According to CoinMarketCap, Uniswap executed its UNIfication on-chain, redirecting fees to buy back and burn UNI and completing an additional 100M UNI burn, a change that directly reduces token supply via fee-funded burns (source: CoinMarketCap, Jan 2, 2026). Raydium launched Raydium Perps with 100+ markets powered by Orderly, expanding derivatives trading venues and market coverage for DeFi traders (source: CoinMarketCap, Jan 2, 2026). Lifinity is shutting down after four years, with users able to redeem xLFNTY and related NFTs for USDC as part of the wind-down process (source: CoinMarketCap, Jan 2, 2026).

According to @CoinMarketCap, Bitwise has filed with the U.S. SEC to launch 11 single-token, altcoin-focused strategy ETFs that would provide regulated exposure to Aave, Uniswap, Hyperliquid, Zcash, Bittensor and others; source: @CoinMarketCap on X, December 31, 2025. The post identifies these as single-token strategy ETFs offering regulated exposure to individual assets named, including Aave AAVE, Uniswap UNI, Zcash ZEC, and Bittensor TAO; source: @CoinMarketCap on X, December 31, 2025. No filing identifiers, proposed tickers, fees, timelines, or approval status were disclosed in the post; source: @CoinMarketCap on X, December 31, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x3EBF linked to the Indexed Finance and Kyber Network exploiter resumed activity after a year of dormancy and dumped 226,961 UNI (~USD 1.36M), 33,215 LINK (~USD 410K), 845,806 CRV (~USD 328K), and 5.25 YFI (~USD 17.5K) on December 30, 2025. According to @lookonchain, the reported USD values sum to approximately USD 2.12M across these assets. Arkham Intelligence’s address page for 0x3EBFC212ab2CBb16cbFD52e220381a85fD75D665 corroborates the wallet attribution and recent on-chain activity.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Uniswap burned 100M UNI (about $627M), representing roughly 10% of the total supply, with an on-chain transaction link provided by the source. source: @OnchainDataNerd The reported supply reduction is a material deflationary event that traders can factor into UNI supply-demand models, liquidity assumptions, and price discovery frameworks. source: @OnchainDataNerd Traders may monitor UNI spot liquidity, perpetual funding and basis, and Uniswap pool depth for volatility and slippage around the burn timing referenced by the source. source: @OnchainDataNerd Execution note: confirm the burn’s on-chain timestamp via the transaction reference provided by the source before initiating momentum or mean-reversion strategies. source: @OnchainDataNerd

According to @ai_9684xtpa, 100 million UNI have been burned and UNI price has reclaimed $6, highlighting near-term strength following a reported supply reduction; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, an identified whale address 0x4B0d3273B75AA15715be2e36E111f4cA8AB6c9f8 sold 662,605 UNI at $8.82 with an average entry of $5.99, realizing $1.875 million profit on that tranche; source: @ai_9684xtpa; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4B0d3273B75AA15715be2e36E111f4cA8AB6c9f8. According to @ai_9684xtpa, cumulative realized gains across three UNI swing cycles since September 2020 total $23.415 million with a 100% win rate, and the whale exited five months ago rather than holding to present levels; source: @ai_9684xtpa; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4B0d3273B75AA15715be2e36E111f4cA8AB6c9f8. According to @ai_9684xtpa, key reference levels mentioned include the $6 reclaim, prior distribution around $8.82, and a previous local high near $12, which traders can use as supply and resistance references in UNI swing strategies; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to Lookonchain, after Uniswap’s fee burn proposal was approved, the Uniswap treasury executed an on-chain burn of 100,000,000 UNI valued at about 591 million dollars roughly 4 hours ago. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. On-chain data from the Uniswap treasury address 0x1a9C8182C09F50C8318d769245beA52c32BE35BC shows UNI being sent to a burn address, confirming the reported burn transaction. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. Traders should track UNI spot liquidity, slippage on major Uniswap pools, and derivatives funding and open interest for immediate market response to the burn event. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence. Further monitoring of the treasury address and governance implementation activity can help identify any follow-on transfers related to the fee burn rollout. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @OnchainLens, Uniswap's treasury executed an on-chain burn of 100,000,000 UNI valued at approximately 594 million dollars, confirmed by transaction 0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e, source: Onchain Lens tweet https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/2005077451333079113; Etherscan https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e. The action follows a fee burning proposal that passed two days earlier, and traders can verify the supply-side burn on-chain to update UNI supply and treasury-balance trackers for positioning decisions, source: Onchain Lens tweet https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/2005077451333079113; Etherscan https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e.

According to @EmberCN, Uniswap executed an on-chain burn of 100,000,000 UNI (about $596 million) from the Uniswap treasury at around 04:30 today, confirmed by Etherscan transaction 0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e. Source: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/2005072023362666511; https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e The author adds that the fee-burn proposal passed two days earlier and that future Uniswap protocol fees will be used to burn UNI, establishing an ongoing supply-reduction mechanism. Source: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/2005072023362666511 Based on the UNI contract showing a total supply of 1,000,000,000, the burn equals roughly 10 percent of supply, a material tokenomics change traders can factor into liquidity and valuation models. Source: https://etherscan.io/token/0x1f9840a85d5aF5bf1D1762F925BDADdC4201F984 Traders can monitor subsequent burns and fee accruals via the on-chain burn transactions and Uniswap analytics to gauge the pace of supply contraction and DEX revenue trends. Source: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x091f0083242a777d55821c1189e568d6d033d9da501b75087dc736fa143d2c1e; https://info.uniswap.org

According to @CoinMarketCap, Uniswap's UNIfication proposal to turn on the protocol's fee switch and burn 100 million UNI was approved on Thursday, with 125.3 million UNI voting in favor and only 742 UNI against. According to @CoinMarketCap, the vote outcome indicates overwhelming DAO support for enabling the protocol fee mechanism and executing a 100 million UNI burn, key parameters that directly affect token supply and protocol fee policy.

According to @MikeSilagadze, 2026 will be dominated by a revenue and fundamentals meta, with tokens that have sensible value accrual massively outperforming source: https://twitter.com/MikeSilagadze/status/2004307828249710804. He highlighted Hayden Adams’ update that Uniswap’s Unification vote concluded with 125,342,017 YES and 742 NO source: https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2004265701083918475. Per Adams, after an approximately two-day timelock, 100 million UNI will be burned, protocol fee switches will be flipped on, and Uniswap Labs will turn off frontend fees to focus on the protocol source: https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2004265701083918475.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222 withdrew 2,179,487 UNI (~$12.68M) from Coinbase in the last 6 hours, lifting total holdings to 3.629M UNI (~$20.02M) with an average withdrawal price of $5.51 and an unrealized profit of about $0.74M; source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence explorer for address 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222. According to @ai_9684xtpa, from Dec 15–23 the wallet cumulatively withdrew 1,682,220 UNI (~$8.75M) at an average price of $5.20; the Unification proposal was submitted for final governance vote on Dec 18 and passed on Dec 22, during which UNI reached a high of $6.5; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the activity may be Coinbase internal wallet consolidation rather than external accumulation, which would change the interpretation of these flows; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222 accumulated 1,682,220 UNI between Dec 15–23 by withdrawing from Coinbase, worth about 8.75 million dollars at an average cost of 5.2 dollars per token (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain reference: Arkham Intel explorer for address 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the Unification proposal entered its final governance vote on Dec 18 and passed on Dec 22, during which UNI peaked at 6.5 dollars (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the position shows about 1.37 million dollars in unrealized profit based on the reported accumulation and price action (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intel, trading-relevant reference points are the 5.2 dollar cost basis, the 6.5 dollar swing high, and the observed Coinbase outflows tied to the address, which frame potential liquidity and supply dynamics for UNI in the near term (sources: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intel explorer for address 0xEfaf5B67a88F44139b12F98acd303C67520C8222).

According to @CoinMarketCap, Uniswap’s protocol fee switch is expected to turn on this week after the UNIfication proposal reached quorum with virtually no opposition, marking one of the largest upgrades in the DEX’s seven-year history (source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Dec 22, 2025). This defined activation window creates a near-term governance and fee-structure catalyst for UNI and Uniswap liquidity pools, with traders focused on the switch timing highlighted for this week (source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Dec 22, 2025). The near-unanimous quorum reduces immediate governance uncertainty around the upgrade path, sharpening event-driven positioning for UNI (source: @CoinMarketCap on X, Dec 22, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, over the past 48 hours Vitalik Buterin sold UNI, ZORA, BNB, KNC, OMG and other meme tokens from his wallet as observed on-chain; source: @OnchainLens. Following these disposals, the wallet transferred $564,672 USDC and 27 ETH (about $80,364) via the RAILGUN Project; source: @OnchainLens, Nansen profiler. The referenced Nansen profiler page lists the sales and subsequent transfers, confirming timing, assets, and amounts for traders tracking whale activity; source: Nansen profiler.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, new wallet 0xDE2b2f5D55EcC64d7D3A55D4FC7247041b9E4613 withdrew a $17.8 million basket from Binance two hours ago comprising ETH, LINK, AAVE, UNI, POL, and COMP, with ETH accounting for 95% or $16.93 million at a withdrawal price of $2,935.55, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The wallet address is listed on the Arkham Intelligence explorer for verification of holdings and further on-chain tracking, source: Arkham Intelligence explorer. A small test transfer was executed yesterday before the larger withdrawal, indicating staged movement of funds, source: @ai_9684xtpa. With 95% of the position in ETH, the wallet’s exposure is predominantly tied to ETH price moves from the noted entry level, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew assets from Binance that include 5,770 ETH valued at USD 16.92 million, 9,870 LINK valued at USD 125.59 thousand, 140.62 AAVE valued at USD 26.03 thousand, 1,950 UNI valued at USD 9.9 thousand, 75,450 POL valued at USD 8.44 thousand, and 9.99 COMP valued at USD 270, with data sourced from Nansen. According to @OnchainLens, these figures total about USD 17.1 million and are dominated by ETH at roughly 99 percent of the withdrawn value, based on the same Nansen dataset. According to Glassnode research, net withdrawals from exchanges reduce on-exchange balances and can tighten immediate sell-side liquidity for the withdrawn assets, a dynamic traders monitor during large outflows; this context is relevant to the ETH-heavy nature of the flow reported by @OnchainLens using Nansen data.

According to @EmberCN, a16zcrypto transferred 276,000 COMP worth about $7.6 million to Coinbase Prime roughly two hours prior, indicating a venue-side move of inventory (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, a16z led Compound’s round and received 1,000,000 COMP in March 2020, equal to 10% of COMP’s total supply (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, a16z’s labeled on-chain wallets now mainly hold 64 million UNI (~$325 million) and 19.51 million OP (~$5.71 million) and no longer hold COMP (source: @EmberCN). Coinbase Prime is Coinbase’s institutional trading and custody platform where deposited assets can be executed via exchange and OTC services, making the transferred COMP tradable on venue infrastructure if orders are placed (source: Coinbase Prime, Coinbase). For trading, watch COMP spot volumes and Coinbase-related order flow given the wallet-to-exchange movement, and track UNI and OP on-chain and venue flows in light of the updated a16z allocations (sources: @EmberCN; Coinbase Prime).

According to @OnchainLens, Blockchain Capital withdrew 1.13M UNI worth approximately $6.48M from Bybit, Binance, and OKX over the last 6 hours (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The receiving wallet now holds 1.92M UNI valued around $10.88M at the time of reporting (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The figures imply an average reference value of about $5.73 per UNI for the withdrawn amount, based on the values provided by the source (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The address cited is 0xb5E4d21240e9356caFc3a1261d10383f62DFc24e, which the source attributes to Blockchain Capital activity (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xb5E4 withdrew 823,368 UNI (about $4.72M) from Binance and Bybit in the past 5 hours and now holds 1.61M UNI (about $9.1M), with the holdings and transfers viewable via Arkham Intelligence’s address explorer. According to @lookonchain, these transactions are framed as institutional accumulation of UNI, and the cited Arkham Intelligence page is provided as the on-chain source for verification.

According to @lookonchain, whale 0xBC64 bought another ~$13.9M across 10 assets during the dip and moved them on-chain to wallet 0xBC64, including ENA $5.92M (22.7M), ETH $5.79M (1,898), LINK $527K (38,614), UNI $413K (74,217), PENDLE $323K, CRV $295K, ONDO $242K, ENS $141K, AAVE $140K, and AERO $98K (source: @lookonchain on X). According to @lookonchain, the same wallet previously accumulated ~$35.7M across 8 assets and transferred them on-chain, led by ETH $10.13M (3,175), LINK $7.99M (557,937), ENA $5.82M (20.14M), AAVE $4.9M (25,396), ONDO $3.27M (6.53M), UNI $2.05M (340,849), SKY $1.09M (22.59M), and LDO $244K (384,075) (source: @lookonchain on X; wallet: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xBC64BDE4C3b70147C47c16dD9277a6Aaef7e0f02). According to @lookonchain, based on these reported amounts the cumulative purchases total ~$49.6M with the largest exposures now ETH ~$15.92M (32.2%), ENA ~$11.74M (23.6%), LINK ~$8.52M (17.2%), AAVE ~$5.04M (10.2%), ONDO ~$3.51M (7.1%), and UNI ~$2.46M (5.0%), with smaller positions in SKY, PENDLE, CRV, LDO, ENS, and AERO held at 0xBC64 (source: @lookonchain on X; on-chain wallet verified via ARKM explorer).