List of Flash News about perpetual futures funding rate
| Time | Details |
|---|---|
|
2025-12-07 12:01 |
ETH Perpetual Futures Funding Rates Explained: 1 percent Premium Example, 7.2 percent Monthly Cost, and Trading Uses on Hyperliquid, Binance, Bybit
According to @0xRyze, funding rates transfer payments between longs and shorts to keep perpetual futures aligned with spot, with positive funding meaning longs pay and negative funding meaning shorts pay, source: @0xRyze. The funding payment is calculated as Position Size times Oracle Price times Funding Rate, source: @0xRyze. Payments occur hourly on Hyperliquid and every eight hours on major centralized exchanges including Binance and Bybit, source: @0xRyze. In the ETH example where spot is 3000 dollars and the perp trades at 3030 dollars, a simple estimate of the funding rate is perp minus spot divided by spot which is about one percent, so a long of ten ETH would pay 300 dollars to shorts, prompting longs to close and shorts to add until the perp converges to spot, source: @0xRyze. Conversely, when the perp trades below spot the funding turns negative so shorts pay longs, encouraging shorts to close and longs to open which pushes the perp back up toward spot, source: @0xRyze. Trading implications include holding costs where an hourly funding of zero point zero one percent equates to about zero point two four percent per day and seven point two percent per month, using extreme positive or negative funding as a leverage sentiment gauge that often precedes reversals, and running basis arbitrage by shorting high positive funding perps while buying spot to collect funding, source: @0xRyze. These dynamics explain why perps track spot and how funding can drive PnL and positioning across crypto markets including ETH, source: @0xRyze. |
|
2025-10-13 21:53 |
Bitcoin Crash Explained: How Liquidations and High Leverage Trigger Cascades in BTC (Trading Signals and Risk Controls)
According to the source, sharp BTC drawdowns are often amplified by forced liquidations on derivatives venues when margin falls below maintenance thresholds, causing exchanges to close positions at market and accelerate downside moves; source: Binance Academy. Liquidation cascades occur as liquidation engines sweep thin order books, pushing price through clustered stops and trigger levels that set off further liquidations in a feedback loop; source: Deribit Insights. In perpetual futures, positive and elevated funding rates alongside rising open interest indicate crowded long positioning and increase the probability of downside liquidation squeezes if price reverses; sources: BitMEX Blog and Glassnode Insights. Traders can monitor open interest, funding rates, and liquidation heatmaps to time entries, de-risk during overheated conditions, and avoid chasing moves into cascade risk; sources: Glassnode and CoinGlass. Practical controls include using lower leverage, isolated margin, pre-defined stop-losses, and sizing for slippage during high-volatility events to reduce forced liquidation risk; source: Kraken Learn Center. |
|
2025-10-12 17:06 |
Crypto Max Pain Setup After Leverage Flush: Trader @KookCapitalLLC Flags Possible ATH Scenario and 5 Metrics to Watch
According to @KookCapitalLLC, the crypto market may be in a max pain setup after a broad leverage flush across perp DEX users and wallet-integrated perps, with the author asserting that new all-time highs could arrive within weeks rather than years; this reflects trader sentiment rather than verified data, source: @KookCapitalLLC on X, Oct 12, 2025. Historically, sharp reductions in aggregate futures open interest alongside negative perpetual funding rates have preceded short-squeeze rallies and mean-reversion pops, making this a critical regime for traders to monitor, sources: Glassnode research 2023; Kaiko derivatives market reports 2023. Traders should track total open interest, perp funding rate dispersion across major exchanges, liquidation heatmaps, spot-futures basis, and order-book depth to gauge squeeze risk, liquidity gaps, and timing for entries and exits, sources: Glassnode 2022–2023; Kaiko 2023; Binance Research 2023. Claims that 75 percent of participants were wiped out are unverified and should be treated as sentiment; validate any alleged wipeout using on-chain and exchange data before positioning, sources: @KookCapitalLLC on X, Oct 12, 2025; Glassnode research 2023. A max pain rally narrative increases the probability of crowded re-risking and forced short covering if funding stays negative while spot demand rises, so use disciplined risk controls and monitor funding, basis, and liquidity in real time, sources: Kaiko 2023; Deribit Insights 2022. |