According to @OnchainLens, a wallet labeled thefourthturning.eth purchased 3,000,000 ENA for 2.3 million USDC at an average price of about $0.766 per ENA on Sep 12, 2025, based on Nansen on-chain data. According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen, the buyer address is 0xaf297dec752c909092a117a932a8ca4aaaff9795. According to @OnchainLens and the referenced Nansen dataset, this represents whale accumulation of ENA on-chain.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited $2.91 million USDC into HyperLiquid and opened an ETH short position with 25x leverage, with the on-chain tracking link provided to the address on hypurrscan.io (source: @OnchainLens, Sep 12, 2025).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x7E4E deposited 8M USDC into Hyperliquid and bought 86,322 HYPE valued at $4.88M and 466.68M PUMP valued at $2.74M, source: @lookonchain on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7E4E766d0aE5ea9cDED0c694669194Db92800107; hypurrscan.io/address/0x1abD8168EA60B37a6A8CC149fa058910d89b0767. According to @lookonchain, another wallet 0x1abD deposited 4.58M USDC into Hyperliquid to buy HYPE, source: @lookonchain on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x1abD8168EA60B37a6A8CC149fa058910d89b0767. According to @lookonchain, combined inflows across these two wallets total 12.58M USDC directed toward HYPE and PUMP activity on Hyperliquid, source: @lookonchain on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7E4E766d0aE5ea9cDED0c694669194Db92800107; hypurrscan.io/address/0x1abD8168EA60B37a6A8CC149fa058910d89b0767. According to @lookonchain, traders tracking HYPE and PUMP can monitor these wallets on Hypurrscan for additional large orders and position changes tied to Hyperliquid activity, source: @lookonchain on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7E4E766d0aE5ea9cDED0c694669194Db92800107; hypurrscan.io/address/0x1abD8168EA60B37a6A8CC149fa058910d89b0767.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited $8M USDC to HyperLiquid about 2 hours ago, source: Onchain Lens on X https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/1966303635706622222. The address executed buys of 79,257 $HYPE for $4.5M and 466.68M $PUMP for $2.7M, with flows visible on the linked explorer, source: Onchain Lens on X and Hypurrscan https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x7E4E766d0aE5ea9cDED0c694669194Db92800107. An open order to purchase an additional $800K of $HYPE remains active on HyperLiquid, source: Onchain Lens on X https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/1966303635706622222. Based on the reported fills, the average execution prices were approximately $56.77 per HYPE and $0.00579 per PUMP, computed from the notional and size reported by @OnchainLens, source: Onchain Lens on X https://x.com/OnchainLens/status/1966303635706622222. The $8M deposit aligns with $7.2M already filled and $0.8M resting for HYPE, indicating a total planned allocation of $5.3M to HYPE and $2.7M to PUMP from this address, source: Onchain Lens on X and Hypurrscan https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x7E4E766d0aE5ea9cDED0c694669194Db92800107.

According to @OnchainLens, citing Nansen data, Patricio Worthalter sold 2,000 ETH for $8.85M USDC at an executed price of $4,423 after a 2-year holding period (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The sale realized a $5.37M profit on this tranche, implying an average entry near $1,740 per ETH based on the reported figures (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). He continues to hold 41,135 ETH valued around $183.27M, meaning the 2,000 ETH sale represented roughly 4.64% of his tracked balance prior to the transaction (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The wallet to monitor is address 0xf6b6f07862a02c85628b3a9688beae07fea9c863 for any subsequent flows (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, five newly created wallets withdrew a combined 60,499 ETH, equivalent to about 264.31 million dollars, from Kraken roughly 12 hours before the post, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X dated Sep 11, 2025. The same source reported that about 30 minutes before the post, a wallet labeled SharpLinkGaming transferred 319.43 million USDC to a Galaxy Digital labeled address, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X and Arkham Intelligence address 0x9E07015c083da6384A174934b970b783415a6586 at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x9E07015c083da6384A174934b970b783415a6586. For ETH traders, large exchange withdrawals and sizable stablecoin transfers to institutional desks are commonly monitored as liquidity signals that can affect near term market depth and execution costs, source: Kaiko Research on order book liquidity and CryptoQuant Exchange Reserves metric documentation. To validate persistence of these flows, traders can track ETH exchange balances and subsequent movements of the receiving address in real time, source: CryptoQuant exchange reserve dashboards and Arkham Intelligence address explorer.

According to @lookonchain, SharpLink transferred 379 million USDC to Galaxy Digital, with the transaction traceable via Arkham’s explorer at the linked address (source: @lookonchain X post on 2025-09-11 https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1965963519096140029; source: Arkham address https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x9E07015c083da6384A174934b970b783415a6586). @lookonchain added that the funds may be used to purchase more ETH, though this intent is not confirmed on-chain (source: @lookonchain X post on 2025-09-11 https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1965963519096140029). Galaxy Digital publicly provides OTC and market-making services for digital assets including ETH, indicating it can facilitate large client transactions (source: Galaxy Digital Trading overview https://www.galaxydigital.io/our-businesses/trading/).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet deposited $10M USDC, bought HYPE on spot, and opened a 10x leveraged short on HYPE, indicating combined spot and derivatives positioning; source: @OnchainLens on X, Sep 10, 2025; hypurrscan.io/address/0xec55bc00558498b8CA8AE4a2481AA1b748992C45. According to @OnchainLens, the wallet still holds about $9M and was characterized as likely to buy more; source: @OnchainLens on X, Sep 10, 2025. According to @OnchainLens, the specific address for on-chain verification is 0xec55bc00558498b8CA8AE4a2481AA1b748992C45; source: hypurrscan.io/address/0xec55bc00558498b8CA8AE4a2481AA1b748992C45.

According to @EmberCN, whale wallet qianbaidu.eth purchased 431,000 HYPE for 20.57M USDC at an average price of $47.7, after which HYPE reached a new all-time high, source: @EmberCN on X, Sep 9, 2025. Based on the provided figures, the position reflects about $2.5M in unrealized profit, implying roughly a 12% gain and an indicative price near $53.5 at the time of reporting, source: @EmberCN on X, Sep 9, 2025; calculation from source data. The $47.7 average fill forms a clear cost basis and reference level tied to a 431K-token buy for traders tracking momentum and pullbacks, source: @EmberCN on X, Sep 9, 2025; calculation from source data.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, on-chain data via HypurrScan shows wallet 0x746bd928F271434deaAa6682EEFe6f82674D4561 spent 10.56 million USDC to acquire 217,689 HYPE at an average entry of $48.51. According to @ai_9684xtpa citing HypurrScan, the position currently shows an unrealized profit of $1.356 million after HYPE moved from $48 to $54 in one day, a 13 percent return.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, whale wallet pfm.eth purchased 1,896 ETH over the past 40 minutes, spending 6.508 million USDC and 1.706 million USDT at an average fill price of 4,332.7 per ETH. Source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1965306221852074049 Based on those figures, the total stablecoin outlay is approximately 8.214 million dollars, with roughly 79 percent in USDC and 21 percent in USDT, which traders can use as concrete order-flow context. Source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1965306221852074049 The post provides the on-chain wallet address 0x0052ee6950C3D6c86da0491037b75306E74b1022 for verification and monitoring of subsequent flows. Sources: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1965306221852074049 and https://explorer.cow.fi/address/0x0052ee6950C3D6c86da0491037b75306E74b1022

According to @lookonchain, Arthur Hayes spent 1.02M USDC to purchase 1.34M ENA over the past 8 hours, implying an average fill price of about $0.76 per ENA based on the reported quantities (source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 9, 2025). According to @lookonchain, his wallet now holds 4.45M ENA after this additional buy, reflecting repeat buying activity in a short window that traders may track for liquidity and flow analysis (source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 9, 2025).

According to @EmberCN, BitMEX cofounder Arthur Hayes purchased about $1.01 million of ENA over the last 8 hours at an execution price of $0.73, citing Arkham Intelligence address 0x6cd66DbdFe289ab83d7311B668ADA83A12447e21 (intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x6cd66DbdFe289ab83d7311B668ADA83A12447e21). Per @EmberCN, the wallet sent 1.01M USDC to Binance and Flowdesk before receiving 1.395M ENA, with the flows visible on Arkham Intelligence (intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x6cd66DbdFe289ab83d7311B668ADA83A12447e21). The post also notes Hayes previously bought BIO, according to @EmberCN.

According to @rovercrc, the stablecoin supply on Ethereum has reached a new all-time high, which the author characterizes as bullish for market liquidity and risk appetite (source: @rovercrc on X, Sep 8, 2025). Historically, elevated on-chain stablecoin balances are associated with greater crypto buying power as captured by Glassnode’s Stablecoin Supply Ratio methodology, which traders use to gauge potential rotation into assets like ETH and BTC (source: Glassnode Academy, Stablecoin Supply Ratio). For confirmation and execution, traders can monitor new USDT and USDC issuance and burns on Ethereum alongside exchange inflows and funding dynamics to assess whether this sidelined capital is moving into spot or perps for ETH and BTC (source: Tether Transparency; Circle Transparency; Glassnode exchange flow metrics).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale wallet deposited 10.56M USDC and bought 217,689 HYPE at an average price of 48.5 dollars per token, as shown on Hypurrscan at hypurrscan.io/address/0x746bd928F271434deaAa6682EEFe6f82674D4561. According to @OnchainLens and the Hypurrscan transaction record, this reflects continued accumulation by the same address, which anchors a visible cost basis near 48.5 dollars that traders often monitor for liquidity and potential support. According to @OnchainLens and Hypurrscan, the 10.56M dollar notional size concentrates spot demand in HYPE and can affect short-term order book dynamics, making flow from this address a key signal for entries and risk management.

According to @EmberCN, whale address qianbaidu.eth purchased 411,000 $HYPE today for a total of 19.57 million USDC at an average price of $47.6 (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, this sets a reported cost basis around $47.6 for the address, providing a clear reference level for $HYPE traders (source: @EmberCN).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the USD plus single-letter stablecoin ticker space is getting crowded, citing USDC, USDT, USDS, and USDD as examples and signaling less room for new symbols and higher lookalike risk in listings and pair selection. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 8, 2025 For trade execution, verify the asset name and contract address before interacting with any new USD* ticker to avoid misorders or fake token traps, as major exchanges instruct users to confirm contract addresses and issuer details prior to trading. Source: Binance Support Help Center Confirm stablecoin contract addresses from issuer pages such as Circle for USDC and Tether for USDT before swapping or depositing to ensure you are trading the intended asset rather than a similarly named token. Source: Circle official documentation and Tether issuer website Check order books and depth across similarly named stablecoin pairs because liquidity can fragment across USD* tickers, which can materially affect spreads and slippage during execution. Source: Exchange order book and depth tools provided by major centralized and decentralized exchanges

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a smart-money wallet deposited 2.95M USDC about two hours ago and has cumulatively spent 8.6M USD to build a HYPE position of 175,645 tokens at an average entry of 48.96; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Sep 8, 2025). The disclosed average cost of 48.96 offers a clear on-chain cost basis reference for traders evaluating near-term positioning in HYPE; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Sep 8, 2025).

According to @lookonchain, wallet qianbaidu.eth deposited another 6.06M USDC today to buy more HYPE; sources: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1964871123474190669 and Hypurrscan addresses https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x8319eF53245d8FFfe01Ae8FB4Ad0A22016BDbB42 and https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x746bd928F271434deaAa6682EEFe6f82674D4561. According to @lookonchain, the wallet purchased a cumulative 276,834 HYPE over the past week for about $13M; source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1964871123474190669. According to @lookonchain, this implies an average paid price near $46.96 per HYPE based on the reported totals; source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1964871123474190669. According to @lookonchain, the wallet is characterized as smart money, indicating notable whale activity in HYPE; source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1964871123474190669.

According to @OnchainLens, one whale deposited about $3.33M in $USDC to HyperLiquid, opened a 10x leveraged $HYPE long, and is staking 144,295 $HYPE (~$6.84M), with the position and staking balance visible on Hypurrscan at hypurrscan.io/address/0xe0f06e1042380fDf62b854c019A00A4f47704fC7 (source: Onchain Lens on X; Hypurrscan). A second whale deposited $2M, bought 42,161 $HYPE at $47.44, and sent it to staking, bringing its staked balance to 146,018 $HYPE (~$6.93M) per hypurrscan.io/address/0x23fA1AD1dc4bCdFFA41B722a7aef4e3E335D74C4 (source: Onchain Lens on X; Hypurrscan). Combined, these two wallets hold 290,313 $HYPE (~$13.77M) in staking and added fresh long-side exposure on HyperLiquid, as reported by @OnchainLens with transaction details corroborated via the cited Hypurrscan address pages (source: Onchain Lens on X; Hypurrscan).