According to @AltcoinGordon, an additional 0.6% of the SWIF token supply was burned, bringing the reported weekly total to 6.6%; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, the post tags @sheepwifhatcoin and includes the string 9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ as a reference; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, the update suggests a potential move toward a 10% weekly burn, framed as a question in the post; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, no on-chain explorer link is provided in the text excerpt here, making the post itself the sole cited evidence at this time; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025. According to @AltcoinGordon, if the claimed 6.6% weekly burn is accurate, it would represent a significant short-term supply contraction that traders may factor into liquidity and price dynamics for SWIF; source: implication based on the reported percentages by @AltcoinGordon on X, August 16, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, $SWIF has held strong after a reported 'matrix attack' and remains around a $4M market cap, highlighting resilience in this microcap memecoin, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025. The post explicitly labels this as 'incredible strength,' with the trading-relevant datapoint being the approximately $4M market cap level cited by the source, source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 15, 2025.

According to @AltcoinGordon, an individual described as "Alex" at BlackRock has burned another 2% of the $SWIF supply valued at over $150,000, bringing the alleged cumulative burn to 6% (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 14, 2025). The post does not include a transaction hash, burn wallet, contract address, or official confirmation from BlackRock or the project, so the claim remains unverified at this time (source: @AltcoinGordon on X). Token burns permanently reduce circulating supply and can affect liquidity and volatility; traders should independently verify via the project’s official channels and on-chain explorers before positioning (source: Binance Academy — What Is a Token Burn; source: @sheepwifhatcoin on X for project updates). If confirmed, a 2% supply reduction could influence order book depth and slippage; monitor spot volume, spreads, and large-holder concentration around any verified burn event for trading signals (source: Binance Academy — Liquidity and Order Books; source: @AltcoinGordon on X).

According to @AltcoinGordon, SWIF has pulled back and he describes the move as a perfect entry for traders who were sidelined; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 9, 2025. The post tags the project account @sheepwifhatcoin and includes the string 9hdynudAhhWzuNFAnpz7NjvdKMfh9z8mcZKNYHuAUgJQ, reinforcing that the comment targets SWIF; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 9, 2025. The post does not specify price levels, timeframes, or risk parameters for the suggested entry; source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Aug 9, 2025.