According to @rovercrc, 1,000,000,000 USDT was minted at Tether Treasury in an Aug 28, 2025 post on X, flagging a large treasury mint event. source: Crypto Rover on X, Aug 28, 2025. Tether’s CTO Paolo Ardoino has previously stated that Treasury mints are typically authorized but not issued and used to replenish inventory for future issuance requests, meaning circulating supply may not increase immediately. source: Paolo Ardoino on X, 2023–2024 statements. Traders monitor large USDT treasury mints as potential signals for upcoming stablecoin liquidity shifts that can influence BTC and ETH market depth and funding conditions. source: Kaiko Research on stablecoin market structure (2023–2024); CryptoQuant analyses on stablecoin exchange inflows and BTC performance. Before positioning, practitioners commonly seek on-chain confirmation via Tether’s Transparency dashboard and issuance alerts from Whale Alert and relevant block explorers. source: Tether Transparency; Whale Alert; Etherscan; TRONSCAN.

According to @EmberCN, an address deposited 200 million PENGU worth $6.12 million into Binance about 30 minutes ago; source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 28, 2025, x.com/EmberCN/status/1960970463200600556. The same address has cumulatively transferred 765 million PENGU worth $26.57 million to Binance over the past two months during a high-price range, with an average price of $0.035; source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 28, 2025, x.com/EmberCN/status/1960970463200600556. Traders can reference the $0.035 average transfer price and the fresh 200 million token exchange inflow as data points for liquidity and risk management in $PENGU; data source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 28, 2025, x.com/EmberCN/status/1960970463200600556. The original post notes the update is sponsored by Bitget; source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 28, 2025, x.com/EmberCN/status/1960970463200600556.

According to @lookonchain, a correction clarifies that smart trader address 0xEB8d withdrew 3,516 OKB valued around USD 658.9K from OKX to XLayer, source: @lookonchain. This on-chain movement confirms an exchange outflow of 3,516 OKB from OKX to the XLayer network, source: @lookonchain.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an address that accumulated 1,294,000 LINK since Aug 15 transferred the entire balance to Coinbase about five minutes before the post, valuing the deposit at approximately 30.08 million dollars based on a referenced price of 23.25 dollars per LINK, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 26, 2025. The same source states the address withdrew LINK from Binance at an average cost of 23.69 dollars, implying about a 570,000 dollar loss if the Coinbase deposit is sold at 23.25 dollars, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 26, 2025. The post includes the wallet address link for independent verification of the on-chain transfer and exchange deposit, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 26, 2025.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, an on-chain wallet swapped 5,000,000 USDC for 1,076 ETH roughly 15 minutes before their post, indicating a large buy-side flow into ETH (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The address referenced was shared via an Arkham Intelligence explorer link by the author, identifying the wallet involved in the transaction (source: Arkham Intelligence link via @OnchainDataNerd). The author also noted the wallet may be associated with WLFI, which remains unverified at the time of reporting (source: @OnchainDataNerd). Based on the reported amounts, the swap implies an average of about 4,647 USDC per ETH, providing traders a reference for execution size and potential slippage in intraday context (source: calculation from figures reported by @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created Bitcoin wallet at address bc1qcn6y873qtmjquh5x6zl0r2lcqgufpn9d9nae0q received 1,046 BTC worth about 118.22 million dollars from Binance roughly 20 minutes ago. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 22, 2025. Large exchange outflows to newly created self-custody wallets are commonly associated with potential accumulation and reduced immediate sell-side liquidity when the pattern persists across sessions. Source: Glassnode, Week On-Chain research series and exchange flow methodologies. For trading context, Glassnode notes that sustained net outflows carry more signal than single transfers, so follow-on flows from Binance would better confirm a meaningful decline in exchange reserves rather than a one-off move. Source: Glassnode, Week On-Chain research series and exchange flow methodologies.

According to @zachxbt (X, Aug 21, 2025), on Aug 19, 2025 a victim was socially engineered by impostors posing as exchange and hardware-wallet support and lost 783 BTC (~$91M) (source: @zachxbt, X, Aug 21, 2025). The thief has begun peeling the funds with deposits sent to Wasabi, signaling active on-chain distribution of the stolen BTC (source: @zachxbt, X, Aug 21, 2025). Traders should monitor the related peel-chain and Wasabi inflows to manage UTXO exposure and potential exchange touchpoints (source: @zachxbt, X, Aug 21, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, a newly created wallet withdrew 60,000 SOL (~$11.23M) from Binance over the past 15 hours to address D87JTHDiB3Daj9jNL2xsasSuG5G22TZSPvpGBCNSsF6G (source: @OnchainLens, Aug 21, 2025). Based on the reported notional, the average transfer price is approximately $187.17 per SOL, calculated from $11.23M divided by 60,000 using @OnchainLens data (source: @OnchainLens; calculation from reported figures). As these funds moved off-exchange, they were removed from Binance order books at the time of withdrawal; traders can monitor this address for any re-deposits to assess near-term liquidity signals for SOL (source: @OnchainLens for the address and withdrawal alert).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a new address 0x5ef...Fa96F withdrew 4,492 ETH from Kraken about 30 minutes ago, valued at approximately $20.01 million at an indicated price of $4,453.6 per ETH (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The post provides the wallet link for verification and notes the alert is sponsored by Gate_zh (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders track such reported exchange outflows as reductions in on-exchange balances that may affect immediate sell-side liquidity in venue order books (sources: @ai_9684xtpa for the transaction; Glassnode research on exchange outflows).

According to Lookonchain (X, Aug 11, 2025), an Ethereum ICO participant who initially received 20,000 ETH at a total cost of $6,200 (now valued at $86.6M) sold another 2,300 ETH worth $9.91M about 20 minutes before the post, leaving 1,623 ETH valued at $6.99M. Lookonchain reported the remaining wallet balance at 1,623 ETH after the sale, noting this was another distribution from the same holder (X, Aug 11, 2025).

According to @EmberCN, address 0x969...aF5 transferred 5.682 million ENA worth about $4.27 million to Bybit approximately five hours ago (source: X post by @EmberCN on Aug 10, 2025). The alert specifies the destination as Bybit and the exact size and timing of the inflow, flagging a high-volume exchange deposit for traders to monitor (source: X post by @EmberCN on Aug 10, 2025).

According to @rovercrc, an Ethereum co-founder deposited 9,840 ETH worth about $9.22M to Kraken roughly an hour before the post, indicating an exchange inflow event; source: @rovercrc. The post asserts the intent is to sell the ETH, but no on-chain transaction hash or Kraken execution details were provided for independent verification; source: @rovercrc. Historically, elevated ETH exchange inflows are associated with increased short-term sell pressure and downside volatility, especially when concentrated on a single venue; source: CryptoQuant Research, Glassnode Insights. Traders can monitor ETH exchange inflows, Kraken order book depth and large-taker volume, and ETH perpetual funding rates to gauge immediate impact; source: CryptoQuant, Kaiko Research.

According to @lookonchain, a wallet identified as 'BitMine' has executed a significant accumulation of Ethereum (ETH) over the past week. The on-chain analysis reveals that the entity purchased 266,119 ETH, valued at approximately $970 million, within a seven-day period. This recent buying activity has increased BitMine's total holdings to 566,776 ETH, with a current market value of $2.06 billion. For traders, such a large-scale purchase by a single entity could signal strong bullish sentiment and potentially impact ETH's market dynamics by increasing buying pressure and reducing the available supply on exchanges.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, on-chain data shows a significant transaction where 450 Bitcoin (BTC), valued at approximately $53.42 million, was moved to a new, unidentified wallet address (bc1qs...ejruu). The source of the funds was wallet address bc1qc...udryz. Large-scale movements of BTC to unknown addresses are closely monitored by traders as they can precede increased market volatility or signal strategic repositioning by a major holder, potentially impacting Bitcoin's price.

According to @lookonchain, a Bitcoin whale wallet that has been inactive for 14.5 years has transferred its entire holding of 3,962 BTC, valued at approximately $468 million, to a new wallet address (bc1qcz). This significant on-chain movement of very old coins is a critical event for traders to monitor, as it could signal a potential intention to sell, which would increase the available supply of BTC on the market and could exert downward pressure on its price.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a significant on-chain transaction has been detected involving the movement of 3,963 Bitcoin (BTC), valued at approximately $469 million. The entire sum was transferred to a new wallet address, bc1qc...udryz. The source notes that as of the report, the receiving address has not initiated any subsequent outgoing transactions. Traders are closely monitoring this wallet, as large movements of this scale can signal preparations for selling, custody changes, or strategic repositioning, potentially impacting BTC's short-term price volatility.

According to @lookonchain, a Bitcoin whale wallet containing 3,962 BTC, valued at approximately $468 million, has become active after a 14.5-year period of dormancy. The wallet originally received the BTC in January 2011 when the price was just $0.37 per coin, making the initial investment a mere $1,453. Recently, the address executed a small test transaction of 0.0018 BTC, worth about $218. This activity from a long-dormant, high-value wallet is closely watched by traders, as any move to sell this substantial holding could introduce significant selling pressure into the Bitcoin market.

According to @lookonchain, a significant whale with the address KMhcqN has continued to accumulate and stake Solana (SOL). The entity withdrew another 76,000 SOL, valued at approximately $14.5 million, from the Kraken exchange today. This recent transaction brings the whale's total withdrawal from Kraken to 164,000 SOL, worth $30.14 million, since July 8. All the withdrawn tokens have been subsequently staked. For traders, this on-chain activity is often interpreted as a bullish signal, as moving assets off an exchange and into staking reduces the immediately available supply for sale and suggests a long-term holding strategy.

According to @lookonchain, a significant whale identified by the address KMhcqN has continued a strong accumulation of Solana (SOL). The entity recently withdrew another 76,000 SOL, valued at approximately $14.5 million, from the Kraken exchange. This action brings the whale's total withdrawal from Kraken since July 8 to 164,000 SOL, worth a total of $30.14 million, as cited by the source. Notably, all of the withdrawn tokens have been staked. This pattern of withdrawing large amounts from a centralized exchange for staking is often viewed by traders as a bullish indicator, suggesting a long-term holding strategy and reducing the liquid supply of SOL available on the market.

According to The Data Nerd, market maker GSR recently withdrew 2,708 ETH, valued at approximately $9.87 million, from the Binance exchange. The on-chain data shows these funds were transferred to a wallet identified as a potential storage address for GSR, which now holds a total of 103,822 ETH, worth around $378.97 million. For traders, a significant withdrawal of assets from an exchange by a major market maker like GSR can be interpreted as a bullish signal for Ethereum (ETH). This action reduces the immediately available supply on the market, potentially decreasing selling pressure and suggesting an intention to hold the asset for a longer term.