According to @CryptoKing4Ever, Layer 2 Lighter is sustaining around 4,000 TPS, which is framed as more impactful than a 24,192 TPS peak figure, source: @CryptoKing4Ever. According to @CryptoKing4Ever, this implies Ethereum’s scaling is fixed with faster and cheaper transactions and positions ETH as the world’s main settlement layer, source: @CryptoKing4Ever. According to @CryptoKing4Ever, traders should monitor confirmations via ETH spot and perpetual liquidity, average gas fees, and L2 throughput/volumes to validate the performance claim, source: @CryptoKing4Ever. According to @CryptoKing4Ever, if sustained, higher L2 throughput could shift activity to rollups and support ETH’s role as collateral and settlement asset, which traders can track through L2 bridge flows and DEX volumes, source: @CryptoKing4Ever.

According to @VitalikButerin, Ethereum is scaling; he posted the statement on Nov 4, 2025 and linked to a Growth The Pie post on X to highlight progress (source: @VitalikButerin on X, Nov 4, 2025). The tweet provides no quantitative metrics, timelines, or price guidance in the provided content, signaling sentiment rather than a new technical release for traders to price in (source: @VitalikButerin on X, Nov 4, 2025). Traders seeking concrete on-chain data are directed by the post to the linked Growth The Pie thread for scaling indicators such as Layer-2 activity and transaction fees (source: @VitalikButerin on X linking to @growthepie_eth, Nov 4, 2025).

According to the source, Solana co‑founder Anatoly Yakovenko called the claim that Ethereum L2s inherit Ethereum’s security erroneous in a public X post on Oct 27, 2025, highlighting a core debate in the modular vs monolithic roadmap, source: provided social media post (Oct 27, 2025). Ethereum’s documentation states that rollups derive security from Ethereum only when proofs are correctly verified on L1 and operators cannot bypass the proof system, clarifying that security depends on implementation details, source: Ethereum.org rollups documentation. Independent risk dashboards show many L2s still rely on upgrade admin keys, centralized sequencers, or incomplete proof systems, implying additional trust beyond L1 guarantees, source: L2Beat risk framework and project pages. Optimistic rollups enforce challenge windows that delay withdrawal finality and require fraud-proof availability, which materially affects bridge and exchange flow assumptions, source: Ethereum.org optimistic rollups documentation. ZK rollups depend on prover correctness and liveness; trusted upgrades or prover halts can deviate user security from pure L1 enforcement, source: Ethereum.org zk-rollups documentation and L2Beat project risk notes. For trading, position sizing across SOL, ETH, ARB, and OP can incorporate objective factors such as proof status, upgrade key control, sequencer decentralization, and data availability mode, which are enumerated and updated by L2Beat, source: L2Beat methodology and dashboards.

According to @VitalikButerin, ZK and FHE teams should report performance as an overhead ratio—cryptographic compute time divided by raw compute time—rather than N ops/sec, enabling more hardware-independent comparisons and straightforward estimation by multiplying known raw runtimes, source: @VitalikButerin, Oct 18, 2025. He acknowledges ratios remain somewhat hardware-dependent due to heterogeneous operations, SIMD/parallelization, and memory access patterns, but argues the overhead factor is still the most informative single number for developers, source: @VitalikButerin, Oct 18, 2025. For trading due diligence on ETH rollups and privacy protocols, lower overhead ratios imply less efficiency loss versus raw compute, clarifying prover requirements and throughput planning once projects disclose these figures, supporting more comparable cross-project benchmarking, source: @VitalikButerin, Oct 18, 2025.

According to the source, Ethereum is reportedly evaluating higher gas limits and a PeerDAS implementation on the Sepolia testnet as a pre-mainnet step. Source: ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/networks/#sepolia; eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7594 PeerDAS (EIP-7594) expands blob data availability for rollups, a design intended to lower L2 transaction costs and increase throughput for ecosystems such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. Source: eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7594; ethereum.org/roadmap/danksharding; ethereum.org/developers/docs/rollups Any change to gas limits or protocol parameters is tested on public testnets and coordinated via AllCoreDevs before mainnet activation, so traders should await confirmations from the Ethereum Foundation and client teams (e.g., Geth, Nethermind) before positioning. Source: ethereum.org/developers/docs/blocks/#gas-limit; blog.ethereum.org; github.com/ethereum/pm; geth.ethereum.org; nethermind.io If officially confirmed and scheduled, added blob capacity and higher gas limits are designed to compress L2 fees and support higher on-chain throughput, consistent with the fee-reduction goals introduced by EIP-4844 for rollups. Source: eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4844; ethereum.org/roadmap/danksharding; ethereum.org/developers/docs/blocks/#gas-limit

According to @alice_und_bob, the Ethereum ecosystem now operates at one-third the speed of a single Polkadot parachain, framing a throughput and TPS comparison between ETH and DOT that could shape short-term narratives, source: @alice_und_bob on X. The post provides no TPS figures, benchmarks, definitions of ecosystem scope (L1 vs L2 rollups), or test methodology, so the performance claim is unverified within the source text, source: @alice_und_bob on X. For trading, consider monitoring ETH and DOT spot volume, futures funding rates, and the ETH/BTC vs DOT/BTC relative strength for narrative-driven flows tied to this claim, source: @alice_und_bob on X. Also watch rollup utilization and average gas fees on Ethereum to assess whether any capacity constraints align with the claim or not, before making positioning decisions, source: @alice_und_bob on X.

According to @VitalikButerin, the Ethereum co-founder stated that "The L2 scaling thing is working" on Oct 11, 2025, sharing a link to a GrowThePie post that tracks Layer-2 activity and costs. Source: x.com/VitalikButerin/status/1976809800840495316, x.com/growthepie_eth/status/1976756960532848846 Ethereum’s roadmap prioritizes rollups to boost throughput and lower fees, making L2 adoption a core driver of network usability that traders track when forming ETH views. Source: ethereum.org/en/roadmap/rollups To validate momentum, traders can monitor Layer-2 transaction counts, total value secured (TVS), average user fees, and sequencer revenue via established analytics dashboards. Source: l2beat.com, growthepie.xyz For execution, track spot and perpetual markets liquidity, volume, and funding for ETH around L2 data inflections to gauge market response. Source: binance.com/en/futures

According to @alice_und_bob, the Polkadot Builder Party will host three workshops on Oct 9–10, 2025 covering Reliability Dashboard - The end-to-end Cloud approach, Introduction to Polkadot Products, and Deploying Rollups with the Polkadot Deployment Portal; source: @alice_und_bob on X (Oct 8, 2025) and opengovwatch.notion.site. The meetup calendar lists 11 cities across Oct 8–12, 2025: Bangkok, Berlin, Singapore, Hyderabad, Rome, Kisumu, Cebu, Vadodara, Enugu, Nagpur, and Enakulam; source: @alice_und_bob on X (Oct 8, 2025) and luma.com/sub0. For DOT-focused trading calendars, these dates consolidate ecosystem workshops and meetups listed by Polkadot Builder Party with full workshop details at opengovwatch.notion.site and meetup sign-ups at luma.com/sub0; source: @alice_und_bob on X (Oct 8, 2025).

According to the source, Vitalik Buterin said a proposal called Fusaka will address Ethereum’s blob usage issues and emphasized a safety‑first rollout using PeerDAS so nodes can verify data availability without downloading full blocks; source: the provided social media post dated Sep 25, 2025. PeerDAS enables probabilistic data availability checks by light clients and is designed to increase data throughput for rollups, which the Ethereum Foundation links to lower L2 data costs via the EIP‑4844 blobs rationale; source: Ethereum Research forum discussions on PeerDAS (2023–2024) and Ethereum Foundation EIP‑4844 specification and rationale.

According to the source, a new academic study finds that Ethereum layer-2 rollups misprice small transactions, which can inflate user costs and increase denial-of-service risk by enabling spam that congests sequencers. Source: new academic study on Ethereum layer-2 rollups. For trading, monitor L2 fee markets, sequencer throughput, and parameter updates targeting small-transaction pricing, as congestion can impair execution and widen slippage during peak periods. Source: new academic study on Ethereum layer-2 rollups.

According to @alice_und_bob, the Ethereum L2 thesis is not dead and the market will see hundreds of private and public L1s and L2s, shaping how users and liquidity are distributed across chains. According to @alice_und_bob, there will not be a single winning architecture for scaling, making interoperability the decisive factor for value capture and execution quality across ETH-linked ecosystems. According to @alice_und_bob, this outlook makes cross-chain interoperability and liquidity routing the core trading focus for positioning across ETH L2s and alternative L1s.

According to @alice_und_bob, Layer 2 networks have built a bad reputation and the author shared a link to reasons supporting that view, highlighting reputational risks that traders should review when evaluating L2-related tokens and ecosystems. Source: https://twitter.com/alice_und_bob/status/1955412890615414785

According to Alice und Bob, the market is set to “drown in ephemeral L2s,” signaling a coming wave of short-lived Layer-2 networks beyond today’s new L1 pace, source: Alice und Bob on X, Aug 12, 2025, twitter.com/alice_und_bob/status/1955412882549613016. Based on this assertion, traders should prepare for heavier fragmentation across ETH L2 ecosystems and closely watch the rate of new L2 launches, TVL churn, bridge volumes, and token emission schedules that could shorten project lifecycles, source: Alice und Bob on X, Aug 12, 2025, twitter.com/alice_und_bob/status/1955412882549613016.

According to @alice_und_bob, Ethereum Layer-2s are running into a dead end. Source: @alice_und_bob. The post is a thread teaser and, in this excerpt, provides no supporting metrics, timelines, or named L2 projects beyond Ethereum (ETH), limiting immediate trading takeaways. Source: @alice_und_bob.

According to @alice_und_bob, a Stage 2 L2 is fully controlled by code with no centralized points of failure, source: @alice_und_bob on X and L2BEAT Stages documentation. L2BEAT defines Stage 2 networks as having live trustless state validation via fraud or validity proofs, permissionless exits and censorship resistance, and no privileged upgrade keys that can seize or halt user funds, source: L2BEAT Stages framework. For trading risk assessment on ETH L2s, L2BEAT’s dashboard classifies each network’s stage so Stage 2 denotes lower trust assumptions versus Stage 0 or Stage 1, enabling objective comparison across rollups, source: L2BEAT dashboard and Stages documentation.

According to @alice_und_bob, the Ethereum ecosystem is stuck in a bad meta with excessive diversity across bridges, interoperability, sequencing, proving, exits, and data availability, source: @alice_und_bob on X on August 11, 2025. According to @alice_und_bob, this fragmentation is reinforced by many venture firms funding many teams that repeatedly reinvent these core components, source: @alice_und_bob on X on August 11, 2025. Based on @alice_und_bob's view, traders focused on ETH and L2 tokens can monitor standardization efforts, consolidation signals, and interoperability roadmaps across rollups and bridges as potential catalysts for sentiment shifts, source: @alice_und_bob on X on August 11, 2025.

According to Vitalik Buterin, the most effective way to build a Layer 2 (L2) network is to heavily rely on the Layer 1 (L1) for core functionalities such as security, censorship resistance, and data availability. In his view, the L2's logic should be reduced to simply being a sequencer and a prover, or only a prover for 'based' rollups that use the L1 for sequencing. This vision implies that L2s with deeper integration into the L1's security model may be viewed more favorably, a key consideration for traders evaluating the long-term viability and potential valuation of various L2 ecosystem tokens and the core value proposition of Ethereum (ETH) as the ultimate settlement layer.

According to Alice und Bob on Twitter, NOMT is set to launch on the Polkadot network with an anticipated fourfold increase in transactions per second (TPS) for rollup solutions (source: https://twitter.com/alice_und_bob/status/1925227741172969653). This upgrade could significantly enhance throughput and scalability for Polkadot-based DeFi and dApp projects, potentially driving increased trading volumes and lower latency for crypto traders operating on the network. Traders should monitor Polkadot and related ecosystem tokens for increased activity and possible price movements following NOMT's deployment.

According to Patrick McCorry (@stonecoldpat0), rollups are positioned not to compete directly with Layer 1 blockchains, but rather with centralized crypto exchanges and other off-chain crypto services. This viewpoint suggests that rollups, by providing faster and cheaper on-chain transactions, could attract trading volume away from traditional exchanges and off-chain solutions, potentially increasing on-chain liquidity and reducing exchange dominance in crypto trading (source: Twitter, May 7, 2025). Traders should monitor how rollup adoption affects trading fees, liquidity distribution, and the relative influence of exchanges versus decentralized infrastructure.

According to Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, blockchain security depends not only on stage 2 protocol improvements but also heavily on the quality of the underlying proof system, as highlighted in his recent tweet (source: @VitalikButerin, May 5, 2025). For traders, this underscores the necessity of evaluating both protocol upgrades and the robustness of cryptographic proofs when assessing blockchain project security. This insight is particularly relevant for those trading tokens linked to zero-knowledge proofs and rollups, as vulnerabilities in the proof system could directly impact asset risk and price stability.