According to @EmberCN, 5.355 million UNI were moved to address 0xF436 four days ago, followed by subsequent transfers from that wallet into centralized exchanges (CEX) (source: @EmberCN on X). As of now, 780,000 UNI worth about $7.56 million have been deposited into multiple CEX from 0xF436, with the wallet and flows viewable on Arkham Intelligence (source: @EmberCN on X; source: Arkham Intelligence address 0xF436ADa6B8f4d235BA806f44B22Fa4ee115c9BC2). Traders monitor exchange inflows because rising on-exchange token supply is commonly used as a signal for potential sell-side liquidity and volatility (source: Binance Academy on exchange inflows/outflows).

According to @EmberCN, 5.355 million UNI (about USD 52.9 million) were transferred to address 0xF43...BC2, which is possibly tied to Anchorage Digital’s institutional platform, per @EmberCN. According to @EmberCN, 200,000 UNI (about USD 1.97 million) were deposited to a centralized exchange 9 hours earlier. According to @EmberCN, this tranche was accumulated in 2023 via Anchorage Digital at an average cost of USD 4.95, implying about USD 27.5 million in unrealized profit at current prices, with the source address cited as 0x985D... on Arkham Intel per @EmberCN. For traders, according to @EmberCN, monitoring 0xF43...BC2 and 0x985D... on Arkham Intel for any further transfers to exchanges can help track near-term UNI supply dynamics.

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x4940 deposited 408,557 UNI worth about $3.93M to Binance after buying the same amount two weeks ago at $10.06 for roughly $4.11M, implying a mark-to-market loss near $180K and an implied current price around $9.62, source: @lookonchain on X and Arkham Intel address 0x4940BFCfF28d58602aAbebA4e3E54D49d0D40460. The transfer was described as a move to cut losses and matches the full recent purchase size, with Binance identified as the destination exchange, source: @lookonchain on X.

According to @santimentfeed, the top 10 addresses hold the following share of circulating supply for ETH-based assets: SHIB 62.3%, UNI 52.2%, ETH 51.0%, USDT 40.5%, PEPE 39.4%, LINK 31.5%, DAI 31.0%, and USDC 28.6%, source: Santiment (@santimentfeed) on X, Sep 2, 2025. According to @santimentfeed, only SHIB, UNI, and ETH show majority top-10 concentration above 50%, while stablecoins USDT and USDC show 40.5% and 28.6% respectively, source: Santiment (@santimentfeed) on X, Sep 2, 2025. According to @santimentfeed, traders can track live whale address changes at https://t.co/m99pJbV2cp for monitoring flows and concentration shifts, source: Santiment (@santimentfeed) on X, Sep 2, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a whale who previously netted $2.34M across four UNI swing trades allegedly cleared 4,720 ETH worth about $21.08M roughly 8 hours ago, described as a suspected full exit, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The source adds the ETH was withdrawn on July 1 from FalconX at an average entry of $2,452, implying a two-month ROI of 82.2%, source: @ai_9684xtpa. If the entire 4,720 ETH stack was sold, the realized profit would total approximately $9.514M based on the source’s calculation, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The wallet address was provided by the source for on-chain verification and trader monitoring, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to Lookonchain, whales accumulated WLD, AAVE, and UNI via large exchange withdrawals totaling about USD 26.84 million within the last two days; source: Lookonchain. Whale address 0xF436 withdrew 43,123 AAVE, approximately USD 13.87 million, from exchanges over the past two days; source: Lookonchain. Fresh wallet 0xC0D9 withdrew 9.325 million WLD, approximately USD 8.86 million, from Binance about 11 hours ago; source: Lookonchain. Fresh wallet 0x4940 withdrew 408,557 UNI, approximately USD 4.11 million, from Binance; source: Lookonchain.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a new address 0x494...40460 withdrew 408,557 UNI from Binance about 4 hours ago at a stated price of 10.06 dollars per UNI, totaling roughly 4.11 million dollars, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The source also shared the wallet address for tracking and characterized the movement as an exchange withdrawal of UNI from Binance, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet (0x4940bfcff28d58602aabeba4e3e54d49d0d40460) withdrew 408,557 UNI, worth about $4 million, from Binance. According to @OnchainLens, the wallet has not withdrawn ETH for gas to facilitate further transactions.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance’s WLFI contract reached a high of $0.55. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 23, 2025. The author also referenced a fully diluted valuation of 55 billion and described WLFI as the sum of the FDVs of LINK, UNI, ENA, and ONDO. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 23, 2025.

According to Patrick McCorry, the open question is why Governor Bravo-style governance sets quorum relative to the total votable supply rather than the sum of delegated tokens, and whether this choice was driven by gas constraints around 2021; he raised the issue on X on Aug 23, 2025. Source: https://twitter.com/stonecoldpat0/status/1959147607751790772 In Compound’s Governor Alpha/Bravo, quorum is a fixed absolute threshold (e.g., 400,000 COMP required) while voting power still comes from delegated votes at a snapshot block, meaning the quorum requirement is not tied to the currently delegated supply. Source: https://docs.compound.finance/v2/governance/ Uniswap’s Governor Bravo implementation defines quorum as 4% of UNI total supply at the snapshot block, explicitly anchoring quorum to total supply rather than the amount currently delegated. Source: https://docs.uniswap.org/concepts/governance/overview The design rationale for total-supply-based quorum is to ensure sufficient participation and mitigate governance capture, as the OpenZeppelin Governor framework specifies quorum as a fraction of the token’s past total supply via on-chain snapshots. Source: https://docs.openzeppelin.com/contracts/4.x/governance#quorum For trading, total-supply-anchored or fixed absolute quorums make proposals dependent on broad participation before execution, which can slow or constrain fee or parameter changes that may act as catalysts for COMP and UNI until quorum is reached. Source: https://docs.compound.finance/v2/governance/ and https://docs.uniswap.org/concepts/governance/overview

According to @EmberCN, a Trend Research-labeled address withdrew 1,000,000 PENDLE (about $5.83 million) from Binance roughly 20 minutes before the post, signaling a notable CEX outflow (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the same address holds approximately 108,000 ETH (around $516 million) with an estimated cost basis near $2,250 (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the address also holds about 670,000,000 NEIROETH, reported as 67% of total supply, with an estimated cost basis of roughly $0.0828 and an indicated value near $87.55 million (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the address further holds roughly 5,411,000 UNI, with the post noting quantity while the dollar value line is truncated (source: @EmberCN).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale withdrew 315,529 UNI worth about $3.55M from Binance roughly 10 minutes before the post, with the wallet address 0x4c6452f18d5967f1f7e9884bc5cdfc60452e015a, source: @OnchainLens. The whale now holds 814,724 UNI valued at about $9.17M, source: @OnchainLens. Based on the reported figures, the withdrawn amount equals approximately 38.8% of the wallet’s current UNI and lifted the balance by roughly 63% versus pre-transfer, source: @OnchainLens. The implied unit price from the stated valuations is about $11.26 per UNI at the time of reporting, source: @OnchainLens. The post is dated August 23, 2025, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @EmberCN, USV transferred 2.981 million UNI (~$31.09 million) to Coinbase Prime about 15 minutes prior to the source post and still holds 6.694 million UNI (~$69.82 million) at the referenced address; all figures and timing are cited from @EmberCN.

According to Lookonchain, a newly created wallet withdrew 234,083 UNI (about $2.36M) and 485.765 ETH (about $2.04M) from Binance within the past 40 minutes, highlighting a rapid multi-million-dollar outflow tracked on-chain, source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence explorer. The address reference provided points to Arkham Intelligence for verification of the transfers from Binance to the new wallet, source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence explorer. The USD notional values reported imply roughly $10.08 per UNI and $4,199 per ETH at the time of the withdrawals based on Lookonchain’s figures, source: Lookonchain on X.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 234,083 UNI (about $2.35 million) and 485.77 ETH (about $2.00 million) from Binance to address 0xae1d0156a2fdc0c632ab2ea521b05d3e71068e31 on Aug 20, 2025. According to @OnchainLens, the combined outflow equals roughly $4.35 million in crypto assets moving off-exchange.

According to @EmberCN, USV transferred 731,000 UNI (about $7.43M) to Coinbase Prime roughly 8 hours before the Aug 20, 2025 post. Source: @EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence. The same source reports USV’s previous UNI sale occurred in December 2024, totaling 3.511 million UNI at a $15.53 average price for approximately $54.56 million. Source: @EmberCN. USV-linked addresses still hold 9.675 million UNI (about $96.65 million), based on the referenced on-chain address tracker. Source: @EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence. This marks USV’s first reported UNI move of this type in about eight months, a datapoint traders often watch for potential liquidity events. Source: @EmberCN; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x4B5...90AFA swapped 1,090 ETH into 415,005 UNI on Aug 13 during an ETH uptrend (source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Aug 16, 2025; Arkham address explorer). Ten hours before the post time, the wallet bought another 115,005 UNI to lower its cost basis, bringing cumulative UNI exposure to about $6.26 million and total holdings to roughly 530,010 UNI (source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham address explorer). The stated average entry is $11.82 per UNI, leaving an unrealized loss of about $535,000 at the time of posting, roughly 8.5% on a $6.26 million position (source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa). For trading purposes, $11.82 marks the on-chain breakeven of this wallet, useful for tracking potential positioning and flows from 0x4B5...90AFA (source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham address explorer).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Amber Group built a 358,000 UNI position earlier in the day and later Uniswap fee switch news was released, with the position now showing about $200,000 unrealized profit at a current price of $11.2 versus an entry of $10.64, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The author provides the holding address link via Arkham Intel explorer and notes the post is sponsored by Gate.io zh, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @AggrNews, the Uniswap Foundation proposed a DUNA DAO structure designed to clear the path for enabling Uniswap’s long‑awaited fee switch. source: @AggrNews The fee switch allows governance to route a portion of swap fees to the protocol under governance control, altering protocol revenue flows and LP/treasury economics relevant to trading decisions. source: Uniswap Protocol documentation

According to Matt Hougan, Uniswap's current market capitalization of $6 billion positions it as roughly the 400th largest financial services company globally, on par with Norway's Storebrand, a well-established savings and insurance firm. This comparison highlights Uniswap's underrepresentation in market value relative to its influence in the decentralized finance space, which may signal potential upside for traders looking for undervalued crypto assets (source: Matt Hougan).