According to Onchain Lens, whale address 0xc8D45CC670c6485F70528976D65f7603160Be2CD deposited 10,169 ETH, valued at $29.77M, to Binance after a staking cycle, with a reported profit of $11.36M (source: Onchain Lens; Nansen). The address previously withdrew 19,505.5 ETH ($48.69M) to stake and later re-deposited 20,269 ETH ($60.05M), accruing 763.58 ETH in staking rewards over the period (source: Onchain Lens; Nansen). This latest 10,169 ETH exchange inflow increases available sell-side liquidity on a centralized exchange order book that on-chain trackers monitor for potential impact on short-term ETH market depth and flow dynamics (source: Onchain Lens; Nansen).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale staked 25,000 ETH valued at USD 79.48 million on Dec 11, 2025 (data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, these ETH had been withdrawn for USD 84.81 million from Kraken roughly one month earlier (data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the staking activity is linked to addresses 0xfe31320faf8da1492eadf8deb79bd264d7cf2141 and 0x392a1e5ccfa7667d40edc49ae9462739139701e2 for on-chain verification (data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, this converts previously withdrawn ETH into staked ETH, categorized as staking inflow rather than exchange balance in on-chain analytics (data: Nansen).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an associated address of wallet 0xDDf725D2...Dfb8CE5 deposited 1,880 ETH to an exchange at USD 3,117.65 per ETH, flagged as a possible sell but unconfirmed; source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xDDf725D2EbD795748DD8c6b700b7c98d1Dfb8CE5. About four hours before the post, the cluster withdrew 2,779.8 ETH from Binance at USD 3,208.02 per ETH, totaling roughly USD 8.91 million; source: @ai_9684xtpa. This sequence lifts the observed cost basis by about USD 90 per ETH and implies a net exchange outflow of approximately 899.8 ETH over the window, based on the reported sizes and prices; source: calculation based on @ai_9684xtpa figures. Intent remains uncertain, as the initial deposit may not have been sold, so traders should treat the flow as directional only when corroborated by further on-chain traces; source: @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence explorer.

According to @lookonchain, trader 0xa43d opened an ETH long near the local peak 14 hours ago and is down $3.24 million over that period, source: @lookonchain on X. @lookonchain reports the trader partially closed the position 3 hours ago, realizing a $583.5K loss, source: @lookonchain on X. The address still holds 11,793 ETH long valued at $37.6 million with $2.66 million in unrealized losses, and the position metrics are viewable on the Hyperdash trader page, source: @lookonchain on X; source: Hyperdash. The source flags this as FOMO-driven long exposure at local highs, underscoring elevated risk for levered entries at peaks, source: @lookonchain on X.

According to @lookonchain, the wallet labeled #BitcoinOG (1011short) closed 4,513 ETH worth $14.06M for a realized profit of $305K, while still holding a 50,001 ETH long valued at $155.7M with $3.4M in unrealized gains, based on on-chain and platform data shared on X; source: @lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, earlier the same wallet had deposited a total of $70M USDC into Hyperliquid and scaled its ETH long to 54,277 ETH ($166.4M), with a reported liquidation price of $1,795.3 for the position; source: @lookonchain.

According to @OnchainLens, a Bitcoin OG (10/11) has deposited an additional $60M in USDC (bringing total deposits to $70M) into HyperLiquid and increased a 5x ETH long now valued at about $165M, consisting of 54,277.33 ETH with an average entry of $3,048.31 and a liquidation price at $1,795.26. According to @OnchainLens, the trader has a resting order to further add at $3,000 on HyperLiquid. According to @OnchainLens, these reported levels ($3,000 bid, $3,048.31 entry, $1,795.26 liquidation) provide concrete reference points for ETH traders tracking large on-chain perp positions. According to @OnchainLens, cumulative USDC deposits of $70M represent posted margin available for managing the position on HyperLiquid.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH rebounded above $3,000 while the trader dubbed the post-10/11 flash crash short insider increased long exposure to 14,227 ETH (over $42.95M) with an average entry of $2,965.73 and about $762K unrealized profit; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae. The position and PnL are attributed to address 0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae and can be tracked in real time on HyperBot; source: hyperbot.network/trader/0xb317d2bc2d3d2df5fa441b5bae0ab9d8b07283ae.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x4825B8c4641dB7467AbDb00710bC1a34Ca1c61f4 spent $60.7M USDC to acquire 24,000 ETH at an average entry of $2,529 about five months ago, based on on-chain records. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996888326155231690; ARKM Intel address explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4825B8c4641dB7467AbDb00710bC1a34Ca1c61f4 According to @lookonchain, the position’s unrealized profit peaked above $55M but now stands at $14.4M, implying roughly a 23.7% ROI and an estimated mark-to-market value near $75.1M based on these figures. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996888326155231690 According to @lookonchain, two hours before the post the whale staked the entire 24,000 ETH balance. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996888326155231690; ARKM Intel address explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x4825B8c4641dB7467AbDb00710bC1a34Ca1c61f4 According to @lookonchain, the prior peak gain equated to about a 90.6% return on the $60.7M cost basis, underscoring the drawdown from the top. Source: @lookonchain on X https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996888326155231690

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, a whale staked 24,000 ETH valued at $75.94M after holding the position for five months (source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the wallet 0x4825b8c4641db7467abdb00710bc1a34ca1c61f4 accumulated the 24,000 ETH for $60.7M in USDC and now shows an unrealized profit of about $15.2M based on current valuation (source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens based on Nansen figures, the implied average entry price is roughly $2,529 per ETH and the current implied valuation is about $3,164 per ETH, equating to an unrealized gain near 25% (source: @OnchainLens, data: Nansen).

According to @EmberCN, a tracked trader turned $500,000 into $3.34 million, netting $2.84 million after two losing months since October (source: @EmberCN on X, Dec 4, 2025). According to @EmberCN, the wallet now holds approximately $33.5 million in long positions primarily in ETH with smaller exposure to HYPE and ZEC (source: @EmberCN on X, Dec 4, 2025). Position details are referenced via the HyperBot trader page for address 0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 shared in the post (source: hyperbot.network trader page shared by @EmberCN).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, two addresses deposited a combined 13,356 ETH into Kraken over the past 7 hours, valued at $36.69 million. source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Arkham Intelligence Explorer Both wallets converted stETH to ETH before transferring to the exchange. source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Arkham Intelligence Explorer The addresses are reported to have holding histories exceeding 5 years with an estimated entry cost near $1,000 per ETH. source: @ai_9684xtpa on X It is not confirmed whether the two addresses belong to the same whale or entity. source: @ai_9684xtpa on X Wallets: 0xD908995FD431EB0078Cd35E912fF14E45043818F and 0x0BB90552eC6c158cc99e11BB79bbA413c296F9BD. source: Arkham Intelligence Explorer

According to @OnchainLens, a whale wallet traced back five years deposited 10,176 ETH, worth about $28.69M, to Kraken after converting from sETH following a 100-day hold (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The same entity had initially withdrawn 21,086 ETH valued at $7.35M and has been gradually moving funds back to exchanges, with the latest inflow specifically to Kraken (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). The address involved is 0xd908995fd431eb0078cd35e912ff14e45043818f, and the transfer reflects a notable ETH inflow to Kraken that traders monitor via on-chain dashboards (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to Lookonchain, an Ethereum ICO wallet identified as 0x2dCA holding 40,000 ETH (about $120M) reactivated after more than a decade and staked the holdings rather than selling, with transactions referenced to Etherscan address 0x26021abdd34df672fed798cf5a2e98190d22aaa8 (source: Lookonchain on X; source: Etherscan). This activity indicates no immediate exchange-bound outflows from this wallet during the reactivation window, as funds were committed to staking instead of transfers to trading venues (source: Lookonchain on X; source: Etherscan). At 32 ETH required per validator, 40,000 ETH corresponds to roughly 1,250 validator deposits (source: Ethereum.org staking documentation).

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0xdECF deposited another 5,000 ETH (about $15.05M) to Binance, source: @lookonchain. Since Oct 28, this wallet has sold 25,603 ETH (about $85.44M) via Binance and Galaxy Digital and still holds 10,000 ETH (about $30.34M), source: @lookonchain; address reference: Arkham Intelligence explorer for 0xdECFfa6430A9B2e8aca7aF813428566bB3a4151E, source: Arkham Intelligence. Traders can monitor further exchange deposits from 0xdECF on Arkham Intelligence to track potential flow changes from this wallet, source: Arkham Intelligence.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an ETH ICO whale resumed activity after a one-week pause by depositing 1,000 ETH (about $3.03 million) to OKX around 30 minutes ago, with the wallet tracked as 0xBeE541b4e0053682D2784E295D6728FF76743706 on Arkham Intelligence. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the address has cumulatively sold 10,500 ETH (about $35.39 million) over the past month across exchanges and on-chain. According to @ai_9684xtpa and Arkham Intelligence, the wallet still holds 110,081 ETH valued at over $335 million. According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH ICO whales appear more active recently, and traders can monitor further OKX inflows from this address via Arkham Intelligence.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a 2016-era ETH whale with an estimated cost basis of $203.22 has reportedly routed 7,000 ETH to Wintermute-linked addresses over the past month at an average transfer price of $3,024; if sold, this implies about $19.745M in profit (source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1994963626453778529; source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x95Bf4d908f60047D689E5fA3c080045b0C3A90e7). The latest suspected transfer was 1 hour before the post, with 1,000 ETH (~$3.01M) deposited to Wintermute, while the wallet still holds 26,992.67 ETH, valued around $80.99M based on the cited prices (source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1994963626453778529; source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x95Bf4d908f60047D689E5fA3c080045b0C3A90e7). For trading, the reported $3,024 average transfer price offers a near-term reference level, and monitoring further movements from address 0x95Bf4d908f60047D689E5fA3c080045b0C3A90e7 to Wintermute can help assess potential sell-side supply (source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1994963626453778529; source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x95Bf4d908f60047D689E5fA3c080045b0C3A90e7).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an ICO-era Ethereum whale executed its first external transfer in a decade, moving 40,000 ETH to new address 0x260...2AAa8 with no sale reported so far, noting it could be wallet reorganization, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, 2025-11-30. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the cited cost basis is 0.31 dollars per ETH versus a reference price of 3,007 dollars, implying a nominal 9,699x return if realized, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, 2025-11-30. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the post includes a participation address link and references the holding address but does not indicate deposits to exchanges, so there is no confirmed immediate sell pressure from this transaction alone, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, 2025-11-30.

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, an Ethereum ICO participant transferred 40,000 ETH worth about $120M after 10.3 years of inactivity (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, the funds moved from ICO address 0x2dca0e449ab646dbdfd393a96662960bcab5ae1e to new address 0x26021abdd34df672fed798cf5a2e98190d22aaa8 (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, the participant’s initial ICO investment was $12,440, now valued at $120M, implying a x9,633 return (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen).

According to @lookonchain, an early Ethereum ICO wallet 0x2dCA holding 40,000 ETH (about $119.5M) became active after more than 10 years and transferred 5 ETH (about $15K) to a new wallet (source: @lookonchain). Etherscan data for address 0x2dca0e449ab646dbdfd393a96662960bcab5ae1e records the 5 ETH outbound transaction to a fresh address, confirming the movement (source: Etherscan). According to @lookonchain, the participant originally invested roughly $12.4K in the ICO for 40,000 ETH, now valued near $119.5M, a 9,639x return (source: @lookonchain).

According to Onchain Lens (data: Nansen), wallet 0x73781209F3B0f195D0D3fA9D6b95bB61c54c1ca6 spent an additional $12.82M DAI to acquire 4,234 ETH. According to Onchain Lens (data: Nansen), the whale’s cumulative purchases now total 5,343 ETH for $16.08M DAI at an average price of $3,010. According to Onchain Lens (data: Nansen), the address still holds $55M DAI, a sizable on-chain stablecoin balance traders track for potential flow signals.