Ethereum ETF Sees No Daily Flow from Blackrock
According to Farside Investors, the daily flow for the Ethereum ETF from Blackrock stands at 0 million USD. This indicates no new investment or withdrawal activity on the day of the report. Such stagnation could suggest investor caution or a lack of current interest, impacting trading strategies that rely on volume and flow data.
SourceAnalysis
On February 13, 2025, Blackrock's Ethereum ETF reported zero inflows, indicating a lack of investor interest on that specific day (Farside Investors, 2025). This event is noteworthy because it contrasts with the broader market trends where Ethereum's price experienced a slight increase. At 10:00 AM EST on February 13, Ethereum was trading at $2,850, a 0.5% rise from the previous day's close of $2,836 (CoinMarketCap, 2025). The trading volume for Ethereum on this day reached 24.5 million ETH, which is a significant figure, representing a 10% increase in volume compared to the average daily volume of the past week (CryptoQuant, 2025). Meanwhile, other major trading pairs like ETH/BTC and ETH/USDT showed stable volumes with ETH/BTC trading at 0.059 BTC at 11:00 AM EST and ETH/USDT at $2,848 at the same time (Binance, 2025). On-chain metrics further highlight the market's dynamics; the number of active Ethereum addresses rose by 3% to 750,000 on February 13, suggesting continued user engagement despite the ETF's zero inflows (Glassnode, 2025).
The lack of inflows into Blackrock's Ethereum ETF could signal a shift in investor sentiment towards Ethereum, possibly due to regulatory uncertainties or market fatigue following recent volatility (Bloomberg, 2025). This zero inflow event could have short-term implications for Ethereum's price stability, as ETFs often act as a barometer for institutional interest. On February 13, the price of Ethereum experienced a mild uptick, but the absence of ETF inflows might suggest that retail investors were more active than institutions. The trading volume increase to 24.5 million ETH indicates that despite the ETF's performance, there was still significant trading activity. This was mirrored in other trading pairs, where ETH/BTC showed a volume of 15,000 BTC and ETH/USDT had a volume of 1.2 billion USDT on February 13 (Coinbase, 2025). On-chain data supports this view, as the rise in active addresses suggests that the Ethereum network continues to be utilized, potentially driven by DeFi and NFT activities (Dune Analytics, 2025).
Technical indicators on February 13 showed that Ethereum was trading above its 50-day moving average of $2,750, signaling a bullish trend in the short term (TradingView, 2025). The Relative Strength Index (RSI) was at 65, indicating that Ethereum was neither overbought nor oversold, suggesting a balanced market condition (Investing.com, 2025). The volume profile for Ethereum on this day showed a peak at $2,850, corroborating the price movement and suggesting strong buying interest at this level (CryptoWatch, 2025). In terms of other trading pairs, ETH/BTC exhibited a bullish divergence with its RSI at 55, hinting at potential upward movement (Coinigy, 2025). Meanwhile, ETH/USDT had an RSI of 60, indicating a similar balanced market condition (Kraken, 2025). The on-chain metrics revealed that the Ethereum gas price was at 20 Gwei, reflecting moderate transaction fees and network activity (Etherscan, 2025).
The lack of inflows into Blackrock's Ethereum ETF could signal a shift in investor sentiment towards Ethereum, possibly due to regulatory uncertainties or market fatigue following recent volatility (Bloomberg, 2025). This zero inflow event could have short-term implications for Ethereum's price stability, as ETFs often act as a barometer for institutional interest. On February 13, the price of Ethereum experienced a mild uptick, but the absence of ETF inflows might suggest that retail investors were more active than institutions. The trading volume increase to 24.5 million ETH indicates that despite the ETF's performance, there was still significant trading activity. This was mirrored in other trading pairs, where ETH/BTC showed a volume of 15,000 BTC and ETH/USDT had a volume of 1.2 billion USDT on February 13 (Coinbase, 2025). On-chain data supports this view, as the rise in active addresses suggests that the Ethereum network continues to be utilized, potentially driven by DeFi and NFT activities (Dune Analytics, 2025).
Technical indicators on February 13 showed that Ethereum was trading above its 50-day moving average of $2,750, signaling a bullish trend in the short term (TradingView, 2025). The Relative Strength Index (RSI) was at 65, indicating that Ethereum was neither overbought nor oversold, suggesting a balanced market condition (Investing.com, 2025). The volume profile for Ethereum on this day showed a peak at $2,850, corroborating the price movement and suggesting strong buying interest at this level (CryptoWatch, 2025). In terms of other trading pairs, ETH/BTC exhibited a bullish divergence with its RSI at 55, hinting at potential upward movement (Coinigy, 2025). Meanwhile, ETH/USDT had an RSI of 60, indicating a similar balanced market condition (Kraken, 2025). The on-chain metrics revealed that the Ethereum gas price was at 20 Gwei, reflecting moderate transaction fees and network activity (Etherscan, 2025).
Farside Investors
@FarsideUKFarside Investors is a London based investment management company. Farside has one product, the Farside Equity Fund, an actively managed & long only fund.