According to @adam3us, "printer is now!", echoing Greg Foss’s earlier "printer is coming!" remark, signaling his view that fiat-liquidity expansion is at hand and drawing attention from Bitcoin (BTC) traders. Source: Adam Back on X, Dec 10, 2025. For trading, this post serves as a sentiment cue from a prominent Bitcoin figure that market participants may reference when assessing BTC risk-on positioning and short-term volatility. Source: Adam Back on X, Dec 10, 2025. No macro policy details or data were cited in the post, so traders should treat this as sentiment-only and monitor official monetary releases for confirmation before position sizing. Source: Adam Back on X, Dec 10, 2025.

According to @adam3us, Blockstream released Jade firmware 1.0.38 with important security updates and major camera improvements to Jade Plus, including 35% faster transaction signing and enhanced QR reliability in low light and with imperfect codes, which directly impacts BTC self-custody transaction processing speed and accuracy (source: @adam3us on X citing @BlockstreamJade, Dec 10, 2025). He urges users to upgrade promptly and stay on the latest firmware, highlighting JadeLink as the best method for fast, air-gapped updates that support reliable PSBT and QR-based cold-signing workflows for BTC (source: @adam3us on X; @BlockstreamJade firmware 1.0.38 announcement).

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin’s 200-week moving average has risen to around 56,000, establishing a new long-term reference level for BTC technical analysis and risk management, source: @adam3us. Traders commonly treat the 200-week moving average as a major support/resistance zone and use it to guide entries, exits, and stop placement in trend-following strategies, source: Binance Academy; Investopedia. Historically, market participants monitor BTC reactions around the 200WMA via the 200WMA heatmap to gauge cycle momentum and potential regime shifts, source: Look Into Bitcoin.

According to @adam3us, he will participate in a Swiss BTCTC initiative by Future Hodlings alongside chairman Richard Byworth, CEO Seb Hess, SYZCAP Vice Chair Marc Syz, and Julian Liniger, with an announcement coming soon; source: Adam Back on X, Nov 25, 2025. He highlighted a treasury company focus with Swiss interest in a backdrop of zero rates; source: Adam Back on X, Nov 25, 2025. No specific launch date or further details were included in the post, so traders should watch for official updates from Future Hodlings; source: Adam Back on X, Nov 25, 2025.

According to @adam3us, he rebutted a claim that the $19.5 billion raised in the first nine months of 2025 did not fund new Bitcoin purchases, asserting instead that 193,631 BTC were bought during that period. Source: Adam Back on X, Nov 24, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1992873575771238906 The post provides a specific total of 193,631 BTC purchased for that timeframe, directly contesting the debt-servicing narrative referenced in the quoted discussion. Source: Adam Back on X, Nov 24, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1992873575771238906

According to Adam Back, a model by Daniele argues the traditional 4-year Bitcoin cycle is different this time, with a flat bubble detection metric and a thesis that BTC grinds higher without a bear market and with smaller pullbacks than prior cycles. Source: Adam Back on X, Nov 16, 2025. For trading, this thesis favors a trend-following bias and buying shallow dips in BTC while monitoring the bubble metric for any spike that could signal a regime change. Source: Adam Back on X, Nov 16, 2025.

According to @adam3us, the Nov 16, 2025 X post shows an image with no accompanying text, tickers, or price levels, providing no explicit trading signal or actionable market guidance at this time; source: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1990126649505947764. With no referenced assets, catalysts, or timeframes, there is no verifiable, immediate impact on crypto market positioning from this post alone; source: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1990126649505947764.

According to @adam3us, current anti-spam actions are being framed as showing strength but risk freezing funds, breaking the miniscript compiler, and hurting programmability. Source: Adam Back @adam3us on Twitter, Nov 14, 2025. He added that proponents admit these steps will not meaningfully slow spammers. Source: Adam Back @adam3us on Twitter, Nov 14, 2025. Based on these flagged risks, traders should closely monitor any transaction policy or script-compatibility changes implied by this warning. Source: Adam Back @adam3us on Twitter, Nov 14, 2025.

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin is permissionless bearer money and a realization of cypherpunk bearer e-cash ideas, underscoring BTC's censorship-resistance and self-custody for peer-to-peer value transfer without intermediaries, source: Adam Back on X, Nov 11, 2025. For trading strategy, bearer and irreversible settlement properties highlight custody choice and on-chain settlement finality that influence exchange reliance and transfer latency, source: Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, 2008. On-chain context aligns with this thesis, with BTC held on exchanges at multi-year lows during 2023-2024, affecting readily tradable float and market microstructure, source: Glassnode on-chain exchange balance data, 2023-2024.

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin’s 200-week moving average has moved above 55,000 dollars, lifting a key long-term reference level for BTC as of November 11, 2025, source: @adam3us on X, Nov 11, 2025. The 200-period moving average is widely used to define long-term trend and often acts as dynamic support or resistance that traders use for entries and risk controls, source: Binance Academy (Moving Averages); StockCharts ChartSchool (Moving Averages). Practically, a rising 200WMA near 55,000 dollars is commonly monitored for staged spot entries on pullbacks and for placing protective stops just below in trend-following systems, source: StockCharts ChartSchool (Moving Averages); Investopedia (Moving Average Strategies). Monitoring the distance between spot BTC price and the 200WMA helps gauge mean-reversion risk and position sizing across crypto portfolios, source: Investopedia (Moving Average Strategies).

According to Adam Back (@adam3us) on Twitter on Nov 9, 2025, he posted the one-line message 'you're using bitcoin incorrectly' without any added context or technical detail, source: Adam Back on Twitter, Nov 9, 2025. The post includes no BTC price targets, no on-chain metrics, and no mention of protocol changes, so it provides no explicit trading signal by itself, source: Adam Back on Twitter, Nov 9, 2025. Given the absence of actionable specifics in the message, traders have no verifiable catalyst to act on from this post alone and should await further clarification from the same source before adjusting BTC exposure, source: Adam Back on Twitter, Nov 9, 2025.

According to @adam3us, he stated a Bitcoin price target range of $100,000-$120,000 in a Nov 8, 2025 tweet reading $0.10m-$0.12m bitcoin (source: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1987111055374295238). The post specifies two upside levels at $100k and $120k but does not include a timeline or methodology (source: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1987111055374295238). Traders tracking BTC can reference these two levels as the author’s stated targets (source: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1987111055374295238).

According to @adam3us, ETF buyers are good Bitcoin investors and represent the current cycle HODLers, implying a holder-dominated cohort among ETF participants in this phase (source: Adam Back on X, Nov 8, 2025). He characterizes ETF participation as long-term oriented rather than short-term trading during the current market cycle (source: Adam Back on X, Nov 8, 2025).

According to @adam3us, BTC price dips function as a transfer from weak hands to strong hands, signaling a long‑term accumulation stance toward pullbacks for Bitcoin traders, source: @adam3us on X, Nov 6, 2025. He referenced a CryptoQuant update in the same post, pointing traders to on-chain context behind current volatility and accumulation behavior, source: CryptoQuant link shared by @adam3us on X.

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin’s 200-week moving average has crossed above 54,000 dollars, marking a higher long-term trend anchor that traders monitor on weekly timeframes. Source: @adam3us on X, Oct 22, 2025. Traders commonly use the 200-week moving average as dynamic support and resistance for trend-following entries and stops. Source: StockCharts ChartSchool, Moving Averages. A sustained weekly close above the 200WMA is a typical bullish confirmation in classic technical analysis, while a weekly close back below often prompts risk reduction. Source: Murphy, Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets; StockCharts ChartSchool, Moving Averages. The 200WMA near 54,000 dollars is the immediate level to watch for pullbacks and invalidation on weekly closes. Source: @adam3us on X for the level; StockCharts ChartSchool for the risk framework.

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN is not an endorsement of storing data on the blockchain and this point is reflected in Bitcoin Core release notes, addressing claims about protocol “intent.” source: Adam Back on X (Oct 19, 2025). OP_RETURN is a provably unspendable output meant for small metadata and is relayed under node standardness policy rather than designed for bulk data storage, which limits its role in non-transactional data use cases. source: Bitcoin Core policy documentation; Bitcoin Wiki OP_RETURN. Most Ordinals inscriptions embed data in Taproot witness, not OP_RETURN, so this clarification targets intent arguments but not the main mechanism behind inscription-driven blockspace demand. source: Ordinals protocol documentation; Bitcoin Optech Newsletter. For trading, monitor BTC average fees, mempool congestion, and miner fee share because relay policy and social norms around non-payment data influence blockspace competition and transaction costs. source: Bitcoin Core policy documentation on standard transactions; mempool.space fee market dashboard.

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin aims to remove power from central groups and give it to no one, sharing Waxwing’s statement and noting interesting thoughts on filtering. Source: Adam Back on X, 2025-10-19: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1980016264190771304 The post provides no protocol change details, on-chain metrics, price data, or trading signals; it is a narrative comment only. Source: Adam Back on X, 2025-10-19: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1980016264190771304

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin should prioritize ossification for long-term stability and shift experimentation to Layer-2, modeled after TCIP, contingent on more secure Layer-2 pegs and anchors and aligned with Satoshi’s script minimalism argument. Source: Adam Back, X, Oct 19, 2025. He identifies BitVM as solid R&D toward improved Layer-2 and notes Simplicity as another path, underscoring the importance of robust BTC Layer-2 security primitives. Source: Adam Back, X, Oct 19, 2025. Trading focus centers on the security of BTC Layer-2 peg and anchor designs and progress in BitVM- or Simplicity-based implementations within the Bitcoin L2 stack. Source: Adam Back, X, Oct 19, 2025.

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin should organize how it socializes protocol changes to avoid developer infighting between dogmatic crusaders and strictly technical arguers, underscoring governance as an operational risk for the network; source: Adam Back on X, Oct 12, 2025 https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1977419936235729077. For traders, governance flashpoints have historically coincided with notable BTC price swings during major upgrades such as SegWit activation in Aug 2017 and Taproot activation in Nov 2021, reinforcing the need to monitor upgrade discourse as a volatility catalyst; sources: SegWit activation confirmation by Bitcoin Core https://bitcoincore.org/en/2017/08/23/segwit-activated/ and BTC-USD historical data https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BTC-USD/history, Taproot activation parameters by Bitcoin Core https://bitcoincore.org/en/2021/05/01/release-0.21.1/ and BTC-USD historical data https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BTC-USD/history. Near term, monitor the Bitcoin-Dev mailing list, BIPs on GitHub, and activation dashboards to gauge coordination progress and potential sentiment shifts that can move BTC; sources: Bitcoin-Dev https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/, Bitcoin Improvement Proposals https://github.com/bitcoin/bips, Taproot Watch https://taproot.watch.

According to @adam3us, Bitcoin contributor statistics shared by @Leishman indicate that Luke Dashjr ranks 15th while having made no commits in the past three years. Source: Adam Back on X, Oct 12, 2025, citing Leishman’s contributor stats thread. According to @adam3us, the post draws attention to contributor distribution and recent code submission pace in Bitcoin by underscoring multi-year inactivity from a historically prominent maintainer. Source: Adam Back on X, Oct 12, 2025, citing Leishman’s contributor stats thread.