According to @AltcoinGordon, "Alex from Blackrock" has burned another 16.5M SWIF tokens, and the post states this single actor has burned over 12% totaling about $500k to date (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 15, 2025). According to the source post, no transaction hashes or wallet addresses were provided, so independent on-chain verification is not available within the post itself (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 15, 2025). According to the same source, the post tags @sheepwifhatcoin, signaling where traders might look for official confirmation (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 15, 2025). Based on the source claim, traders should treat SWIF as a potential supply-tightening setup and monitor on-chain circulating supply, top-holder concentration, and DEX or CEX liquidity for widening spreads and higher slippage that often follow large burns by a single wallet (analysis anchored to the claim by @AltcoinGordon). According to the source-triggered context, prudent steps include waiting for on-chain confirmation, watching for abnormal exchange inflows/outflows of SWIF, and tracking any follow-up statements from the tagged project account before initiating momentum entries or short squeezes (analysis anchored to the claim by @AltcoinGordon).