According to @AltcoinGordon, daily $SWIF token burns are underway and the token’s supply is shrinking, a supply-side change that is trading-relevant (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 12, 2025). The post provides no burn amounts, transaction hashes, or contract address, so the scale and pace of the reduction cannot be quantified from this post alone (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 12, 2025). The post tags @sheepwifhatcoin, indicating the project’s account is referenced in the communication around the burn claim (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 12, 2025). Traders tracking $SWIF can monitor official project disclosures and confirm burns on-chain via block explorer data before acting on the headline to manage execution and liquidity risk (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 12, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, another $1,000 worth of SWIF was burned, with daily burns reportedly removing nearly 11% of the token’s supply to date. Source: https://twitter.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1966052240562565426 Token burns permanently remove tokens from circulation, reducing total supply when executed as stated, a mechanic that can influence price dynamics in thin markets. Source: https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/what-is-a-coin-burn A shrinking float can tighten liquidity and heighten volatility and slippage, which are key considerations for short-term position sizing and stop placement. Sources: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquidity.asp and https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/slippage.asp For confirmation and timing, traders should monitor the project’s official updates before acting on the burn narrative. Source: https://x.com/sheepwifhatcoin

According to @AltcoinGordon, another 1M SWIF tokens were burned, bringing reported cumulative burns to over 100M, as stated in his X post on Sep 8, 2025 (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). The post also states the burned tokens are removed from supply permanently (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). The announcement did not include transaction hashes, burn address, chain details, or pricing data, limiting on-chain verification from the post alone (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). For traders, if accurate, the reported cumulative burn implies a smaller circulating float versus prior periods because the tokens are described as removed from supply forever in the same post (source: @AltcoinGordon on X).

According to @AltcoinGordon, over 10% of SWIF’s supply was burned in recent weeks, as stated in an X post dated Sep 6, 2025 (source: X post by @AltcoinGordon, Sep 6, 2025). The same post alleges additional burns next week, which should be treated as unverified until confirmed by the project (source: X post by @AltcoinGordon, Sep 6, 2025). Token burns reduce circulating supply and can tighten float, impacting price impact and liquidity during execution (source: Binance Academy, What Is a Coin Burn; Investopedia, Float definition). Traders should confirm burn transactions via the project’s official channels and the relevant block explorer before acting (source: project account @sheepwifhatcoin; explorers such as Etherscan, Solscan, BscScan). Monitor burn wallet activity, changes in circulating supply, and DEX liquidity to gauge potential near-term volatility in SWIF (source: block explorers and DEX analytics such as DEX Screener).

According to @AltcoinGordon, an additional 3 million SWIF tokens were burned, bringing the cumulative burn to over 10 percent of the token’s supply and described as gone forever. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 5, 2025. The post did not share on-chain transaction details or a contract address for verification, so the update remains based on the author’s disclosure. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 5, 2025. Token burns permanently remove tokens from circulation and can impact supply-demand dynamics that traders monitor. Source: Binance Academy, What Is a Token Burn?

According to @secondswap_io, an APT token unlock is scheduled for Sept 11, 2025, which will increase the circulating supply (source: SecondSwap on X, Sept 3, 2025). According to @secondswap_io, this is another batch in an ongoing unlock schedule, and the key trading variable is how Aptos deploys the released tokens to build demand (source: SecondSwap on X, Sept 3, 2025). According to @secondswap_io, traders should prioritize monitoring Aptos’ post-unlock demand-building initiatives over the mere supply increase when planning positioning around the Sept 11 APT unlock event (source: SecondSwap on X, Sept 3, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, Alex from BlackRock burned another 1,000,000 SWIF tokens and shared a transaction link and image as evidence on September 3, 2025, highlighting a fresh supply reduction event for SWIF; source: @AltcoinGordon. According to @AltcoinGordon, the use of the word another indicates this is at least the second SWIF burn, a detail traders tracking circulating supply and short-term volatility often factor into order flow and liquidity assessments; source: @AltcoinGordon. According to @AltcoinGordon, the post itself did not include official confirmations from BlackRock or the SWIF project within the tweet, so traders may rely on the shared on-chain link for verification when evaluating trade timing and size; source: @AltcoinGordon.

According to @AltcoinGordon, another 5 million SWIF were burned, bringing the cumulative burns over the past few weeks to nearly 10% of the token’s supply (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 3, 2025). Token burns permanently remove coins from circulation, reducing the effective float and tightening available liquidity for trading, which can increase sensitivity to order flow in spot and DEX markets (source: Binance Academy, What Is Coin Burning?).

According to Bubblemaps, WLFI’s locked token supply does not yet have a decided vesting schedule or cliff, and no community vote has finalized these parameters; source: Bubblemaps on X, Sept 1, 2025. This leaves the token unlock timeline and future circulating supply path unknown to the market, limiting traders’ ability to model potential supply dynamics; source: Bubblemaps on X, Sept 1, 2025. Bubblemaps directs users to follow WLFI in real time to track any governance or team updates that could define the vesting and cliff terms; source: Bubblemaps on X, Sept 1, 2025.

According to @EmberCN citing the official announcement, WLFI has a circulating supply of 24.67 billion and at 0.28 dollars trades at a circulating market cap of about 7.0 billion dollars. According to the same source, the circulating allocation is 10.0 billion to ecosystem, 7.78 billion to Alt5, 2.88 billion to liquidity, and 4.0 billion to public investors. Based on those disclosed figures, that equals roughly 40.5 percent ecosystem, 31.5 percent Alt5, 11.7 percent liquidity, and 16.2 percent public float, per @EmberCN.

According to @secondswap_io, the headline 16.27% unlock overstates near-term float because at TGE only 20% of the presale allocation unlocks and the presale equals 25% of total supply, yielding just 5% of total supply available in the short term (source: @secondswap_io on X, Sep 1, 2025). This means initial circulating supply expansion at TGE should be modeled at 5% rather than 16.27% for float-based trading calculations and liquidity planning (source: @secondswap_io on X, Sep 1, 2025).

According to @secondswap_io, 16.27% of the 25% presale allocation is locked in a Lockbox and can only be released via governance, which limits early sell pressure and strengthens scarcity, source: @secondswap_io. The remaining 8.73% of the presale allocation is unclaimed and currently locked, restricting immediate circulating supply from presale participants, source: @secondswap_io. For traders, this lock structure reduces near-term float and dampens initial sell-side liquidity in line with the stated design goal to curb early selling, source: @secondswap_io.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, WLFI's blog confirms an initial circulating supply of 24,669,070,265 tokens, equal to 24.6% at TGE. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the breakdown includes 10 billion for the ecosystem, 7.78 billion attributed to Alt5, 288 million for DEX and CEX liquidity and marketing, and 4 billion for public investors. According to @ai_9684xtpa, these listed items sum to 22.068 billion, indicating about 2.601 billion of the circulating supply is not detailed in the shown categories. Based on the figures provided by @ai_9684xtpa, the implied total supply is about 100.28 billion and Alt5 accounts for roughly 31.5% of the initial circulating float, while the ecosystem share is about 40.5%. Based on @ai_9684xtpa, the liquidity and marketing allocation is approximately 1.17% of the initial float and the public investor portion is about 16.2%, which are useful float concentration metrics for traders.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, citing @0xDylan_, the $WLFI token generation event targets an 8% circulating supply, equivalent to 8.0B tokens (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; @0xDylan_ on X). However, only 16.88B tokens have been deposited into the Lockbox so far, implying a 20% unlock of 3.37B tokens and an effective TGE float around 6.37%, with the final figure dependent on the contract balance at 20:00 local time (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). With less than five hours to the open at the time of posting, traders should monitor the Lockbox and contract balances at 20:00 to size orders and plan liquidity and slippage around initial price discovery (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, CMC CEO @RushCMC said the circulating supply figure was repeatedly confirmed with the project team (source: @ai_9684xtpa). This update means strategic-round tokens are counted as circulating at TGE for the referenced project, as relayed in the same disclosure (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders should update initial float, FDV, and unlock assumptions for TGE pricing and liquidity planning based on this inclusion (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance has updated the WLFI contract token info page to show circulating supply sourced from CoinMarketCap, accompanied by a notice stating This information does not constitute any form of representation or warranty, which signals the figure is not guaranteed for accuracy yet (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025). The post adds that the market is closely tracking WLFI’s TGE circulating supply and that whether this figure is verified will depend on Binance team validation, urging caution to avoid misleading interpretations before official verification (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025). For traders, this implies any FDV or float-based valuation using the displayed circulating number should be treated as provisional until Binance confirms verification on the token page (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Binance’s WLFI listing announcement highlights the official contract addresses on Ethereum 0xdA5e1988097297dCdc1f90D4dFE7909e847CBeF6, Solana WLFinEv6ypjkczcS83FZqFpgFZYwQXutRbxGe7oC16g, and BSC 0x47474747477b199288bF72a1D702f7Fe0Fb1DEeA, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025. The post also notes the announcement did not disclose WLFI’s opening circulating supply, which the author describes as an uncommon case, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 1, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, WLFI has a 100B total supply, and only 20% of Phase 1 and Phase 2 public-sale tokens unlock at TGE with the public-sale allocation totaling 25B tokens — implying limited immediate float. source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 31, 2025. On the assumption all participants transferred to Lockbox and activated, the TGE float is estimated at 5B WLFI, or 5% of total supply. source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 31, 2025. At a Binance contract price of $0.3858, the author estimates this translates into roughly $1.93B of potential sell pressure into TGE. source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 31, 2025.

According to @secondswap_io, DEX markets need verifiable data on circulating supply, unlock schedules, and vesting to function efficiently, making supply data providers critical for price discovery and risk management. source: x.com/secondswap_io/status/1960326440920162627 For actionable monitoring, traders commonly use TokenUnlocks for unlock and vesting calendars, CoinGecko and Messari for circulating supply disclosures, Etherscan for on-chain token supply and holder distributions, Nansen for labeled wallet flows and concentration analysis, and Dune for custom circulating-supply dashboards. sources: unlocks.app; coingecko.com; messari.io; etherscan.io; nansen.ai; dune.com

According to @AltcoinGordon, Alex from Blackrock burned another 0.5% of the $SWIF token supply, shared via an X post that tagged @sheepwifhatcoin and included an image, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 22, 2025. The cited post does not include a transaction hash, chain details, block explorer link, or an official issuer confirmation, so the burn remains unverified within the source, source: @AltcoinGordon on X. Based on the information provided in the post, traders seeking to act on this claim would need on-chain confirmation of a burn address inflow and an issuer update to validate a 0.5% reduction in circulating supply before making trading decisions, source: @AltcoinGordon on X.