK purchased and locked as leading indicators of token demand within this tokenomics framework.

According to @milesdeutscher, the current bull run is perfectly aligning with Chainlink’s narrative, positioning LINK as a timely trading focus. Source: @milesdeutscher on X, Aug 13, 2025. According to @milesdeutscher, he breaks down LINK’s tokenomics and a flywheel framework and states there is significant room for upside. Source: @milesdeutscher on X, Aug 13, 2025. According to @milesdeutscher, he also discloses his positioning in LINK, providing transparency that is relevant for traders assessing narrative-driven exposure. Source: @milesdeutscher on X, Aug 13, 2025.

According to @alice_und_bob, Gavin is taking charge at Parity while multiple ecosystem initiatives converge (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 13, 2025). According to @alice_und_bob, Bill Laboon is stepping up as VP of Ecosystem at the Web3 Foundation, with W3F taking the lead on the business development funnel (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 13, 2025). According to @alice_und_bob, major tokenomics improvements are coming, specifically a capped supply and lower inflation (source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 13, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the key trading question is whether OKB will function as X Layer gas or remain positioned as an OKX exchange token, as this determines its valuation framework and peer comps. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, a cited announcement states the removal of mint and burn functions for OKB, prompting concerns that exchange-revenue-funded buybacks could end. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. If buybacks cease as implied by the cited notice, @ai_9684xtpa notes OKB would be valued more like a public chain gas token, making X Layer transaction counts, active addresses, and gas fee trends the primary demand indicators traders should monitor. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. If the buyback model continues, @ai_9684xtpa’s framing implies the traditional exchange-token valuation persists, so traders should track OKX trading volumes, fee income disclosures, and any official buyback statements for inferred buy-side pressure. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. The immediate catalyst is an official OKX clarification on OKB’s utility and buyback policy; traders should monitor OKX announcements and adjust positions once confirmed. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Source: OKX official announcements.

According to @EmberCN, OKX will burn 65,256,712 OKB on August 15, 2025, after which the OKB total supply will be 21,000,000 tokens (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, OKB previously had a 300,000,000 total supply and 28 burns since May 2019 have already destroyed 213,743,286 OKB, with the planned burn bringing cumulative burns to 279,000,000 and the remaining supply to 21,000,000 (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, OKB rose on the news (source: @EmberCN). Based on these figures shared by @EmberCN, the burn program represents roughly a 93 percent reduction from the original 300,000,000 supply, a material tokenomics change for supply-sensitive trading strategies (source: @EmberCN).

According to @jessepollak, creators can produce unlimited valuable content and value tends to accrue to creators, raising direct questions about how creator coins capture value for token holders. Source: @jessepollak on Twitter, August 12, 2025. In current creator-economy designs, fee flows often prioritize creator earnings over generic token-holder accrual, which can cap direct value capture for platform tokens without explicit cash-flow rights. Source: friend.tech app FAQ and fee schedule; DeSo (Decentralized Social) creator coin documentation. On friend.tech, trades incur a fee with a defined share paid to creators, aligning revenue primarily with creators rather than any separate platform token exposure. Source: friend.tech app FAQ and fee schedule. On DeSo, creator coins use bonding curves with a configurable founder reward that pays creators a percentage of each purchase, concentrating value accrual at the creator level rather than at a platform token. Source: DeSo creator coin documentation. Platform risk is a key precedent: the Rally sidechain was sunset in 2023, reducing utility for RLY and affecting creator coin activity tied to that network. Source: Rally team blog announcement, January 2023. Trading takeaway: when evaluating creator coins or related platform tokens, prioritize structures with enforceable on-chain claims to cash flows or governance over fee splits; absent these, exposure primarily benefits creators while token holders may see weaker direct value capture. Source: friend.tech app FAQ and fee schedule; DeSo documentation; Rally team blog announcement.

According to @alice_und_bob, a new resource on how to grow the DOT economy is available at https://t.co/YEUF9ck8xq. Source: https://twitter.com/alice_und_bob/status/1954087516794994957 The post does not include details on metrics, timelines, or tokenomics changes, nor does it announce protocol updates, so no direct trading signal can be confirmed from the post alone. Source: https://twitter.com/alice_und_bob/status/1954087516794994957 This is informational rather than immediately market-moving; traders should wait for verifiable updates in the linked resource or official announcements before adjusting DOT exposure. Source: https://twitter.com/alice_und_bob/status/1954087516794994957

According to @EmberCN, ZK Proof Network Succinct Labs will list its $PROVE token on Binance Spot at 1 AM tomorrow. The total supply of $PROVE is 1 billion tokens, with an initial circulating supply of 195 million tokens (19.5% of total supply). The circulating portion includes 5% from Succinct's first round airdrop, 1.5% Binance HODLer airdrop, and 5% released by the foundation. Detailed token distribution and unlocking schedules are available from the official documentation. Traders should closely watch liquidity and price action as the majority of tokens remain locked at launch, potentially impacting volatility and short-term trading opportunities. Source: @EmberCN

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the Succinct airdrop registration is in its final 4-hour window, making it crucial for eligible participants who have previously interacted with the platform to complete their registration promptly. The Succinct tokenomics reveal a total supply of 1 billion SCC tokens, with 25% allocated to the public and future incentives (including a 5% initial airdrop), 25% for ecosystem and R&D, 29.5% to core contributors, 10.5% to investors, and the remainder dedicated to foundation operations. This transparent distribution is likely to influence SCC token liquidity and trading strategies soon after launch, with a significant portion available for public participation, which may impact early price discovery and volatility. Source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @EmberCN, Solayer has activated its governance function and launched its first proposal vote to set the PoS inflation rate for the InfiniSVM network's $LAYER governance token. The initial inflation rate is proposed at 8% per year upon mainnet launch, aiming to incentivize $LAYER holders to participate in network staking. The proposal also suggests a 15% annual reduction in the inflation rate thereafter. This governance development and inflation structure could influence $LAYER's tokenomics and trading volumes, especially as InfiniSVM nears its testnet launch (Source: @EmberCN).

According to @alice_und_bob, a tokenomics-focused open mic session is scheduled to start at 3pm UTC, providing traders with a real-time opportunity to gain actionable insights into tokenomic models and their impact on cryptocurrency valuations. Such discussions can inform short-term and long-term trading strategies by highlighting pivotal metrics like token supply, distribution, and incentive mechanisms, which directly influence price movements and market sentiment (source: @alice_und_bob).

According to @wingbits, users can earn WINGS tokens for every plane they track through the Wingbits platform, with 50% of all revenue allocated to token buy-back and burn. This DePIN mechanism is designed to incentivize participation and reduce circulating supply, potentially supporting WINGS price action and trading volume. Source: @wingbits

According to @alice_und_bob, a new discussion around Polkadot (DOT) tokenomics is gaining momentum, focusing on implementing a capped supply, lowering interest rates to stimulate DeFi participation, and creating new demand drivers. These proposed changes could significantly alter DOT's market dynamics by influencing supply-demand balance and enhancing DeFi ecosystem growth. Traders should monitor upcoming discussions for concrete updates, as these tokenomics adjustments may impact DOT's price volatility and trading opportunities (source: @alice_und_bob).

According to Michaël van de Poppe, VET is currently consolidating within an accumulation range, which is often a precursor to significant price action in the cryptocurrency market. The upcoming substantial reduction in VTHO inflation is expected to positively impact VET's price, as the market tends to react strongly to supply-side changes. Historically, such supply reductions can lead to larger upward moves compared to previous cycles, as traders and investors price in the effects of lower inflation on VTHO and its relationship to VET. This scenario provides a bullish setup for VET, with potential for increased trading volume and volatility as market participants anticipate and react to these tokenomics changes (source: Michaël van de Poppe).