According to @EmberCN, a wallet deposited 6,294 ETH (about $27.56M) to Bybit roughly 20 minutes ago after withdrawing the same amount from Bybit a month earlier when ETH was $3,779, implying an unrealized profit of about $3.76M at a $4,379 transfer price, source: @EmberCN on X. Historically, large exchange inflows from whales are associated with increased short-term sell pressure and higher intraday volatility in ETH order books, which traders monitor for liquidity shifts, source: CryptoQuant research on exchange inflows and selling pressure.

According to @secondswap_io, 16.27% of the 25% presale allocation is locked in a Lockbox and can only be released via governance, which limits early sell pressure and strengthens scarcity, source: @secondswap_io. The remaining 8.73% of the presale allocation is unclaimed and currently locked, restricting immediate circulating supply from presale participants, source: @secondswap_io. For traders, this lock structure reduces near-term float and dampens initial sell-side liquidity in line with the stated design goal to curb early selling, source: @secondswap_io.

According to @secondswap_io, Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is scheduled to unlock approximately $483 million worth of tokens on Sept 1, 2025, positioning it among the year’s most closely watched token events. Source: @secondswap_io. Large token unlocks have historically coincided with short-term increases in circulating supply and elevated intraday volatility, particularly in altcoins with thinner order books. Source: Binance Research; Kaiko. Traders commonly track on-chain flows from vesting or treasury wallets to exchanges around the unlock window to assess potential sell pressure and liquidity needs. Source: Nansen; Arkham. Derivatives indicators such as funding rates, open interest, and spot-futures basis often react into and immediately after unlock events, providing signals for hedging and mean-reversion strategies. Source: Binance Research; Kaiko. Given the event-driven supply shock, market participants also monitor broader risk sentiment and correlations, including potential spillover to majors like BTC and ETH. Source: Binance Research; Kaiko.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, CoinMarketCap lists WLFI’s verified TGE initial circulating supply at 27.3 billion tokens, far above the previously discussed 5 billion theoretical float; source: CoinMarketCap via @ai_9684xtpa. Using the Binance contract price of $0.3599 referenced by @ai_9684xtpa, the implied potential opening sell pressure is about $9.83 billion (27.3B x $0.3599); source: Binance contract price via @ai_9684xtpa. Per @ai_9684xtpa’s review, the figure appears calculated as total supply minus team, advisor, partner, and Lockbox allocations; source: CoinMarketCap methodology as noted by @ai_9684xtpa. Based on these cited figures (27.3B vs 5B), the initial float is roughly 5.5x higher, indicating materially greater potential supply overhang at TGE at the same price reference; source: comparative calculation from CoinMarketCap data and Binance price via @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @EmberCN, a wallet linked to Trend Research transferred 203,000 ENS valued around $4.72 million into Binance about 10 minutes before the post, source: @EmberCN. The same ENS were withdrawn from Binance about one month earlier when valued around $5.5 million, implying a potential realized loss of about $780,000 if sold now, source: @EmberCN. The author questioned whether this exchange deposit signals intent to sell and provided the wallet address link in the post, source: @EmberCN.

According to Lookonchain, Bitcoin address bc1qlf deposited another 250 BTC to Binance worth about 28.29 million dollars, leaving roughly 3,000 BTC valued near 339 million dollars under the same holder, source: Lookonchain. Large holder deposits to exchanges are historically associated with increased near-term sell-side liquidity and downside risk during thin depth conditions, source: CryptoQuant research on exchange inflows and Glassnode insights on exchange net position change. The remaining 3,000 BTC represents a supply overhang that traders track for additional transfers as potential sell pressure signals, source: Lookonchain wallet balance data and CryptoQuant whale behavior studies. Traders commonly monitor Binance spot order books and exchange inflow spikes to time hedges or adjust leverage when such whale deposits occur, source: CryptoQuant intraday flow metrics guidance.

According to @alice_und_bob, they are being required by tax authorities to pay corporate tax and will sell a portion of their Polkadot (DOT) holdings, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 26, 2025. The post highlights time to break 4.20, identifying 4.20 as a key near-term level that DOT traders are watching for a potential breakout, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 26, 2025. The author also claims their sales often precede a big pump, framing this as a contrarian signal, but this reflects personal experience rather than verified market data, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 26, 2025. No position size or execution timing was disclosed, limiting the ability to quantify immediate sell pressure, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 26, 2025.

According to Onchain Lens, a whale deposited 1,962 ETH, valued at approximately $9.38 million, into OKX from address 0xf3c7D5b83DCf6F297E4B1f5A525C1a3eE45D5585 on August 25, 2025. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 25, 2025. The wallet held the ETH for over 11 months and realized about $4.7 million in profit; this implies an estimated cost basis near $2.39k per ETH, derived from the reported notional and profit figures. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 25, 2025; calculation derived from Onchain Lens figures. Large exchange inflows are commonly tracked by traders as a potential sell-pressure proxy because moving coins to centralized exchanges increases readily sellable supply. Source: CryptoQuant Metrics Guide on Exchange Inflows; Glassnode Insights on Exchange Net Position Change. Traders can monitor OKX ETH order flow and broader ETH exchange netflows to gauge whether additional supply follows this deposit and to assess short-term liquidity and volatility risk. Source: CryptoQuant Metrics Guide on Exchange Flows; Glassnode Insights on Exchange Activity.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 1,962 ETH worth about $9.38M to OKX and realized approximately $4.7M in profit, with the sending address 0xf3c7D5b83DCf6F297E4B1f5A525C1a3eE45D5585, source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, the ETH was reportedly held for over 11 years before the deposit, source: @OnchainLens. Large inflows to centralized exchanges are historically monitored as potential sell-side supply by on-chain analysts, so traders may watch OKX spot and derivatives flow around ETH for confirmation, source: Glassnode Academy.

According to @lookonchain, address 0xe0ba deposited 12M BIO, approximately $3.79M, to Binance after receiving 4.8M BIO, approximately $1.53M, from the BioProtocol vesting wallet about 40 minutes earlier, with the on-chain activity attributed to the address monitored via Arkham Intelligence as supporting evidence (source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence). @lookonchain also reports the same address withdrew 15M BIO from Binance five months ago at $0.057 and is now sitting on an estimated profit of $3.72M, a gain of about 436 percent, based on current valuations cited in the alert (source: Lookonchain on X). The cited USD amounts imply a current BIO spot near $0.318 to $0.319, derived from $3.79M for 12M BIO and $1.53M for 4.8M BIO, indicating a substantial price appreciation versus the $0.057 reference level (source: calculation from figures provided by Lookonchain on X). Large token deposits to exchanges are historically associated with increased near-term sell-side liquidity and distribution phases, making the 12M BIO inflow a key flow to monitor for potential market impact (source: Glassnode Insights research on exchange inflows and sell pressure). Traders tracking BIO can watch Binance order book depth and spot volumes to gauge whether the deposited 12M BIO begins to hit the market, as order book dynamics and volume shifts are standard tools for assessing flow-driven price impact (source: Binance Academy explainer on order book depth and volume analysis).

According to Lookonchain, multiple wallets labeled as linked to Matrixport deposited 95,873 ETH, valued at approximately $452 million, into Binance and OKX over the past three hours, with Arkham Intelligence address pages provided for verification (source: Lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence). Arkham Intelligence labels indicate the sending wallets are associated with Matrixport and the receiving addresses are exchange deposit wallets for Binance and OKX, confirming centralized exchange inflows rather than self-custody transfers (source: Arkham Intelligence). The 95,873 ETH represents about 0.08% of Ethereum’s circulating supply, increasing near-term available liquidity on exchanges if sold (sources: Ultrasound.money for circulating supply; CryptoQuant metrics guide on exchange inflow as a proxy for potential sell pressure). Large, rapid exchange inflows are commonly monitored by traders for short-term price impact and potential shifts in funding and basis in ETH derivatives markets (sources: CryptoQuant metrics guide; Kaiko market structure research).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x7C1...36FA7 withdrew 2,216.79 ETH from Binance in early June at a cost basis of 2,484 dollars, held with no on-chain moves for roughly three months, and then deposited the full amount back to Binance about three hours before the post, source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intel explorer. The author states the position would deliver a 73 percent return and around 4 million dollars in profit if sold at current levels, source: @ai_9684xtpa. Large whale inflows to exchanges are historically associated with increased potential sell-side liquidity and short-term price pressure, source: Glassnode on-chain research; CryptoQuant exchange flow analyses. Traders can track Binance spot order books, ETH funding rates, and follow address 0x7C1...36FA7 on Arkham to confirm any actual selling and gauge near-term volatility and liquidity risk, source: Binance exchange and Binance Futures market data; Arkham Intel explorer.

According to @bubblemaps, Naseem sold 800,000 dollars from an original 250,000 dollar purchase and still holds about 600,000 dollars, source: @bubblemaps on X, Aug 21, 2025. The remaining 600,000 dollars represents potential sell-side supply that traders should monitor for further outflows and liquidity impact, source: @bubblemaps on X, Aug 21, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, BlackRock deposited 1,885 BTC valued at about 111.66 million dollars and 59,606 ETH valued at about 254.43 million dollars to Coinbase Prime, and the post characterized this activity as selling, source: @lookonchain on X dated August 21, 2025. Coinbase describes Prime as its institutional platform for custody and trade execution including OTC and agency trading, so deposits can precede execution rather than cold storage, source: Coinbase Prime official site and product documentation. Traders should monitor Coinbase Prime linked inflows and any subsequent outflows to gauge whether execution completes and sell-side liquidity clears in the short term, source: Coinbase Prime trading workflow materials and the inflow report by @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x1D8d deposited 17,972 ETH (~$77.4M) to Coinbase about an hour ago. According to @lookonchain, address 0x5A8E deposited 13,521 ETH (~$57.72M) to Binance in the past 12 minutes. According to @lookonchain, address 0x3684 deposited 3,003 ETH (~$12.89M) to Binance about 20 minutes ago. Based on figures reported by @lookonchain, these transfers total 34,496 ETH (~$148.01M) moved to centralized exchanges within roughly the last hour, aligning with @lookonchain’s note that whales are panic-selling as the market drops. CryptoQuant states that rising exchange inflows are historically associated with increased sell pressure, a metric traders monitor for short-term ETH price risk (source: CryptoQuant).

According to @lookonchain, a wallet identified as pumpfun deposited 2.5B PUMP valued at $9.19M to OKX about 2 hours ago, with the transaction timing and size cited from on-chain monitoring by @lookonchain on X. Large exchange inflows increase on-exchange supply and are widely tracked by traders as a proxy for potential sell-side liquidity and short-term volatility risk, source: Glassnode Academy Exchange Inflows and CryptoQuant Research. Key confirmation metrics to monitor include OKX spot netflows, order book depth, and perpetual funding or basis signals for PUMP, source: OKX Learn and Binance Research.

According to @rovercrc, ETH supply on centralized exchanges is drying up quickly, suggesting fewer coins available for immediate spot selling, source: @rovercrc on X, Aug 16, 2025. Historically, declining exchange reserves are interpreted as reduced near-term sell pressure and tighter sell-side liquidity, which can magnify price impact during inflows, source: Binance Academy (Exchange Reserves), CryptoQuant (Exchange Reserve metric documentation). Traders can monitor on-chain exchange-reserve dashboards alongside order book depth to confirm the signal before positioning in ETH spot or perpetual futures, source: Binance Academy (on-chain indicators), Kaiko Research (order book depth and liquidity).

According to @lookonchain, an Ethereum Foundation-linked wallet (0xF39d) sold 7,294 ETH over the past 3 days for a total of $33.25M at an average execution price of $4,558, based on on-chain tracking (source: Lookonchain, X, Aug 16, 2025). According to @lookonchain, the same wallet previously accumulated 33,678 ETH between June 13–16, 2022 at an average price of $1,193 for about $40.2M, indicating historical cost basis data for the address (source: Lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, the spread between the reported 2022 purchase price and the recent average sale price is $3,365 per ETH, or roughly +282%, calculated from the figures provided (source: Lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, traders can reference $4,558 as a recent realized sale level for sizable ETH supply by a foundation-linked address when assessing near-term liquidity and execution clusters (source: Lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, the address labeled "0x17E0" sold 4,958 ETH for approximately $22.13M at $4,463 during a market dip about five hours ago, confirming a large-lot exit that hit the market. Source: @lookonchain on X: x.com/lookonchain/status/1956189691465884168. The realized profit totals $9.75M, implying an estimated entry cost near $2,496 per ETH based on the reported sale price and profit figures. Source: @lookonchain on X: x.com/lookonchain/status/1956189691465884168. Traders may reference the $4,463 level as a recent heavy-supply zone where significant size cleared, which can act as a near-term liquidity and potential resistance area for ETH price action. Source: analysis based on the transaction reported by @lookonchain on X: x.com/lookonchain/status/1956189691465884168. Monitoring subsequent on-chain flows from the address labeled as a hacker by @lookonchain can help gauge follow-on sell or buy pressure and manage intraday volatility risk in ETH. Source: event data via @lookonchain on X: x.com/lookonchain/status/1956189691465884168.

According to Samson Mow, around $3B worth of ETH is currently queued for unstaking, and he expects ETHUSD to drop massively once withdrawals are processed and hit the market. Source: Samson Mow on X, Aug 14, 2025. Ethereum’s proof-of-stake design requires validators to enter an exit queue with churn limits before full withdrawals, pacing outflows over time but potentially sustaining sell pressure when the queue is elevated. Source: Ethereum Foundation staking withdrawals and validator lifecycle documentation. Traders should monitor exit-queue size and pending withdrawals to gauge near-term supply, and consider hedging exposure via ETH futures and options if outflows intensify. Source: Ethereum Foundation staking withdrawals documentation; CME Group derivatives education.