According to @ai_9684xtpa, the referenced blog has been republished and the circulating supply section remains unchanged, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Sep 1, 2025) and the linked blog at https://t.co/49g9X7N4Jo. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the blog emphasizes that CoinMarketCap’s previously listed 27.2 billion circulating supply was accurate at the time, with only minor subsequent adjustments noted, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Sep 1, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders tracking CMC data should note there is no change to the circulating supply section in this update, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X (Sep 1, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the allocation for DEX and CEX liquidity and marketing is 2.88 billion tokens after a decimal-position error was corrected; source: @ai_9684xtpa, X, Sep 1, 2025. This confirmed figure informs liquidity provisioning on centralized and decentralized venues and the marketing token budget, so traders should update token supply models and listing liquidity assumptions accordingly; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, WLFI's blog confirms an initial circulating supply of 24,669,070,265 tokens, equal to 24.6% at TGE. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the breakdown includes 10 billion for the ecosystem, 7.78 billion attributed to Alt5, 288 million for DEX and CEX liquidity and marketing, and 4 billion for public investors. According to @ai_9684xtpa, these listed items sum to 22.068 billion, indicating about 2.601 billion of the circulating supply is not detailed in the shown categories. Based on the figures provided by @ai_9684xtpa, the implied total supply is about 100.28 billion and Alt5 accounts for roughly 31.5% of the initial circulating float, while the ecosystem share is about 40.5%. Based on @ai_9684xtpa, the liquidity and marketing allocation is approximately 1.17% of the initial float and the public investor portion is about 16.2%, which are useful float concentration metrics for traders.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the WLFI official multisig moved a total of 485 million market-making tokens to two Jump Crypto addresses within the past 10 minutes, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the transferred amount equals 0.485% of the token’s total supply, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the size represents 16.2% of the 3 billion tokens earmarked for CEX liquidity and DEX LP as referenced by Dylan, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the tokens are designated for market-making across centralized exchanges and decentralized liquidity pools per the allocation referenced, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, WLFI will deploy on Ethereum, Solana, and BSC, with cross-chain transfers routed through the Chainlink CCIP portal, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, September 1, 2025. According to @ai_9684xtpa, bridging between these networks takes roughly 20 minutes and carries associated risks, so traders should account for interim price exposure and confirm settlement before offsetting legs, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, September 1, 2025. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the stated 20-minute window implies potential basis and slippage risk during cross-chain moves for WLFI, making liquidity checks and gas cost monitoring on ETH, SOL, and BSC critical before executing size, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, September 1, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, address 0x453...13F95 transferred 2,000,000 USDC to a WLFI fundraising address around seven months ago and received 40,000,000 WLFI, implying a $0.05 unit cost (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025). The author adds that the funds for 0x453...13F95 were sourced from GSR and that it is unclear whether GSR participated institutionally or will provide market-making, with no related transfers observed from an official multisig so far (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025). For trading context, the reported 40M WLFI allocation and $0.05 cost basis offer concrete reference levels, and the cited wallet and raise addresses shared by the author can be monitored for further token movements (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, citing @0xDylan_, the $WLFI token generation event targets an 8% circulating supply, equivalent to 8.0B tokens (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; @0xDylan_ on X). However, only 16.88B tokens have been deposited into the Lockbox so far, implying a 20% unlock of 3.37B tokens and an effective TGE float around 6.37%, with the final figure dependent on the contract balance at 20:00 local time (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). With less than five hours to the open at the time of posting, traders should monitor the Lockbox and contract balances at 20:00 to size orders and plan liquidity and slippage around initial price discovery (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, CMC CEO @RushCMC said the circulating supply figure was repeatedly confirmed with the project team (source: @ai_9684xtpa). This update means strategic-round tokens are counted as circulating at TGE for the referenced project, as relayed in the same disclosure (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders should update initial float, FDV, and unlock assumptions for TGE pricing and liquidity planning based on this inclusion (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders are split on WLFI valuation, with bulls citing a low circulating market cap and bears pointing to a high FDV. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, 2025-09-01. The post claims WLFI is siphoning liquidity from the broader crypto market, implying near-term pressure on altcoins for holders of smaller caps. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, 2025-09-01. For trading decisions, the post highlights tracking circulating market cap versus FDV and monitoring liquidity rotation into WLFI as key signals. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, 2025-09-01.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance has updated the WLFI contract token info page to show circulating supply sourced from CoinMarketCap, accompanied by a notice stating This information does not constitute any form of representation or warranty, which signals the figure is not guaranteed for accuracy yet (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025). The post adds that the market is closely tracking WLFI’s TGE circulating supply and that whether this figure is verified will depend on Binance team validation, urging caution to avoid misleading interpretations before official verification (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025). For traders, this implies any FDV or float-based valuation using the displayed circulating number should be treated as provisional until Binance confirms verification on the token page (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, CoinMarketCap lists WLFI’s verified TGE initial circulating supply at 27.3 billion tokens, far above the previously discussed 5 billion theoretical float; source: CoinMarketCap via @ai_9684xtpa. Using the Binance contract price of $0.3599 referenced by @ai_9684xtpa, the implied potential opening sell pressure is about $9.83 billion (27.3B x $0.3599); source: Binance contract price via @ai_9684xtpa. Per @ai_9684xtpa’s review, the figure appears calculated as total supply minus team, advisor, partner, and Lockbox allocations; source: CoinMarketCap methodology as noted by @ai_9684xtpa. Based on these cited figures (27.3B vs 5B), the initial float is roughly 5.5x higher, indicating materially greater potential supply overhang at TGE at the same price reference; source: comparative calculation from CoinMarketCap data and Binance price via @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Ansem (@blknoiz06) exited 1.88M AOL roughly 2.5 hours before WLFI's Solana ecosystem partner announcement, realizing an estimated $29.7K loss (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, he had purchased the position two days earlier using 1.73M LIGHT (about $75K) at a cost basis of $0.03698 per AOL (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, he sold at an average price of $0.021165 after WLFI did not mention AOL among Solana ecosystem partners, during which AOL fell over 50% intraday (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance’s WLFI listing announcement highlights the official contract addresses on Ethereum 0xdA5e1988097297dCdc1f90D4dFE7909e847CBeF6, Solana WLFinEv6ypjkczcS83FZqFpgFZYwQXutRbxGe7oC16g, and BSC 0x47474747477b199288bF72a1D702f7Fe0Fb1DEeA, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025. The post also notes the announcement did not disclose WLFI’s opening circulating supply, which the author describes as an uncommon case, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the WLFI official multisig transferred 47 WLFI to a Jump Crypto-designated wallet about 10 minutes before the post, described as a small test, indicating Jump Crypto will be the second publicly disclosed market maker for WLFI after DWF Labs; the market-making address links were provided by the source: https://t.co/90xXPzeRKw and https://t.co/ePmpKAmhTp. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962343138070024290

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the WLFI team recommends claiming WLFI via direct smart contract interaction to avoid congestion during the claim process, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The shared guide instructs users to open the provided link and click Connect to Web3 so plugin wallets display for authorization before proceeding, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance has published a WLFI spot listing announcement and WLFI’s official multisig has initiated small OKX deposit tests, indicating exchanges are in final pre-listing checks, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025. The token claim for public sale participants opens at 20:00, while centralized exchanges plan to open WLFI spot trading at 21:00, creating a one-hour claim-to-listing window, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025. Nearly all initial circulating WLFI will be released from the public sale tranche, concentrating the float among public sale recipients at launch, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025. Traders should align execution and transfer logistics to this 20:00–21:00 timeline and monitor exchange deposit readiness accordingly, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, roughly two hours before the post the WLFI official multisig transferred 17.625 billion WLFI to contract 0xFef...b14B4 and then sent 5 billion WLFI back to the multisig, with a net 12.625 billion WLFI remaining at the contract based on the reported figures, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The author notes this was the largest single transaction from that address in 11 months and states the contract’s purpose is currently unknown, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The author adds that pre-TGE on-chain updates will be maintained in a thread under the original post, with major items posted separately, source: @ai_9684xtpa. For traders, the flagged addresses to monitor ahead of TGE are the WLFI official multisig and contract 0xFef...b14B4 for subsequent token movements, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a whale who previously netted $2.34M across four UNI swing trades allegedly cleared 4,720 ETH worth about $21.08M roughly 8 hours ago, described as a suspected full exit, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The source adds the ETH was withdrawn on July 1 from FalconX at an average entry of $2,452, implying a two-month ROI of 82.2%, source: @ai_9684xtpa. If the entire 4,720 ETH stack was sold, the realized profit would total approximately $9.514M based on the source’s calculation, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The wallet address was provided by the source for on-chain verification and trader monitoring, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a WLFI-linked address bridged 10 WLFI to BSC using Chainlink CCIP, and the transaction is currently in a waiting manual execution status, source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962319407449035048. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the post indicates WLFI intends to deploy on BSC, source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962319407449035048. According to @ai_9684xtpa, a total of 47 WLFI were set aside for pre-TGE testing, source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1962319407449035048.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Trend Research transferred 1,000,000 PENDLE to Binance about 10 minutes before the post, valuing the deposit at roughly $4.78M at a $4.78 per-token price (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 31, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the position was initiated about a week earlier with a $5.83 withdrawal price, so sending at $4.78 implies a $1.05 per-token or about $1.05M loss if sold at the deposit price, and the source characterizes it as another loss-making sell while questioning broader altcoin de-risking (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 31, 2025).