MEV Bots vs Users: Why 100x Blockchain Scaling May Not Lower Gas Fees — Trading Implications for MEV and Throughput | Flash News Detail | Blockchain.News
Latest Update
11/13/2025 10:16:00 AM

MEV Bots vs Users: Why 100x Blockchain Scaling May Not Lower Gas Fees — Trading Implications for MEV and Throughput

MEV Bots vs Users: Why 100x Blockchain Scaling May Not Lower Gas Fees — Trading Implications for MEV and Throughput

According to Patrick McCorry (@stonecoldpat0), added blockchain throughput is quickly absorbed by MEV bots, so even a 100x capacity increase does not ensure cheaper gas because fees must remain meaningful to deter spam and abuse. Source: Patrick McCorry (Twitter, Nov 13, 2025) According to Patrick McCorry, transaction fees originated as an anti-DoS mechanism rather than a revenue stream, which structurally necessitates non-trivial fees even after scaling. Source: Patrick McCorry (Twitter, Nov 13, 2025) According to Patrick McCorry, the core imbalance is that aggregate MEV profits exceed what users are willing to pay, enabling bots to afford fees while pricing out low-fee applications. Source: Patrick McCorry (Twitter, Nov 13, 2025) According to Patrick McCorry, these dynamics challenge trading theses that assume scaling alone will cut fees, implying fee relief-driven adoption narratives may be unreliable without direct MEV mitigation. Source: Patrick McCorry (Twitter, Nov 13, 2025)

Source

Analysis

In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency trading, understanding the challenges of blockchain scaling is crucial for identifying profitable opportunities and managing risks. A recent insight from cryptocurrency researcher Patrick McCorry highlights a persistent issue: while technological advancements can expand blockchain capacity, MEV bots quickly consume this extra space, driving up transaction fees and complicating market dynamics. This discussion is particularly relevant for traders eyeing Ethereum and layer-2 solutions, as it underscores how anti-spam mechanisms like fees were originally designed to prevent denial-of-service attacks rather than generate revenue. As we delve into this, we'll explore how these factors influence trading strategies, price movements, and potential entry points in related crypto assets.

MEV Bots and Their Impact on Blockchain Scalability

MEV, or Miner Extractable Value, refers to the profits bots extract by reordering transactions in blocks, often leading to front-running or sandwich attacks. According to Patrick McCorry's analysis on November 13, 2025, even if blockchain capacity increases by 100 times, fees must remain 'meaningful' to deter these bots and curb resource abuse. This creates a delicate balance: fees need to be high enough to mitigate bot activity but low enough to keep users engaged. Traders should note that when collective MEV bot profits exceed what users are willing to pay in fees, it results in a scenario where bots dominate, pricing out low-fee applications. This dynamic has been evident in Ethereum's history, where gas fees spiked during high-demand periods, such as the 2021 DeFi boom, causing ETH prices to fluctuate wildly. For instance, on-chain metrics from that era showed trading volumes surging to over $10 billion daily on Uniswap, with gas fees averaging 100-200 gwei, directly correlating with ETH's price rally to above $4,000. Today, this insight suggests monitoring Ethereum's upcoming upgrades, like potential improvements in sharding, which could alleviate some pressure but might not fully resolve MEV issues without fee adjustments.

Trading Opportunities in Scaling Solutions

From a trading perspective, this scaling conundrum opens doors for assets focused on layer-2 protocols and alternative blockchains. Tokens like MATIC from Polygon or OP from Optimism have seen significant price action tied to scalability narratives. For example, in mid-2023, Polygon's zkEVM launch led to a 30% price increase in MATIC within a week, with trading volumes jumping to $500 million daily across major exchanges. Traders can look for support levels around $0.50 for MATIC, with resistance at $0.80, using indicators like RSI to gauge overbought conditions. Similarly, Solana (SOL), known for its high throughput, has benefited from lower MEV exposure, with its price recovering to $150 in late 2024 amid reduced congestion. On-chain data indicates Solana's transaction volume hit 100 million per day in Q3 2024, far outpacing Ethereum's base layer. However, the risk remains: if MEV bots adapt to these networks, fees could rise, potentially triggering sell-offs. Institutional flows, as reported by various market analysts, show hedge funds allocating over $2 billion to layer-2 tokens in 2024, signaling long-term bullish sentiment despite short-term volatility.

The broader market implications extend to cross-asset correlations, especially with stock markets. Tech stocks like those in the Nasdaq, which often mirror crypto trends, could see sympathy moves if blockchain scaling issues persist, affecting AI-driven trading bots in traditional finance. For crypto traders, this means watching Bitcoin (BTC) as a bellwether; BTC's dominance index rose to 55% during Ethereum's fee spikes in 2022, drawing capital away from altcoins. Current sentiment analysis from trading platforms reveals a neutral to bearish outlook on ETH if fees don't stabilize, with potential downside to $2,500 support if bot activity intensifies. To capitalize, consider swing trading strategies: enter long positions on ETH dips below $3,000, targeting $3,500 resistance, backed by moving averages like the 50-day EMA. Remember, the worst-case scenario outlined by McCorry—bots affording fees while users can't—could suppress adoption of decentralized apps, impacting tokens like UNI or AAVE. Overall, this narrative emphasizes the need for adaptive trading plans that incorporate on-chain metrics and fee trends for informed decision-making.

Strategic Insights for Crypto Traders

In conclusion, balancing transaction fees against MEV bot profits is key to sustainable blockchain growth, directly influencing trading volumes and price stability. Traders should prioritize real-time monitoring of gas fees via tools like Etherscan, where recent data shows average fees at 20-50 gwei as of late 2024, down from peaks but still vulnerable. This environment favors diversified portfolios, blending high-capacity chains like Solana with Ethereum's ecosystem plays. By focusing on verifiable metrics—such as a 15% drop in Ethereum's daily active users during high-fee periods in 2023—investors can anticipate market shifts. Ultimately, as scalability evolves, opportunities abound for those who align strategies with these economic realities, potentially yielding substantial returns in a market projected to reach $10 trillion by 2030.

Patrick McCorry

@stonecoldpat0

ethereum and L2 bull @arbitrum @lemniscap