According to @ThinkingUSD, HL’s approach spotlights that tokens with revenue but without allocating the majority to on-chain buybacks may offer weaker holder value. Source: X post by @ThinkingUSD, Oct 29, 2025. The post signals a potential rotation toward projects with verifiable, revenue-funded buyback programs, making the revenue-to-buyback ratio a key screen for traders. Source: X post by @ThinkingUSD, Oct 29, 2025. Actionably, traders can prioritize tokens with transparent wallet disclosures and on-chain proofs of buybacks, while applying a discount to tokens where cash flows accrue to treasury or teams instead of buybacks. Source: X post by @ThinkingUSD, Oct 29, 2025. This is an opinion and provides no audited figures, so verification of buyback execution and wallet provenance remains critical for risk management. Source: X post by @ThinkingUSD, Oct 29, 2025.

According to @KookCapitalLLC, there is a noticeable increase in FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) regarding new 'cabal plays' entering the Hyper EVM ecosystem, with numerous posts from original Hyperliquid (HL) community members expressing concern. Despite the uncertainty, @KookCapitalLLC highlights continued personal investment in established meme coins such as HL, Buddy, and Purr, suggesting ongoing organic hype. For traders, this signals potential volatility and entry points as the Hyper EVM ecosystem integrates new projects. Monitoring sentiment shifts and trading volumes on HL, Buddy, and Purr could offer actionable insights, especially as FUD sometimes precedes price movements in the meme coin sector. Source: @KookCapitalLLC on Twitter, June 19, 2025.

According to ZachXBT, the user 0xf3f signed a message under the X account @qwatio claiming to have made $20 million on the platforms GMX and HL. To substantiate this claim, 0xf3f would need to control the wallets associated with these earnings. The original posts regarding this claim were subsequently deleted from the platform.