According to Lookonchain, two whale addresses (0x7Dac and 0xB5eE) withdrew 98.24 million MERL worth approximately $14.9 million from exchanges over the past six days, indicating accumulation of MERL based on their on-chain tracking (source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 15, 2025). According to Lookonchain, the activity is evidenced by transaction records tied to the Merlin Chain explorer pages referenced for these addresses (source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 15, 2025). According to Lookonchain, the withdrawals consolidate large holdings off-exchange, aligning with the author’s stated view of whale accumulation in MERL (source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 15, 2025).

According to @lookonchain, Galaxy Digital bought another 325,000 SOL valued at about $78 million in the past 5 hours. Source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 14, 2025.

According to @bubblemaps on X dated Sep 12, 2025, 50% of $PUMP traders are currently in profit across 270k+ on-chain participants. According to @bubblemaps, the profit cohorts include 1 entity with $10M+ profit identified as Wintermute, 30 with $1M–$10M, 400 with $100k–$1M, 2,000 with $10k–$100k, 10,000 with $1k–$10k, and 120,000 with under $1k. According to @bubblemaps, 50% of 270k+ implies roughly 135k+ traders are in profit, indicating the scale and concentration of realized gains in $PUMP.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x7E4E deposited 8M USDC into Hyperliquid and bought 86,322 HYPE valued at $4.88M and 466.68M PUMP valued at $2.74M, source: @lookonchain on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7E4E766d0aE5ea9cDED0c694669194Db92800107; hypurrscan.io/address/0x1abD8168EA60B37a6A8CC149fa058910d89b0767. According to @lookonchain, another wallet 0x1abD deposited 4.58M USDC into Hyperliquid to buy HYPE, source: @lookonchain on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x1abD8168EA60B37a6A8CC149fa058910d89b0767. According to @lookonchain, combined inflows across these two wallets total 12.58M USDC directed toward HYPE and PUMP activity on Hyperliquid, source: @lookonchain on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7E4E766d0aE5ea9cDED0c694669194Db92800107; hypurrscan.io/address/0x1abD8168EA60B37a6A8CC149fa058910d89b0767. According to @lookonchain, traders tracking HYPE and PUMP can monitor these wallets on Hypurrscan for additional large orders and position changes tied to Hyperliquid activity, source: @lookonchain on X; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7E4E766d0aE5ea9cDED0c694669194Db92800107; hypurrscan.io/address/0x1abD8168EA60B37a6A8CC149fa058910d89b0767.

According to @lookonchain, qianbaidu.eth accumulated 260,900 HYPE (~$13M) across two wallets in the past 16 hours (source: Lookonchain post on X dated Sep 8, 2025; Hypurrscan addresses 0x8319eF53245d8FFfe01Ae8FB4Ad0A22016BDbB42 and 0x746bd928F271434deaAa6682EEFe6f82674D4561). Address 0xe0f0 opened a long position of 136,906 HYPE (~$6.9M) in the past 6 hours (source: Lookonchain post on X dated Sep 8, 2025; Hypurrscan address 0xe0f06e1042380fDf62b854c019A00A4f47704fC7). Address 0x328B bought 43,415 HYPE (~$2.13M) in the past 12 hours (source: Lookonchain post on X dated Sep 8, 2025; Hypurrscan address 0x328Bb023B9B9f0EffCcC73F169F9DDe7680C28b3). Address 0x23fA bought and staked 42,161 HYPE (~$2M) about 7 hours ago (source: Lookonchain post on X dated Sep 8, 2025; Hypurrscan address 0x23fA1AD1dc4bCdFFA41B722a7aef4e3E335D74C4). In total, the tracked whale exposure amounts to roughly 483,382 HYPE (~$24M) across spot purchases, staking, and a new long over the reported windows (source: aggregation of amounts from the Lookonchain post on X dated Sep 8, 2025).

According to @lookonchain, WLFI dropped below $0.19 and on-chain wallet 0x1527 is down over $2.2M on a WLFI long (source: @lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, on-chain wallet 0x92bb is up over $1.8M on a WLFI short (source: @lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xc26c opened a 28.61M WLFI long valued at 6.84M USD; source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x92bb opened a 5.5M WLFI short valued at 1.32M USD; source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, combined positioning from these two wallets shows a net +23.11M WLFI long totaling about 5.52M USD; source: @lookonchain.

According to @OnchainLens, two wallets linked to @Trend_Research_ deposited 1,000,000 PENDLE valued at $4.8M and 203,100 ENS valued at $4.73M into Binance, with reported losses of $1.12M and $808K respectively (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai). According to @OnchainLens, the wallets are 0x8b0e4a56b3bc5ecbbaff8c64b06967c25af1f319 and 0x4F62bF3A8ef0383a2df8Effe08c6595433f4BC2E, totaling approximately $9.53M in inflows and about $1.93M in reported losses (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x01ef sold 197 BTC for about $21.35M at $108,398 and then opened a 3x leveraged short totaling 561 BTC with roughly $60.89M notional (source: @lookonchain). The combined activity represents 197 BTC spot sold plus a 561 BTC short, equating to around 758 BTC of bearish exposure and approximately $82.24M positioned around the reported price level (source: @lookonchain).

According to @OnchainLens, three wallets likely controlled by the same whale deposited 4.338 trillion CHEEMS worth $4.99 million to Binance about 10 hours ago, realizing a $1.58 million profit after a nine-month hold, source: @OnchainLens. The deposits originated from 0xFb5a021b5785f7A6eC451a30d08E9fd5DF4eBcB8, 0x0199C521BE43D20DC906ADEFd5ccCB6c08216ED6, and one additional address, source: @OnchainLens. This constitutes a large inflow of CHEEMS to a centralized exchange that traders can track for liquidity and order book changes, source: @OnchainLens.

According to Lookonchain, two whale wallets purchased a combined 358,279 HYPE valued at $18.23 million within the past 12 hours, based on on-chain transaction traces shared on X; source: Lookonchain. Based on the reported totals, the implied average fill price is approximately $50.9 per HYPE, derived from $18.23 million divided by 358,279 tokens; source: Lookonchain. The concentration of purchases in two large wallets during a short window indicates notable accumulation activity in HYPE over this period; source: Lookonchain.

According to @QCPgroup, BTC dominance slipped from 60% to 57% while still remaining above the sub-50% levels seen in 2021, highlighting a shift in market share that traders track for rotation signals. According to @QCPgroup, the move is fueling speculation that whales expect ETH to outperform, particularly if ETH staking ETFs secure approval later this year.

According to @Andre_Dragosch, despite significant profit-taking by the HTX whale, overall whale realized profits have only seen a minor uptick as of Aug 25, 2025. Source: @Andre_Dragosch. According to @Andre_Dragosch, whale profit-taking has generally declined since July 2025. Source: @Andre_Dragosch.

According to @OnchainLens, The Unit team reports a long-time Bitcoin OG sold 19,663 BTC valued at approximately 2.22 billion dollars for 455,672 ETH via two entities, @OnchainLens said. Of the received ETH, 279,000 ETH worth about 1.13 billion dollars has been staked, @OnchainLens reported. The OG still holds BTC on HyperLiquid with the stated intent to convert it to ETH, @OnchainLens added. The entity maintains 176,616 ETH after these transactions, @OnchainLens said.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a PEPE whale withdrew 183.7 billion PEPE from Binance about 9 hours ago at $0.00001107, worth $2.035 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 23, 2025). The same address currently holds 1.31 trillion PEPE with an average cost of $0.00001683 (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 23, 2025). Based on these figures, the position shows an unrealized loss of $7.25 million at the stated cost basis (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 23, 2025). The wallet last added approximately five months ago and reportedly began building the PEPE position in June 2024 (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 23, 2025).

According to @rovercrc, China Renaissance is buying $100M worth of BNB, source: @rovercrc on X. He also stated that altcoin season is coming, signaling a bullish stance toward BNB and broader altcoins, source: @rovercrc on X. Traders focused on BNB can monitor spot volume, perpetual funding, and order-book imbalances for confirmation signals following this post, source: @rovercrc on X.

According to @lookonchain, a newly created wallet 0x2607 withdrew 11,950 ETH valued at 51.32 million dollars from Binance, with Arkham Intelligence explorer references provided by the source. According to @lookonchain, another newly created wallet bc1qcn withdrew 1,046 ETH valued at 118.27 million dollars from Binance about 20 minutes earlier, with Arkham Intelligence explorer references provided by the source. According to Glassnode and CryptoQuant, large exchange outflows to self-custody are often interpreted as accumulation and can reduce near-term sell-side liquidity, a dynamic traders monitor for ETH and BTC.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, trader The White Whale currently maintains six addresses on Hyperliquid with total position value around USD 300 million, including 530,925.04 SOL longs and 55,358.87 ETH longs (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the combined unrealized profit stands at USD 19.895 million, and these figures reflect performance even after this week’s significant ETH pullback (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the disclosed positions indicate concentrated long exposure in SOL and ETH perps on Hyperliquid, relevant for monitoring large whale positioning and potential order flow (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @EmberCN, the individual referenced has repeatedly used tokens obtained from investments to buy back their own token, noting that a prior allocation of 25 million LDO was mostly used to repurchase MKR. source: @EmberCN on X https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1957058261703930269 Traders can monitor on-chain transfers linked to the reported MKR buybacks and watch MKR liquidity and LDO flow around these events to assess potential impact on order books. source: @EmberCN on X https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1957058261703930269

According to @rovercrc, three whale addresses purchased approximately $280 million worth of ETH in a breaking update posted on X on Aug 16, 2025, with a screenshot attached. Source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 16, 2025, post 1956768054961926600. The post explicitly identifies ETH as the asset and cites a combined notional of $280M across three addresses. Source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 16, 2025, post 1956768054961926600. The post does not disclose the specific wallet addresses, transaction hashes, or execution venues, and no third-party on-chain verification is provided in the post. Source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 16, 2025, post 1956768054961926600.