According to Milk Road (@MilkRoadDaily), the Dune Index, which aggregates fees, transfer volume, and transaction count, has displayed consistent onchain adoption growth since 2021. Each decline in the index has aligned closely with broader market corrections. The current dip in the index mirrors the patterns observed during the 2023 and 2024 corrections, suggesting a cyclical trend. Traders should note that previous similar dips were followed by significant recoveries, indicating a potential opportunity if historical trends persist (source: Milk Road on Twitter, May 4, 2025).

According to @justinsuntron, Tron DAO has generated $2.6 billion in fees over the past year, accounting for 43.3% of all Layer 1 (L1) blockchain fee revenue. Since November, Tron has consistently achieved weekly fees exceeding $60 million, demonstrating strong performance and network health.

According to @MilkRoadDaily, Uniswap generated nearly $59 million in fees during March 2025. A significant portion of these fees was allocated to liquidity providers and third-party applications built on the protocol. Approximately $10 million of the fees were directed to Uniswap Labs from their decentralized exchange, highlighting the benefits of building on Uniswap.

According to Milk Road, Uniswap generated nearly $59 million in fees during March 2025. Most of these fees were distributed to liquidity providers and third-party applications built on the protocol, while approximately $10 million were retained by Uniswap Labs from their decentralized exchange (DEX). This highlights the profitability of building on the Uniswap platform.

According to @MilkRoadDaily, Avalanche (AVAX) spearheaded a significant surge in alternative Layer 1 blockchains in 2021, surpassing Ethereum (ETH) in growth. This marked a shift of focus and investment towards blockchains offering enhanced scalability and reduced fees.

According to ZachXBT, the focus of decentralized finance should be on creating products that outperform centralized services in terms of fees and efficiency. ZachXBT emphasizes that the purpose is not merely to settle for decentralization if it incurs higher costs and longer transaction times, but to develop superior decentralized solutions that offer competitive advantages over centralized alternatives. This insight is critical for traders evaluating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of using decentralized exchanges versus centralized ones.

According to Miles Deutscher, the implementation of rewards programs for holding USDC on the platform incentivizes users to maintain their USDC on the exchange. This strategy boosts overall engagement and transaction activity, which can indirectly enhance revenue through increased fees (source: Miles Deutscher, Twitter, March 27, 2025).

According to @zachxbt, projects associated with JP previously failed to conduct proper due diligence, leading to the accidental hiring of DPRK IT workers as developers. This issue remained undisclosed until highlighted by @zachxbt. The current discussion revolves around Asgardex's practice of retaining fees, raising concerns about transparency and operational integrity.

According to Mihir (@RhythmicAnalyst), comparing Ethereum and Solana is futile due to their different developmental priorities. Ethereum prioritized stability and security initially and is now aiming to reduce fees and enhance scalability. In contrast, Solana focused on achieving low fees and high scalability first and is now working on improving system stability.

According to @js_horne, Zora's decision to build on the Base blockchain is driven by its scalability and security features, which are crucial for handling high transaction volumes and ensuring long-term network reliability. This move is expected to enhance Zora's trading capabilities by offering faster transaction processing and reduced fees, critical factors for traders. @js_horne emphasizes that Base provides an optimal environment for decentralized applications, aligning with Zora's goal to expand its user base and trading activities. Source: @jessepollak.

According to @milesdeutscher, the Sonic ($S) ecosystem achieved the 5th rank in 24-hour app revenues. Projects on the Sonic mainnet are generating significant fees in addition to incentives from @SonicLabs. This performance could attract more developers, enhancing the ecosystem's growth and maintaining momentum.

According to Flood (@ThinkingUSD), there are allegations that many memecoins have been subject to insider trading, potentially incentivized by individuals who stand to gain from their trading volume and retail demand through the collection of fees.

According to @EmberCN, pump.fun transferred 140,000 SOL ($26.62M) to Kraken. Since the start of 2025, they have sold 1.021 million SOL ($208.22M), cashing out $208.22 million. Pump.fun has earned 2.724 million SOL in fees since launch.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the user expressed uncertainty about their choice of trading platform. This highlights the importance of selecting a platform that aligns with a trader's specific needs, such as security, fees, and available cryptocurrencies. Traders should conduct thorough research and consider platform reviews and features before committing to a particular exchange.

According to Justin Sun, the issue of high fees for NFT minting and trading has been acknowledged and will be resolved today with a significant reduction. This move is likely to encourage more activity in the NFT market by lowering the cost barriers for traders and creators.

According to @FarsideUK, the fees for the ETH spot ETFs have been disclosed. The key fees include Grayscale's ETHE at 2.5% (unchanged) and Grayscale Mini ETH at 0.25%. While the 0.25% fee for the Mini ETH is competitive, Farside Investors believe a more aggressive 0.15% fee would have been better to prevent potential outflows.

According to BitMEX Research, the progression of market dynamics in cryptocurrency trading follows a predictable pattern: initial ignorance, ridicule, resistance, fee imposition, fee reduction to gain market share, and ultimately, victory for the persistent. This suggests that exchanges might lower fees to attract more traders, potentially leading to increased trading volumes and market share for those who endure.