According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet bc1qup received 5,817 BTC valued at about $678M from a FalconX-labeled address roughly 8 hours ago. According to Arkham Intelligence, the bc1qup address and its inbound transaction from a FalconX entity are visible on-chain, allowing traders to monitor any subsequent transfers from this wallet in real time.

According to @OnchainLens using Nansen data, a long-dormant Bitcoin whale moved 1,000 BTC worth $115.95M to four new addresses after 11.7 years, originating from wallet 1NzHXRDizgEGaJZfBG46k66QXpRzDrtpZo on Sep 17, 2025. Source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen.

According to Onchain Lens, a tracked wallet received 99,675 SOL worth $22.3M from FalconX in the past 4 hours; source: Onchain Lens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1965959652413477190. The wallet now holds 119,508.41 SOL valued at $26.93M as liquid balance and 21,695.46 SOL valued at $4.89M staked; sources: Onchain Lens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1965959652413477190 and Solscan https://solscan.io/account/FaZnFJCRzWNNn4FQnWB3pkoN5qZLEVLFiUXjNhRAoWGQ#transfers. Total holdings stand at 141,203.87 SOL, of which approximately 15.4% is staked; source: Solscan https://solscan.io/account/FaZnFJCRzWNNn4FQnWB3pkoN5qZLEVLFiUXjNhRAoWGQ#transfers.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, six hours ago a wallet possibly associated with Flowdesk deposited 6.7 million ENA approximately 5.54 million USD to Binance and those tokens were originally received three weeks ago source: @OnchainDataNerd. The on-chain address referenced is 0xB3DA28717944D3BfD8056aB7a2F16569953F466a with details visible at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xB3DA28717944D3BfD8056aB7a2F16569953F466a source: Arkham Intelligence. Flowdesk is identified as one of ENA’s market makers in the cited post source: @OnchainDataNerd. Exchange inflows are commonly monitored by traders as a gauge of potential liquidity supply and short term sell side availability in token markets source: CryptoQuant research.

According to @lookonchain, Longling Capital bought 5,000 ETH worth $21.57M and now holds 88,589 ETH valued at $383M (source: @lookonchain). The source also characterizes Longling Capital as known for buying low and selling high, highlighting a notable accumulation by a large holder (source: @lookonchain).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, moonmanifest47.eth transferred 100,000,000 WLFI to new address 0x6e7e6f4b73794321852993bf8f5524094e74d7c4 about 10 minutes before the post, with the transfer valued at approximately 18.24M USD, implying around 0.1824 USD per WLFI. Source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1963808726223089795 The WLFI token contract 0xda5e1988097297dcdc1f90d4dfe7909e847cbef6 on Etherscan shows the recipient address holding the transferred WLFI, confirming the on-chain movement. Source: https://etherscan.io/token/0xda5e1988097297dcdc1f90d4dfe7909e847cbef6?a=0x6e7e6f4b73794321852993bf8f5524094e74d7c4

According to @lookonchain, an Ethereum ICO participant who received 1,000,000 ETH reactivated after 8 years and transferred 150,000 ETH valued at about $645M to a new wallet for staking, source: @lookonchain. The participant invested $310,000 in the Ethereum ICO across three wallets and received 1,000,000 ETH now valued around $4.3B, source: @lookonchain. After staking 150,000 ETH, the participant still holds 105,000 ETH valued at about $451.5M across two wallets, source: @lookonchain. ICO wallets reported are 0x87d7ac0653ccc67aa9c3469eef4352193f7dbb86, 0xdddd7b9e6eab409b92263ac272da801b664f8a57, and 0x7c532db9e0c06c26fd40acc56ac55c1ee92d3c3a; the staking wallet is 0x317BcFCC8d645e365A796eb505b57c060aC2132B; the wallets still holding 105,000 ETH are 0x7c2a289c0523e748c286A37570D2efc16d2C934e and 0x565B8FbF9336BeC8FbFb4F78fBf30D7f70D6973b, source: @lookonchain.

According to Lookonchain, Trend Research deposited 129M NEIRO (about $10M) into Bybit roughly 40 minutes ago, Source: Lookonchain. Lookonchain reports that Trend Research withdrew 670.75M NEIRO ($55.55M), equal to 67.08% of total supply, from exchanges between Mar 24 and Aug 23 via 14 wallets at an average acquisition price of $0.083, Source: Lookonchain. Lookonchain identifies Trend Research as holding 67.08% of the NEIRO supply, establishing a concentrated ownership profile and a clear average cost basis at $0.083 for this holder, Source: Lookonchain. Lookonchain’s data gives traders concrete reference points, including the new 129M NEIRO exchange deposit to monitor on Bybit and the holder’s breakeven near $0.083 for scenario planning and execution risk controls, Source: Lookonchain.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 692 BTC (about $77.32 million) from Galaxy Digital to address 3DavyTWVZ1TXTY6tAzw4dRg3jceSpuJ3YS; source: @OnchainLens. Timestamp: Sep 4, 2025; source: @OnchainLens.

According to @OnchainLens, on Sept 1, 2025 three wallets sold 8,961 ETH for 39.26 million DAI at an average execution price of 4,381 USD, based on on-chain data shared by @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, the funds entering these wallets from Tornado Cash belong to a hacker.

According to @lookonchain, Longling Capital executed an on-chain purchase of 7,000 ETH valued at $30.67M roughly three hours before the post, and is described as a firm that historically buys low and sells high (source: @lookonchain). Based on the reported figures, the implied average execution price is approximately $4,381 per ETH, calculated directly from $30.67M divided by 7,000 ETH (source: @lookonchain).

According to @rovercrc, a crypto whale purchased approximately $163,000,000 worth of BTC, flagged as a large spot-buy alert for short-term traders, but no confirming details were provided in the post (source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 30, 2025). The post does not include a transaction hash, wallet address, or exchange venue to independently verify the buy, so the flow should be treated as unconfirmed until corroborated by on-chain data or exchange prints (source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 30, 2025). No specific execution timestamp beyond the posting time was disclosed, limiting immediate order book and liquidity analysis based solely on this claim (source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 30, 2025).

According to @rovercrc, 1,000,000,000 USDT was minted at Tether Treasury in an Aug 28, 2025 post on X, flagging a large treasury mint event. source: Crypto Rover on X, Aug 28, 2025. Tether’s CTO Paolo Ardoino has previously stated that Treasury mints are typically authorized but not issued and used to replenish inventory for future issuance requests, meaning circulating supply may not increase immediately. source: Paolo Ardoino on X, 2023–2024 statements. Traders monitor large USDT treasury mints as potential signals for upcoming stablecoin liquidity shifts that can influence BTC and ETH market depth and funding conditions. source: Kaiko Research on stablecoin market structure (2023–2024); CryptoQuant analyses on stablecoin exchange inflows and BTC performance. Before positioning, practitioners commonly seek on-chain confirmation via Tether’s Transparency dashboard and issuance alerts from Whale Alert and relevant block explorers. source: Tether Transparency; Whale Alert; Etherscan; TRONSCAN.

According to @EmberCN, an address deposited 200 million PENGU worth $6.12 million into Binance about 30 minutes ago; source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 28, 2025, x.com/EmberCN/status/1960970463200600556. The same address has cumulatively transferred 765 million PENGU worth $26.57 million to Binance over the past two months during a high-price range, with an average price of $0.035; source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 28, 2025, x.com/EmberCN/status/1960970463200600556. Traders can reference the $0.035 average transfer price and the fresh 200 million token exchange inflow as data points for liquidity and risk management in $PENGU; data source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 28, 2025, x.com/EmberCN/status/1960970463200600556. The original post notes the update is sponsored by Bitget; source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 28, 2025, x.com/EmberCN/status/1960970463200600556.

According to @lookonchain, a correction clarifies that smart trader address 0xEB8d withdrew 3,516 OKB valued around USD 658.9K from OKX to XLayer, source: @lookonchain. This on-chain movement confirms an exchange outflow of 3,516 OKB from OKX to the XLayer network, source: @lookonchain.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an address that accumulated 1,294,000 LINK since Aug 15 transferred the entire balance to Coinbase about five minutes before the post, valuing the deposit at approximately 30.08 million dollars based on a referenced price of 23.25 dollars per LINK, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 26, 2025. The same source states the address withdrew LINK from Binance at an average cost of 23.69 dollars, implying about a 570,000 dollar loss if the Coinbase deposit is sold at 23.25 dollars, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 26, 2025. The post includes the wallet address link for independent verification of the on-chain transfer and exchange deposit, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 26, 2025.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, an on-chain wallet swapped 5,000,000 USDC for 1,076 ETH roughly 15 minutes before their post, indicating a large buy-side flow into ETH (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The address referenced was shared via an Arkham Intelligence explorer link by the author, identifying the wallet involved in the transaction (source: Arkham Intelligence link via @OnchainDataNerd). The author also noted the wallet may be associated with WLFI, which remains unverified at the time of reporting (source: @OnchainDataNerd). Based on the reported amounts, the swap implies an average of about 4,647 USDC per ETH, providing traders a reference for execution size and potential slippage in intraday context (source: calculation from figures reported by @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created Bitcoin wallet at address bc1qcn6y873qtmjquh5x6zl0r2lcqgufpn9d9nae0q received 1,046 BTC worth about 118.22 million dollars from Binance roughly 20 minutes ago. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 22, 2025. Large exchange outflows to newly created self-custody wallets are commonly associated with potential accumulation and reduced immediate sell-side liquidity when the pattern persists across sessions. Source: Glassnode, Week On-Chain research series and exchange flow methodologies. For trading context, Glassnode notes that sustained net outflows carry more signal than single transfers, so follow-on flows from Binance would better confirm a meaningful decline in exchange reserves rather than a one-off move. Source: Glassnode, Week On-Chain research series and exchange flow methodologies.

According to @zachxbt (X, Aug 21, 2025), on Aug 19, 2025 a victim was socially engineered by impostors posing as exchange and hardware-wallet support and lost 783 BTC (~$91M) (source: @zachxbt, X, Aug 21, 2025). The thief has begun peeling the funds with deposits sent to Wasabi, signaling active on-chain distribution of the stolen BTC (source: @zachxbt, X, Aug 21, 2025). Traders should monitor the related peel-chain and Wasabi inflows to manage UTXO exposure and potential exchange touchpoints (source: @zachxbt, X, Aug 21, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 60,000 SOL (~$11.23M) from Binance over the past 15 hours to address D87JTHDiB3Daj9jNL2xsasSuG5G22TZSPvpGBCNSsF6G (source: @OnchainLens, Aug 21, 2025). Based on the reported notional, the average transfer price is approximately $187.17 per SOL, calculated from $11.23M divided by 60,000 using @OnchainLens data (source: @OnchainLens; calculation from reported figures). As these funds moved off-exchange, they were removed from Binance order books at the time of withdrawal; traders can monitor this address for any re-deposits to assess near-term liquidity signals for SOL (source: @OnchainLens for the address and withdrawal alert).