According to @52kskew, BTC may face one more downside liquidation before moving higher after roughly 2,000 BTC in long positions aggressively chased price, indicating near-term stop-run risk on longs before potential upside continuation, source: @52kskew on X, Sep 11, 2025. The view implies traders should anticipate a final liquidity sweep against recent long entries before positioning for continuation higher in BTC derivatives, source: @52kskew on X, Sep 11, 2025.

According to @OnchainLens, after a prior liquidation, James Wynn has re-entered a $HYPE position with a 10x leveraged long on Sep 10, 2025. Source: https://twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1965706416414691402 The position is linked to wallet 0x5078c2fbea2b2ad61bc840bc023e35fce56bedb6, which traders can monitor for real-time changes. Source: https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x5078c2fbea2b2ad61bc840bc023e35fce56bedb6

According to Lookonchain, James Wynn’s $HYPE long was completely liquidated again, and the account states that fading his trades has been a winning strategy for traders (source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 9, 2025, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1965444540640428374).

According to Onchain Lens, trader James Wynn was fully liquidated on a 25x ETH long, realizing a loss of 10,025 USD on Sep 5, 2025 (source: Onchain Lens). The event is tied to wallet 0x5078C2fBeA2b2aD61bc840Bc023E35Fce56BeDb6, as recorded on the Hyperdash trader page that details the liquidation and loss amount (source: Hyperdash). This was a complete position wipeout with no remaining exposure on the trade (source: Onchain Lens).

According to @lookonchain, Andrew Tate’s $WLFI long was liquidated about six hours before the post for a $67.5K realized loss (source: @lookonchain on X, Sep 2, 2025). According to @lookonchain, he immediately reopened a new $WLFI long position after the liquidation, indicating renewed directional exposure by that trader (source: @lookonchain on X). According to @lookonchain, this update is derived from their on-chain tracking shared in the referenced post, which traders can use to monitor subsequent $WLFI position changes (source: @lookonchain on X).

According to @OnchainLens, Andrew Tate opened a $WLFI long position that was liquidated, realizing a $67,603 loss; source: @OnchainLens (X, September 1, 2025). He subsequently re-entered with a new $WLFI long at 3x leverage, indicating renewed leveraged exposure; source: @OnchainLens (X, September 1, 2025).

According to @EmberCN, the ETH whale who sold HYPE and then went long ETH reduced the position from 86,800 ETH to 50,000 ETH during the drop three days ago to avoid liquidation. Source: @EmberCN on X (Sep 1, 2025). After ETH stopped falling and stabilized, the whale gradually rebuilt, and after a fresh add about five hours ago the long on Hyperliquid increased to 78,500 ETH. Source: @EmberCN on X (Sep 1, 2025). The ETH long is located on Hyperliquid per the tracking shared. Source: @EmberCN on X (Sep 1, 2025).

According to @EmberCN, a trader known as silentraven realized $38.77M by manipulating XPL liquidations on Hyperliquid two days ago, and is still actively influencing XPL price action on the venue, keeping Hyperliquid’s XPL price roughly 35% higher than Binance at the time reported (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 29, 2025). According to @EmberCN, the realized profits were bridged and dispersed into more than 20 addresses, and some of those addresses re-entered Hyperliquid with 1x positioning, coinciding with the noted price dislocation between Hyperliquid and Binance for XPL (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 29, 2025). According to @EmberCN, traders engaging XPL on Hyperliquid should account for the venue-specific premium versus Binance and concentrated flow in sizing, risk limits, and liquidation thresholds (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 29, 2025).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x64a4 suffered multiple liquidations on an XPL short and lost roughly $2 million within minutes, indicating a rapid upside move that punished shorts source: @lookonchain. For traders, this underscores acute short-side risk and potential squeeze dynamics in XPL during fast moves, calling for lower leverage, larger collateral buffers, and strict risk controls source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, a whale manipulated XPL on Hyperliquid, causing address 0xC2Cb's XPL short to be fully liquidated. According to @lookonchain, the realized loss from the liquidation totaled $4.59M. According to @lookonchain, the incident was reported on Aug 27, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, ETH fell sharply overnight, triggering the liquidation of a highly leveraged trader known as “滚仓哥,” with the position wiped to roughly $70,000 in remaining margin (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 26, 2025). According to the same source, the trader’s PnL swung from a $9.19 million profit yesterday to a $670,000 loss, and an earlier run saw $43 million in profit retrace to $6.86 million before flattening (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 26, 2025). According to the source, the account originally grew from $125,000 and, after two large cycles, is now effectively back near the starting level (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 26, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, James Wynn was fully liquidated on a 10x long position in DOGE, realizing a $22,627 loss, underscoring the downside of high leverage during volatile moves in DOGE; source: @OnchainLens. At 10x leverage, an adverse price move of roughly 9-11% can trigger liquidation on isolated margin depending on maintenance and fees, highlighting tight liquidation thresholds in DOGE perpetuals; source: Binance Futures documentation. Traders aiming to mitigate similar outcomes often reduce leverage, place hard stop-losses, and prefer isolated over cross margin to contain losses in memecoin futures; sources: Binance Futures documentation and CME Group risk disclosure.

According to PeckShieldAlert, address 0xac1f...f553 was liquidated for 29.68 WBTC, valued at approximately $3.41 million, as BTC fell below $113,000 (source: PeckShieldAlert). According to PeckShieldAlert, the same address still supplies 42.71 WBTC against roughly $3.1 million in stablecoin borrows, highlighting ongoing on-chain leveraged exposure (source: PeckShieldAlert).

According to @OnchainLens, as ETH traded above $4,700, a whale deposited $5.22M USDC into Hyperliquid to avoid liquidation. According to Hyperliquid Hyperdash for trader 0x8c586..., the account shows roughly $14M in unrealized losses and about $26M in cumulative losses. According to @OnchainLens, the timing highlights active margin defense while ETH gains, making the account’s liquidation risk visible on Hyperliquid’s dashboard.

According to Lookonchain, wallet 0x2611 is over 1.85 million in unrealized loss on an ENA long on Hyperliquid. Source: Lookonchain; Hypurrscan. Lookonchain reports the trader deposited an additional 1.7 million USDC roughly four hours ago to reduce liquidation risk. Source: Lookonchain; Hypurrscan. This capital top-up increases margin and lowers immediate liquidation pressure on the ENA position. Source: Hyperliquid documentation; Lookonchain.

According to Lookonchain, a prominent trader went long on ETH and was liquidated during the market crash, resulting in a $6.22M loss. According to Lookonchain, the trader’s account started with $125K, grew to $6.99M with a peak above $43M, and now shows only $771K remaining. According to Lookonchain, roughly four months of gains were wiped out in just two days.

According to @lookonchain, a legendary trader was liquidated on an ETH long during the market crash, realizing a $6.22M loss; the account reportedly grew from $125K to $6.99M (peaking above $43M) but now shows $771K remaining, with roughly four months of gains erased in two days (source: X post https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957966462959956319, Aug 20, 2025).

According to @EmberCN on X, ETH has continued to decline while a whale’s leveraged ETH long position, tracked as “滚仓哥,” has been repeatedly liquidated, leaving a remaining position size of $57.77 million and just $1.37 million in margin. According to @EmberCN, the current liquidation price on the remaining position is $4,119.

According to @EmberCN, as ETH fell toward the trader’s liquidation level, the account offloaded 10,745 ETH in the last 30 minutes, trimming the long from 76,700 ETH to 66,000 ETH and effectively closing the size added earlier today (source: @EmberCN). On Aug 14, with ETH hitting $4,788, the position’s unrealized profit peaked near $43 million, now down to $8.58 million after the reduction; the cut equals roughly 14% of the prior size based on the figures shared (source: @EmberCN). The post also notes the account remains 14x long with the liquidation level near current price (source: @EmberCN).

According to @EmberCN, trader AguilaTrades opened an approximately USD 10 million position on Hyperliquid using about USD 330,000 in remaining collateral after a prior liquidation; that position survived roughly 30 minutes and was liquidated about 10 minutes before the post, adding an estimated USD 230,000 loss (source: @EmberCN, Aug 14, 2025). According to @EmberCN, the trader then used around USD 100,000 remaining collateral to open a new ETH (ETH) long position worth under USD 3 million on Hyperliquid (source: @EmberCN). According to @EmberCN, the trader’s cumulative PnL on Hyperliquid is currently a loss of about USD 37.5 million (source: @EmberCN). Based on figures reported by @EmberCN, the implied leverage on the USD 10 million position was approximately 30x (USD 10,000,000 on about USD 330,000 collateral), and the subsequent ETH long also implies near-30x leverage given sub-USD 3 million size on roughly USD 100,000 collateral (calculation from data reported by @EmberCN).