According to @gdb, Codex code review caught two real bugs that would have been easy for human reviewers to miss, highlighting effective AI-assisted checks on pull requests. Source: @gdb on X, Nov 3, 2025. The post describes Codex as a strong safety net watching over every PR but provides no quantitative performance metrics, rollout details, or enterprise availability information. Source: @gdb on X, Nov 3, 2025. No cryptocurrencies, tokens, or on-chain integrations are mentioned, and the post offers no direct trading signal or measurable KPIs for modeling AI-exposed equities or AI-linked crypto assets. Source: @gdb on X, Nov 3, 2025.

According to @gdb, Codex code reviews are becoming indispensable for some teams, as stated in his X post on Oct 4, 2025 source: https://twitter.com/gdb/status/1974407570950701506. He also linked to an example thread by @embirico for additional context source: https://x.com/embirico/status/1974276717360419091. The post includes no adoption metrics, pricing, customer counts, or product release details, limiting immediate data-driven trading signals source: https://twitter.com/gdb/status/1974407570950701506.