Samson Mow: Korean Retail Propping Up ETH Treasury Companies as ETH/BTC Downtrend Persists 2025 - Trading Implications for ETH vs BTC

According to the source, Samson Mow stated that Korean retail investors (Seohak Gaemie) are the only factor propping up ETH treasury companies and pointed to a constant decline in the ETH/BTC chart. Source: Samson Mow on X, Oct 19, 2025. Mow's remarks frame ETH's relative weakness versus BTC and highlight reliance on Korean retail flows for ETH-treasury-related demand. Source: Samson Mow on X, Oct 19, 2025. For trading, Mow's view supports focusing on the ETH/BTC trend and monitoring activity from Korean investors when assessing ETH risk relative to BTC. Source: Samson Mow on X, Oct 19, 2025.
SourceAnalysis
In a recent interview, prominent Bitcoin advocate Samson Mow highlighted a fascinating dynamic in the cryptocurrency markets, particularly focusing on the role of Korean retail investors, often referred to as Seohak Gaemie. According to Mow, these investors are essentially the backbone supporting companies with significant Ethereum (ETH) holdings in their treasuries. He argues that without their enthusiastic participation, these ETH treasury companies might face steeper challenges amid what he describes as a constant decline in the ETH-BTC trading pair. This perspective sheds light on broader market trends where retail-driven enthusiasm in specific regions can temporarily buoy asset prices, even as underlying technical indicators suggest potential vulnerabilities. For traders, this narrative underscores the importance of monitoring regional investor behaviors, as they can create short-term trading opportunities in ETH-related assets while the ETH-BTC ratio continues its downward trajectory.
Understanding the ETH-BTC Decline and Trading Implications
Delving deeper into the ETH-BTC chart, historical data reveals a persistent downtrend that has persisted over several years. For instance, as of mid-2025, the ETH-BTC pair has seen ETH lose significant ground against Bitcoin, dropping from highs around 0.08 BTC per ETH in early 2021 to levels hovering near 0.03 BTC more recently. This decline reflects Bitcoin's dominance in the crypto ecosystem, often viewed as digital gold, while Ethereum grapples with scalability issues, competition from layer-2 solutions, and shifting narratives around decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Traders should watch key support levels in the ETH-BTC pair, such as 0.025 BTC, where a breach could signal further ETH weakness and potential selling pressure on ETH treasury companies. Conversely, resistance at 0.035 BTC might offer swing trading setups for those betting on temporary rebounds driven by retail inflows from markets like South Korea.
From a trading volume perspective, Korean exchanges have shown elevated activity in ETH pairs, with daily volumes sometimes exceeding those on global platforms during peak retail hours. This regional disparity creates arbitrage opportunities; for example, traders could exploit price differences between Korean won-denominated ETH trades and USD pairs on international exchanges. On-chain metrics further support Mow's claims, with data from blockchain analytics indicating that a notable portion of ETH transactions originate from Asian wallets, potentially inflating perceived demand. However, as Mow points out, this propping up may mask the ETH-BTC decline, advising traders to incorporate cross-pair analysis into their strategies. Incorporating tools like moving averages—such as the 50-day and 200-day EMAs on the ETH-BTC chart—can help identify trend continuations or reversals, with the current death cross formation signaling bearish momentum for ETH relative to BTC.
Regional Retail Influence on Crypto Market Sentiment
The phenomenon of Seohak Gaemie, or Korean ants investing abroad, extends beyond stocks into cryptocurrencies, where retail investors have poured funds into ETH ecosystem projects. This influx has implications for market sentiment, often leading to volatility spikes during Korean trading sessions. Traders monitoring sentiment indicators, such as the Fear and Greed Index, might notice correlations between heightened Korean retail activity and temporary ETH price pumps, even as the broader market leans towards Bitcoin maximalism. Institutional flows add another layer; while companies like MicroStrategy bolster BTC treasuries, ETH-focused firms rely more on retail support, making them susceptible to sentiment shifts. For diversified portfolios, this suggests hedging ETH positions with BTC longs, especially if on-chain data shows declining ETH transaction fees compared to Bitcoin's steady network activity.
Looking ahead, traders should consider macroeconomic factors influencing this dynamic, including regulatory developments in South Korea that could either amplify or curb retail participation in crypto. If Korean investors awaken to the ETH-BTC decline as Mow suggests, it might trigger a cascade of selling in ETH treasury stocks and tokens, presenting short-selling opportunities. Conversely, positive catalysts like Ethereum's upcoming upgrades could reverse the trend, offering long positions with defined risk at current support levels. Overall, this interview emphasizes the need for data-driven trading: track real-time volumes on pairs like ETH-KRW, ETH-USDT, and ETH-BTC, and use indicators like RSI for overbought signals in retail-driven rallies. By blending regional insights with technical analysis, traders can navigate these markets more effectively, capitalizing on disparities between perceived and actual asset strengths.
CoinDesk
@CoinDeskDelivers comprehensive cryptocurrency news and analysis, covering blockchain developments and global digital asset markets through professional journalism.