According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x3Ed4 deposited $1.84M USDC to Hyperliquid about 5 hours ago and placed a BTC limit long order in the $88,611–$89,211 range, source: @lookonchain on X and Hypurrscan. For execution, a buy limit order only fills when market trades at or below the limit price, and partial fills are possible, source: Investopedia and Binance Academy. Until executed or canceled, a large resting bid can function as a local buy wall that may influence short-term order flow on that venue, source: Binance Academy. Traders should monitor whether the order remains in the book, is modified, or pulled, and set alerts around $89k to track potential liquidity interactions on Hyperliquid, source: @lookonchain for the order disclosure and Binance Academy for order book monitoring best practices. The post does not disclose exact order size, and an on-chain deposit does not guarantee the entire amount backs a single order, so verify size and live status directly on Hyperliquid or Hypurrscan before acting, source: @lookonchain and Hypurrscan.

According to @lookonchain, an attacker withdrew 3M USDC from OKX, split the funds across 19 wallets, deposited them into Hyperliquid, and opened 125.14M HYPE longs valued at $26.28M (source: @lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, the attacker then placed an approximately $20M buy wall near $0.21, canceled the orders, and triggered a liquidity collapse that caused mass liquidations (source: @lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, the Hyperliquidity Provider (HLP) absorbed the positions and lost around $4.9M, while the attacker’s entire $3M stake was wiped out (source: @lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, the tactic involved manipulating POPCAT to attack Hyperliquid, resulting in significant venue-side losses (source: @lookonchain).

According to @52kskew, Bitcoin (BTC) recorded approximately 1,000 BTC in buy volume within a single 15‑minute candle, with a TWAP bid positioned under spot price and more than $30 million in resting bid depth, indicating a large allocator deploying size and concentrated liquidity support below market (source: @52kskew, Nov 11, 2025).

According to the source, Bitcoin (BTC) fell below $109,000 while order book data showed spot buyers stepping in near that level, indicating dip absorption. According to the source, despite that bid support, a further downside probe toward $107,000 remains a risk zone to monitor. Based on the source, traders can frame $109,000 as a near-term pivot and $107,000 as a potential liquidity target, focusing on spot-led bid depth and buy-wall persistence for execution timing.

According to @OnchainLens, a wallet that had been inactive for 4 months deposited $15M USDC into HyperLiquid and placed an open buy order for $HYPE between $35.14 and $49 (source: @OnchainLens; Hypurrscan address 0x50dE6ef4D11B263DC2e4547602E963355E17dC81). For traders, the defined price band indicates a visible demand zone and potential buy wall on HyperLiquid, as the order would absorb sell-side liquidity within $35.14–$49 if executed (source: @OnchainLens). Monitoring order fills, amendments, or cancellations at the referenced address and the HyperLiquid order book can inform entry timing and risk levels for HYPE exposure (source: @OnchainLens; Hypurrscan). Position sizing and stops can be mapped around this range given the reported order parameters and potential liquidity concentration in that band (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @adam3us, a Bitfinex whale resumed buying around 08:30 CET near $115.5k, executing about $600 per second in purchases, equivalent to roughly 450 BTC per day. Source: @adam3us on X (Aug 18, 2025): https://x.com/adam3us/status/1957371934339113104 At that stated pace, the implied flow is approximately $2.16 million per hour and about $52 million per day if sustained, indicating concentrated spot demand near the $115.5k level. Source: @adam3us on X (Aug 18, 2025): https://x.com/adam3us/status/1957371934339113104

According to Material Indicators, the FireCharts data reveals a significant sell wall forming resistance just below the 50-Day Moving Average, while a comparatively thin buy wall is acting as support slightly above the 100-Day Moving Average. This suggests that the price may continue to fluctuate within this narrow range, with a probable retest of the support level at the 100-Day MA occurring soon. This trading setup indicates potential short-term price volatility and provides traders with key levels to watch for potential breakout or breakdown scenarios. Source: Material Indicators.