23 Wallets From Bitget/Binance Sniped $AVA on Solana — Bubblemaps On-Chain Alert for Traders | Flash News Detail | Blockchain.News
Latest Update
12/18/2025 6:37:00 PM

23 Wallets From Bitget/Binance Sniped $AVA on Solana — Bubblemaps On-Chain Alert for Traders

23 Wallets From Bitget/Binance Sniped $AVA on Solana — Bubblemaps On-Chain Alert for Traders

According to @bubblemaps, 23 wallets, including the deployer, were freshly funded from Bitget and Binance just before launch (source: Bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2001723489993330919). These wallets were funded in tight time windows, received similar amounts of SOL, had no prior activity, and sniped $AVA at launch (source: Bubblemaps on X https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/2001723489993330919; on-chain map https://v2.bubblemaps.io/map/S8JgQPfZT7bJkLmkKscb).

Source

Analysis

In the fast-paced world of cryptocurrency trading, recent on-chain analysis has spotlighted suspicious activities surrounding the launch of the $AVA token on the Solana blockchain. According to a detailed bubble map shared by blockchain investigator Bubblemaps, just moments before the $AVA token went live, a cluster of 23 wallets, including the deployer's address, received fresh funding from major exchanges like Bitget and Binance. These wallets exhibited highly coordinated behaviors: they were funded within tight time windows, each receiving similar amounts of SOL, showed no prior transaction history, and immediately sniped large quantities of $AVA tokens right at launch. This pattern raises red flags for potential insider trading or coordinated sniping in the volatile memecoin market, where such tactics can manipulate early liquidity and pump prices artificially. Traders monitoring Solana-based tokens should pay close attention to these on-chain metrics, as they could signal unfair advantages and increased risks of rug pulls or sudden dumps.

Analyzing On-Chain Metrics and Trading Implications for $AVA

Diving deeper into the trading analysis, the bubble map visualization from Bubblemaps, dated December 18, 2025, illustrates how these 23 wallets operated in unison. Funded with SOL amounts ranging closely around similar values, these addresses had zero activity before the influx, suggesting they were purpose-built for this event. At launch, they executed sniper buys, capturing a significant portion of the initial $AVA supply. From a trading perspective, this could indicate a pre-planned distribution strategy, potentially inflating trading volumes early on and creating a false sense of organic demand. For crypto traders, key indicators to watch include wallet clustering on platforms like Bubblemaps, where interconnected addresses might reveal sybil attacks or team allocations. Without real-time price data, we can infer that such activities often lead to short-term volatility spikes; for instance, similar patterns in past Solana launches have seen tokens surge 200-500% in the first hour before correcting sharply. Traders should consider support levels around initial liquidity pools and resistance at early highs, using tools like DEX screeners to track volume anomalies.

Spotting Similar Patterns in Solana Memecoin Launches

To optimize trading strategies amid these revelations, it's crucial to integrate on-chain forensics into your routine. Historical data from Solana's ecosystem shows that launches with clustered, freshly funded wallets often correlate with higher scam risks, as seen in various memecoin rugs throughout 2024 and 2025. For $AVA specifically, the lack of prior wallet activity points to no genuine community buildup, which could deter long-term holders and favor quick flips. Savvy traders might look for trading pairs like AVA/SOL on decentralized exchanges, monitoring 24-hour volume changes that exceed average by 300% as a buy signal, but only after confirming no immediate sell-offs from these sniper wallets. Broader market sentiment in the Solana space remains bullish, with institutional flows into SOL pushing its price toward new highs, potentially spilling over to tokens like $AVA if the launch proves legitimate. However, caution is advised: set stop-losses at 10-15% below entry points to mitigate downside risks from potential dumps.

Looking at the bigger picture for cryptocurrency trading opportunities, this $AVA incident underscores the importance of transparency in token launches. As Solana continues to dominate the memecoin narrative with its low fees and high throughput, traders can capitalize on correlated assets. For example, if $AVA's price action mirrors successful launches like those in the past, we might see cross-pair trading with ETH or BTC, where arbitrage opportunities arise during volatility. Market indicators such as RSI oversold conditions post-launch could signal entry points, while on-chain metrics like active addresses and transaction counts provide real-time validation. Ultimately, this event highlights the need for due diligence; by avoiding tokens with suspicious wallet patterns, traders can focus on sustainable projects, enhancing overall portfolio performance in the dynamic crypto market.

Shifting to risk management in such scenarios, experienced traders often diversify across multiple Solana tokens to hedge against single-point failures like the $AVA sniping. Institutional interest in blockchain analytics tools is growing, potentially leading to more regulated launches and stabilized trading volumes. For those eyeing $AVA, waiting for post-launch stabilization—perhaps after 48 hours of consistent volume above 1 million SOL—could offer safer entry. In summary, while the coordinated funding raises concerns, it also presents learning opportunities for spotting trading signals in real-time, ensuring you're ahead in the competitive world of crypto trading.

Bubblemaps

@bubblemaps

Innovative Visuals for Blockchain Data.