According to @BitMEXResearch, tightening Bitcoin relay policy with your full node is unlikely to influence other nodes because it is hard to stop data flowing across the internet, source: @BitMEXResearch, X, Nov 20, 2025. According to @BitMEXResearch, loosening relay policy can materially increase your node's influence on transaction propagation and the effect scales with peer count, which is relevant for desks seeking broader broadcast of BTC transactions, source: @BitMEXResearch, X, Nov 20, 2025. According to @BitMEXResearch, for enforcing consensus rules, whether your node matters depends on its economic weight rather than its mere presence, guiding traders to focus on the economic context of their own validation, source: @BitMEXResearch, X, Nov 20, 2025. According to @BitMEXResearch, the core takeaway is that running a node primarily safeguards your own view of the chain rather than steering the wider network, a practical point for BTC settlement assurance and counterparty risk checks, source: @BitMEXResearch, X, Nov 20, 2025.

According to Samson Mow on Twitter, traders should be vigilant about efforts to alter the definition of a Bitcoin full node. Mow highlights that maintaining the original definition is critical for the security and decentralization of the Bitcoin network, which directly impacts trading confidence and long-term investor trust (Source: @Excellion, Twitter, May 8, 2025). This discussion is especially relevant as institutional interest grows and regulatory scrutiny intensifies, potentially affecting Bitcoin liquidity and price stability in the crypto market.