According to Patrick McCorry (@stonecoldpat0), added blockchain throughput is quickly absorbed by MEV bots, so even a 100x capacity increase does not ensure cheaper gas because fees must remain meaningful to deter spam and abuse. Source: Patrick McCorry (Twitter, Nov 13, 2025) According to Patrick McCorry, transaction fees originated as an anti-DoS mechanism rather than a revenue stream, which structurally necessitates non-trivial fees even after scaling. Source: Patrick McCorry (Twitter, Nov 13, 2025) According to Patrick McCorry, the core imbalance is that aggregate MEV profits exceed what users are willing to pay, enabling bots to afford fees while pricing out low-fee applications. Source: Patrick McCorry (Twitter, Nov 13, 2025) According to Patrick McCorry, these dynamics challenge trading theses that assume scaling alone will cut fees, implying fee relief-driven adoption narratives may be unreliable without direct MEV mitigation. Source: Patrick McCorry (Twitter, Nov 13, 2025)

According to @stonecoldpat0, the main blocker to cheaper on-chain execution is that MEV bots immediately absorb any added blockspace, so throughput increases alone will not sustainably lower transaction fees, source: @stonecoldpat0. He states that fees were introduced primarily as a DoS and anti-spam mechanism rather than a revenue source, and even with 100x capacity, fees must remain meaningful to impose costs on bots and prevent resource abuse, source: @stonecoldpat0. He frames the binding condition as collective MEV profits versus what real users are willing to pay in fees; if MEV profits exceed user fee tolerance, congestion and elevated costs persist, source: @stonecoldpat0. Trading takeaway: plan for a non-zero fee floor and sustained MEV-driven competition during peak events; strategies dependent on ultra-cheap on-chain execution need added MEV mitigation or alternative execution routes to remain viable, source: @stonecoldpat0.

According to EmberCN, today's extreme market conditions led to Ethereum DeFi protocols seeing liquidations exceeding $350 million, setting a new record. Notably, at least $20 million was captured by MEV (Miner Extractable Value) bots. EmberCN highlights API3's OEV (Oracle Extractable Value) network as a potential solution to help lending protocols reclaim value leaked through oracles, which is often exploited by MEV bots.