According to @ai_9684xtpa, SpaceX transferred 1,021 BTC worth about 94.48 million USD to a new address, based on Arkham Intelligence data at intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/spacex, source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence. According to @ai_9684xtpa, total BTC moved over the past month reached 3,267 BTC valued near 299 million USD, and the recipient addresses show no subsequent outbound transfers on Arkham Intelligence, source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence. According to @ai_9684xtpa, a week earlier SpaceX also transferred 1,083 BTC worth about 99.81 million USD, with the new address bc1qy…xv5g9 receiving 800 BTC around 73.71 million USD and still showing no outflows on Arkham Intelligence, source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence. According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders can monitor the SpaceX entity page and the cited recipient addresses for any first outbound hop or exchange cluster tags on Arkham Intelligence at intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/spacex to track potential liquidity routes, source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, USDT issuance is concentrated on Tron at roughly 80.2B versus 1.94B on Plasma and 0.482B on Stable, highlighting a dominant liquidity base for TRC20 USDT (sources: @ai_9684xtpa; tronscan.org/#/data/charts/tokens/usdt-stats; plasmascan.to; stablescan.xyz). Reported daily activity shows Tron USDT handling about 39.4B transactions per day versus Plasma’s peak 7.208M and Stable’s peak 85K, with the latter two counting all token transfers, underscoring a large throughput gap that affects market depth and settlement speed (sources: @ai_9684xtpa; tronscan.org/#/data/charts/tokens/usdt-stats; plasmascan.to/insight/chart?id=tx; stablescan.xyz/chart/tx). The author also notes Plasma’s peak FDV reached $16.9B and that both $XPL and $STABLE have fallen below $2B FDV, shifting attention back to Tron’s USDT rail for liquidity-sensitive trading (source: @ai_9684xtpa). For traders, the concentration of USDT supply and higher confirmed throughput suggest tighter spreads and lower slippage on TRON venues relative to Plasma and Stable until these on-chain metrics converge, which can be monitored directly on the cited dashboards (sources: tronscan.org; plasmascan.to; stablescan.xyz).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH was entered at 2700 and is up 22.2%, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X Dec 10 2025 post 1998589268340650162. According to @ai_9684xtpa, between Nov 23 and Nov 27, @Jackyi_ld publicly stated a full allocation with five of six mentioned tokens rising, led by ETH +22.2% and BTC +7.11% while ASTER fell 19.78%, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X Dec 10 2025 post 1998589268340650162. According to @ai_9684xtpa, position sizes were not disclosed so overall PnL cannot be computed, and costs for tokens other than ETH were estimated using Nov 23 14:30 pricing rather than actual entries, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X Dec 10 2025 post 1998589268340650162. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the watchlist groups are public chains ETH main position BTC BCH, exchanges BNB ASTER, and stablecoin WLFI with USD1 as its stated underlying logic, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X Dec 10 2025 post 1998589268340650162. According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH outperformed BTC by about 15.1 percentage points in this window based on the reported figures, highlighting short term ETH BTC relative strength while data accuracy is limited by unknown sizing and estimated costs, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X Dec 10 2025 post 1998589268340650162.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833 withdrew 12.43M ASTER from Binance about 9 hours ago, valued at $13.04M at a stated withdrawal price of $0.9705; source: @ai_9684xtpa post on Dec 10, 2025, and Arkham Intelligence address page intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833. The same address was previously reported to have accumulated roughly $133M in ASTER around three months earlier; source: @ai_9684xtpa. For trading context, the reported $0.9705 level offers a near-term reference, and subsequent flows from this address can be monitored on Arkham Intelligence to gauge exchange outflow activity; source: @ai_9684xtpa and intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an address dubbed the 10/11 crash insider holds a 80,985.83 ETH long on Hyperliquid at a $3,108.49 average, valuing the position near $269M with about $17.72M unrealized profit as ETH traded above $3,300; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the trader deposited an additional 40M USDC as margin and is using only 38.35% margin, leaving capacity to scale the long; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, there is a resting buy order for 19,108.68 ETH at $3,280, totaling roughly $62.67M in bid liquidity that remains unfilled; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, this ETH long is the address’s second-largest position since the 10/11 crash short, indicating elevated directional exposure; source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders may monitor the $3,280 liquidity and the low margin utilization as potential drivers of order flow and volatility in ETH derivatives on Hyperliquid; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH has broken above $3,300, highlighting notable momentum in ETH perpetuals (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The trader reports a fresh $40 million USDC margin top-up on Hyperliquid by a large participant (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The address’s current ETH long stands at 80,985.83 ETH with a notional value of $269 million, an average entry of $3,108.49, and an unrealized profit of $17.72 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa). A resting buy order is placed at $3,280 for 19,108.68 ETH, sized at $62.67 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa). The source adds that this ETH long is now the address’s second-largest position following its prior 1011 flash-crash short (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an address labeled 1011 flash-crash short insider holds a 70,001.53 ETH long with an average entry of $3,068.64, showing about $10.21 million in unrealized profit and a notional value near $224 million at the time referenced, based on their X post dated Dec 9, 2025 and the hyperbot.network trader page for 0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae. The same source reports ETH moved from $2,956 to $3,214 around that period, with all figures cited directly from the X post and HyperBot dashboard.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x49329e0A9F7Ea3FE0a4f10d755B711146a8f308d deposited 1,880 ETH to OKX about one hour before the Dec 9, 2025 post, valued around 5.86 million dollars and described as a likely sell; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. Arkham Intelligence shows the wallet now holds approximately 11.31 ETH on-chain, indicating near-full offloading from prior balances; source: Arkham Intelligence wallet explorer. This transfer places 1,880 ETH on OKX and available for execution on that venue in the near term; traders can monitor OKX ETH net inflows, large sell walls, and funding or basis shifts for execution cues tied to this deposit; sources: @ai_9684xtpa post and Arkham Intelligence data.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, HashKey Group has filed an IPO prospectus on HKEXnews and positions itself as a diversified digital-asset firm spanning exchange and OTC trading, on-chain services (staking, tokenization, HashKey chain), and asset management (investments and secondary funds). Source: @ai_9684xtpa; hkexnews.hk. According to @ai_9684xtpa, revenue increased across 2022–2024 with cumulative revenue of $721 million by end-2024, while the company remains in a net loss position. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, user count expanded roughly 80,000x over 2.5 years to about 1.447 million, with institutional client proportion rising on Hong Kong policy support and a compliance-first approach. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the IPO will act as a market-driven valuation event and another pressure test for the group’s development and for HSK as a benchmark, with the market determining fair value. Source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Stable chain’s TGE is facing thin liquidity with a fully diluted valuation around 1.88 billion dollars and total open interest near 37.23 million dollars, indicating a wide FDV-to-OI gap that limits derivatives depth and price support, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, competitor XPL’s former main perp venue Hyperliquid shows only about 2.4 million dollars in OI, underscoring subdued leverage participation relative to headline valuations, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the airdrop has been reduced and social media heat has notably declined, dynamics the source links with underwhelming attention and price action for Stable compared with Plasma over the same period, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, pre-deposit complications and limited listing resources are additional overhangs, contributing to weaker chart performance and lower visibility versus Plasma, source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders should account for higher slippage risk and less resilient order books around TGE given the FDV-to-OI disparity and softer retail flow, prioritize limit orders, and monitor OI and funding expansion across venues for confirmation of improving liquidity, source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an ETH long position has surpassed 70,000 ETH, with 70,001.53 ETH currently held and an estimated notional value of about $218 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa, Dec 9, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the reported entry price is $3,068.64 and the unrealized profit is $3.23 million, which implies roughly $46 per ETH in unrealized gains and about a 1.5% unrealized return from entry based on the reported size and PnL (source: @ai_9684xtpa, Dec 9, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a tracked ETH address increased long exposure to 65,801.61 ETH, about $205 million, with a $3,066.36 average entry and roughly $3.6 million unrealized profit. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1998237619453645159 and on-chain dashboard https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae The same source reports a resting limit buy of 4,006.4 ETH at $3,120 worth about $12.5 million for the same address. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1998237619453645159 and dashboard https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae In a separate update, the address reduced 4,513 ETH about 9 hours earlier for approximately $304,000 realized profit and still held 50,001 ETH long with a $3,048.56 entry and about $3.96 million unrealized gains. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1998190584591515918 and dashboard https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae For traders, the reported buy interest near $3,120 and average cost bases around $3,066 and $3,049 mark immediate ETH order flow levels to monitor. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1998237619453645159 and https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1998190584591515918 and dashboard https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x968e20E2DF4B27B7F0CA33F242deD3EC89F0F305 purchased 2,226 ETH on-chain over the past 3 hours for approximately USD 6.95 million at an average price of 3,121.52 USD, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; Arkham Intelligence explorer. The source also reports that 1,100 ETH has been transferred from this wallet to address 0x7b7…52814, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; Arkham Intelligence explorer. The post notes this update was sponsored by Gate exchange, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a wallet labeled as the “1011 post-flash-crash short insider” trimmed 4,513 ETH about 9 hours ago for roughly $14.06M notional, realizing $304k profit; source: X post https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1998190584591515918 and tracker page https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the address subsequently showed 54,277.33 ETH long (~$165M) with an average entry of $3,048.31 and an unrealized loss of $294k at the time of the post; source: X post https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1998190584591515918 and tracker page https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae. According to @ai_9684xtpa, there is also a 20,000 ETH limit buy resting at $3,000 (about $60M), and if filled, total long exposure would rise to about $225M; source: X post https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1997824014895780026 and tracker page https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae. According to @ai_9684xtpa, earlier snapshots showed 50,001 ETH long (~$156M) at a $3,048.56 entry with around $3.96M unrealized profit before flipping negative, highlighting sensitivity around the $3,048 break-even and $3,000 order level; source: X post https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1997824014895780026 and tracker page https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a new address withdrew 77,385.34 ETH (about $219 million) on Dec 1 with an average withdrawal price of $2,835.62, and ETH was quoted at $3,141 eight days later, implying an unrealized gain of about $23.47 million; wallet link: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x36ED68c47a007b6D896515070375b3f5AC9BC889 source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the ETH withdrawal occurred the same day a $230 million stablecoin deposit was recorded to Binance, though any ownership linkage is unconfirmed and presented as a market observation; wallet reference: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x36ED68c47a007b6D896515070375b3f5AC9BC889 source: @ai_9684xtpa. According to @ai_9684xtpa, key trading reference levels from this flow are the reported cost basis near $2,835.62 and the short-term price reference around $3,141 for ETH, alongside the position size of 77,385.34 ETH, which are relevant for monitoring on-chain whale activity and potential order flow shifts source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance issued an announcement on the “Huang Guo Zhi Nian” insider front-running case within about 24 hours, suspending the involved employee, planning to pursue legal liability, and allocating a $100,000 bounty to be split among five whistleblowers who used official reporting channels; source: @ai_9684xtpa. @ai_9684xtpa adds that this “high efficiency + strong penalties” approach is intended to deter similar misconduct on the exchange, a factor traders track when evaluating venue risk and order book integrity; source: @ai_9684xtpa. The speed of action is linked by the source to leadership changes noting @heyibinance as co-CEO; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an insider whale holds 54,514.73 ETH valued around $170 million and has $4.592 million in unrealized profit. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the long position began near $2,956, and ETH recently reached $3,133, a 5.98% rise from that entry. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the referenced levels are $2,956 (initial long open) and $3,133 (latest price).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a tracked wallet re-entered long positions three hours ago across ETH, SUI, and FARTCOIN with total exposure of $20.28M and unrealized profit of $188K. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. The ETH leg holds 3,000 ETH worth $9.39M with an entry price of $3,116.98, implying PnL turns negative below the reported entry level based on the data shared. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. The wallet previously recorded 36 consecutive long positions from Nov 3 to Nov 26 and has recently switched between long and short, per the author. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. The author notes they joined the trade again and shared a tracking page for the wallet on hyperbot.network, indicating potential copy-trading interest. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; hyperbot.network.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an ETH whale who previously entered near $3,027.33 has started taking profit, selling 2,136 ETH over the last 2 hours at an average execution price of $3,066.4 for roughly $6.55M, with about $83,000 realized on that tranche (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; on-chain: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x7916aCE256062ACE4DcCE54A8F674bA964f1c25b and intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xf7e784cC6C468cF71269028BdDd34cdcF0F7C5e5). The whale and linked addresses still hold 7,290 ETH valued around $22.61M as reported, providing a concrete snapshot of remaining supply concentration (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; on-chain: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x7916aCE256062ACE4DcCE54A8F674bA964f1c25b and intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xf7e784cC6C468cF71269028BdDd34cdcF0F7C5e5). The reported sell addresses are 0x7916aCE256062ACE4DcCE54A8F674bA964f1c25b and 0xf7e784cC6C468cF71269028BdDd34cdcF0F7C5e5, which can be used to verify the transactions and timing on Arkham’s explorer (source: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x7916aCE256062ACE4DcCE54A8F674bA964f1c25b; intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xf7e784cC6C468cF71269028BdDd34cdcF0F7C5e5).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the ETH long tied to address 0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae reached 54,277.33 ETH (about $165M) at a $3,048.31 average entry and is showing an unrealized loss of roughly $294,000 as of Dec 8, 2025, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X citing hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae. According to @ai_9684xtpa, a resting limit buy of 20,000 ETH at $3,000 (~$60M) is visible for the same address, which if filled would lift total exposure to around $225M, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; hyperbot.network. According to @ai_9684xtpa, an earlier update the same day showed 48,988.65 ETH (~$154M) at a $3,045.27 entry with $4.99M unrealized profit and planned bids for 25,288.68 ETH between $3,000–$3,094 (~$76.27M), indicating intraday order adjustments, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; hyperbot.network. According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders can track ETH order flow around the $3,000 bid and the $3,048 average entry via the on-chain dashboard for the address, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; hyperbot.network.