According to @lookonchain, Unipcs @theunipcs purchased 2.54M $4 for 407,174 USDT and now holds 13.185M $4 valued at 3.26M USD, source: Lookonchain on X Oct 7, 2025 x.com/lookonchain/status/1975567593554784688. The latest tranche implies an average fill price of approximately 0.1603 USDT per $4 based on the reported amounts, source: Lookonchain on X Oct 7, 2025 x.com/lookonchain/status/1975567593554784688. The additional 2.54M $4 represents roughly 19.3% of the post-trade 13.185M stack, derived from the figures provided, source: Lookonchain on X Oct 7, 2025 x.com/lookonchain/status/1975567593554784688. The stated mark value of 3.26M USD for 13.185M $4 implies a per-token valuation near 0.247 USDT at the time of reporting, based on the same data, source: Lookonchain on X Oct 7, 2025 x.com/lookonchain/status/1975567593554784688.

According to @rovercrc, a post on X on Oct 4, 2025 reported a $122,000,000 purchase of Bitcoin (BTC); the post did not include a transaction hash, wallet address, or exchange print to verify the claim. Source: @rovercrc on X, Oct 4, 2025. Traders commonly wait for independent confirmation of alleged whale transactions via on-chain trackers or exchange data before adjusting positions. Source: Binance Academy educational resources on crypto whales and market impact. Large notional orders can affect order book liquidity and short-term volatility, so monitoring spot order books, perpetual funding rates, and open interest for dislocations is standard practice. Source: Binance Academy educational resources on order books, funding rates, and risk management.

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet at 0x982C042fe4db3d7e4e352049212fcAE461513D57 received 26,029 ETH valued at USD 116.8 million from Kraken on Oct 4, 2025, source: @OnchainLens. Traders can monitor this fresh address for subsequent movements following this large on-chain transfer disclosed by @OnchainLens, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @EmberCN, an alleged hacker who stole funds from Coinbase users swapped 22.95M DAI to USDC, bridged the funds to Solana, and purchased 100,913 SOL at an average price of $227 about 15 hours ago. According to Arkham Intelligence address pages referenced by @EmberCN, the receiving Solana addresses executed the SOL buys following the cross-chain transfer. According to @EmberCN, the $22.95M notional and $227 reported average fill indicate notable liquidity absorption, a reference level traders may monitor for positioning. According to Arkham Intelligence data cited by @EmberCN, tracking the specified Solana addresses for subsequent transfers may provide early signals of distribution that could impact SOL order books.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a wallet labeled "Trend Researh" withdrew 17,450 ETH from Aave and transferred the full amount to Binance roughly two minutes before the post, with the size estimated at about USD 75.69M; source: @ai_9684xtpa. The transaction hash 0x423c03e87ef5cc2262c63da84ab436f80da2dbc6d65f643216683b5ce6d9a769 is listed on Arkham Intelligence and corresponds to the reported movement; source: Arkham Intelligence. Large exchange inflows are commonly tracked by traders as a proxy for potential sell-side liquidity and short-term volatility in ETH markets; source: CryptoQuant Exchange Inflows metric documentation.

According to @lookonchain, a long-dormant Bitcoin address transferred 400.08 BTC (approximately $44.29M) to multiple new wallets about 3 hours ago, indicating a significant on-chain movement of legacy coins (source: Lookonchain/X). The coins were originally received from miners roughly 15 years ago, confirming the age of the UTXOs tied to the originating address (source: Lookonchain/X; Arkham Intel address explorer). Traders can track the originating wallet and subsequent outputs via Arkham’s labeled explorer to see whether any of the funds later route to exchange-tagged addresses, which are visible on Arkham and indicate potential deposit destinations (source: Arkham Intel).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 500 BTC worth 54.48 million dollars from OKX. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Sep 26, 2025. According to @OnchainLens, the receiving address is bc1qf8kep70t232jtajg2x4r8dhtuvtd7kuea8ve9w02qy5k4wncyl7spmnfme, marking a single-tranche exchange outflow of 500 BTC to an external Bech32 address. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Sep 26, 2025.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale at address 0xbf1b890f92b2f7deb2863ba79ec7420c04ae9571 sold 233,094 LINK for $4.85M USDC at an execution price of $20.80, source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen. According to @OnchainLens, the same address deposited 10,000 LINK (about $209,000) to OKX, source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen. According to @OnchainLens, the combined movements account for 243,094 LINK transacted or transferred across on-chain and exchange venues, calculated from the reported figures, source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, address 0x90013e5fDd23ef161fb4154cfb239Cb2a904b53b deposited 16,800 ETH to Binance about 45 minutes ago, valued around 72.88 million dollars, source: @OnchainDataNerd. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the address accumulated these ETH roughly three weeks ago at an average entry price of about 4,429 dollars, source: @OnchainDataNerd. According to @OnchainDataNerd, a full sale at the current market price would realize an estimated loss of approximately 1.46 million dollars, source: @OnchainDataNerd. The address and transfer labeling can be reviewed via Arkham Intelligence explorer for 0x90013e5fDd23ef161fb4154cfb239Cb2a904b53b, source: Arkham Intelligence.

According to @EmberCN, an Aster team multisig wallet transferred 80,000,000 APX worth about $132 million to an Aster address roughly 30 minutes before the post time on Sep 21, 2025 (source: @EmberCN on X). According to @EmberCN, the referenced on-chain address is visible via ARKM Intel at https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x60EdE4402a34762D608AD9bA7bD3797f5bFE544c (source: @EmberCN; ARKM Intel link provided in the post). According to @EmberCN, the movement represents a large on-chain transfer of APX that traders may track for subsequent flows (source: @EmberCN).

According to @rovercrc, Michael Saylor will buy more Bitcoin tomorrow (source: Crypto Rover @rovercrc on X, Sep 21, 2025). The post provides no details on purchase size, timing, or whether this refers to MicroStrategy, and includes no supporting evidence or links to an official statement (source: Crypto Rover @rovercrc on X, Sep 21, 2025). As this is a single-source, unverified claim, treat it as unconfirmed until there is a statement from Michael Saylor or MicroStrategy on official channels (source: lack of corroboration in the cited post on X, Sep 21, 2025).

According to @EmberCN on X, 50.10 million ASTER worth about $80.16 million were withdrawn from Aster within one hour into 10 newly created wallets, roughly 5 million per address, indicating unusually concentrated on-chain activity (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the 10 wallets appear linked to a single controller because each address’s gas was funded the same way, with TRX first sent to Tron via ChangeNOW and then cross-chain swapped to BNB to fund the receiving BSC addresses (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, this gas funding route suggests deliberate traceability reduction, and an Arkham Intel entity page was shared for real-time tracking of subsequent movements at intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/75d9eeea-37e4-4fce-922c-f53e1de067c8 (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the ownership of these wallets is unconfirmed, and traders are advised to monitor further transfers from these addresses for potential signals (source: @EmberCN).

According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet bc1qup received 5,817 BTC valued at about $678M from a FalconX-labeled address roughly 8 hours ago. According to Arkham Intelligence, the bc1qup address and its inbound transaction from a FalconX entity are visible on-chain, allowing traders to monitor any subsequent transfers from this wallet in real time.

According to @OnchainLens using Nansen data, a long-dormant Bitcoin whale moved 1,000 BTC worth $115.95M to four new addresses after 11.7 years, originating from wallet 1NzHXRDizgEGaJZfBG46k66QXpRzDrtpZo on Sep 17, 2025. Source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen.

According to Onchain Lens, a tracked wallet received 99,675 SOL worth $22.3M from FalconX in the past 4 hours; source: Onchain Lens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1965959652413477190. The wallet now holds 119,508.41 SOL valued at $26.93M as liquid balance and 21,695.46 SOL valued at $4.89M staked; sources: Onchain Lens on X https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1965959652413477190 and Solscan https://solscan.io/account/FaZnFJCRzWNNn4FQnWB3pkoN5qZLEVLFiUXjNhRAoWGQ#transfers. Total holdings stand at 141,203.87 SOL, of which approximately 15.4% is staked; source: Solscan https://solscan.io/account/FaZnFJCRzWNNn4FQnWB3pkoN5qZLEVLFiUXjNhRAoWGQ#transfers.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, six hours ago a wallet possibly associated with Flowdesk deposited 6.7 million ENA approximately 5.54 million USD to Binance and those tokens were originally received three weeks ago source: @OnchainDataNerd. The on-chain address referenced is 0xB3DA28717944D3BfD8056aB7a2F16569953F466a with details visible at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xB3DA28717944D3BfD8056aB7a2F16569953F466a source: Arkham Intelligence. Flowdesk is identified as one of ENA’s market makers in the cited post source: @OnchainDataNerd. Exchange inflows are commonly monitored by traders as a gauge of potential liquidity supply and short term sell side availability in token markets source: CryptoQuant research.

According to @lookonchain, Longling Capital bought 5,000 ETH worth $21.57M and now holds 88,589 ETH valued at $383M (source: @lookonchain). The source also characterizes Longling Capital as known for buying low and selling high, highlighting a notable accumulation by a large holder (source: @lookonchain).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, moonmanifest47.eth transferred 100,000,000 WLFI to new address 0x6e7e6f4b73794321852993bf8f5524094e74d7c4 about 10 minutes before the post, with the transfer valued at approximately 18.24M USD, implying around 0.1824 USD per WLFI. Source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1963808726223089795 The WLFI token contract 0xda5e1988097297dcdc1f90d4dfe7909e847cbef6 on Etherscan shows the recipient address holding the transferred WLFI, confirming the on-chain movement. Source: https://etherscan.io/token/0xda5e1988097297dcdc1f90d4dfe7909e847cbef6?a=0x6e7e6f4b73794321852993bf8f5524094e74d7c4

According to @lookonchain, an Ethereum ICO participant who received 1,000,000 ETH reactivated after 8 years and transferred 150,000 ETH valued at about $645M to a new wallet for staking, source: @lookonchain. The participant invested $310,000 in the Ethereum ICO across three wallets and received 1,000,000 ETH now valued around $4.3B, source: @lookonchain. After staking 150,000 ETH, the participant still holds 105,000 ETH valued at about $451.5M across two wallets, source: @lookonchain. ICO wallets reported are 0x87d7ac0653ccc67aa9c3469eef4352193f7dbb86, 0xdddd7b9e6eab409b92263ac272da801b664f8a57, and 0x7c532db9e0c06c26fd40acc56ac55c1ee92d3c3a; the staking wallet is 0x317BcFCC8d645e365A796eb505b57c060aC2132B; the wallets still holding 105,000 ETH are 0x7c2a289c0523e748c286A37570D2efc16d2C934e and 0x565B8FbF9336BeC8FbFb4F78fBf30D7f70D6973b, source: @lookonchain.

According to Lookonchain, Trend Research deposited 129M NEIRO (about $10M) into Bybit roughly 40 minutes ago, Source: Lookonchain. Lookonchain reports that Trend Research withdrew 670.75M NEIRO ($55.55M), equal to 67.08% of total supply, from exchanges between Mar 24 and Aug 23 via 14 wallets at an average acquisition price of $0.083, Source: Lookonchain. Lookonchain identifies Trend Research as holding 67.08% of the NEIRO supply, establishing a concentrated ownership profile and a clear average cost basis at $0.083 for this holder, Source: Lookonchain. Lookonchain’s data gives traders concrete reference points, including the new 129M NEIRO exchange deposit to monitor on Bybit and the holder’s breakeven near $0.083 for scenario planning and execution risk controls, Source: Lookonchain.