According to @ai_9684xtpa, Upbit listed Orderly’s token ORDER today following a BlockFocus event that Orderly sponsored last night. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1981618538612957598 The author reports BlockFocus holds 5,957,200 ORDER with an average entry near $0.20, accumulated since August 2024, and notes the position had dipped below cost at one point. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1981618538612957598 Based on the current rally, the author estimates this move brings roughly $595,000 in profit to BlockFocus. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1981618538612957598 Two wallets attributed by the author to BlockFocus were shared for verification: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xd7Fb6921a3a40E80aa9Dd7AF2AeE94819913317B and intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x0581e83e26FBE437eFd03d74dFC17881aD80F404. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1981618538612957598

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, in the past few hours a whale spent $3M USDC to buy 5.116 MET, implying an average execution price near $586.4K per MET based on those figures (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, the whale still holds $4.45M USDC and the author indicates the entity is likely to buy more (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the shared wallets for tracking are Buying: 2bof59ej3N5WaHbCfjzwa6LiUfU8hiJpj9ZjNxPFf7or and Holding: FzULv8pR9Rd7cyVKjVkzmJ1eqEmgwDnzjYyNUcEJtoG9, sourced to Nansen labels (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). For trade monitoring, traders can track these wallets shared by @OnchainLens, which are based on Nansen data, to watch for additional MET inflows (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen).

According to @EmberCN, a 1 million SOL-allocated investor sold 733,000 HYPE in the past 4 hours for roughly USD 26.31 million, bridged USDC back to Solana, and bought 142,000 SOL. Source: @EmberCN on X: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1980558523017875729. According to @EmberCN, at the end of last year the same wallet sold 375,000 SOL (about USD 70 million) and bought 2.52 million HYPE at 27.7, and since yesterday has sold a cumulative 1.142 million HYPE at 36.7 (about USD 42 million) while rebuying 223,000 SOL at 187.6. Source: @EmberCN on X: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1980558523017875729. According to @EmberCN, current holdings stand at 1.216 million SOL (about USD 224 million) and 1.42 million HYPE (about USD 50.5 million). Source: @EmberCN on X: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1980558523017875729. Verification and tracking addresses provided: HYPE sell addresses hypurrscan.io/address/0x00f5da329d61371ffa39680b4d226bcba46e406e and hypurrscan.io/address/0x756BDe7e4726E0bB1cfbAE3DE3d3Cc46B13d6441; SOL buy address intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/5XgbLyoMBCeEm73y5JBcFDFn9GqtwumY88uBvZUxaabW. Source: @EmberCN on X: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1980558523017875729; hypurrscan.io; intel.arkm.com. This on-chain rotation evidences net outflows from HYPE and inflows into SOL by a large holder; active traders can monitor the listed wallets for further flow signals. Source: @EmberCN on X: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1980558523017875729; hypurrscan.io; intel.arkm.com.

According to @lookonchain, a whale that it says previously manipulated JELLY has gone long 85.86M ZEREBRO worth $3.42M across two wallets (0x234a8a11a01fe7ff6b292bec616ce810f4930501 and 0x8d0a7b41ece5ac812e417270f83a299c3efb6486), driving ZEREBRO up over 300% and sitting on more than $2.3M in unrealized profit; source: @lookonchain on X, Oct 12, 2025, x.com/lookonchain/status/1904902828319269068. According to @lookonchain, ZEREBRO volatility is high and traders should exercise caution; source: @lookonchain on X, Oct 12, 2025, x.com/lookonchain/status/1904902828319269068.

According to @OnchainLens, two newly created wallets received 51,255 ETH valued at approximately $212.15M from FalconX and likely belong to Bitmine; the addresses are 0xB471b1F623F33248C3da6a5C9B9C80F5c8985FEB and 0x8f28bE380dfbdBE5273A7920cf9DFb719332722B (Source: @OnchainLens on X, Sep 30, 2025).

According to Lookonchain, a whale withdrew 50.1M $ASTER valued at about $80.6M from Aster to 10 newly created wallets roughly four hours before their post, with recipient addresses reported as 0x5B659D234c976578C710CC9C66C96e62dBdB83B3, 0xf93CDa48dF7208FEe000d8b8391e0A06c4BD2ecf, 0xa8bE1961A50c4CBE3737d48E0d078dB3D5FA06B5, 0x8FC5f0064a0746932A2C9B5Eab4A0244aB3c1C7e, 0xbDd14b1E7cbCA902329309dcE87f74dbE793c6Fd, 0x17AF340cCc301c287cDa1f586930CbBa7eDBBC53, 0xcBB1B7812a205f56Ae7c4a8AfBe99893aA84b488, 0x326E8295A014DC310219d85010eB26b74EF725fF, 0x2A4833621AA45097EB15FF6e9773ce388Dd1368E, and 0xd13C35fB7e95647A2fF750C684bc44591feCefdA, source: Lookonchain. According to Lookonchain, this distribution implies an average of approximately 5.01M ASTER, or about $8.06M, per wallet based on their figures, source: Lookonchain. According to Lookonchain, the activity was characterized as a mysterious whale action and was timestamped at about four hours before publication, source: Lookonchain.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale accumulated 6.486 million ASTER worth $7.595 million at an average price of $1.17 within the past 7 hours, based on Nansen on-chain data (source: @OnchainLens on X; data via Nansen). The associated wallets are 0x734c92135eb462B8Ba5A5edfe4000c5d7f6a6eC4 and 0x793a3e8a1f0e19719bfa39288436958bcd475dc4, as identified in the post (source: @OnchainLens on X; data via Nansen). This establishes a clear on-chain cost basis at $1.17 for the whale’s recent ASTER entries during that period (source: @OnchainLens on X; data via Nansen).

According to @lookonchain, a whale who bought and staked 2M HYPE nine months ago at an $8.68 average (costing $17.4M USDC via three wallets on Hyperliquid) has completed unstaking and is very likely to sell for profits (source: @lookonchain). The buyer transferred the 2M HYPE into nine wallets for staking, submitted an unstake request seven days ago, and received the tokens 21 hours ago (source: @lookonchain). At current prices the position is valued at $107.2M, implying an unrealized profit of $89.8M (source: @lookonchain). Addresses to monitor include: 0x382f18700bb16ac07b15543c3db3c56366ba11d7, 0xa08ae97126af5d42d4bcf340d3a535d479c4abcc, 0xa47e762439f75fd83e1d64e3415f6f4cc6d0bdb8, 0xfe7c1383cd21267cf0bd1243ce0c1f1010f659f8, 0x9d4d6af75bbb1f814f4e946c7366625b64b7bc2d, 0x1d8f930e9e00789d2a36f9390e30482ef21469aa, 0xd5f57d7c7836498e6d014b19b5e49abf8f5d7eb6, 0x52c701dfda9f7f0e9a24a98177675ef4bdb4734d, 0xe3f41398c4b12305230930117d24a68a2c140369, 0x2918f0e47488ea0e93751cd1d3ea26245eba8e3b, 0x24ca22a893dd37a6d0d7c7992fc6d1ea59395647, 0xba1b45c1499b69a8521575e114488bea598bdc86 (source: @lookonchain). Given @lookonchain’s assessment that the whale is very likely to sell, traders should be alert to potential near-term sell pressure on HYPE as these wallets move, per the on-chain alert (source: @lookonchain).

According to @bubblemaps, on-chain wallet clustering indicates that addresses 0x1246E490308db61DCa45ead613f47430De3830ad, 0xF32e3596f555546ACc4aD6Ef67e1ABF36b134748, 0xee7f7f53f0d0c8c56a38e97c5a58e4d321a174dc, and 0x7e99042e82204Df12C3D783C6795e8b7dDCf3FCe are linked to the WLFI team and collectively account for about 33% of supply based on percentage matching, while official team addresses have not been disclosed, source: Bubblemaps on X. According to @bubblemaps, the identified 33% team allocation signals high holder concentration for WLFI and provides specific wallets for trade surveillance and risk controls, including monitoring large transfers to exchanges and liquidity pools, source: Bubblemaps on X. According to @bubblemaps, these mappings are inferred from matching percentages and are not confirmed by WLFI, so traders should treat the labels as provisional when designing on-chain alerts and position sizing, source: Bubblemaps on X.

According to ZachXBT, a leaked price sheet lists 200+ crypto influencers and their wallet addresses from a project that contacted them for paid promotion (source: ZachXBT on X, Sep 1, 2025). According to ZachXBT, 160+ accounts accepted the deal, yet fewer than five disclosed the posts as advertisements (source: ZachXBT on X, Sep 1, 2025). According to ZachXBT, the presence of identifiable wallet addresses tied to paid promotions enables traders to monitor these wallets on-chain around the timing of promotional posts to evaluate short-term flow and transparency risks (source: ZachXBT on X, Sep 1, 2025). According to ZachXBT, traders can use the leaked wallet list as a watchlist to track transfers involving newly promoted tokens and to detect coordinated activity across multiple influencer accounts (source: ZachXBT on X, Sep 1, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, four related wallet addresses participated in an XPL snipe and realized a cumulative profit of 46.1 million dollars, with detailed transactions and addresses shared in the post at https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1960531751337640214 (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders can review the cited wallets and transaction history to monitor potential flows that could impact XPL liquidity and volatility if trading this asset (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @OnchainLens, a wallet it labels as the Coinbase hacker accumulated 38,126 SOL, worth about $8M, within the last 2 hours across addresses 7reyCVVxQpkBjFxauBtdzBWynEh3y6MvGPwuRwwn7Doh and 0xcC434153CD323b8537d245920a8e8e0Aa3C3c638 (source: Onchain Lens). Based on this flagged on-chain accumulation, traders are monitoring SOL liquidity, depth, and potential follow-through flows tied to these addresses for short-term market impact (source: Onchain Lens). Market participants can set alerts on the cited addresses to track subsequent transfers toward exchanges that could signal intent to rotate or hedge positions, using the Onchain Lens data as the reference point (source: Onchain Lens).

According to @OnchainLens, two wallets received a combined 6,812 ETH valued at about USD 32.63 million from a sender labeled Galaxy on August 23, 2025, source: @OnchainLens. The newly created wallet 0xa7a503d31465a99b71079afce56f40431048e24e received 4,812 ETH valued at about USD 23 million, source: @OnchainLens. Wallet 0xDda8E9405CFd9Cdc3D32f2c87a7d01909c5d5A5c received 2,000 ETH valued at about USD 9.63 million, source: @OnchainLens. Based on the reported USD amounts, the implied unit prices are approximately USD 4,780 to USD 4,815 per ETH, derived from the figures provided by @OnchainLens, source: @OnchainLens.

According to @OnchainLens, two newly created wallets received a combined 25,684 ETH worth $115.11M from FalconX-linked addresses on Aug 18, 2025 (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, the destination wallets are 0x50A5c6647931C2B6bCaD57500758F6cd6D808Aa0 and 0x9bdB85fdAE894E2729CaF1DD31C700b217325E77, likely belonging to a single entity (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, the $115.11M size signals a large on-chain movement; traders can track these wallets for any onward transfers to exchanges or DeFi to assess near-term ETH liquidity risks (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @OnchainLens, Bitmine (@BitMNR) received 122,835 ETH valued at approximately $549.65M into five newly created wallets on August 16, 2025 (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, the wallets include: 0xcDda5d6861989874639fc92CEa923b2e80E02F69, 0x8dBf95DAa0710Ee70127C8099d10Ca68132206D4, 0x11D012dA53475dfDAB1C15a944D6D39621cdb112, 0x27673631A8b8A84337F3C5fC7806C9aD97d5516b, plus one additional wallet referenced by @OnchainLens (source: @OnchainLens). Using the @OnchainLens-identified wallets, traders can monitor subsequent transfers to track near-term ETH liquidity and potential flows (source: @OnchainLens).

According to The Data Nerd, several cryptocurrency wallet addresses were shared, potentially indicating significant on-chain activities that could affect market liquidity and trading volumes. Detailed analysis of these addresses may offer insights into large transactions or whale movements, which are critical for traders monitoring market shifts.

According to Ai 姨, two wallet addresses have been identified as engaging in selling activity. These addresses have been shared publicly, suggesting that traders should be cautious of potential market impacts or price movements resulting from these transactions.

According to Ai 姨, two specific wallet addresses have been identified as actively selling. These addresses could indicate significant market movements or influence on specific cryptocurrency assets. Traders should monitor these wallets for potential impact on asset prices or to identify trends in market behavior.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, two specific cryptocurrency wallet addresses have been identified. These addresses may be relevant for traders who are tracking specific transactions or movements in the crypto market. The addresses are provided via hyperlinks, suggesting that they may lead to more detailed transaction data or analysis.

According to OnchainDataNerd, key wallet addresses for various cryptocurrencies have been shared. These include an ERC20 wallet, a BTC wallet, a TRX wallet, and an ETH transferred wallet. Traders can use these addresses to monitor transactions and analyze on-chain data.