According to @adam3us, Bitcoin development operates by rough consensus and running code, and will not halt without a clearly explained and valid technical objection. Source: Adam Back on X, Oct 3, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1974248334098407879 He added that he would champion a sound technical objection if convinced, underscoring a merit-driven path for protocol changes focused on working implementations and technical validity. Source: Adam Back on X, Oct 3, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1974248334098407879 For BTC traders, this clarifies governance risk by signaling that protocol progress depends on demonstrated code and rough consensus rather than non-technical pressure. Source: Adam Back on X, Oct 3, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1974248334098407879 Traders should watch developer discussions and code proposals where objections are technically substantiated, as those venues can shape Bitcoin’s roadmap and market narratives. Source: Adam Back on X, Oct 3, 2025, https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1974248334098407879