According to @ai_9684xtpa, two addresses that may belong to the same entity withdrew 69.23 million WLFI from Bitget over the past 10 hours, worth $14.228 million, with 30 million WLFI deposited to Binance and 39.23 million WLFI remaining at address 0x4624e5f66C4B643f5cEFD3209Ba836B7c9A0AaF1, showing an unrealized profit of $251,000 (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The involved wallets are 0xe4B65476D0921C1eeED2fB7Cf09bc63E2f33F54f and 0x4624e5f66C4B643f5cEFD3209Ba836B7c9A0AaF1, as listed on Arkham Intelligence (source: Arkham Intelligence).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a newly created wallet 0x4624e5f66C4B643f5cEFD3209Ba836B7c9A0AaF1 withdrew 35.71M WLFI worth about 7.1M USD from Bitget roughly four hours before the Sep 12, 2025 post, source: @OnchainDataNerd. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the on-chain reference address shared is intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4624e5f66C4B643f5cEFD3209Ba836B7c9A0AaF1, source: @OnchainDataNerd. According to calculations based on the 7.1M USD figure cited by @OnchainDataNerd, the implied average value of the transferred WLFI is approximately 0.199 USD per token, source: @OnchainDataNerd.

According to Onchain Lens, a newly created wallet withdrew 35.71M WLFI worth $7.15M from Bitget to address 0x4624e5f66C4B643f5cEFD3209Ba836B7c9A0AaF1. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Sep 12, 2025. Based on those figures, the transfer implies an average value of roughly $0.20 per WLFI. Source: calculation using Onchain Lens data on X, Sep 12, 2025. Large exchange outflows can reduce available sell-side liquidity and are closely watched as potential accumulation signals when sustained. Source: Glassnode on-chain research and Binance Research analyses on exchange flow metrics.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a single entity withdrew 24.05 million WLFI from Bybit valued at $4.94 million on Sep 8, 2025 (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the entity’s cumulative spend across WLFI and BLOCK now exceeds $23.26 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the whale controls 0.097% of WLFI supply with an updated average cost basis of $0.2194 (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Given the exchange outflow scale reported by @ai_9684xtpa, traders often monitor WLFI exchange liquidity and potential volatility around whale accumulation events to manage order book depth and slippage risk (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, wallet 0x8C4 withdrew another 10.25M WLFI, approximately 2.35M USD, from Bybit about three hours ago, source: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1964874906174439611. According to @OnchainDataNerd and Arkham Intelligence, the address 0x8C43369166d42dA3cf289b7caA72C57E98496CAd now holds roughly 73M WLFI with an average entry near 0.23 USD, sources: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1964874906174439611 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x8C43369166d42dA3cf289b7caA72C57E98496CAd. Per @OnchainDataNerd, this constitutes a net exchange outflow from Bybit and removes 10.25M WLFI from the exchange’s immediately tradable balance, while Arkham Intelligence shows the tokens in self-custody at the cited address, sources: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1964874906174439611 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x8C43369166d42dA3cf289b7caA72C57E98496CAd.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale withdrew 10.25M WLFI (about USD 2.34M) from Bybit and 5.36M BLOCK (about USD 0.509M) from MEXC, citing Nansen data as the source. @OnchainLens reports the wallet at address 0x8c43369166d42da3cf289b7caa72c57e98496cad now holds 72.83M WLFI valued at USD 16.39M and 17.23M BLOCK valued at USD 1.2M, with figures attributed to Nansen. Based on the valuations provided by @OnchainLens, the implied unit prices are roughly USD 0.225 per WLFI (16.39M divided by 72.83M) and USD 0.070 per BLOCK (1.2M divided by 17.23M), and the withdrawn tranches imply approximately USD 0.228 per WLFI (2.34M divided by 10.25M) and USD 0.095 per BLOCK (0.509M divided by 5.36M), all derived from the same reported data via Nansen. In total, @OnchainLens indicates the wallet controls about USD 17.59M across WLFI and BLOCK per Nansen data.

According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet withdrew 13M WLFI worth about $2.84M from Binance around 8 hours ago, with the address shown as 0x0AA8Ef2CC4256B05E32248fD792E096150c32F9E (source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1964483245174870248). The transfer and balance details can be verified on Arkham Intelligence’s explorer for the cited address (source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x0AA8Ef2CC4256B05E32248fD792E096150c32F9E). For trading context, @lookonchain explicitly flagged this single large WLFI outflow from a Binance wallet to the new address (source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1964483245174870248).

According to @AltcoinGordon, Justin Sun plans to market buy $10M of WLFI and $10M of ALTS on X on Sep 6, 2025, source: @AltcoinGordon on X (Sep 6, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, the post characterizes the move as potential damage control, signaling urgency behind using market orders, source: @AltcoinGordon on X (Sep 6, 2025). According to @AltcoinGordon, no execution venue, timing details, or confirmations from other parties were provided in the post, indicating a single-source claim for traders to monitor, source: @AltcoinGordon on X (Sep 6, 2025). According to Binance Academy, market orders consume order book liquidity and can widen spreads and increase short-term volatility, which is relevant for WLFI and ALTS if such buys occur, source: Binance Academy. According to Investopedia, large market orders can incur slippage when depth is thin, informing risk management and potential entry/exit adjustments for WLFI and ALTS traders, source: Investopedia.

According to @OnchainLens, an on-chain whale deposited 5M USDC into Hyperliquid and opened a 3x leveraged long on HYPE, with the activity viewable on Hypurrscan: hypurrscan.io/address/0x363db8A8387d59B4b53e473FC9C12fbF7994F0ef. According to @OnchainLens, the same address also holds long positions in ETH at 5x, PUMP at 3x, and PENGU at 3x on Hyperliquid. According to @OnchainLens, the address has open orders for HYPE and WLFI to further increase its position.

According to @cookiedotfun, WLFI sentiment turned sharply negative over the past 24 hours after the project reportedly blacklisted and froze Justin Sun’s significant token allocation, source: @cookiedotfun. According to @cookiedotfun, the move sparked widespread backlash on crypto Twitter and amplified concerns about extreme centralization and potential market manipulation, source: @cookiedotfun. According to @cookiedotfun, WLFI fell roughly 50% from its peak and is currently ranked number one on their bad sentiment leaderboard, source: @cookiedotfun. For traders, these reported blacklist and freeze controls alongside deteriorating sentiment point to elevated governance and counterparty risk, heightened volatility, and the need to monitor liquidity, slippage, and order book depth, per @cookiedotfun.

According to @rovercrc, Justin Sun announced a market purchase of $10 million in WLFI tokens, signaling a bullish stance (source: X post by Crypto Rover: https://twitter.com/rovercrc/status/1963965789679055217). The post did not include wallet or transaction details for independent verification at the time of posting, so traders may need on-chain proof before reacting (source: X post by Crypto Rover: https://twitter.com/rovercrc/status/1963965789679055217; Etherscan guide: https://info.etherscan.com/etherscan-101-a-beginners-guide/). Market buy orders consume order book liquidity and can increase slippage and short-term volatility, especially in tokens with shallow depth (source: Binance Academy — What is a Market Order: https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/what-is-a-market-order; Investopedia — Slippage: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/slippage.asp; Binance Academy — Order Book: https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/what-is-an-order-book). Justin Sun is the founder associated with the TRON (TRX) ecosystem, so mentions of large purchases can influence related sentiment even without direct WLFI linkage disclosed in the post (source: Justin Sun — Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Sun; X post by Crypto Rover: https://twitter.com/rovercrc/status/1963965789679055217).

According to @justinsuntron, he intends to place market buy orders totaling $20 million, split as $10 million in ALTS and $10 million in WLFI, stating that U.S.-listed crypto stocks are undervalued; source: X/@justinsuntron, Sep 5, 2025. The disclosure specifies both tickers and the order type as market buy, directly indicating planned immediate order flow in ALTS and WLFI; source: X/@justinsuntron, Sep 5, 2025. He also tagged @worldlibertyfi, @EricTrump, @DonaldJTrumpJr, @ZachWitkoff, @zakfolkman, and @WatcherChase in the announcement; source: X/@justinsuntron, Sep 5, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the trader known as Maji closed a 5x long on $WLFI five minutes before the update, realizing a profit of $55,700 (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 5, 2025). The trader still holds a 15x long on $ETH and a 10x long on $HYPE with $2.71 million cumulative unrealized profit, and the account’s total cumulative profit exceeds $36.55 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 5, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance Alpha token $M surged about 300% in 8 days with a fully diluted valuation near $17.2B, rivaling WLFI by FDV metrics (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance open interest tied to $M is roughly $50M, creating a notable mismatch between large FDV and relatively light derivatives positioning that leaves traders hesitant to buy or short (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, this setup has produced a momentum-driven but cautious market where both sides remain reluctant to take aggressive positions (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @bubblemaps, Justin Sun transferred $9 million of still-unlocked WLFI to HTX, bringing total WLFI sent to centralized exchanges to $10 million over the past three days (source: @bubblemaps on X, Sep 5, 2025). Traders focused on WLFI liquidity can monitor HTX deposits and broader CEX inflow trends given the size and cadence of these transfers (source: @bubblemaps on X, Sep 5, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, moonmanifest47.eth transferred 100,000,000 WLFI to new address 0x6e7e6f4b73794321852993bf8f5524094e74d7c4 about 10 minutes before the post, with the transfer valued at approximately 18.24M USD, implying around 0.1824 USD per WLFI. Source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1963808726223089795 The WLFI token contract 0xda5e1988097297dcdc1f90d4dfe7909e847cbef6 on Etherscan shows the recipient address holding the transferred WLFI, confirming the on-chain movement. Source: https://etherscan.io/token/0xda5e1988097297dcdc1f90d4dfe7909e847cbef6?a=0x6e7e6f4b73794321852993bf8f5524094e74d7c4

According to @lookonchain, Machi Big Brother opened a long position of 10,000,000 WLFI valued at approximately $1.8 million, reported on Sep 5, 2025; source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1963789838244872663. According to @lookonchain, the initiating wallet is linked in the post, and on-chain details are viewable at https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872; source: Hypurrscan https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872. According to @lookonchain, no additional execution data such as entry price, leverage, or liquidation thresholds was disclosed in the announcement; source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1963789838244872663. According to Hypurrscan, traders can monitor the referenced address for subsequent position changes and on-chain updates; source: Hypurrscan https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Hyperbot’s trader page for address 0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 shows a first 5x WLFI long, holding 10,000,000 WLFI with an entry price of 0.1822 and an estimated notional value of about 1.82 million dollars. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 According to @ai_9684xtpa, the position was opened after a Sun-linked address was reportedly blacklisted, a timing detail attributed to the author. Source: @ai_9684xtpa Traders can monitor the live position metrics, including size and entry, at the cited Hyperbot link for updates. Source: hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872

According to @OnchainLens, World Liberty blacklisted an address associated with Justin Sun, freezing 540 million WLFI in unlocked tokens and 2.4 billion WLFI in locked tokens. Source: Onchain Lens X post dated Sep 4, 2025 and the Etherscan transaction https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0230880850ae1daebdb1a9984f0f6b1601390bbe4738152556738aa901862d74. According to @OnchainLens, World Liberty alleged that an exchange used customer tokens to sell and depress WLFI price. Source: Onchain Lens X post dated Sep 4, 2025. According to @OnchainLens, Justin Sun invested 75 million dollars to buy 3 billion WLFI across November 2024 and January 2025. Source: Onchain Lens X post dated Sep 4, 2025. For traders, the blacklisting event and the related allegations are material for monitoring WLFI liquidity and address risk, which can be checked via the referenced Etherscan transaction and related address activity. Source: Etherscan link provided by Onchain Lens.

According to @bubblemaps, Justin Sun was blacklisted after allegedly selling $WLFI, with Bubblemaps stating it was the first to track his centralized exchange deposits linked to the token (source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 4, 2025). The post does not specify which entity enforced the blacklist or the amounts involved, so near-term WLFI trading may hinge on additional disclosures and on-chain evidence shared by Bubblemaps (source: Bubblemaps on X, Sep 4, 2025).