According to @EmberCN, a whale who previously netted about $850,000 swing-trading WBTC has re-accumulated 264.8 WBTC over the last four days using $30 million USDT at an average price of $113,262 per WBTC, as reported in the post x.com/EmberCN/status/1982613407665983831. According to @EmberCN, the same wallet bought 97.6 WBTC at $110,039 in late September and sold at $118,748 in early October, implying roughly $850,000 profit, which matches a calculation from those cited prices. According to @EmberCN, the on-chain wallet for verification is debank.com/profile/0x8c0824ffccbe9a3cdda4c3d409a0b7447320f364, which traders can reference to confirm size and timing. Based on the @EmberCN figures, the whale’s new cost basis is $113,262 and the prior exit level is $118,748, defining a $5,486 spread between the latest entry and the last distribution price. Using the prices cited by @EmberCN, if the wallet exited the new 264.8 WBTC position at $118,748 again, the theoretical gross PnL would be about $1.45 million. According to @EmberCN, the post is sponsored by Bitget.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, smart-money wallet 0x6e1784…90733 spent 10,000,000 USDT to buy 88.6143 WBTC about one hour before the post at an average price of $112,846; source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1982415778109628860. The same source reports this address began its current swing accumulation on Oct 21 and is showing an unrealized profit of $747,000 for the period; source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1982415778109628860. Including prior entries, the wallet now holds a cumulative 271.73 WBTC with a blended cost basis of $110,403.69, valued at roughly $30,000,000; source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1982415778109628860. The wallet address is 0x6e1784b360F1bEcb692FCf8393A699811af90733 and can be reviewed on CoW Explorer for on-chain verification; source: https://explorer.cow.fi/address/0x6e1784b360F1bEcb692FCf8393A699811af90733. Key on-chain reference levels for traders from this activity are the average add price $112,846 and the blended cost basis $110,403.69 as reported; source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1982415778109628860.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x6e1784b360F1bEcb692FCf8393A699811af90733 bought 183.12 WBTC on-chain in the past hour at an average price of $109,219, totaling roughly $20 million. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; CoW Explorer address 0x6e1784b360F1bEcb692FCf8393A699811af90733. The post also reports this wallet realized about $651,000 profit from WBTC swing trades in July. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. Key trading references from this flow are the average entry level at $109,219 and the net size of 183.12 WBTC for monitoring subsequent on-chain activity via the provided address. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; CoW Explorer address 0x6e1784b360F1bEcb692FCf8393A699811af90733.

According to @PeckShieldAlert, a whale wallet 0x19c4...d26a with long exposure to WBTC, ETH, and LINK via Aave was liquidated for $1.45M after BTC broke below $104K, source: @PeckShieldAlert. The alert dated Oct 17, 2025 identifies the affected markets (Aave, WBTC, ETH, LINK) and the BTC trigger level of $104K for the liquidation, source: @PeckShieldAlert.

According to @PeckShieldAlert, on Oct 17, 2025 a whale wallet 0xbf2b..15bd long on WBTC via Aave was liquidated for 1.50 million USD after BTC fell below 108,000 USD.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 33 million USD into HyperLiquid, bought 7,311 ETH at 4,514 USD, and supplied the ETH to Aave V3 for lending, source: Onchain Lens on X. According to @OnchainLens, the entity now holds 38,275 ETH valued at 172.9 million USD and 35.18 WBTC valued at 4.34 million USD across multiple wallets, corroborated by the referenced addresses on hypurrscan.io and Arkham Intelligence, source: Onchain Lens on X; hypurrscan.io address 0xC7880fC94d88476c0df9272928645834E6F39854; Arkham address 0xd65FDb5EB1efD6A8859e619793d25C9357948568. According to @OnchainLens, the purchase size and price imply approximately 33.0 million USD deployed (7,311 x 4,514), aligning with the reported deposit size and confirming net long ETH exposure of 7,311 ETH, source: calculation based on figures reported by Onchain Lens on X. Adding 7,311 ETH to Aave V3 increases ETH reserve liquidity, which mechanically reduces utilization and can lower variable borrow APRs and supply APYs if utilization declines under Aave’s interest rate model, source: Aave Protocol documentation docs.aave.com. Traders can monitor Aave V3 ETH reserve utilization and rate changes to assess funding conditions after this inflow, and verify positions via the cited hypurrscan.io and Arkham addresses, source: Aave app reserve overview app.aave.com; hypurrscan.io; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @PeckShieldAlert, the UXLINK exploiter swapped 28.67 WBTC for roughly 778 ETH valued at about $3.27 million; source: @PeckShieldAlert on X https://twitter.com/PeckShieldAlert/status/1972917298286739458. The exploiter has started depositing the acquired ETH into Tornado Cash; source: @PeckShieldAlert on X https://twitter.com/PeckShieldAlert/status/1972917298286739458.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, after trader Eugene publicly turned bearish, the broader market moved lower intraday, prompting heightened attention to whale flows for BTC. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xdfcaf2...07 spent 9.829 million USDT to purchase 89.44 WBTC at an average price of 109,897 dollars within the past 30 minutes, indicating concentrated spot demand near 110,000 dollars. Sources: @ai_9684xtpa on X; CoW Explorer address 0xdfcaf2...07. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the same wallet reportedly profited 5.16 million dollars from shorting BTC during the LUNA/UST crash and has accumulated 13.293 million dollars in gains by bottom-buying BTC and ETH, with its latest BTC reduction occurring around 115,000 dollars. Sources: @ai_9684xtpa on X; CoW Explorer address 0xdfcaf2...07. Traders are monitoring the 109,897 to 115,000 dollar zone defined by this wallet’s average buy and prior trim to assess near-term momentum and potential invalidation via further entries or distribution from the address. Sources: @ai_9684xtpa on X; CoW Explorer address 0xdfcaf2...07.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x4F12b217Aa59E6D3e1f91ca2dC96f9543576618B sold approximately $4.84 million worth of WBTC and $2.838 million of AAVE about three hours ago, signaling an exit from BTC and AAVE exposure. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1971474512039608699; hypurrscan.io/address/0x4F12b217Aa59E6D3e1f91ca2dC96f9543576618B The same wallet then deposited 4.692 million USDC into Hyperliquid and purchased 101,000 HYPE for about $4.25 million, implying an average fill near $42.1 per HYPE. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1971474512039608699; hypurrscan.io/address/0x4F12b217Aa59E6D3e1f91ca2dC96f9543576618B The author frames this as a rotation into the Perp DEX narrative and notes the wallet previously showed a bearish bias on ASTER with three short positions. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1971474512039608699 These on-chain flows concentrate the wallet’s exposure into HYPE on Hyperliquid, a trading-relevant shift for monitoring HYPE liquidity and momentum amid the Perp DEX trend. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1971474512039608699; hypurrscan.io/address/0x4F12b217Aa59E6D3e1f91ca2dC96f9543576618B

According to @PeckShieldAlert, the UXLINK exploiter swapped 1,620 ETH for 6.73 million DAI, source: @PeckShieldAlert. The address currently holds 26.564 million DAI, 40.2 WBTC valued at approximately $4.52 million, and 990.7 ETH valued at approximately $4.13 million, source: @PeckShieldAlert. These on-chain balances define the exploiter’s immediately movable inventory across DAI, WBTC, and ETH for trade execution tracking, source: @PeckShieldAlert.

According to the source, a wallet reportedly lost 6.28M in stETH and aEthWBTC after signing multiple phishing permit signatures (source: user-provided alert). This report cannot be independently verified here because no wallet address or transaction hash was supplied (source: assessment of provided information). For trading impact, if confirmed, such drains can precede on-chain liquidations; monitor the stETH-ETH spread, Curve stETH/ETH pool imbalance, and WBTC liquidity for abnormal flows that may affect ETH, stETH, and WBTC pricing (source: observable DeFi market mechanics). Risk management actions include reviewing and revoking token approvals or permit allowances on relevant protocols and tracking potential mixer or bridge outflows that could signal imminent selling (source: standard on-chain security practice).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a single whale accumulated $28M of ETH and WBTC over the past 5 days, including $8M in ETH and $4M in WBTC in the last 8 hours via CoWswap; source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1966669430664098127 and https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1965220765684613383, on-chain address: https://explorer.cow.fi/address/0x22a867f24093d9249653e07D89805016C8D6a2A0. Per the same source and wallet data, the whale now holds 3,550.67 ETH (~$16M) at an average cost of $4,506.19 with an unrealized profit of $0.727M; source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1966669430664098127 and on-chain address: https://explorer.cow.fi/address/0x22a867f24093d9249653e07D89805016C8D6a2A0. Per the same source and wallet data, WBTC holdings total 104.52 (~$12M) at an average cost of $114,810.56 with an unrealized profit of $0.147M; source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1966669430664098127 and on-chain address: https://explorer.cow.fi/address/0x22a867f24093d9249653e07D89805016C8D6a2A0. For trading, these whale cost bases near $4,506 for ETH and $114,811 for WBTC can serve as on-chain reference levels, and further accumulation or distribution can be monitored via the cited wallet on CoW Explorer; source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1966669430664098127 and on-chain address: https://explorer.cow.fi/address/0x22a867f24093d9249653e07D89805016C8D6a2A0.

According to @EmberCN, a swing whale bought 2,171.4 ETH for $9.5M USDT at an average price of $4,375 and 39.6 WBTC for $4.5M USDT at an average price of $113,544 within the past 45 minutes, totaling $14M USDT. Source: X post by @EmberCN on Sep 10, 2025 (https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1965773070653858072). According to @EmberCN, the referenced wallets can be viewed on Debank at debank.com/profile/0x109b304ab7eee74dafc93e3b04eae7001d7a295f and debank.com/profile/0x8d63d0d38b9d2f6e34fd73cfd58442495b95da16, providing on-chain context for the reported buys. Source: X post by @EmberCN on Sep 10, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, a whale or institution accumulated about $230 million in WBTC and ETH over three weeks using Aave recursive borrowing, indicating a leveraged long structure; source: @EmberCN. The wallet holds 1,356.8 WBTC valued at $149 million with an average entry of $117,556; source: @EmberCN. It also holds 18,454 ETH valued at $81.06 million with an average entry of $4,415; source: @EmberCN. Outstanding borrowings on Aave total $114 million due to the leverage loop; source: @EmberCN. Based on these figures, the position implies roughly a 50 percent loan-to-value ratio calculated from $114 million debt over $230 million assets; source: @EmberCN. The address for verification is provided in the source post; source: @EmberCN.

According to Lookonchain, wallet 0x4ED0 purchased another 5,553 ETH (~$24.44M) within the past 40 minutes, source: Lookonchain. Since Aug 11, the address accumulated 18,447 ETH (~$81.5M) at a $4,417 average and 1,357 WBTC (~$160M) at a $117,547 average, then deposited these assets into Aave to borrow $114.2M USDT, source: Lookonchain. Based on these figures, the collateral value is roughly $241.5M versus $114.2M debt, implying an estimated loan-to-value near 47%, derived from Lookonchain’s reported amounts, source: Lookonchain.

According to @EmberCN, over the last 30 minutes the whale purchased about $10 million of WBTC and $3.19 million of ETH, source: @EmberCN. For the day, the address accumulated 589.5 WBTC (about $65.4 million) and 691.5 ETH (about $3.19 million) at average buy prices of $110,947 and $4,616 respectively, source: @EmberCN. These figures imply roughly $68.6 million in combined net buys today across WBTC and ETH, source: @EmberCN. Traders can track the reported average entries as near-term reference levels at $110,947 for WBTC/BTC and $4,616 for ETH, source: @EmberCN.

According to @EmberCN, a leveraged WBTC whale borrowed 14.473 million U in the last 20 minutes to purchase 132 WBTC, bringing today’s total to 500.2 WBTC worth about $55.4 million with an average entry price of $110,762 via Binance withdrawals and on-chain U borrowing, source: @EmberCN on X, 2025-08-27 https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1960642273743659266.

According to @EmberCN, an on-chain whale withdrew 145 WBTC from Binance around 11 hours ago, deposited it to Aave as collateral, borrowed 13M USDT, and purchased an additional 117.5 WBTC, bringing total holdings to 262.5 WBTC valued at approximately $28.95M with an average cost of $110,286, address: https://t.co/QSAjtClnrK, source: @EmberCN. This sequence reflects a leveraged long position in WBTC financed via Aave against WBTC collateral, making the reported $110,286 cost basis a key reference level for position PnL, source: @EmberCN.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a whale labeled as smart money sold another 15 WBTC at $111,991.22 about eight hours before the post (approximately $1.68 million), leaving only 15 WBTC remaining in the tracked wallet. According to @ai_9684xtpa, BTC has pulled back $2,276 from $114,267 to $111,991 since the entity first trimmed its position two days ago, and the same trader reportedly profited $5.16 million shorting BTC during the LUNA/UST crash, with the wallet address shared by the source for on-chain verification.

According to PeckShieldAlert, address 0xac1f...f553 was liquidated for 29.68 WBTC, valued at approximately $3.41 million, as BTC fell below $113,000 (source: PeckShieldAlert). According to PeckShieldAlert, the same address still supplies 42.71 WBTC against roughly $3.1 million in stablecoin borrows, highlighting ongoing on-chain leveraged exposure (source: PeckShieldAlert).