According to @ItsDave_ADA, decentralization is the non-negotiable foundation for blockchain trust, and throughput, utility, TVL or TPS cannot offset discretionary control that compromises trustlessness. Source: @ItsDave_ADA on X, Oct 26, 2025. He warns many chains centralize validator sets and consolidate governance for coordination and performance, scaling quickly but reintroducing counterparty risk under the guise of innovation. Source: @ItsDave_ADA on X, Oct 26, 2025. He states Cardano (ADA) was architected to avoid this by separating consensus, computation, and governance, with governance and treasury models that transparently distribute authority to limit concentrated interests. Source: @ItsDave_ADA on X, Oct 26, 2025. He adds Cardano’s deliberate roadmap prioritizes durable credibility over metric-chasing and highlights 8+ years of reliability as evidence of this design choice. Source: @ItsDave_ADA on X, Oct 26, 2025. For trading context, the author signals ADA’s core catalysts center on decentralization progress and governance participation rather than short-term TVL/TPS boosts, shaping a long-duration, decentralization-first thesis. Source: @ItsDave_ADA on X, Oct 26, 2025.

According to @dydxfoundation, an on-chain governance vote is live asking whether to reduce the dYdX Chain active validator set to 42, with voting scheduled to end on Oct 20, 2025 at 16:22 UTC. Source: dYdX Foundation on X, Oct 16, 2025. Traders seeking official materials and live tallies can review the discussion on the dYdX Forum and track on-chain status as Proposal 297 on Mintscan to monitor the outcome at the deadline. Sources: dYdX Forum DRC Reduce Active Validator Set to 42; Mintscan dYdX Proposal 297.

According to dYdX Foundation, the community has passed a governance vote to approve eight nominated validators as the initial designated proposer set, confirming the outcome on the referenced Mintscan proposal page (source: dYdX Foundation on X; source: Mintscan proposal page referenced in the announcement). For traders, the establishment of a designated proposer set directly ties to who proposes blocks and how consensus progresses, which is foundational for transaction inclusion and network operations in Tendermint-style Proof-of-Stake systems (source: Tendermint Core documentation).

According to @VitalikButerin, the maximum withdrawal rate from the Ethereum validator set is 1/65536 per epoch. If only the Ethereum Foundation (EF) withdraws, it would take approximately 2.6 days to complete. However, if 20% of the stakers decide to withdraw, the process could extend to 58 days. This implies potential impacts on market liquidity and price movements as traders should anticipate varying withdrawal periods based on staker actions.