According to @stonecoldpat0, the main blocker to cheaper on-chain execution is that MEV bots immediately absorb any added blockspace, so throughput increases alone will not sustainably lower transaction fees, source: @stonecoldpat0. He states that fees were introduced primarily as a DoS and anti-spam mechanism rather than a revenue source, and even with 100x capacity, fees must remain meaningful to impose costs on bots and prevent resource abuse, source: @stonecoldpat0. He frames the binding condition as collective MEV profits versus what real users are willing to pay in fees; if MEV profits exceed user fee tolerance, congestion and elevated costs persist, source: @stonecoldpat0. Trading takeaway: plan for a non-zero fee floor and sustained MEV-driven competition during peak events; strategies dependent on ultra-cheap on-chain execution need added MEV mitigation or alternative execution routes to remain viable, source: @stonecoldpat0.

According to @deanmlittle, alternative tokens (ALTs) are classified as spam for which fees cannot be charged, and the trend of larger transactions further worsens the spam issue, making ALTs redundant (source: Twitter @deanmlittle, May 30, 2025). For crypto traders, this highlights increased network congestion risks and potential vulnerabilities in blockchain security. Traders should closely monitor how transaction size trends and spam management strategies could affect transaction costs, network reliability, and token valuation.