According to @OnchainLens, citing Nansen data, whale address 0x7c8d24c8600721966e5cb09d697b09b801b80a1a spent $2.5M in USDT to buy 213.46B PEPE and transferred the tokens to main wallet 0x5f71019e98a76a0eddb29c47a19c74411d71d968 on Sep 13, 2025 (source: Onchain Lens on X; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, citing Nansen data, whale address 0xe84dd04e67e6d01a1ab80d5876f8af212292689f spent $1.018M in USDC and USDT to acquire 89.73B PEPE on Sep 13, 2025 (source: Onchain Lens on X; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, citing Nansen data, the two buys total $3.518M in stablecoin inflows for 303.19B PEPE, highlighting notable on-chain accumulation by large holders on the day reported (source: Onchain Lens on X; data: Nansen).

According to @OnchainLens, Arthur Hayes purchased 578,956 ENA valued at USD 467.7K from Binance (source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen). His on-chain ENA holdings now total 5.02M valued at USD 3.91M at address 0x6cd66DbdFe289ab83d7311B668ADA83A12447e21 (source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen). The transaction update was reported on Sep 11, 2025 (source: Onchain Lens).

According to @OnchainLens, on-chain investigator @zachxbt reported SwissBorg was exploited for 192,623 SOL, estimated at $41.1M in the report (source: @OnchainLens citing @zachxbt). On-chain records show a subsequent transfer of 2,100 SOL (about $451K) to a new address after the exploit (source: Solscan as referenced by @OnchainLens). Address labels indicate a 100 SOL deposit into a Bitget-tagged wallet following the movements (source: Nansen labels referenced by @OnchainLens). For trade monitoring, the cited Solscan account and Nansen-tagged exchange inflows provide direct on-chain signals of further SOL fund movements (sources: Solscan, Nansen).

According to @OnchainLens, an ETH whale moved 47,507 ETH ($207.38M) into two new wallets after four years of inactivity, traced to address 0x67f706db3bbd04a250eed049386c5d09c4ee31f0, which is relevant for near-term ETH liquidity monitoring (source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen). The whale previously received 123,687 ETH (~$19.04M at receipt) from Bitfinex, routed 2,901 ETH (~$1.67M) via Tornado Cash, and redeposited 20,000 ETH (~$39.4M) to Bitfinex, indicating measurable exchange inflows that traders track for potential order-book impact (source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen). The wallet still holds 53,278 ETH (~$232.51M), leaving substantial supply off-exchange but with distribution risk if transfers continue, warranting watch on further flows (source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen). Exchange inflows are historically associated with elevated short-term selling risk and can pressure price and funding if sustained, so monitoring Bitfinex netflows and any follow-on transfers from the cited address is prudent (source: CryptoQuant metrics guide; data: Nansen).

According to @pedrouid, he and Nansen will host a session to explain WCT and the recent distribution of 1,000,000 tokens; source: Pedro Gomes (@pedrouid) on X, Sep 8, 2025. According to @pedrouid, the post confirms a completed distribution totaling 1,000,000 WCT, and further details will be provided in the session for market participants to understand mechanics and allocations; source: Pedro Gomes (@pedrouid) on X, Sep 8, 2025.

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, a wallet labeled as linked to the Ethereum Foundation transferred 4,000 ETH, valued at $17.19M, after 9 years of inactivity, indicating a notable on-chain wallet activity event for ETH traders to monitor (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the funds moved from 0x0f08fd3f92ab62afcc372ea57eeef609b7114213 to a new wallet at 0xACABE9d1bC52C3d94A50bc904288740563dd03B9, highlighting a non-exchange destination at the time of reporting (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the 9-year dormancy and the size of the transfer make this flow relevant for tracking subsequent movements that could inform ETH liquidity dynamics if further transfers occur (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, an Ethereum ICO participant has staked 150,000 ETH worth approximately $656 million to the ETH2 deposit contract after 8 years of inactivity (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the participant originally received 300,000 ETH for $93,300 during the ICO, implying an estimated cost basis of about $0.31 per ETH based on those figures (source: @OnchainLens). The staking address is 0x317BcFCC8d645e365A796eb505b57c060aC2132B and the ICO address is 0x7c532DB9E0c06C26fd40Acc56AC55C1eE92D3C3A, according to @OnchainLens with Nansen as the data source (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). At 32 ETH per validator, the 150,000 ETH stake is equivalent to roughly 4,687 validator lots, per Ethereum Foundation specifications (source: Ethereum Foundation).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deployed $5.43M USDT to purchase 1,237 ETH on Binance at an execution price of $4,393 after holding the USDT for approximately 1.5 months, source: Onchain Lens; Nansen. The buying address is 0x3255cdee41ad8ad989547c745975244bf69401a4, source: Onchain Lens; Nansen. The reported size and average fill establish a visible on-chain cost basis at $4,393 for 1,237 ETH tied to the cited address, source: Onchain Lens; Nansen.

According to @OnchainLens, two wallets linked to @Trend_Research_ deposited 1,000,000 PENDLE valued at $4.8M and 203,100 ENS valued at $4.73M into Binance, with reported losses of $1.12M and $808K respectively (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai). According to @OnchainLens, the wallets are 0x8b0e4a56b3bc5ecbbaff8c64b06967c25af1f319 and 0x4F62bF3A8ef0383a2df8Effe08c6595433f4BC2E, totaling approximately $9.53M in inflows and about $1.93M in reported losses (source: @OnchainLens; data: @nansen_ai).

According to @OnchainLens, over the past six days one wallet sold 275 BTC for about 30.5 million USD, acquired 6,802.7 ETH at 4,482 USD, and supplied the ETH to Aave V3 for lending, citing Nansen data. According to @OnchainLens, the activity originated from address 0xFf1553158Be654DeFCCe7Ba3c1B4d27427DeF7a8 and reflects a BTC to ETH rotation with an ETH deposit into DeFi, based on Nansen on-chain traces.

According to @secondswap_io, DEX markets need verifiable data on circulating supply, unlock schedules, and vesting to function efficiently, making supply data providers critical for price discovery and risk management. source: x.com/secondswap_io/status/1960326440920162627 For actionable monitoring, traders commonly use TokenUnlocks for unlock and vesting calendars, CoinGecko and Messari for circulating supply disclosures, Etherscan for on-chain token supply and holder distributions, Nansen for labeled wallet flows and concentration analysis, and Dune for custom circulating-supply dashboards. sources: unlocks.app; coingecko.com; messari.io; etherscan.io; nansen.ai; dune.com

According to @OnchainLens, a whale purchased 2.94M VIRTUAL for 785 ETH (~$3.76M) at an average price of $1.28 per token (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the receiving wallet is 0x4322fd98f95a219d2aae2bba6664e3574b4c3708, establishing an on-chain cost basis of $1.28 for that position (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens, the USD notional aligns with 2.94M x $1.28 ≈ $3.76M, confirming the reported transaction size of 785 ETH (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @1HowardWu, major funds’ and institutions’ crypto wallets are being tracked and analyzed in real time, underscoring pervasive on-chain surveillance that can affect trade execution and information leakage. Source: @1HowardWu (X, Aug 21, 2025). Real-time entity labeling and alerts make this possible at scale, including Arkham Intelligence’s labeled entities and notifications that surface fund and exchange addresses as they move assets. Source: Arkham Intelligence product documentation. Traders already monitor labeled whale transfers on platforms like Nansen to anticipate near-term order flow; large inflows to exchanges are commonly viewed as potential sell pressure, while outflows to self-custody are seen as accumulation signals. Source: Nansen features overview; CryptoQuant Exchange Inflows/Outflows metrics guide. Practically, watching institutional wallet flows helps inform short-term positioning and risk around big deposits or withdrawals that may impact BTC and ETH liquidity and volatility. Source: Glassnode Academy on Exchange Flows; CryptoQuant metrics documentation.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale withdrew $1.72M USDC from Binance and purchased 1.79M FARTCOIN at a price of $0.96, with data sourced from Nansen. According to @OnchainLens, the buyer address is 8BUpZser9HYAxaNQmKbeYcd3J3am2EQCwpDNKFLhKtec, enabling on-chain tracking of subsequent flows. According to @OnchainLens (data: Nansen), these figures imply an approximate notional of $1.72M and a unit cost basis near $0.96 for the whale’s position, reported on Aug 17, 2025.

According to Cas Abbé, traders can enhance their decision-making by leveraging key on-chain monitoring tools. Nansen provides insights into wallet flows, Glassnode tracks exchange net flows, Lookonchain reveals whale activity, and CoinGlass offers open interest and funding data. By confirming market strength through these data points before increasing trade size, traders can better manage risk and identify potential trends in assets such as BTC and ETH (Source: Cas Abbé).

According to @lookonchain, the Tron (TRX) network has experienced a significant reduction in transaction costs following the rollout of its Gas-Free feature in early 2025. On-chain data from a Nansen query shows that the average weekly transaction fee has dropped from 2.47 TRX to 0.72 TRX, marking a decrease of more than 70%. For traders, this drastic reduction in network fees could enhance the attractiveness of the Tron ecosystem for decentralized applications and users, potentially leading to increased network activity and a positive impact on TRX demand.

According to Ai 姨 (@ai_9684xtpa), Nansen has been a foundational blockchain analytics platform since 2019, offering deep on-chain data crucial for active traders. Before the rise of tools like Arkham and GMGN, Nansen, alongside Debank and Etherscan, provided essential insights for spotting whale movements and tracking smart money in the crypto market. For traders, utilizing Nansen's analytics can enhance decision-making by providing real-time wallet tracking and token flow analysis, supporting profitable trading strategies and risk management. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on Twitter.

According to @nansen_ai, traders can efficiently identify large ZKJ and KOGE token sell-offs by using Nansen's Token God Mode. The method involves searching the token contract address, selecting the 'Who Bought/Sold' feature, narrowing the time range to 1 hour, and reviewing addresses with over 1 million in transactions. This process enables rapid detection of significant DEX sell-off activity, helping traders anticipate price movements and manage risk accordingly (Source: @nansen_ai on Twitter).

According to Nansen (@nansen_ai), users can now stake $OM directly on MANTRA Chain via the Nansen platform, making it easier to secure and manage Real World Asset (RWA) token positions. This integration streamlines asset transfer and staking, reducing friction for crypto traders who are bullish on RWA tokens. The announcement signals increased support for RWA-focused DeFi projects and may boost $OM liquidity and staking demand on Nansen. Verified source: Nansen Twitter (May 16, 2025).

According to AltcoinGordon, 86% of crypto traders who invested in $LIBRA, which is endorsed by Javier Milei, incurred a total of $251 million in losses. Meanwhile, insiders reportedly made $180 million in gains, highlighting a significant disparity in outcomes. This data was reported by Nansen.